President Obama Re-Elected - Page 32
Forum Index > General Forum |
Hey guys! We'll be closing this thread shortly, but we will make an American politics megathread where we can continue the discussions in here. The new thread can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=383301 | ||
Papulatus
United States669 Posts
| ||
Alex1Sun
494 Posts
On April 19 2012 18:24 murphs wrote: Dear America, Vote Obama. Sincerely, Rest of the fucking world. I would prefer Ron Paul if I could vote for him. But Obama is far lesser evil for this planet than Romney. | ||
-_-Quails
Australia796 Posts
On April 20 2012 10:04 DeepElemBlues wrote: The last national election would imply that it is not Republicans who have the problem with being out of touch, but rather, it is you who is out of touch with what American voters want. You don't win one of the largest electoral victories in 60 years by being out of touch with what voters want. Actually, you can. See very few people vote based on a reasoned consideration of all issues - that would require a huge amount of effort and for them to actively challenge their own biases in order to fairly weight policies. Many pick one party, usually the one their parents voted for, and stick with that doggedly. Many others pick a single issue and vote based on this - gay marriage and perceived religious fundamentalism can both be examples of this. And most of the rest accept what the popular pundits say about candidates and their policies at face value - even though most of them (in the US, particularly on the right wing) blatantly lie to support their views. This ignores the impact of growing fundamentalism in the GOP, that both parties are well to the right of centre, and that the two party system in place cripples the ability of the people to actually vote for significant change. Surveys of actual opinion on the US, when divorced from political parties, usually show the general public as being rather to the left of the Democrats on economic matters. | ||
politik
409 Posts
| ||
-_-Quails
Australia796 Posts
On April 20 2012 10:21 docvoc wrote: Directed at your comment: He is very nice to the rest of the world he emulates the normal style of more socialist or psuedo-socialist governments popular in europe, however, he had a democratic super majority in the beginning of his term in office because everyone was angry at the republicans. He proceeded to do absolutely jack shit and attempted to pass a health care bill that was too costly for our government right now, and too much for our economy to handle, he shoved it down the throats of all the democrats and if they didn't vote, they were called racist. Sounds totally legit, IKR. The fact is that until you live here, you don't understand why our politics are as weird as they are. You are in Ireland, or so your moniker states, its fine that you don't know the intimate details of the literal amount of 0 change he brought, but at the same time, to be so forward about who we as a nation should vote for is a bit out of tune with reality. Directed at the original idea: The president doesn't matter much after appointing the supreme court judges, because he is now mostly a figure head since modern politics have placed a lot of power in the legislative body even after George Bush created the pocket veto. What matters is congress, and this largely republican congress was elected because the democrats had the worst popularity EVER, seriously it was at 13% at one point. People inside and outside of the U.S. are quick to forget how little got done and how much was spent during that time. Granted some say Obama pulled us out of a coming depression, but afterward many economists stepped forward and said that they had said before that the recession was just that, and the fear mongering was popularized by the liberal media and conservative media for no reason other than views. Basically its all about congress and the senate once you understand american politics, Except that quite a lot did get done. Most of the campaign promises have either been fulfilled or are in the process of being fulfilled and not all of that has happened in the last year. Also, what the US can afford less than health care reform is to not reform healthcare. | ||
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
On April 20 2012 11:11 politik wrote: I dunno, Obama isn't much better. Starting wars left and right, raiding dispensaries, NDAA, other stuff I've probably forgotten. Romney and Obama are both so similar that it probably won't make much of a difference. Which wars were those again? | ||
DeepElemBlues
United States5079 Posts
Congress severely neutered the executive branch post watergate with FOIA, WPA, FISA and the 1974 Impoundment Control Act out of spite. Slowly but surely under the direction of Dick Cheney and David Addington did the executive branch flex and wrestle back much of the power through action (although the Iraq War gave them carte blanche to not only regain but vastly expand executive power) I think you meant September 11th, but still no, first of all none of that shit really neutered the executive except on paper, hey, it did look good, but didn't really change much. The government has just had to get judges to sign off on still doing what they were doing before and judges have pretty much went along, a few FOIA crumbs notwithstanding. And Congress has mostly given the Executive greater latitude (not the executive just assuming it), the only time Congress and the President clash over who is taking powers from whom is when Congress is controlled by one party and the Presidency the other (Clinton-Gingrich, Bush-Pelosi/Reid, Obama-Boehner). Reagan and Tip O'Neill worked together pretty well, but politics wasn't 90% a game for the next election in the 1980s the way it is now. | ||
IamBach
United States1059 Posts
| ||
Picklebread
808 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
politik
409 Posts
| ||
Ksquared
United States1748 Posts
| ||
A Wet Shamwow
United States1590 Posts
On April 20 2012 11:11 politik wrote: I dunno, Obama isn't much better. Starting wars left and right, raiding dispensaries, NDAA, other stuff I've probably forgotten. Romney and Obama are both so similar that it probably won't make much of a difference. Hasn't there been a net loss of one war under his administration? | ||
screamingpalm
United States1527 Posts
On April 20 2012 11:23 A Wet Shamwow wrote: Hasn't there been a net loss of one war under his administration? Oh please, he does not desrve credit for that. At all. He wanted to extend the occupation, but the Iraqi government demanded that the terms (which Bush should get the credit for if anyone) be upheld. The increased powers granted to the executive branch aren't going to vanish anytime soon with a perpetual war on terror. | ||
Diizzy
United States828 Posts
| ||
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
| ||
U_G_L_Y
United States516 Posts
On April 20 2012 09:46 Defacer wrote: I always thought that Romney was a worthy, moderate conservative candidate. But his pandering to the dregs of the GOP base in the primary has really hurt his viability and image, and just reinforced the stigma of Republican's offering another puppet candidate. The problem with the Republican party isn't their leaders, such as Romney or McCain, it's the party's current brand and their base. They have positioned themselves as the anti-tax, anti-welfare, anti-social services, anti-abortion, anti-gay, anti-regulation, anti-environment, pro-rich, pro-Wall street, pro-oil, pro-Christian, pro-war party. They are neither libertarians or fiscally conservative. They are a mess. Governor Romney was not out-of-touch until the GOP molested him. Now he's a flip-flopping automaton. The GOP needs a serious reboot, or all their candidates will seem out-of-touch. Romney pander and its aweful. So did Obama. Just like McCain did. Just like John Kerry Did. Just like George Bush and Al Gore did. By the time elections are held, we elect the SECOND most-hated man in America. I LOVE policy but I HATE politics because it is just a meaningless game that drags good men (like Obama and Romney) down. But there is no way around it. There is a reason that Romney seems insincere when his tone mimics crazy hard-right nutters. He is a policy wonk, and it makes him uncomfortable, but he knows he can't win unless he sells himself. I believe the 40 year pattern of behavior tells us what kind of President he would be far better than he can himself. | ||
ElMeanYo
United States1032 Posts
On April 20 2012 11:07 Alex1Sun wrote: I would prefer Ron Paul if I could vote for him. But Obama is far lesser evil for this planet than Romney. Romney would be wise to support Paul for VP. I bet he would get alot of extra votes from that. | ||
DeepElemBlues
United States5079 Posts
On April 20 2012 11:09 -_-Quails wrote: Actually, you can. See very few people vote based on a reasoned consideration of all issues - that would require a huge amount of effort and for them to actively challenge their own biases in order to fairly weight policies. Many pick one party, usually the one their parents voted for, and stick with that doggedly. Many others pick a single issue and vote based on this - gay marriage and perceived religious fundamentalism can both be examples of this. And most of the rest accept what the popular pundits say about candidates and their policies at face value - even though most of them (in the US, particularly on the right wing) blatantly lie to support their views. This ignores the impact of growing fundamentalism in the GOP, that both parties are well to the right of centre, and that the two party system in place cripples the ability of the people to actually vote for significant change. Surveys of actual opinion on the US, when divorced from political parties, usually show the general public as being rather to the left of the Democrats on economic matters. Man, is this tired old 'argument' ever going to die the death it deserves? Voters vote on their perceived most important interests, and that is entirely subjective. And there is nothing wrong with it being an entirely subjective process. There is no objective way to determine whether people are voting "rationally." Surprise, surprise, the charge that people never vote rationally or fairly weight policies or challenge their biases comes from someone who also supported what the voters supported or opposed what the voters opposed. "Growing fundamentalism in the GOP... both parties are well to the right of center... "the two party system... cripples the ability of people to actually vote for significant change" are not actual objective observations, they are political opinions dressed up otherwise. Surveys show no such thing, sorry. | ||
LlamaNamedOsama
United States1900 Posts
On April 20 2012 10:21 docvoc wrote: Directed at your comment: He is very nice to the rest of the world he emulates the normal style of more socialist or psuedo-socialist governments popular in europe, however, he had a democratic super majority in the beginning of his term in office because everyone was angry at the republicans. He proceeded to do absolutely jack shit and attempted to pass a health care bill that was too costly for our government right now, and too much for our economy to handle, he shoved it down the throats of all the democrats and if they didn't vote, they were called racist. Sounds totally legit, IKR. The fact is that until you live here, you don't understand why our politics are as weird as they are. You are in Ireland, or so your moniker states, its fine that you don't know the intimate details of the literal amount of 0 change he brought, but at the same time, to be so forward about who we as a nation should vote for is a bit out of tune with reality. Directed at the original idea: The president doesn't matter much after appointing the supreme court judges, because he is now mostly a figure head since modern politics have placed a lot of power in the legislative body even after George Bush created the pocket veto. What matters is congress, and this largely republican congress was elected because the democrats had the worst popularity EVER, seriously it was at 13% at one point. People inside and outside of the U.S. are quick to forget how little got done and how much was spent during that time. Granted some say Obama pulled us out of a coming depression, but afterward many economists stepped forward and said that they had said before that the recession was just that, and the fear mongering was popularized by the liberal media and conservative media for no reason other than views. Basically its all about congress and the senate once you understand american politics, The claim that Obama has done "jack shit" is just an oft repeated political sound bite that is factually incorrect. http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/ | ||
Cassel_Castle
United States820 Posts
Chris Christie seems unlikely to me, there's not much of a chance NJ goes red and he's charismatic but too much of a Romney guy from the start, I think the Rubio/Portman strategy of playing hard to get and then jumping in with a "party unity" line later is better considering people are cautious about Mitt. | ||
| ||