• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:50
CEST 20:50
KST 03:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202577RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced25BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 I offer completely free coaching services What tournaments are world championships?
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 777 users

If you're seeing this topic then another mass shooting hap…

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 727 728 729 730 731 891 Next
Although this thread does not function under the same strict guidelines as the USPMT, it is still a general practice on TL to provide a source with an explanation on why it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Failure to do so will result in a mod action.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-27 21:53:18
May 27 2018 21:24 GMT
#14561
On May 28 2018 05:50 superstartran wrote:
1.63 per 100k is pretty much nothing

You were previously very insistent that 0.3 per 100k is an epidemic.

I can quote your posts if you need me to.

You were extremely sure that anyone who thought that 0.3 per 100k was not an epidemic was, in your words, "an idiot".
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9118 Posts
May 27 2018 21:47 GMT
#14562
On May 28 2018 06:18 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2018 05:50 superstartran wrote:
The UK also has like no minority, the country is 87% white.

Go to London sometime buddy.

Even if it were 100% white, his comparison would make no more sense. There are white gangs in Scotland, counting all of homicides in one country vs just one demographic in another does not make it seem like there isn't a problem. It only makes it seem like he doesn't see other ethnic groups as equal citizens, a 'not my problem' mantra.
evilfatsh1t
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia8649 Posts
May 27 2018 23:36 GMT
#14563
i dont get sst's claim that the nra doesnt view guns as a tool for killing. like wtf?????
ask 100 randoms on the street that arent members of the nra "what is a guns purpose" and every single one of them would say "to inflict lethal damage" or something along those lines.
how deluded can you get
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24676 Posts
May 27 2018 23:49 GMT
#14564
On May 28 2018 08:36 evilfatsh1t wrote:
i dont get sst's claim that the nra doesnt view guns as a tool for killing. like wtf?????
ask 100 randoms on the street that arent members of the nra "what is a guns purpose" and every single one of them would say "to inflict lethal damage" or something along those lines.
how deluded can you get

I think this is an Australian viewpoint. I'm not saying that as a criticism, but if we did your experiment in Australia you would likely be correct, and if you did your experiment in the USA or a fair number of other places, you would be wrong. Most people I know who target shoot have never shot a living thing and think it's very unlikely they ever will.

Of course, there are a fair number of people here who would answer similarly to your prediction as well.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9118 Posts
May 27 2018 23:58 GMT
#14565
On May 28 2018 08:49 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2018 08:36 evilfatsh1t wrote:
i dont get sst's claim that the nra doesnt view guns as a tool for killing. like wtf?????
ask 100 randoms on the street that arent members of the nra "what is a guns purpose" and every single one of them would say "to inflict lethal damage" or something along those lines.
how deluded can you get

I think this is an Australian viewpoint. I'm not saying that as a criticism, but if we did your experiment in Australia you would likely be correct, and if you did your experiment in the USA or a fair number of other places, you would be wrong. Most people I know who target shoot have never shot a living thing and think it's very unlikely they ever will.

Of course, there are a fair number of people here who would answer similarly to your prediction as well.

They could target shoot with air guns. What is the purpose of the difference in lethality between firearms and air guns, if not damage? I guess entertainment would be an acceptable answer, but even that extra entertainment comes from the thought of what it can do, no? There's not much else there.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 00:06:36
May 28 2018 00:05 GMT
#14566
On May 28 2018 08:49 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2018 08:36 evilfatsh1t wrote:
i dont get sst's claim that the nra doesnt view guns as a tool for killing. like wtf?????
ask 100 randoms on the street that arent members of the nra "what is a guns purpose" and every single one of them would say "to inflict lethal damage" or something along those lines.
how deluded can you get

I think this is an Australian viewpoint. I'm not saying that as a criticism, but if we did your experiment in Australia you would likely be correct, and if you did your experiment in the USA or a fair number of other places, you would be wrong. Most people I know who target shoot have never shot a living thing and think it's very unlikely they ever will.

Of course, there are a fair number of people here who would answer similarly to your prediction as well.

Target shooters do not mean they're not a tool for killing. For target shooters proficiency with the tool is its own reward but that doesn't change the purpose. A chess board would be a good example of a tool that has been created purely to be used to demonstrate proficiency with the tool itself. A gun is to killing as a pen is to writing/drawing. Sure, both calligraphy and target shooting exist, but in neither case are they the purpose of the instrument.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24676 Posts
May 28 2018 00:08 GMT
#14567
On May 28 2018 09:05 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2018 08:49 micronesia wrote:
On May 28 2018 08:36 evilfatsh1t wrote:
i dont get sst's claim that the nra doesnt view guns as a tool for killing. like wtf?????
ask 100 randoms on the street that arent members of the nra "what is a guns purpose" and every single one of them would say "to inflict lethal damage" or something along those lines.
how deluded can you get

I think this is an Australian viewpoint. I'm not saying that as a criticism, but if we did your experiment in Australia you would likely be correct, and if you did your experiment in the USA or a fair number of other places, you would be wrong. Most people I know who target shoot have never shot a living thing and think it's very unlikely they ever will.

Of course, there are a fair number of people here who would answer similarly to your prediction as well.

Target shooters do not mean they're not a tool for killing. For target shooters proficiency with the tool is its own reward but that doesn't change the purpose. A chess board would be a good example of a tool that has been created purely to be used to demonstrate proficiency with the tool itself. A gun is to killing as a pen is to writing/drawing. Sure, both calligraphy and target shooting exist, but in neither case are they the purpose of the instrument.

You are changing the issue. evilfatsh1t made the dubious claim that if you asked 100 randoms what the purpose of a gun is that every single one of them would say to inflict lethal damage, or something along those lines. I pointed out that his assertion is likely true (or close to true) in Australia and very untrue in the U.S. If you wan't to have a discussion about what the purpose of guns are, you can, but I did not enter it and do not plan to (although it's been discussed here before many times).
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 00:30:33
May 28 2018 00:13 GMT
#14568
On May 28 2018 09:08 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2018 09:05 KwarK wrote:
On May 28 2018 08:49 micronesia wrote:
On May 28 2018 08:36 evilfatsh1t wrote:
i dont get sst's claim that the nra doesnt view guns as a tool for killing. like wtf?????
ask 100 randoms on the street that arent members of the nra "what is a guns purpose" and every single one of them would say "to inflict lethal damage" or something along those lines.
how deluded can you get

I think this is an Australian viewpoint. I'm not saying that as a criticism, but if we did your experiment in Australia you would likely be correct, and if you did your experiment in the USA or a fair number of other places, you would be wrong. Most people I know who target shoot have never shot a living thing and think it's very unlikely they ever will.

Of course, there are a fair number of people here who would answer similarly to your prediction as well.

Target shooters do not mean they're not a tool for killing. For target shooters proficiency with the tool is its own reward but that doesn't change the purpose. A chess board would be a good example of a tool that has been created purely to be used to demonstrate proficiency with the tool itself. A gun is to killing as a pen is to writing/drawing. Sure, both calligraphy and target shooting exist, but in neither case are they the purpose of the instrument.

You are changing the issue. evilfatsh1t made the dubious claim that if you asked 100 randoms what the purpose of a gun is that every single one of them would say to inflict lethal damage, or something along those lines. I pointed out that his assertion is likely true (or close to true) in Australia and very untrue in the U.S. If you wan't to have a discussion about what the purpose of guns are, you can, but I did not enter it and do not plan to (although it's been discussed here before many times).

Just to clarify my understanding, are you drawing a distinction here between the question of what the purpose of the tool is and what people would say the purpose of the tool is if asked? I made the assumption that you disagreed with the former, and responded supporting the former. Were you accepting his point about the purpose of the tool and only noting that people would probably get it wrong when asked?
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24676 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 00:38:29
May 28 2018 00:37 GMT
#14569
On May 28 2018 09:13 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2018 09:08 micronesia wrote:
On May 28 2018 09:05 KwarK wrote:
On May 28 2018 08:49 micronesia wrote:
On May 28 2018 08:36 evilfatsh1t wrote:
i dont get sst's claim that the nra doesnt view guns as a tool for killing. like wtf?????
ask 100 randoms on the street that arent members of the nra "what is a guns purpose" and every single one of them would say "to inflict lethal damage" or something along those lines.
how deluded can you get

I think this is an Australian viewpoint. I'm not saying that as a criticism, but if we did your experiment in Australia you would likely be correct, and if you did your experiment in the USA or a fair number of other places, you would be wrong. Most people I know who target shoot have never shot a living thing and think it's very unlikely they ever will.

Of course, there are a fair number of people here who would answer similarly to your prediction as well.

Target shooters do not mean they're not a tool for killing. For target shooters proficiency with the tool is its own reward but that doesn't change the purpose. A chess board would be a good example of a tool that has been created purely to be used to demonstrate proficiency with the tool itself. A gun is to killing as a pen is to writing/drawing. Sure, both calligraphy and target shooting exist, but in neither case are they the purpose of the instrument.

You are changing the issue. evilfatsh1t made the dubious claim that if you asked 100 randoms what the purpose of a gun is that every single one of them would say to inflict lethal damage, or something along those lines. I pointed out that his assertion is likely true (or close to true) in Australia and very untrue in the U.S. If you wan't to have a discussion about what the purpose of guns are, you can, but I did not enter it and do not plan to (although it's been discussed here before many times).

Just to clarify my understanding, are you drawing a distinction here between the question of what the purpose of the tool is and what people would say the purpose of the tool is if asked?
Yes. The issue was about what random people think or would say, not what the actual purpose of a gun is.
I made the assumption that you disagreed with the former, and responded supporting the former.
I personally expressed no agreement or disagreement with what the purpose of a gun is. I apologize if I implied a position when discussing target shooters.

Were you accepting his point about the purpose of the tool
No.
and only noting that people would probably get it wrong when asked?
See above.

My input was prompted by an invalid defense of of a position that, if you don't agree with it, makes you deluded.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 00:42:51
May 28 2018 00:41 GMT
#14570
If I were to say "1x1=1, ask anyone" presumably you'd also disagree. Feels a little pedantic to me if you're not interested in disputing the core question.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24676 Posts
May 28 2018 00:43 GMT
#14571
On May 28 2018 09:41 KwarK wrote:
If I were to say "1+1 is 2, ask anyone" presumably you'd also disagree. Feels a little pedantic to me if you're not interested in disputing the core question.

No I would not disagree. Most people, whether it be in the USA or for example, Australia, would agree. You did not take a controversial statement and then insist that pretty much everyone agrees with it, and anyone who doesn't is deluded.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 00:49:59
May 28 2018 00:46 GMT
#14572
On May 28 2018 09:43 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2018 09:41 KwarK wrote:
If I were to say "1+1 is 2, ask anyone" presumably you'd also disagree. Feels a little pedantic to me if you're not interested in disputing the core question.

No I would not disagree. Most people, whether it be in the USA or for example, Australia, would agree. You did not take a controversial statement and then insist that pretty much everyone agrees with it, and anyone who doesn't is deluded.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/terrence-howard-thinks-1x1-2-has-a-secret-system-called-terryology-and-spends-17-hours-a-day-making-10502365.html

Some people are deluded. You can find delusional people who disagree with anything. Even whether guns are a tool for killing things.

1+1 = 2 and guns are tools for killing. If you want to argue against either then feel free to do so. But it feels pedantic to jump in and object only on the grounds that not everyone would agree if asked if you're not willing to dispute the claim itself. Whether or not everyone would agree isn't central to the issue. There are always some people delusional people.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24676 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 00:52:57
May 28 2018 00:51 GMT
#14573
On May 28 2018 09:46 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2018 09:43 micronesia wrote:
On May 28 2018 09:41 KwarK wrote:
If I were to say "1+1 is 2, ask anyone" presumably you'd also disagree. Feels a little pedantic to me if you're not interested in disputing the core question.

No I would not disagree. Most people, whether it be in the USA or for example, Australia, would agree. You did not take a controversial statement and then insist that pretty much everyone agrees with it, and anyone who doesn't is deluded.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/terrence-howard-thinks-1x1-2-has-a-secret-system-called-terryology-and-spends-17-hours-a-day-making-10502365.html

Some people are deluded. You can find delusional people who disagree with anything. Even whether guns are a tool for killing things.

I'll withdraw the accusation of use of 'delusion' and yield to you your right to consider a large chunk of this country's population as delusional, but you should acknowledge that the point I was calling out was not valid. If half of Americans think the Earth is flat, am I really justified if I say, "What! The NRA thinks the Earth is flat!? That's delusional! I mean, if I asked 100 random people, all of them would say the Earth is not flat!"?
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 01:03:26
May 28 2018 01:02 GMT
#14574
On May 28 2018 09:51 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2018 09:46 KwarK wrote:
On May 28 2018 09:43 micronesia wrote:
On May 28 2018 09:41 KwarK wrote:
If I were to say "1+1 is 2, ask anyone" presumably you'd also disagree. Feels a little pedantic to me if you're not interested in disputing the core question.

No I would not disagree. Most people, whether it be in the USA or for example, Australia, would agree. You did not take a controversial statement and then insist that pretty much everyone agrees with it, and anyone who doesn't is deluded.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/terrence-howard-thinks-1x1-2-has-a-secret-system-called-terryology-and-spends-17-hours-a-day-making-10502365.html

Some people are deluded. You can find delusional people who disagree with anything. Even whether guns are a tool for killing things.

I'll withdraw the accusation of delusion and yield to you your right to consider a large chunk of this country's population as delusional, but you should acknowledge that the point I was calling out was not valid. If half of Americans think the Earth is flat, am I really justified if I say, "What! The NRA thinks the Earth is flat!? That's delusional! I mean, if I asked 100 random people, all of them would say the Earth is not flat!"?

I refuse to accept that half of Americans don't know that guns are used for killing things. If they've been exposed to a television then surely they'll have seen a gun used to provide the potential for lethal force, whether used as a threat or killing someone. Even if they just saw Looney Toons or Bambi or whatever, it's still pretty clear what guns do.

Americans know that guns are a tool for killing. Some might add that they're a tool for killing the bad guys, like when a cop or a soldier use them. Some might add that they can be used for defence, like letting weaker people kill evil strong people. Some might say that the threat of killing can be used in many situations. Some might say they only use them for killing animals for food. But you're going to have a consensus that the high speed projectile that comes out of the end of it around the same time it makes the noise is pretty dangerous and that the dangerous projectile is a feature, not a bug. Pull trigger, make bang, thing comes out, that's bad for whatever the thing hits. People know this, even Americans.

I don't think a large chunk of this country are delusional. But apparently you do.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24676 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 01:06:47
May 28 2018 01:05 GMT
#14575
On May 28 2018 10:02 KwarK wrote:
I refuse to accept that half of Americans don't know that guns are used for killing things.

I support your decision to refuse to agree with that straw man argument.

Most Americans know that guns are used for killing things. Possibly 100/100 randoms. I don't think they would respond to the original question the way it was asserted though. 50-75% might.

edit: We don't have valid data to point to here so it's really just a matter of agreeing to disagree once it's clear what the disagreement even is.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 01:11:51
May 28 2018 01:08 GMT
#14576
On May 28 2018 10:05 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2018 10:02 KwarK wrote:
I refuse to accept that half of Americans don't know that guns are used for killing things.

I support your decision to refuse to agree with that straw man argument.

It's really, really unclear what it is you actually think here. Could you try to express your views on the issue a little more clearly?

I'll happily concede the pedantry of "not everyone when asked will answer that way" because that's true of any statement, no matter how self evident it may appear. But beyond that pedantry I honestly still don't know if you disagree with the premise of guns being a tool for inflicting lethal damage, as it was originally phrased.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24676 Posts
May 28 2018 01:13 GMT
#14577
It's pedantry if I'm objecting because I think one of out 10,000 people will answer a different way. It's not pedantry if I'm objecting because I think 1/3 people will answer a different way, despite the strong claim that roughly 100/100 will answer the stated way. Your position seems to be that it really is roughly 100/100 that will answer the way evilfatsh1t did. I think you are wrong but since I don't have applicable non-anecdotal data we can only agree to disagree at this point.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
evilfatsh1t
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia8649 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 01:16:43
May 28 2018 01:15 GMT
#14578
On May 28 2018 10:05 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2018 10:02 KwarK wrote:
I refuse to accept that half of Americans don't know that guns are used for killing things.

I support your decision to refuse to agree with that straw man argument.

Most Americans know that guns are used for killing things. Possibly 100/100 randoms. I don't think they would respond to the original question the way it was asserted though. 50-75% might.

edit: We don't have valid data to point to here so it's really just a matter of agreeing to disagree once it's clear what the disagreement even is.

im not sure why youre arguing that 100/100 people probably wouldnt answer exactly how i said they would. it wasnt really my main point....
as kwark has been pointing out, the point of my statement was that the NRA's claim (or maybe its just SST's claim) that guns "are not a tool for killing" is ridiculous. even more hilarious is the fact that these guys are supposed experts and they are the main body in relation to firearms.
the 100/100 example was merely a hyperbole to make my stance. even in australia i could probably find some idiot who thinks guns are for entertainment
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13925 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 01:18:53
May 28 2018 01:17 GMT
#14579
Is the argument we're having over the argument that guns are "only a tool for killing"? Someone could legitimatly say that they're for intimidation and oppression if asked "what guns are for",
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-28 01:19:09
May 28 2018 01:18 GMT
#14580
On May 28 2018 10:17 Sermokala wrote:
Is the argument we're having over the argument that guns are "only a tool for killing"?

I don't think so; mostly it's just a typical highly pedantic argument that's happening; quibbling over some precise word choices, and nothing more.
the important thing is we finally get a page without startran.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Prev 1 727 728 729 730 731 891 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
18:00
RO8 Round Robin Group - Day 4
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
ZZZero.O192
LiquipediaDiscussion
FEL
09:00
Cracow 2025
SKillous vs LamboLIVE!
Clem vs TBD
Reynor vs TBD
RotterdaM2368
ComeBackTV 1849
IndyStarCraft 620
WardiTV418
CranKy Ducklings167
3DClanTV 153
Rex123
EnkiAlexander 105
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 2368
IndyStarCraft 603
Rex 119
Vindicta 49
MindelVK 17
StarCraft: Brood War
Shine 344
firebathero 276
ZZZero.O 177
BeSt 159
Soulkey 125
Dewaltoss 110
Hyun 58
Dota 2
qojqva4891
capcasts20
Counter-Strike
fl0m3662
flusha255
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1263
Mew2King578
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor605
Liquid`Hasu488
Other Games
Grubby1026
B2W.Neo874
Hui .199
KnowMe145
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2360
StarCraft 2
angryscii 22
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 51
• Legendk 11
• iHatsuTV 10
• LUISG 7
• davetesta6
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
• intothetv
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki7
• HerbMon 4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• Nemesis2402
• WagamamaTV799
Other Games
• imaqtpie1166
• Shiphtur331
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
16h 10m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 15h
WardiTV European League
1d 21h
Online Event
1d 22h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.