EPTShooting of Trayvon Martin - Page 429
| Forum Index > General Forum |
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP. If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
Ansinjunger
United States2451 Posts
On July 14 2013 12:05 Blennd wrote: I'm glad we were able to have such an unbiased unofficial moderator for this discussion. That's more or less what I was thinking. I appreciate xDaunt for not being on a high horse when posting in this thread. On July 14 2013 12:07 Tewks44 wrote: dAPhREAk was a fantastic unofficial moderator, constantly updated with relevant stories and put more dedication into this thread than most people put into their day jobs. His updating of the thread was indeed fantastic, and you could argue that the moderator note set him apart as kind of a moderator for this thread. However, I don't particularly feel the need to be guilt-tripped for initially thinking GZ was guilty back when the other thread was posted. I'd rather thank the informative people in this thread for helping me learn a lot, so this type of remark stings. | ||
|
omisa
United States494 Posts
I believe the jury made the correct decision. | ||
|
shockaslim
United States1105 Posts
On July 14 2013 12:03 Dubzex wrote: Are you saying black people don't want their neighboorhood to be safe? Stop racial profiling please. Depends on where you live. If you live in the hood, you NEVER talk because your family can easily get touched. If you are living in the suburbs......most likely will get better responses. | ||
|
Dubzex
United States6994 Posts
On July 14 2013 12:05 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: So the media is now trying to "actively" locate Zimmerman and his whereabouts. How have the lawsuits not started already? People on twitter are already posting his address and saying to kill him. The joys of social media~ | ||
|
Kleinmuuhg
Vanuatu4091 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
ZetaPulse
59 Posts
| ||
|
sc14s
United States5052 Posts
Race relations are fucked up because the media keeps making EVERYTHING about race. this pretty much hits the nail on the head. So tired of hearing about race every fucking day. The worst part is you get people who just parrot what they see on tv knowing literally nothing then when you say anything elsewise, obviously, you are racist. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
Edit: Trayvon Martin parent's attorneys now talking. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 14 2013 12:10 On_Slaught wrote: Al Shaprton saying they ("Civil rights leaders") are going to press the federal government to pursue the case now. I guess he's never heard of something called double jeopardy. What an asshat. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On July 14 2013 12:10 On_Slaught wrote: Al Shaprton saying they ("Civil rights leaders") are going to press the federal government to pursue the case now. and when the federal government says crimes are a states rights issue, al sharpton and all the other race baiters are going to cry foul and racism. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On July 14 2013 12:10 On_Slaught wrote: Al Shaprton saying they ("Civil rights leaders") are going to press the federal government to pursue the case now. How could they do that/ What will the Feds do make something up? | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On July 14 2013 12:13 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: How could they do that/ What will the Feds do make something up? I think he said something about it being a civil rights crime or hate crime or some shit. Also ranted about how he'll be found guilty in civil trial. How can NBC have one of their own show hosts talking like this on live television... | ||
|
NEOtheONE
United States2233 Posts
On July 14 2013 12:07 dAPhREAk wrote: did you make that decision after reviewing the evidence, or were you a bandwagoner like the majority of people? it appears the former, which is fine. its the people who had no idea what was happening and made decisions without any information or even waiting to hear what actually happened. To me if one person is alive and the other is dead, then there is a strong case for manslaughter. Just by the fact the other person is dead. I watched the trial and there was reasonable doubt everywhere. And therefore, not guilty was the only outcome. | ||
|
Millitron
United States2611 Posts
On July 14 2013 12:12 dAPhREAk wrote: and when the federal government says crimes are a states rights issue, al sharpton and all the other race baiters are going to cry foul and racism. I'd love to see Sharpton tried for about a thousand counts of slander and libel. | ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
I need filled in and my queries keep being ignored. | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
On July 14 2013 11:59 felisconcolori wrote: I guarantee you there will be a civil suit. A civil suit is not constrained by criminal cases, as OJ so amply demonstrated. And wrongful death is a lot easier to obtain than a guilty verdict, regardless of self defense laws and lack of direct witnesses. Edited to add: As explained to me by a police officer (and I live in Florida) during a class in college, before Stand Your Ground was even floated - "The thing I should see if you are going to state self defense is only front entry wounds, and you doing CPR on the corpse when I arrive on the scene." According to O'Mara, Stand Your Ground eliminates civil proceedings before they get started. | ||
|
AimForTheBushes
United States1760 Posts
| ||
|
publicenemies
458 Posts
| ||
| ||
