On October 03 2012 08:28 jdseemoreglass wrote: Wow, I've never visited drudge before. I can't tell if it's an attempt at minimalism or just very low budget. I laughed when I read "THE ACCENT!" Oh god, no!
Drudge likes to use sensational headlines. More often than I like, the headline that Drudge posts doesn't really fit the article to which he is linking.
Yeah, I forgive him that. Heck, for all I know he farms some of it out to staff and some of them are overly enthusiastic at times as well.
THE ACCENT... THE ANGER... THE ACCUSATIONS... THE SERMON...
Guess I'll have to get on the video after the fact to find out their relative importance.
'We don't need to build more highways out in the suburbs. We should be investing in minority-owned businesses, in our neighborhoods'
My president is saying this? Sad day.
As a white person who grew up in the suburbs, we 100% do not need any more highways.
??? Uh maybe in your suburbs, but my suburbs could certainly use some highway improvement. Additional lanes, more efficient traffic control structures (roundabouts, overpasses, etc). Not necessarily highways to new places, but improvements of the ones we already have certainly.
Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
Definitely improvements on highways, but properly managed. NYC has had several highways and bridges with ongoing construction for something like the last 8 years.
Even the MTA was terrible until just about 2 or 3 years ago, when they started actually doing better. I'd love to have the subway system like those in Hong Kong or Japan, but that's probably too much to convert in our aging system.
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
High speed rail would be a colossal waste of money in most of the Midwest. It's too spread out and how would I travel when I get to said city? Quite frankly I don't want to pay for the East Coast travelers. Raise state funds if you want it.
This is the video, a speech he made as a Senator. It's old. We have seen it before. Note its posted date: June, 2007.
Yes, this is news. Thank you, Matt Drudge, for finding the headlines the liberal mainstream media refuses to report (am I doing that right?)
No, it isn't a video of Rev. Wright, but this is the same crap we saw in McCain/Palin 2008. So I likened it Rev. Wright. We should be afraid of the "real" Obama, who hates white people and seeks friendship with terrorists.
But really, this is just a Senator from an urban city making a speech that plays to the audience.
It isn't like he's changing his skin color or anything.
Actually, that's less than 10 minutes of the speech. The rest of it is being put out tonight. It's over a 40 minute speech. If it wasn't a big deal, why are so many Obama supporters commenting ? If Hannity / Tucker Carlson did a story on how Obama ties his shoes, that would be no big deal, and nobody would feel a need to refute / dismiss it. However, apparently this video has some teeth that Obama supporters are taking action against.
Are you actually making the argument that because people on the other side of the political spectrum say it's nonsense then it must be true? Is this what American politics has been reduced to?
I'm saying they are making sure to respond, so they must feel the situation requires a fast response. I'm not sure 'true' enters into the equation, as nobody is really asserting that it's not an actual video of a speech Obama gave. But, as I said, if this Hannity / Tucker Carlson 'story' was about how Obama ties his shoes, nobody would give a shit, and certainly we wouldn't be seeing the attempts to discredit.
You do realize that in case you're right and it's a longer video, Obama supporters (like everyone else) haven't actually seen the rest, right? We're simply denouncing another empty attempt at discrediting Obama over perfectly normal comments that will be spinned every which way to make him sound bad. It doesn't mean I or anyone else is worried about the content of the video.
edit: just read Leporello's post and apparently you're wrong, it is the full video. So yeah, what Leporello said :-)
There's the video. The running time is 36:22. The video posted above is less than 10 minutes. I'm not an expert at compression, but I find it difficult to believe the 10 minute video is the entire video, as I said. However, you are so easily convinced otherwise, simply by having someone else say so. Whatever. Now, if this entire video has been posted on Youtube before, somebody please prove that. By hunch is that you find only the shorter, edited version and people haven't seen the speech in its entirety.
About the Friedman video, the points he brings up could be mitigated by simply enacting programs Democrats/liberals have been advocating in the first place. Increase of access to a university education through increased public funding and a graduated tax system for SS and Medicare (aka removing the cap on taxable income).
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
I've been wondering, would the high speed rail really be worth it? I mean, going from San Diego -> San Francisco by plane is ~$200 round-trip. Traveling that distance in Japan by bullet train would cost well over $400 round-trip. I suppose it may be better for short/intermediate-distance trips (say, San Diego to Los Angeles), but for long-distance trips, planes might be better... Obviously prices would be different in America, but still not sure if it'd be worth it.
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
Definitely improvements on highways, but properly managed. NYC has had several highways and bridges with ongoing construction for something like the last 8 years.
Even the MTA was terrible until just about 2 or 3 years ago, when they started actually doing better. I'd love to have the subway system like those in Hong Kong or Japan, but that's probably too much to convert in our aging system.
One word: Density. The United States, Russia, and China require a novel approach to public transit, one that is far more regional in authority and in planning due to the incredible variance in population density and geographic feature. That being said, a properly run Amtrak would certainly be a welcome sight.
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
I've been wondering, would the high speed rail really be worth it? I mean, going from San Diego -> San Francisco by plane is ~$200 round-trip. Traveling that distance in Japan by bullet train would cost well over $400 round-trip. I suppose it may be better for short/intermediate-distance trips (say, San Diego to Los Angeles), but for long-distance trips, planes might be better... Obviously prices would be different in America, but still not sure if it'd be worth it.
I'm no high-speed rail expert, but is it a good idea in earthquake-prone areas ?
I think people are forgetting how much Americans hate and are stating to hate Airports and their BS policiy on price etc.
Also federal funds have/should(through proper review/checks) to build bike lanes. Memphis, TN is just one example and it's rebuilding/renovation of a bridge as part of the Greenline.
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
I've been wondering, would the high speed rail really be worth it? I mean, going from San Diego -> San Francisco by plane is ~$200 round-trip. Traveling that distance in Japan by bullet train would cost well over $400 round-trip. I suppose it may be better for short/intermediate-distance trips (say, San Diego to Los Angeles), but for long-distance trips, planes might be better... Obviously prices would be different in America, but still not sure if it'd be worth it.
I'm no high-speed rail expert, but is it a good idea in earthquake-prone areas ?
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
Definitely improvements on highways, but properly managed. NYC has had several highways and bridges with ongoing construction for something like the last 8 years.
Even the MTA was terrible until just about 2 or 3 years ago, when they started actually doing better. I'd love to have the subway system like those in Hong Kong or Japan, but that's probably too much to convert in our aging system.
One word: Density. The United States, Russia, and China require a novel approach to public transit, one that is far more regional in authority and in planning due to the incredible variance in population density and geographic feature. That being said, a properly run Amtrak would certainly be a welcome sight.
Yes that is true. But the MTA is making some nice progress, as least in providing customer information now. They used to be really sh*tty.
The Amtrak in my experience has been a far better alternative in terms of comfort and reliability (until it rains more than 2 drops), so if only we could combine the two...
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
I've been wondering, would the high speed rail really be worth it? I mean, going from San Diego -> San Francisco by plane is ~$200 round-trip. Traveling that distance in Japan by bullet train would cost well over $400 round-trip. I suppose it may be better for short/intermediate-distance trips (say, San Diego to Los Angeles), but for long-distance trips, planes might be better... Obviously prices would be different in America, but still not sure if it'd be worth it.
I'm no high-speed rail expert, but is it a good idea in earthquake-prone areas ?
If you have the engineering prowess of the Japanese, yes.
On October 03 2012 11:36 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: I think people are forgetting how much Americans hate and are stating to hate Airports and their BS policiy on price etc.
Also federal funds have/should(through proper review/checks) to build bike lanes. Memphis, TN is just one example and it's rebuilding/renovation of a bridge as part of the Greenline.
I love airports. What is their BS policy on price, though? I'm not very familiar with airport pricing.
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
I've been wondering, would the high speed rail really be worth it? I mean, going from San Diego -> San Francisco by plane is ~$200 round-trip. Traveling that distance in Japan by bullet train would cost well over $400 round-trip. I suppose it may be better for short/intermediate-distance trips (say, San Diego to Los Angeles), but for long-distance trips, planes might be better... Obviously prices would be different in America, but still not sure if it'd be worth it.
I'm no high-speed rail expert, but is it a good idea in earthquake-prone areas ?
If you have the engineering prowess of the Japanese, yes.
On October 03 2012 11:36 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: I think people are forgetting how much Americans hate and are stating to hate Airports and their BS policiy on price etc.
Also federal funds have/should(through proper review/checks) to build bike lanes. Memphis, TN is just one example and it's rebuilding/renovation of a bridge as part of the Greenline.
I love airports. What is their BS policy on price, though? I'm not very familiar with airport pricing.
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
I've been wondering, would the high speed rail really be worth it? I mean, going from San Diego -> San Francisco by plane is ~$200 round-trip. Traveling that distance in Japan by bullet train would cost well over $400 round-trip. I suppose it may be better for short/intermediate-distance trips (say, San Diego to Los Angeles), but for long-distance trips, planes might be better... Obviously prices would be different in America, but still not sure if it'd be worth it.
I'm no high-speed rail expert, but is it a good idea in earthquake-prone areas ?
If you have the engineering prowess of the Japanese, yes.
On October 03 2012 11:36 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: I think people are forgetting how much Americans hate and are stating to hate Airports and their BS policiy on price etc.
Also federal funds have/should(through proper review/checks) to build bike lanes. Memphis, TN is just one example and it's rebuilding/renovation of a bridge as part of the Greenline.
I love airports. What is their BS policy on price, though? I'm not very familiar with airport pricing.
Fees on EVERYTHINGGGGGGG
That IS annoying but airfare is also pretty freaking cheap.
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
I've been wondering, would the high speed rail really be worth it? I mean, going from San Diego -> San Francisco by plane is ~$200 round-trip. Traveling that distance in Japan by bullet train would cost well over $400 round-trip. I suppose it may be better for short/intermediate-distance trips (say, San Diego to Los Angeles), but for long-distance trips, planes might be better... Obviously prices would be different in America, but still not sure if it'd be worth it.
I'm no high-speed rail expert, but is it a good idea in earthquake-prone areas ?
If you have the engineering prowess of the Japanese, yes.
On October 03 2012 11:36 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: I think people are forgetting how much Americans hate and are stating to hate Airports and their BS policiy on price etc.
Also federal funds have/should(through proper review/checks) to build bike lanes. Memphis, TN is just one example and it's rebuilding/renovation of a bridge as part of the Greenline.
I love airports. What is their BS policy on price, though? I'm not very familiar with airport pricing.
Fees on EVERYTHINGGGGGGG
That IS annoying but airfare is also pretty freaking cheap.
Domestic is, I think. My international to Asia was pretty hefty though - but then again, I don't normally fly, so I am a terrible judge. I just dislike the extra fee to check in an additional bag.
On October 03 2012 11:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Improvement in Highways, where it's needed yes but not new ones. High Speed Rail is something we are long overdue and of course more bike lanes never hurt.
I've been wondering, would the high speed rail really be worth it? I mean, going from San Diego -> San Francisco by plane is ~$200 round-trip. Traveling that distance in Japan by bullet train would cost well over $400 round-trip. I suppose it may be better for short/intermediate-distance trips (say, San Diego to Los Angeles), but for long-distance trips, planes might be better... Obviously prices would be different in America, but still not sure if it'd be worth it.
I'm no high-speed rail expert, but is it a good idea in earthquake-prone areas ?
If you have the engineering prowess of the Japanese, yes.
On October 03 2012 11:36 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: I think people are forgetting how much Americans hate and are stating to hate Airports and their BS policiy on price etc.
Also federal funds have/should(through proper review/checks) to build bike lanes. Memphis, TN is just one example and it's rebuilding/renovation of a bridge as part of the Greenline.
I love airports. What is their BS policy on price, though? I'm not very familiar with airport pricing.
Fees on EVERYTHINGGGGGGG
That IS annoying but airfare is also pretty freaking cheap.
Domestic is, I think. My international to Asia was pretty hefty though - but then again, I don't normally fly, so I am a terrible judge. I just dislike the extra fee to check in an additional bag.
Yeah, actually, it cost me an extra $150 to check in an additional bag from LA -> SD. It was only a 30 minute flight...
On October 03 2012 11:36 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: I think people are forgetting how much Americans hate and are stating to hate Airports and their BS policiy on price etc.
Also federal funds have/should(through proper review/checks) to build bike lanes. Memphis, TN is just one example and it's rebuilding/renovation of a bridge as part of the Greenline.
Well, then, I think bike lanes fall into that area where Liberals and Conservatives disagree upon as far as whether it's something Federal funds should be used for.
On October 03 2012 08:28 jdseemoreglass wrote: Wow, I've never visited drudge before. I can't tell if it's an attempt at minimalism or just very low budget. I laughed when I read "THE ACCENT!" Oh god, no!
Drudge likes to use sensational headlines. More often than I like, the headline that Drudge posts doesn't really fit the article to which he is linking.
Yeah, I forgive him that. Heck, for all I know he farms some of it out to staff and some of them are overly enthusiastic at times as well.
THE ACCENT... THE ANGER... THE ACCUSATIONS... THE SERMON...
Guess I'll have to get on the video after the fact to find out their relative importance.
'We don't need to build more highways out in the suburbs. We should be investing in minority-owned businesses, in our neighborhoods'
My president is saying this? Sad day.
As a white person who grew up in the suburbs, we 100% do not need any more highways.
??? Uh maybe in your suburbs, but my suburbs could certainly use some highway improvement. Additional lanes, more efficient traffic control structures (roundabouts, overpasses, etc). Not necessarily highways to new places, but improvements of the ones we already have certainly.
The streets (sidewalks especially) where I grew up could use improvement. The highways were mostly fine, yet highways were consistently the main targets of construction projects. Obviously it's anecdotal, but some of that is how much easier it is to earmark funds for highway improvement and rerouting.
And then you get situations like the construction of the highway in Boston that was never even finished but still resulted in the impoverishment of an entire area of the city.