EPTIn a resource based economy however you do not use the monetary system, It gets rid of the middle hand allowing us the use our resources more efficiently and conservative providing for all people on the planet. Allowing technologies that were previously to monetary expensive to flourish with research basicly never going un/der-funded. At this point you might have alot of questions most of them will be answered bellow.
Simple/Short
[
Thread to this organisation
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=334953
More advanced and longer.
+ Show Spoiler +
Meeting human needs/
+ Show Spoiler +
Incentive/current state of automation
+ Show Spoiler +
Communication/Inventional evolution
+ Show Spoiler +
Satyrs(PM me for Satyr RBE aswel)
+ Show Spoiler +
Resource Based Economy Technologies
When it comes to cranking out goods/products efficiently we cant have hundreds of factories for hundres or thousands of diffrent stuff we need a technology that can create almost all products using 3D technology
This technology is revolutionary and can be adapted for so many things not only to create small products, But can be used to create houses and blocks in days, Our old way of construction is obsolete.
this can also be used(Theoreticly) to construct biological parts such as hearts and kidneys. And hopefuly we will reach a point and i dont doubt it where we wont have a need for creatur because we can grow/create our meat.
Searching for source
+ Show Spoiler +
A ted talk using 3D technology to create residential homes.
For transportation we want Vac-trains which is a form of maglev technology, Puting the train in a vaccum filled tube allows for super-sonic travel and speed up to 8000km/h teoreticly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vactrain
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maglev
We have people developing and testing this stuff in switzerland aswel the chinese are also trying out forms of vac-train technology. Obviously it is very monetary expensive but not as resource expensive.
Maglev video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=aIwbrZ4knpg
Concept video for vactrain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Rx9EVTg95eM
Circular city design
![[image loading]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Jqo0FJ5BmlI/TTK0I1dOSdI/AAAAAAAAAIQ/g8NqAOzyLvE/s1600/fresco_dream.jpg)
Concept art some outdated
Automated food production, and advanced hydroponics.
According to the Institute of Simplified Hydroponics, a group of impoverished children in India has developed a 20 square meter hydroponic garden that produces 730 kg/year(1). If these yields were scaled to a full acre, those yields could increase to ~147,000 kg/acre(2). Using orbitropism, increased CO2 concentrations in the air, and LED lighting, yields could theoretically increase to between ~800,000 to ~1,500,000 kg/acre(3). By adding fulvic acid and gibberellin, yields could increase further. Aeroponic variants have demonstrated an 80% increase in production on top of standard hydroponic yields. With these estimates, it is theoretically possible to produce between 1.8 to 3 million kg/acre(4) – between 180 to 300 times 2007 production, enough to feed a few thousand people every year – and with vertical farming, these yields could be increased linearly. If 4.2 billion acres(5) were required to produce 1.3 thousand kg of food for each living person in 2007, the amount of land used for agricultural means could be dramatically reduced to as little as 3.5 million acres without stacking crops(6), to 1.75 million acres using 2 stacks(6), to 700,000 acres using 5 stacks(6), to 350,000 acres using 10 stacks(6), etc. Using advanced aeroponic facilities and vertical farming, it is physically possible to feed an entire city of up to a million people using only 10 acres of land and 50 stacks(7) – if the population increases, simply add more vertical stacks.
Sources
+ Show Spoiler +
http://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Ag_Statistics/2009/chp04.pdf
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ezRcpPE6EGwJ:www.carbon.org/senegal/india1.doc&cd=4&hl=en
http://www.omegagarden.com/index.php?content_id=1521
http://homeharvest.com/carbondioxideenrichment.htm
http://www.greenhousecanada.com/content/view/1562/38/
http://www.hydroponics.com/howtoinfo/hydroponics articles/gold_fulvic.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibberellin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroponics#Aeroponics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_farming
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ezRcpPE6EGwJ:www.carbon.org/senegal/india1.doc&cd=4&hl=en
http://www.omegagarden.com/index.php?content_id=1521
http://homeharvest.com/carbondioxideenrichment.htm
http://www.greenhousecanada.com/content/view/1562/38/
http://www.hydroponics.com/howtoinfo/hydroponics articles/gold_fulvic.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibberellin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroponics#Aeroponics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_farming
Automated hydroponic lettuce aka "The sallad factory"
Concept art for vertical farming aka "Skyfarming"
![[image loading]](http://questpointsolarsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Vertical-Farming-2.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a7/Vertical_farms.jpg/799px-Vertical_farms.jpg)
Poll: Do you support a Resource based economy
No (29)
56%
Yes (21)
40%
Not sure yet (2)
4%
52 total votes
Yes (21)
Not sure yet (2)
52 total votes
Your vote: Do you support a Resource based economy
Looks so much like what people are doing in minecraft. Lol. I think buildings like these will eventually replace a lot of what we have in the near future. I mean the human race is growing at an obscene rate I think it'll be a necessitation for humanity to eventually adopt architecture like these and innovative solutions to problems that will always arise when there are huge populations. In North america we're expanding outward but eventually that wont be feasible so things like this are innovative solutions. But i don't think that the western world needs this at the moment.
lets try and keep it a bit less emotional in this thread no need to spam this one into 75 pages in a few weeks.
