The Affordable Healthcare Act in the U.S. Supreme Court -…
Forum Index > General Forum |
This topic is not about the American Invasion of Iraq. Stop. - Page 23 | ||
xwoGworwaTsx
United States984 Posts
| ||
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On July 22 2012 00:44 imanoobcs wrote: They only go to Canada for Rx drugs that the government has not approved for use in America. Not because they are cheaper. It is a federal offense to import drugs that are already approved in America because they are cheaper. Regardless of legality, senior citizens fairly routinely organize trips north of the border to purchase medications for cheaper. What are the border police going to do, confiscate their medications which may have been purchased totally above-board if they spent a while in Canada and needed a refill? Have fun with that. | ||
Epocalypse
Canada319 Posts
So now after being ill for 7 weeks, losing his job, losing 15lbs because it's very painful to eat, me and a few of our close friends had gathered 370 dollars to bribe the doctor to up his appointment from 5 weeks from now to tomorrow. Fortunately the bribe worked. We just hope that the specialist will be able to figure out what is wrong with him in time. A few weeks ago we offered to drive him to the US to see a specialist and make a fun road trip out of it. Unfortunately he discarded the suggestion because he did not think it would be this bad. This is disgusting and saddening. Update: After meeting with the specialist, with an oral examination a minor lump was found but the doc could not tell what it is; it could just be a lump that has always been there, but needs further examination. As a precaution he ordered a catscan. However my friend forgot to ask how long it will be before he can get a catscan appointment. The doc is supposed to call him tomorrow with the arranged appointment. | ||
farvacola
United States18815 Posts
On August 03 2012 03:34 Epocalypse wrote: A friend of mine has been sick for 7 weeks now and his "doctor" can not figure it out. In fact, he lost his job because he missed so many days of work due to his ailment. Spend a few minutes and you will see what kind of pain he is in, he can barely speak. Yet, despite the obvious malady, he has to wait 5 weeks to see a specialist. He actually requested to see a specialist after the first set of antibiotics (which failed) they gave him. In Canada one cannot simply go see a specialist without first getting permission from a doctor. You can't just walk in, despite having worked hard for your money. So now after being ill for 7 weeks, losing his job, losing 15lbs because it's very painful to eat, me and a few of our close friends had gathered 370 dollars to bribe the doctor to up his appointment from 5 weeks from now to tomorrow. Fortunately the bribe worked. We just hope that the specialist will be able to figure out what is wrong with him in time. A few weeks ago we offered to drive him to the US to see a specialist and make a fun road trip out of it. Unfortunately he discarded the suggestion because he did not think it would be this bad. This is disgusting and saddening. First off, almost every major medical specialist will require a a recommendation from a general practitioner before an appointment, even in the United States. Additionally, what sort of specialist are you describing, and how did you come to the conclusions that such and such a specialist is what would best help your friend? Usually such observations are meant to be solidified through the recommendation of a general practitioner or hospitalist, as you are and your friends are hardly medically qualified enough to make any sorts of specialist assertion. Your story sounds totally fabricated is why I ask. | ||
karpo
Sweden1998 Posts
| ||
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
On August 03 2012 03:34 Epocalypse wrote: A friend of mine has been sick for 7 weeks now and his "doctor" can not figure it out. In fact, he lost his job because he missed so many days of work due to his ailment. Spend a few minutes and you will see what kind of pain he is in, he can barely speak. Yet, despite the obvious malady, he has to wait 5 weeks to see a specialist. He actually requested to see a specialist after the first set of antibiotics (which failed) they gave him. In Canada one cannot simply go see a specialist without first getting permission from a doctor. You can't just walk in, despite having worked hard for your money. So now after being ill for 7 weeks, losing his job, losing 15lbs because it's very painful to eat, me and a few of our close friends had gathered 370 dollars to bribe the doctor to up his appointment from 5 weeks from now to tomorrow. Fortunately the bribe worked. We just hope that the specialist will be able to figure out what is wrong with him in time. A few weeks ago we offered to drive him to the US to see a specialist and make a fun road trip out of it. Unfortunately he discarded the suggestion because he did not think it would be this bad. This is disgusting and saddening. It seems like all your friends or sick or injured. I call bullshit. | ||
karpo
Sweden1998 Posts
On August 03 2012 04:04 Defacer wrote: It seems like all your friends or sick or injured. I call bullshit. This. There's so much weird stuff in that post. Don't you usually go to a general practitioner first then a specialist? Doctors always have to eliminate the simple solutions first as a person is not a math problem ready to be objectively solved. Specialist doctors, at least in sweden, earn something like 100k-200k+ a year so it sounds fishy that $370 is enough to convince a doctor to do something that is unethical and probably illegal. Risking both your job and license for less than half a days pay... I'm pretty sure americans covered by healthcare insurance don't get to just pick a specialist and book an appointment. I'm also pretty sure that if you want to just walk into a specialists office and get an examination you'd have to pay a ton of cash. And even so i'd say that a system where people with money pay to circumvent the line hurt the collective more than it helps. But to a objectivist i guess money should always be the deciding factor on how people are treated. | ||
Zanno
United States1484 Posts
On August 03 2012 03:34 Epocalypse wrote: 7 weeks? took a family member of mine 7 months to get an appointment with a specialist to get rid of some skin condition and then had to threaten the specialist with a lawsuit when her primary care physician lost the name of the medicine she was prescribed and the specialist wouldn't give the name of it without waiting another 7 months to make an appointmentA friend of mine has been sick for 7 weeks now and his "doctor" can not figure it out. In fact, he lost his job because he missed so many days of work due to his ailment. Spend a few minutes and you will see what kind of pain he is in, he can barely speak. Yet, despite the obvious malady, he has to wait 5 weeks to see a specialist. He actually requested to see a specialist after the first set of antibiotics (which failed) they gave him. In Canada one cannot simply go see a specialist without first getting permission from a doctor. You can't just walk in, despite having worked hard for your money. So now after being ill for 7 weeks, losing his job, losing 15lbs because it's very painful to eat, me and a few of our close friends had gathered 370 dollars to bribe the doctor to up his appointment from 5 weeks from now to tomorrow. Fortunately the bribe worked. We just hope that the specialist will be able to figure out what is wrong with him in time. A few weeks ago we offered to drive him to the US to see a specialist and make a fun road trip out of it. Unfortunately he discarded the suggestion because he did not think it would be this bad. This is disgusting and saddening. | ||
Epocalypse
Canada319 Posts
On August 03 2012 03:34 Epocalypse wrote: A friend of mine has been sick for 7 weeks now and his "doctor" can not figure it out. In fact, he lost his job because he missed so many days of work due to his ailment. Spend a few minutes and you will see what kind of pain he is in, he can barely speak. Yet, despite the obvious malady, he has to wait 5 weeks to see a specialist. He actually requested to see a specialist after the first set of antibiotics (which failed) they gave him. In Canada one cannot simply go see a specialist without first getting permission from a doctor. You can't just walk in, despite having worked hard for your money. So now after being ill for 7 weeks, losing his job, losing 15lbs because it's very painful to eat, me and a few of our close friends had gathered 370 dollars to bribe the doctor to up his appointment from 5 weeks from now to tomorrow. Fortunately the bribe worked. We just hope that the specialist will be able to figure out what is wrong with him in time. A few weeks ago we offered to drive him to the US to see a specialist and make a fun road trip out of it. Unfortunately he discarded the suggestion because he did not think it would be this bad. This is disgusting and saddening. Update: After meeting with the specialist, with an oral examination a minor lump was found but the doc could not tell what it is; it could just be a lump that has always been there, but needs further examination. As a precaution he ordered a catscan. However my friend forgot to ask how long it will be before he can get a catscan appointment. The doc is supposed to call him tomorrow with the arranged appointment. Updated | ||
Epocalypse
Canada319 Posts
On August 03 2012 04:27 Zanno wrote: 7 weeks? took a family member of mine 7 months to get an appointment with a specialist to get rid of some skin condition and then had to threaten the specialist with a lawsuit when her primary care physician lost the name of the medicine she was prescribed and the specialist wouldn't give the name of it without waiting another 7 months to make an appointment Sounds terrible. I wish the government would just get out of the way of individuals and let them deal with one another like rational people. Unfortunately the US doesn't have total freedom in medicine but it's still much better than what we have in Canada. Evidence is that there are thousands of Canadian each year who travel to the US for care while Americans don't come to Canada for care. It's a shame that Romney and Obama both support socialized medicine. Soon Canadians may not have an alternative. At least in the US there is debate over it, organizations that promote freedom in medicine, while in Canada it's not even on the radar. There's a few journalists in Canada that have brought it up here and there over the years, but their reasoning was unprincipled, and therefore worthless. No politician's even mention it on their platform... the only thing they debate among each other is whether or not to give more funding to the healthcare system. | ||
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
| ||
BallinWitStalin
1177 Posts
On August 05 2012 20:08 Epocalypse wrote: Sounds terrible. I wish the government would just get out of the way of individuals and let them deal with one another like rational people. Unfortunately the US doesn't have total freedom in medicine but it's still much better than what we have in Canada. Evidence is that there are thousands of Canadian each year who travel to the US for care while Americans don't come to Canada for care. It's a shame that Romney and Obama both support socialized medicine. Soon Canadians may not have an alternative. At least in the US there is debate over it, organizations that promote freedom in medicine, while in Canada it's not even on the radar. There's a few journalists in Canada that have brought it up here and there over the years, but their reasoning was unprincipled, and therefore worthless. No politician's even mention it on their platform... the only thing they debate among each other is whether or not to give more funding to the healthcare system. Holy god you hurt my brain. Seriously, what is your deal? Canadian healthcare is fine. It's cost effective, and any time I, my family, or my friends have had some kind of medical issue it was taken care of promptly (within a reasonable amount of time, given the seriousness of the condition) and effectively. Our health care is fine. And the reason privatized healthcare is not even on the radar is because 90% of Canadians recognize that publicly funded medicine is the fairest, most equitable, and most cost-effective way to go. The reason public healthcare is not even talked about is because it would be political suicide for any politician to propose privatizing it. Because people are generally happy with publicly funded healthcare and the principles behind it. | ||
Kukaracha
France1954 Posts
On August 05 2012 20:08 Epocalypse wrote: Sounds terrible. I wish the government would just get out of the way of individuals and let them deal with one another like rational people. Unfortunately the US doesn't have total freedom in medicine but it's still much better than what we have in Canada. Evidence is that there are thousands of Canadian each year who travel to the US for care while Americans don't come to Canada for care. It's a shame that Romney and Obama both support socialized medicine. Soon Canadians may not have an alternative. At least in the US there is debate over it, organizations that promote freedom in medicine, while in Canada it's not even on the radar. There's a few journalists in Canada that have brought it up here and there over the years, but their reasoning was unprincipled, and therefore worthless. No politician's even mention it on their platform... the only thing they debate among each other is whether or not to give more funding to the healthcare system. *deal with one another like irrational people Clinics aren't allowed in Canada? | ||
ZeaL.
United States5955 Posts
On August 05 2012 20:08 Epocalypse wrote: Sounds terrible. I wish the government would just get out of the way of individuals and let them deal with one another like rational people. Unfortunately the US doesn't have total freedom in medicine but it's still much better than what we have in Canada. Evidence is that there are thousands of Canadian each year who travel to the US for care while Americans don't come to Canada for care. It's a shame that Romney and Obama both support socialized medicine. Soon Canadians may not have an alternative. At least in the US there is debate over it, organizations that promote freedom in medicine, while in Canada it's not even on the radar. There's a few journalists in Canada that have brought it up here and there over the years, but their reasoning was unprincipled, and therefore worthless. No politician's even mention it on their platform... the only thing they debate among each other is whether or not to give more funding to the healthcare system. Man I feel sorry for you dude. If you really live in Canada it must be very lonely . | ||
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
the best healthcare in the world couldn't save these ppl. from a lifetime of terrible habits to not only zero education on things such as nutrition , but tons of misinformation as well(encouraged by big business) | ||
Epocalypse
Canada319 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:22 Kukaracha wrote: *deal with one another like irrational people Clinics aren't allowed in Canada? Can you elaborate? There are walk-in clinics, but that's no different then a family doctor. Both are paid by the government and both follow the same regulations. But that's only for regular check up kinds of matters. There are no walk-in clinics for specialists like ear, throat, lungs, foot, heart, MRI, Catscans, etc... For all of those one needs to get permission from a general practitioner(GP) to be eligible to receive the service. But first the GP has to be convinced that you need it, and this is where it can work against your best interest. Not all GPs are equal, and our best GPs ran to the US to avoid restrictions and make more money. So we are left with the bottom of the barrel in most cases. And if you want a second opinion it's relatively easy to find another GP... just find a walk-in clinic, wait the 1-3 hours waiting time and see if they are any better. But let's say you do get permission to see a specialist, you wait the 3-5 weeks for your appointment and you then want a second opinion; what option is left to you? I'm not particularly sure because my friend did not seek a second opinion. However I would guess that I would have to go back to the GP, convince them that a second opinion is needed, then wait the 3-5 weeks again to see the next specialist. But do you see all the complications and steps one has to go through for something so simple? Why does it have to be so complicated? Why does one have to wait such long periods? It's the system that makes it so. On another topic: I don't have a statistic for this, but I wonder how many doctors currently practicing in Canada are from North America. It seems to me that all I see is doctors where English is not their primary language. But I'm in Toronto, Ontario, and some of the other posters from other provinces have pointed out that their experience is different than mine. | ||
MVega
763 Posts
While it seems harmless enough (and quite helpful) I'm really hoping that all the new healthcare stuff doesn't break the system or slow it down that badly. :/ The road to waiting 4 months to find out what a growth on your face may be is paved in good intentions. | ||
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
On April 01 2012 07:03 liberal wrote: The United State's rations care by cost, socialized medicine seems to ration care by waiting lists. Personally, I think it is better for an individual to have their life saved and yet be financially damaged than to have the care rationed to begin with. The time spent waiting is often worth more to a person than the price they would pay otherwise. Getting effective and timely treatment for a deadly condition is certainly worth the cost of declaring bankruptcy. I understand and respect your position. However, specialized and timely treatment for real illness or injury is not the problem. It can be argued that people being prescribed non-essential drugs, or going for unnecessary diagnostic treatments and elective surgery are contributing to the increasing the cost of health insurance. From the Wall Street Journal Blog: Mindful of concerns about health-care’s spiraling costs, the Health Blog was struck by some new research on what the investigators identified as wasteful practices by family doctors and general practitioners. Not being doctors, we can’t vouch for the clinical appropriateness of the findings, but there’s no harm in triggering a discussion, right? What did the researchers say was the No. 1 most over-used activity by primary care physicians? Prescribing a brand-name cholesterol-lowering drug without trying a less expensive generic first, according to the research posted online by the Archives of Internal Medicine. Doctors’ prescribing a brand-name statin, without first checking to see if a lower-priced generic drug would cut a patient’s cholesterol sufficiently, results in $5.8 billion in excess health-care spending, according to the research letter published Oct. 1. The authors found $6.76 billion in what they said was non-recommended health-care spending after analyzing surveys of patient visits to certain primary care doctors’ offices and hospital outpatient departments in 2009. Other practices deemed inappropriate by the authors: bone density scans for women ages 40 to 64 years, costing $527.4 million; ordering CT Scans or MRI’s for lower back pain, amounting to $175.4 million; and prescribing antibiotics to children with sore throats caused by a virus, worth $116.3 million. Although these sums aren’t chump change, the authors write that achieving affordable but high-quality health-care will really depend on finding ”‘high value’ targets” in specialty areas. There is also the argument that American health care providers are simply overcharging for everything. For example, an appendectomy -- a common emergency medical procedure -- costs $13000 in the US, more than double the cost of next most expensive countries, Switzerland and Canada ($5000 to 5800). Here's a link to an interactive graphic comparing the cost of specific medical procedures across countries, via the Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/business/high-cost-of-medical-procedures-in-the-us/ There is another simple reason health care in the United States costs more than it does anywhere else: The prices are higher. That may sound obvious. But it is, in fact, key to understanding one of the most pressing problems facing our economy. In 2009, Americans spent $7,960 per person on health care. Our neighbors in Canada spent $4,808. The Germans spent $4,218. The French, $3,978. If we had the per-person costs of any of those countries, America’s deficits would vanish. Workers would have much more money in their pockets. Our economy would grow more quickly, as our exports would be more competitive. There are many possible explanations for why Americans pay so much more. It could be that we’re sicker. Or that we go to the doctor more frequently. But health researchers have largely discarded these theories. As Gerard Anderson, Uwe Reinhardt, Peter Hussey and Varduhi Petrosyan put it in the title of their influential 2003 study on international health-care costs, “it’s the prices, stupid.” Prices don’t explain all of the difference between America and other countries. But they do explain a big chunk of it. The question, of course, is why Americans pay such high prices — and why we haven’t done anything about it. “Other countries negotiate very aggressively with the providers and set rates that are much lower than we do,” Anderson says. They do this in one of two ways. In countries such as Canada and Britain, prices are set by the government. In others, such as Germany and Japan, they’re set by providers and insurers sitting in a room and coming to an agreement, with the government stepping in to set prices if they fail. In America, Medicare and Medicaid negotiate prices on behalf of their tens of millions of members and, not coincidentally, purchase care at a substantial markdown from the commercial average. But outside that, it’s a free-for-all. Providers largely charge what they can get away with, often offering different prices to different insurers, and an even higher price to the uninsured. Full Washington Post article about high US Healthcare Costs So while you've convinced me that the individual mandate is not solution, I'm not sure what could be done to possibly reel in these costs, other than a socialized system. Edit: I accidentally bumped this thread when I went searching for an old post, and accidentally quoted it. Pre-emptive apologies. | ||
MadNeSs
Denmark1507 Posts
| ||
DoubleReed
United States4130 Posts
On September 06 2012 17:46 MadNeSs wrote: As an european reading all this bullshit hurts my eyes. Thank god I dont live in the U.S. I really dont get what americans are so scared about, about getting free healthcare - Is it really that scary to have to pay alittle extra tax? Americans are somehow convinced that the free market solves everything and anything. | ||
| ||