the internet moves fast.
President Obama Re-Elected - Page 862
Forum Index > General Forum |
Hey guys! We'll be closing this thread shortly, but we will make an American politics megathread where we can continue the discussions in here. The new thread can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=383301 | ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
the internet moves fast. | ||
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
On October 17 2012 12:09 ticklishmusic wrote: http://bindersfullofwomen.tumblr.com/ the internet moves fast. Sorry - what is this referencing? Just saw a bunch of these on my FB feed | ||
Deathmanbob
United States2356 Posts
| ||
jdseemoreglass
United States3773 Posts
On October 17 2012 12:09 ticklishmusic wrote: http://bindersfullofwomen.tumblr.com/ the internet moves fast. wow that link is hilarious! thanks. | ||
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
On October 17 2012 12:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: "Please proceed governor." ~ Barack Obama Oh my god that was a beautiful response. "I politely decline to address your accusations. Keep talking, bee-yotch." | ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
https://www.facebook.com/romneybindersfullofwomen | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43771 Posts
On October 17 2012 12:09 ticklishmusic wrote: http://bindersfullofwomen.tumblr.com/ the internet moves fast. Oh my god that's amazing. That last pic... trap her keep her LOL | ||
synapse
China13814 Posts
On October 17 2012 12:12 ticklishmusic wrote: scratch that, the internet moves REALLY fast. https://www.facebook.com/romneybindersfullofwomen holy shit LOL | ||
TheToaster
United States280 Posts
So first off, I think these debates are very interesting because they allow viewers to directly perceive how each candidate presents themselves. Before the first debate, there was no way I was going to watch or read a news report on either candidate, considering the biased American media these days. But now I can watch them face to face, discussing the topics that need attention, not just what the media decides is interesting to cherrypick. From that point, I'd like to first bring attention to a major irony that I think many probably ignore. After watching Romney take time to discuss his policies and agendas, there seems to be a huge trend with how he presents himself. Almost on a repeated cycle, he will state his same basic principles without going into much detail or elaboration. Things like "I care about every single American, rich or poor" or "I want to bring jobs to this country" or "I know what it takes to create a prosperous economy" gets endlessly repeated. It's ironic because this was how Obama largely presented himself during the 2008 election. He wanted people to believe in "change" and other elementary principles without really talking about how they should be implemented or performed. So just based on this comparison, I feel like voters who choose Romney might even get cheated for their vote the same way Obama voters got cheated in 2008. And no, I'm not one of those voters. This is my first election as a registered voter. The most annoying thing, however, is the sheer amount of disrespect for the debate rules that each candidate displays. The lesser of these two evils seems like Obama; the President will make comedic remarks when not spoken to, but I can tell he says them to relieve tension from either himself or the situation. Romney on the other hand acts like an unleashed dog, and it personally makes me start to resent what he's even saying. Mr. Governor, I don't see the need for you to disregard debate rules if you aren't even spending the time to elaborate on what you're saying. Save whatever vague 15 second line of moral uplift you have for your next turn to speak. I'm sure something like "I care about the American people" will sound exactly the same in any context. I feel like the real debating can't even begin until someone gives Romney a chill pill. For now, these small reasons are what's keeping me shifted towards Obama's vote. Signing off for now, I'm yet another independent voter who's just trying to make sense out of all this political chaos. | ||
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On October 17 2012 12:08 JinDesu wrote: I do agree - but usually I am very aware of the quotes being taken out of context, so I don't mind so much. I think he's gotten more and more unhappy with the political field right now, and that's why he's crusading more. I remember him 5-6 years ago and he was a lot less invested. when steward takes something out of context its because he wants to make a joke on comedy central its not like he takes 1 line out of context, runs with it for 2 weeks, then hosts a convention in which the main night is titled with his rebuttle to the 1 out of context line, even though the fact he can even host the convention is a direct lump of shit on his rebuttle. x) | ||
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
Romney is obsessed with 'the rules' a debate. Bend the rules, and he will become unglued. And it worked ![]() | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43771 Posts
On October 17 2012 12:11 JinDesu wrote: Sorry - what is this referencing? Just saw a bunch of these on my FB feed Both candidates were asked by a girl about how they would support gender equality (or something like that). If I recall correctly, Romney gave a wishywashy answer about how when he became governor, his applicants for his cabinet were all men, and so he asked for binders of women (to make things more equal). His word choice wasn't perfect, to say the least. | ||
waxypants
United States479 Posts
On October 17 2012 12:07 xDaunt wrote: In a sick way, Romney flubbing the Libya thing may help him long term, because everyone is talking about Libya now. The problem is that what Obama said at the debate and implied simply isn't true. Which part? | ||
theNational.
Canada54 Posts
On October 17 2012 12:07 Orome wrote: I have no idea who he is, but this is fucking awesome. He's an avid Constitutionalist and while that does tend to have some drawbacks you can't fault the man on integrity. I feel like he was one of the influences for Will McAvoy's character on the Newsroom. If you want good news with a bit of a right wing lean to it he's your go to guy. | ||
TheToaster
United States280 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Before I express my thoughts on the first two debates, I'd just like to point out that there's no such thing as a winner. It's even rather silly to consider a winner, since everyone's political perspective is different. So first off, I think these debates are very interesting because they allow viewers to directly perceive how each candidate presents themselves. Before the first debate, there was no way I was going to watch or read a news report on either candidate, considering the biased American media these days. But now I can watch them face to face, discussing the topics that need attention, not just what the media decides is interesting to cherrypick. From that point, I'd like to first bring attention to a major irony that I think many probably ignore. After watching Romney take time to discuss his policies and agendas, there seems to be a huge trend with how he presents himself. Almost on a repeated cycle, he will state his same basic principles without going into much detail or elaboration. Things like "I care about every single American, rich or poor" or "I want to bring jobs to this country" or "I know what it takes to create a prosperous economy" gets endlessly repeated. It's ironic because this was how Obama largely presented himself during the 2008 election. He wanted people to believe in "change" and other elementary principles without really talking about how they should be implemented or performed. So just based on this comparison, I feel like voters who choose Romney might even get cheated for their vote the same way Obama voters got cheated in 2008. And no, I'm not one of those voters. This is my first election as a registered voter. The most annoying thing, however, is the sheer amount of disrespect for the debate rules that each candidate displays. The lesser of these two evils seems like Obama; the President will make comedic remarks when not spoken to, but I can tell he says them to relieve tension from either himself or the situation. Romney on the other hand acts like an unleashed dog, and it personally makes me start to resent what he's even saying. Mr. Governor, I don't see the need for you to disregard debate rules if you aren't even spending the time to elaborate on what you're saying. Save whatever vague 15 second line of moral uplift you have for your next turn to speak. I'm sure something like "I care about the American people" will sound exactly the same in any context. I feel like the real debating can't even begin until someone gives Romney a chill pill. For now, these small reasons are what's keeping me shifted towards Obama's vote. Signing off for now, I'm yet another independent voter who's just trying to make sense out of all this political chaos. | ||
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
On October 17 2012 12:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Both candidates were asked by a girl about how they would support gender equality (or something like that). If I recall correctly, Romney gave a wishywashy answer about how when he became governor, his applicants for his cabinet were all men, and so he asked for binders of women (to make things more equal). His word choice wasn't perfect, to say the least. Good lord, you serious? I really missed a lot this debate then... | ||
![]()
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
You had to know going into this debate that both sides were preparing heavily for that question. It was the place where Obama was weakest and Romney had the most opportunity to land a knockout punch and tip this debate in his favor. Whoever came up with the strategy for that answer, hats off to them. He played right into how the right-wing media has been hammering the issue, while not lying about what he said in his address to the nation. Fox spent the last 2 weeks talking about how the Obama administration was calling it a spontaneous attack rather than an organized attack by terrorists, so much so that Romney and his campaign got lost on what else the administration had said. When the President said "I called it an act of terror" Romney's eyes lit up, he thought he got him, he was ready to jump on the jugular and stick it to him, but the President really said it, and the moderator backed it up, making Romney look exactly like how Obama's campaign wanted to portray him - opportunistic. On top of that Obama basically got to put in a whole 2 minutes of how strong he is on terror and how he resents the idea that he isn't. I've been in the President's corner from the beginning but this was the biggest issue where he deserved to have it taken to him (not his overall handling of terrorism, but his administration's less than forthcoming stance regarding the information around this particular attack), and somehow he and his advisers were able to avert most of the flak for the time being. The rest of the debate was pretty ho-hum imo if you saw the Vice Presidential debate. Obama kept running with the same playbook that Biden took to Danville last week. I thought he related better on the issue of inequality for women in the workplace - he talked about his mother, grandmother, and Lilly Ledbetter act and seemed very well versed while Romney talked about accommodating women rather than advocating women. Obama had a clear, strong comeback to Romney on Immigration law, was strong on the question of energy and energy independence. Across the board a stronger performance, combined with a crafty way of dodging the issue of Libya and the state dept.'s handling of it made for a clear Obama win. | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
BluePanther
United States2776 Posts
On October 17 2012 12:17 JinDesu wrote: Good lord, you serious? I really missed a lot this debate then... yeah, it was something about how he request someone to collect resume's of qualified women for his cabinet. But he used the phrase "binders full of women" somwhere in that story. It was kinda funny. | ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
| ||