• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:19
CEST 15:19
KST 22:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed12Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll4Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed Who will win EWC 2025? The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Starcraft in widescreen A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Segway man no more. Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 707 users

Shooting of Trayvon Martin - Page 8

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 503 Next
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP.

If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post.
sc2superfan101
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
3583 Posts
March 28 2012 22:59 GMT
#141
On March 29 2012 07:10 Hawk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 29 2012 06:41 Kaitlin wrote:
On March 29 2012 06:33 Hawk wrote:
More damning to his stand your ground/self defense claim is that if you are calling the cops on someone for being suspicious, you are presuming they are in the act of or about to be in the act of a crime. It is then probably safe to assume that he might be armed. Furthermore, if you see him 'reaching into his waistband' (as he stated at least once on the 911 call) it really hammers home the fact that the kid might be armed.

Why are you engaging a person who you called the cops on for being suspicious, and that person has his hand in his waistband and then his pocket??


Because Zimmerman was trying to protect his community ? He was trying to discern whether Trayvon was up to something illegal, thus asking him what he was doing. Following him is nothing more than observing and providing updated information to the police for when they get there. To ignore Trayvon, while obviously the safest for him personally, would leave Trayvon free to victimize others.


It is not about what his goal was, it is what he did: engaging someone who he thougth had commited or was about to commit a crime, and may have a weapon, judging by his 'hand in the waistband' comment. That is provoking, which it very specifically says is a no-no in the op's posting of the law

I don't believe following and talking to a person can be construed as "provoking" in a legal sense. Perhaps if he had put his hands on Trayvon, or if he had walked up and pulled the gun out and started waving it around, but just following and engaging is not a legal provocation, I am almost positive.

In my opinion, with the evidence given and the likelihood of new evidence (low), we will never know exactly what happened, and therefore can't convict, or even charge, Zimmerman of murder, or manslaughter. We have a corpse and a guy claiming self-defense and not much else, and without more I don't know what can be done about it. We shouldn't just arrest the guy and charge him unless something new comes to light, like a new eye-witness or perhaps a clear lie by Zimmerman.

Also, on a side note, I fail to see what any of this has to do with the "Stand your ground" laws. I do not believe that they have any legal pertinence here, as this was not a case of Treyvon breaking into a home, or threatening Zimmerman, or anything that "Stand your ground" laws pertain to. It seems more like a question of self-defense statutes, and even more than that, a lack of proper information.
My fake plants died because I did not pretend to water them.
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10467 Posts
March 28 2012 22:59 GMT
#142
On March 29 2012 06:51 Millitron wrote:
Has anyone else noticed what a farce the mainstream media is making this?

They use a five-year old photo of Zimmerman in an attempt to show him in a negative light. The photo they use is an old mugshot from an arrest (he wasn't convicted on btw). In that one, I agree, Zimmerman doesn't appear to be an upstanding citizen. BUT, in more recent photos (and ones where he hasn't been through the hell that is police booking), he looks like your average, decent citizen, not some crazy racist: Zimmerman Photo

They pull the same kind of crap with Trayvon's photos. The pic they use is years old. More recent photos of Trayvon show that he was not some helpless youngster. Remember, he was 17 when he was shot.

What I'm getting at, is that the media is not where this case should be settled. They explode, and turn local cases into such crazy circuses, we may never know the truth.

Instead of making it a national issue, how about we just let the courts handle it? Juries and judges are far more reasonable, and less prone to letting emotions control them than Al Sharpton or Spike Lee.

At any rate, whether Zimmerman is innocent or not, his life is effectively ruined. Everyone will remember the uproar about the case, but no one will remember in the end what the real result was. They'll automatically assume he was guilty. This will make it impossible for Zimmerman to do pretty much anything with his life.

Remember, Zimmerman may be innocent. We simply do not know; and we shouldn't let the media burn him at the stake until a court of law proves him guilty.


They used that mugshot picture of Zimmerman because it was the only one they had, so you can't claim they were biased in choosing it. The one you linked didn't surface until weeks after this whole thing started when it was leaked by a former employer.
Freddybear
Profile Joined December 2011
United States126 Posts
March 28 2012 23:03 GMT
#143
On March 29 2012 06:58 alQahira wrote:
Millitron, the problem was the courts did not handle this case appropriately initially. The only way this case got reopened was because of the family's protests and appeals that went outside of the criminal justice system, because the system did a cursory investigation, saw that a black man was involved in an altercation with a white man, and moved on.


You are just propogating the racial narrative. Zimmerman isn't white, he's hispanic. And he has a strong case, backed up by the police reports, that it was indeed self defense.
Older than the usual n00b
scribe123456
Profile Joined April 2011
United States43 Posts
March 28 2012 23:14 GMT
#144
It is sad how many people have no respect for the "freedom of speech" in this thread. No police officer (and certainly not a dispatcher) can force you to not confront someone on public land. Completely baffles me how people today don’t understand this extremely basic and fundamental right we have in the US.

Secondly, something no one seems to bring up. What does it say about the parents when they let their son spend his suspension from school at his girlfriend’s house... horrible parents. No excuses. Get caught selling drugs, go have sex with your girlfriend.

User was temp banned for this post.
Sufficiency
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada23833 Posts
March 28 2012 23:20 GMT
#145
My understanding of the issue here is the following:

one can only claim self-defense if the confrontation is initiated by the other party. That is, if someone tries to rob me with a gun, I am allowed to fight back because the robber initiated the confrontation. On the other hand, if I am the robber who tries to rob a guy, and that guy fights back, then I killed him, it's NOT self-defense because I initiated the confrontation.

In this case, I think it is without a doubt that Zimmerman confronted Trayvon. But I am not sure if he is doing it out of his duty as a volunteer neighbourhood watch... I am not sure if this position offers him any protection, or duty, to confront him.
https://twitter.com/SufficientStats
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-28 23:29:52
March 28 2012 23:26 GMT
#146

I don't believe following and talking to a person can be construed as "provoking" in a legal sense. Perhaps if he had put his hands on Trayvon, or if he had walked up and pulled the gun out and started waving it around, but just following and engaging is not a legal provocation, I am almost positive.

Perhaps not in the legal sense. But context is pretty important. You have a lone teen being approached by an adult for no readily apparent reason. Nevermind the height, there's a sort of psychology of it and were I a teen, red flags would be going up if this isn't a neighbourly greeting thing. There's an element of threat just psychologically with a male adult- alpha male if you will. And it's especially a threat as he doesn't have uniform which would allow the teen to account for the adult's behaviour. And who knows what happened, but if he pushed the teen into fright or flight then that could easily account for Zimmerman getting 'attacked' first.

The other thing you get with certain people in security is wannabe cops which end up being way to aggressive. Or as one of our security guards called 'trying to be robocop.' Basically, going way beyond their training and placing themselves in stupid situations. The fact that the guy was told not to pursue and he continued to do so really gives me the wannabe cop vibe.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
Felnarion
Profile Joined December 2011
442 Posts
March 28 2012 23:28 GMT
#147
On March 29 2012 08:20 Sufficiency wrote:
My understanding of the issue here is the following:

one can only claim self-defense if the confrontation is initiated by the other party. That is, if someone tries to rob me with a gun, I am allowed to fight back because the robber initiated the confrontation. On the other hand, if I am the robber who tries to rob a guy, and that guy fights back, then I killed him, it's NOT self-defense because I initiated the confrontation.

In this case, I think it is without a doubt that Zimmerman confronted Trayvon. But I am not sure if he is doing it out of his duty as a volunteer neighbourhood watch... I am not sure if this position offers him any protection, or duty, to confront him.


It's not about duty or protection, its about how he went about it. If it was simply confronting him verbally, asking where he was going or from or something like that, then it is completely within his rights, just as it is within mine to ask you where you're going at any point if I see you on the street.

You of course do not have to answer, nor do you have to even acknowledge my existence.
Zaqwe
Profile Joined March 2012
591 Posts
March 28 2012 23:28 GMT
#148
Zimmerman's lawyer has stated that they do not intend to base their defense on stand your ground law. According to him, Zimmerman is completely covered by regular self defense.

The hand wringing over stand your ground laws seems to be as pointless as the rest of the media hoopla.

Lawyer: Family of Trayvon Martin to pursue civil case

Meanwhile, a lawyer for the man at the center of the death investigation said Florida's "stand your ground" law doesn't apply to the shooting that killed the teen.

"This is self-defense, and that's been around for forever -- that you have a right to defend yourself. So the next issue (that) is going to come up is, was he justified in using the amount of force he did?"


http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/24/justice/florida-teen-shooting/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
Freddybear
Profile Joined December 2011
United States126 Posts
March 28 2012 23:29 GMT
#149
On March 29 2012 08:20 Sufficiency wrote:
My understanding of the issue here is the following:

one can only claim self-defense if the confrontation is initiated by the other party. That is, if someone tries to rob me with a gun, I am allowed to fight back because the robber initiated the confrontation. On the other hand, if I am the robber who tries to rob a guy, and that guy fights back, then I killed him, it's NOT self-defense because I initiated the confrontation.

In this case, I think it is without a doubt that Zimmerman confronted Trayvon. But I am not sure if he is doing it out of his duty as a volunteer neighbourhood watch... I am not sure if this position offers him any protection, or duty, to confront him.


"Confrontation" in this case isn't at the level of attempted robbery. It's more like asking "Who are you and why are you here?"
Older than the usual n00b
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
March 28 2012 23:29 GMT
#150
On March 29 2012 08:03 Freddybear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 29 2012 06:58 alQahira wrote:
Millitron, the problem was the courts did not handle this case appropriately initially. The only way this case got reopened was because of the family's protests and appeals that went outside of the criminal justice system, because the system did a cursory investigation, saw that a black man was involved in an altercation with a white man, and moved on.


You are just propogating the racial narrative. Zimmerman isn't white, he's hispanic. And he has a strong case, backed up by the police reports, that it was indeed self defense.

This racial narrative might be the worst part of the whole situation. Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Spike Lee, and others pull the racism card every chance they get. Absolutely every little issue is about racism to them, and because they are constantly accusing people of racism, I can't take them seriously.

I accept that there are people motivated to do terrible things because of race, but whenever anything bad at all happens to a black person, Al Sharpton and co. immediately call it racism.

They cry wolf so much, that they've lost all credibility to me, which is sad, because one of these days they're going to accuse someone of racism and be right, and I won't pay the least bit of attention.
Who called in the fleet?
Silidons
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States2813 Posts
March 28 2012 23:33 GMT
#151
news stations such as faux news and your general unconvinced civilian for some reason love to point "HEY LOOK HE DID THIS IN THE PAST, HE USED DRUGS! SO HE WAS A BAD PERSON!" but they don't actually understand the entire point of this fucking shooting, is that at the time of the shooting he was actually doing nothing wrong. what type of country do we really live in that killing someone who was unarmed and minding their own business justified if they smoke weed, has sucker punched someone before, was suspended from school? does this somehow justify the killing of him? obviously not and i don't want to live in a country that thinks it does (or its civilians that think it does).
"God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon Bonaparte
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10467 Posts
March 28 2012 23:41 GMT
#152
On March 29 2012 08:33 Silidons wrote:
news stations such as faux news and your general unconvinced civilian for some reason love to point "HEY LOOK HE DID THIS IN THE PAST, HE USED DRUGS! SO HE WAS A BAD PERSON!" but they don't actually understand the entire point of this fucking shooting, is that at the time of the shooting he was actually doing nothing wrong. what type of country do we really live in that killing someone who was unarmed and minding their own business justified if they smoke weed, has sucker punched someone before, was suspended from school? does this somehow justify the killing of him? obviously not and i don't want to live in a country that thinks it does (or its civilians that think it does).


Assaulting someone from behind and then banging their head into concrete and punching them in the face over and over is "doing nothing wrong" according to you?

At least that is what Zimmerman alleges. Since we don't know what the truth is, I don't see a problem with including character evidence in the discussion.
Defacer
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada5052 Posts
March 28 2012 23:43 GMT
#153
On March 29 2012 07:12 dAPhREAk wrote:
same situation, but the other guy gets up, smashes a bottle on the bar and starts towards me with the broken bottle in his hand. i back up and say "fuck, im sorry dude" and try to run away. he still comes at me with the bottle. then i kill him. this is an arguable self defense.



Well, I know what I'm doing tonight!

But seriously, it sounds like self-defense is largely defined by who escalates the conflict, versus who initiates it. Correct?
Joedaddy
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1948 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-29 00:08:11
March 28 2012 23:48 GMT
#154
I don't understand why everyone keeps referring to Martin as a "boy" or "kid." Yes he was 17, but its not uncommon for 17 year old people to be tried as adults in the courts. Martin had demonstrated behavior that shows he was not just another innocent kid. The line between child and adult is not always as black and white as an arbitrary number.

I had the misfortune of needing a job bad enough that I had to take one working at a juvenile prison for almost a year. My particular placement put me in a cell block with 19 young men ages 17-19. The 17 year olds were worse than the 18 and 19 year olds in terms of violence because they believed the fact that they were still 17 made them immune from being sent up to the State Penitentiary with the big boys.

I'm 6' 250 lbs and served 6 years in the military and at least once a week was involved in some form of physical conflict with the prisoners there. It was either trying to break up a fight between the inmates, stopping someone from throwing furniture into the walls, being assaulted personally, or helping another guard who was being assaulted. Three of my ribs were broken during that time, and I had to get 7 stitches to sew up a cut after a 17 year old "kid" took a swing at me.

For anyone thinking that a 17 year old kid isn't capable of putting a full grown man in a position where he feels his life is threatened, go spend a year working at a juvenile detention center with 17 year old "kids" and then tell us how you feel about it.

I for one believe that Zimmerman could have avoided this entire situation by simply following the advice of the 911 operator and not followed Martin at all. Hindsight is 20/20 though. I have a wife and a daughter, and if I saw an unfamiliar suspicious person walking around in my neighborhood I can promise you that I would approach him and introduce myself in an effort to find out who they were and why they were there, especially if there had been a string of robberies in recent months.

Given all the new evidence, witness accounts, and news stories that have been aired I don't understand how anyone can still be assuming Zimmerman is guilty of killing an innocent "kid." Was it poor judgment on Zimmerman's part? In hindsight, yes it was. Is Zimmerman a racist guilty of a murderous hate crime? I think you're lying to yourself if you are already convinced the answer is yes.
I might be the minority on TL, but TL is the minority everywhere else.
nalgene
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada2153 Posts
March 28 2012 23:54 GMT
#155
Just a question, but does the "Stand your Ground" law allow a person to follow/pursuit/stalk another? Is it only for a person to "have a right to be" and "no duty to retreat" such that they do not have to move away, but gives them no right to do the above 3 things?
Year 2500 Greater Israel ( Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Gaza Strip, West Bank, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Yemen )
Makavillin
Profile Joined March 2011
113 Posts
March 28 2012 23:58 GMT
#156
Wait....

So Zimmerman, when confronted by police claimed he stepped out of his vehicle to check which street he was on and was attacked from behind, but when on the call with the non-emergency operator, he admitted to following Martin.

Isn't this immediate grounds to open an investigation and put this man on trial? It seems clear that there are several discrepancies in the entire situation. You would think it's enough to call for a trial.

Sometimes I wonder.
Zaqwe
Profile Joined March 2012
591 Posts
March 29 2012 00:11 GMT
#157
On March 29 2012 08:54 nalgene wrote:
Just a question, but does the "Stand your Ground" law allow a person to follow/pursuit/stalk another? Is it only for a person to "have a right to be" and "no duty to retreat" such that they do not have to move away, but gives them no right to do the above 3 things?

Zimmerman's lawyer has said stand your ground doesn't apply, regular self defense applies.

Meanwhile, a lawyer for the man at the center of the death investigation said Florida's "stand your ground" law doesn't apply to the shooting that killed the teen.

"This is self-defense, and that's been around for forever -- that you have a right to defend yourself. So the next issue (that) is going to come up is, was he justified in using the amount of force he did?"


http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/24/justice/florida-teen-shooting/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
Cloud9157
Profile Joined December 2010
United States2968 Posts
March 29 2012 00:19 GMT
#158
On March 29 2012 08:33 Silidons wrote:
news stations such as faux news and your general unconvinced civilian for some reason love to point "HEY LOOK HE DID THIS IN THE PAST, HE USED DRUGS! SO HE WAS A BAD PERSON!" but they don't actually understand the entire point of this fucking shooting, is that at the time of the shooting he was actually doing nothing wrong. what type of country do we really live in that killing someone who was unarmed and minding their own business justified if they smoke weed, has sucker punched someone before, was suspended from school? does this somehow justify the killing of him? obviously not and i don't want to live in a country that thinks it does (or its civilians that think it does).


They're trying to point out a flaw in the credibility that Travyon was a "harmless boy who never did anything to anyone".

I can't even tell you how many times in Chicago that when a kid is shot(most seem to be African American, but that is REALLY beside the point, there have been Hispanic/Whites as well) no one ever has anything negative to say about the child.

I'm really skeptical about this case. At first I was sure he killed the kid in cold blood, but then Zimmerman somehow gets punched in the face and the back of the head(I believe that was it)? Something doesn't add up imo.
"Are you absolutely sure that armor only affects the health portion of a protoss army??? That doesn't sound right to me. source?" -Some idiot
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
March 29 2012 00:23 GMT
#159
On March 29 2012 08:43 Defacer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 29 2012 07:12 dAPhREAk wrote:
same situation, but the other guy gets up, smashes a bottle on the bar and starts towards me with the broken bottle in his hand. i back up and say "fuck, im sorry dude" and try to run away. he still comes at me with the bottle. then i kill him. this is an arguable self defense.



Well, I know what I'm doing tonight!

But seriously, it sounds like self-defense is largely defined by who escalates the conflict, versus who initiates it. Correct?

just recognize that by pushing the guy off the bar stool, you are committing a battery. self defense based on any subsequent act by the other person does not change the fact that you originally broke the law, and could go to jail for it.

i dont want to play semantics games, but if i understand correctly how you use those words that seems to be a fairly accurate representation. it is entirely possible for two people fighting to both act in self defense at certain points during the fight. if that doesnt make sense to you, welcome to the world of law and reasonableness standards. =D
taitanik
Profile Joined December 2011
Latvia231 Posts
March 29 2012 00:26 GMT
#160
so was zimerman or whatever his name arrested already or not? you cant just let go someone whos suspect right?
"the game is over only when you make it over"
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 503 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 41m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 373
RotterdaM 246
Trikslyr29
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 31325
BeSt 5329
Mini 2329
Pusan 1060
Stork 633
Zeus 419
EffOrt 350
PianO 330
Last 241
Barracks 141
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 133
JulyZerg 68
Rush 62
zelot 52
Aegong 41
Sharp 33
Sacsri 32
Larva 23
sSak 21
SilentControl 14
GoRush 13
IntoTheRainbow 12
Noble 11
scan(afreeca) 11
Bale 8
Hm[arnc] 6
Dota 2
Gorgc8001
singsing2739
qojqva1420
XcaliburYe212
syndereN59
Counter-Strike
sgares401
flusha191
markeloff76
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King129
Other Games
B2W.Neo1509
hiko705
DeMusliM399
Hui .306
oskar202
Pyrionflax115
ArmadaUGS57
QueenE28
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3320
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hinosc 17
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos730
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2h 41m
Replay Cast
10h 41m
The PondCast
20h 41m
OSC
23h 41m
WardiTV European League
1d 2h
Replay Cast
1d 10h
Epic.LAN
1d 22h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
Epic.LAN
2 days
CSO Contender
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Esports World Cup
5 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.