|
On December 28 2011 10:40 Fruscainte wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2011 10:38 Retgery wrote: Ok new depate topic. "Best/Greatest General of the WW2" Rommell Come at me. Show nested quote +On December 28 2011 10:40 N1ghtshade wrote:On December 28 2011 04:09 Sithelin123 wrote:I like World War 2 cause it resulted in Company of Heroes getting made. It is one of my favorite RTS games of all time. Also, Eastern front >>>>>>> Western front in epicness, Too bad that CoH didn't have an Eastern front version  I can't tell if you're trolling or really that heartless and juveneille. People gave their lives on both fronts, both sides. Those wo didn't die were still suffering, and that war has shaped the world today. The first thing you come up with is, "i like it cuz it reslted in vidya games liek coh and codwaw and nazi zombies." while we can enjoy games based on historical events, we shouldn't like such events that resulted in the deaths of millions. He may be a douche, but don't bash CoH  Rommel is kind of overrated in the eyes of the west. If you asked most military commanders at the time they would have said Von manstein.
|
|
Here is my personal WW2 story. The story about my grandfathers and grandmothers. Only my grandmothers are still alive and I often asked them about this time. It seems weird, but as a german, I often asked myself the question if I would have ended up beeing a Nazi too, if I was born at this time. Its weird but you want to know why people you love that much, like your grandparents, participated in such a horrible system of fear and murder. My grandmother grew up in a small village, her father (if I remember correctly) joined the NSDAP in the late 1930s, they didnt care much about politics. She told me, they often made jokes about Hitler and they laughed at the 2-3 SA guys that were running around town cause those actually were loosers that only felt strong cause of the brown made-up uniform. She was a typical part of the system, member of the BDM (youth organisation for girls), active in church, singing songs they learned in school and decorating the village when a high nazi-official visit... She once told me that she actually noticed that one day all the jewish ppl from her village were gone, but she never questioned it at this time. My grandfather was an engineer, when he joined the german army his job was it to build up radio- and communicationstations. I've never asked him this, but I dont think he killed someone during the war. But at his last day of war, when his unit was already retreating, an italian partisan came around a corner and opened machinegun fire on the open truck where he and his friends were sitting in. He was hit by 2 bullets, one in his leg, one in his foot. He was never able to walk properly again after this and he got addicted to morphine for quite some time.
My other grandfather was not that peacefully. He actually was born in romania but in a part where german settelers migrated to hundreds of years ago. When the war started he was young and dumb, he was really athletic and believed that cause he had "german blood" he was better and that he would have to join the fight. He joined the "Waffen-SS" when he was only 17. He got in so many battles that he actually recieved the "Nahkampfspange" in silver, a decoration for beeing really successful in alot of close combats. His unit was captured and when they were about to be brought to a gulag, he and some friends manage to flee. Later he tried to emmigrate to canada, but he couldnt when his SS-tattoo was found. He died before I was born, so I was never able to ask him questions. I dont know if I could have forgiven him for what he had done. His later wife (my other grandma) was a kid when the war was over. She lived in a german region that is now poland. She and her family had to flee from the russian army. On their escape she and her sisters had to expierience horrible things. Only a few from her once big family made it. Untill today she wont tell me how her father died and I have the feeling I dont want to make her remember.
I know in this thread ppl often talk about WW2 from the strategical point of view, I hope you dont mind, that I brought a little personal family-story in this. When you talk about losses in civilians and soldiers, please dont forget that you talk about actual ppl not just numbers. The lessons this war should teach us all is not a strategical one, but the responsibility to never let something like this happen again.
|
On December 28 2011 11:36 CrimsonLotus wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2011 05:14 sermokala wrote: your prospect saying that the Japanese had 0 chance of winning is pretty silly. America was down to just the enterprise as its only carrier in the entire pacific and even then it was heavily damaged While the japan imperial navy had its 4 carriers and an abusively superior gun fleet. The japs had a god level fighter in the zero at the beginning and had every other class of air craft pegged far above the american counter parts. half-way into the war this flipped as the japs were never able to manufacture replacements or even develop new craft. The real strength of the US navy during the pacific theater was its subs who hunted and killed And that's exactly why the Japanese had 0 chance of winning... It doesn't matter if they sunk all the pacific fleet at Pearl Harbor or if they win at Midway, the ability of the US to replace those losses was far, far greater than that of Japan. The US managed to defeat the japanese while dedicating most of it's resources to the war on Europe, if Germany hadn't declared war on the US the Pacific theater would have lasted two years tops. Show nested quote +On December 28 2011 06:00 GreEny K wrote: I disagree with some of the things in this OP. I'm not supporting Nazi Germany, but they definitely could have taken control of Britain. I don't think that's up for debate. Exactly how? The Kriegsmarine was always very inferior to the Royal Navy, and during the Battle of Britain the British made a lot more planes and suffered fewer losses: http://cz-raf.hyperlink.cz/BoB/stat.htmlThe germans also had an inferior program for pilot training and promotion. So, they had an inferior navy and didn't have a chance to archieve air superiority. Let say the germans somehow manage to land a few divisions on Great Britain, that's great, but how do they supply them exactly?
Considering they bombed London to smithereens, I think your perception of who had air control during the entire war is somewhat sketchy. Afaik Germany had periods of air control, especially early on in the war. Even if they had a superior navy it's all about intelligence. If you manage to launch a surprise attack (such as D-day) the British wouldn't have had a snowballs chance in hell. It's as far from Normany to England as it is from England to Normany so to speak, and the Germans had Normandy for quite a while. They had their focus elsewhere though.
|
On December 28 2011 11:36 CrimsonLotus wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2011 05:14 sermokala wrote: your prospect saying that the Japanese had 0 chance of winning is pretty silly. America was down to just the enterprise as its only carrier in the entire pacific and even then it was heavily damaged While the japan imperial navy had its 4 carriers and an abusively superior gun fleet. The japs had a god level fighter in the zero at the beginning and had every other class of air craft pegged far above the american counter parts. half-way into the war this flipped as the japs were never able to manufacture replacements or even develop new craft. The real strength of the US navy during the pacific theater was its subs who hunted and killed And that's exactly why the Japanese had 0 chance of winning... It doesn't matter if they sunk all the pacific fleet at Pearl Harbor or if they win at Midway, the ability of the US to replace those losses was far, far greater than that of Japan. The US managed to defeat the japanese while dedicating most of it's resources to the war on Europe, if Germany hadn't declared war on the US the Pacific theater would have lasted two years tops. Show nested quote +On December 28 2011 06:00 GreEny K wrote: I disagree with some of the things in this OP. I'm not supporting Nazi Germany, but they definitely could have taken control of Britain. I don't think that's up for debate. Exactly how? The Kriegsmarine was always very inferior to the Royal Navy, and during the Battle of Britain the British made a lot more planes and suffered fewer losses: http://cz-raf.hyperlink.cz/BoB/stat.htmlThe germans also had an inferior program for pilot training and promotion. So, they had an inferior navy and didn't have a chance to archieve air superiority. Let say the germans somehow manage to land a few divisions on Great Britain, that's great, but how do they supply them exactly? Show nested quote +On December 28 2011 09:27 Fruscainte wrote:Like I said on the first page, there was a huge Panzer division waiting ready to go in to Normandy at 6AM on D-Day that could have effectively stopped the invasion in its tracks, or at least make it EXTREMELY hard. Yet Hitler decided to sleep in, and only he could give such an order, and they weren't sent out until 3PM. Not to overblow that moment as a "war changing" one, but I wanted to make the point -- Germany had every opportunity to win and you'd be very ignorant to think otherwise. There are literally thousands of stories like this out there where miscommunications, messups in chain of command, etc. caused a massive failure in German war efforts. The timing was also bad, as someone said on the 2nd(?) page. Some of their most powerful weapons came at the very end of the war that could have outright won it for them if they had them from the beginning. I'm sorry, but this whole idea that Germany was a massive military juggernaut that only lost because of bad leadership is simply false. The germans lost because they where way, way over their head, faced agains three other great powers while having not one really significant ally on their side. Allied to Axis GDP ratio was over 2.0 for most of the war, the Germans never had enough oil to fuel their army, and the best chance they had to get that oil, Baku, was too deep in the Soviet Union to be a reasonable objective. Also, the germans where great at the tactical aspect of the war, but their logistics left a lot to be desireed. And most of their high tech weapons were a waste, the V Rockets had a very tiny effect compared to how much they cost, the Tiger I and Tiger II tanks where way, way too expensive and unreliable to be game changers, and the Me262 came to late, in too few number and without adequate fuel and pilots to make any difference.
I did not mean to imply they were a "military juggernaut", I was simply making the point that their horrendous leadership and command structure compounded onto their military issues in devastating manners. Of course they were way in over their head, however, it's no secret that with an organized command structure and a competent leader --- they would have done FAR more damage.
|
The Luftwaffe gave preference to bomber aircraft until late in the war, so they didn't assigned their best pilot to fighters until then.
The reason why the germans had so many aces was because most of their fighter planes where rather good, and faced very little opposition from the poorly trained soviet fighters using crap planes during 1941-1942.
The western pilots fared a lot better against the Luftwaffe
|
I think the lesson for Hitler (and for Napoleon) is that do not ever mess with the Russians.
|
I think it's silly to try and quantify who had "better" pilots, honestly. It all comes down to the individual. I personally think the Luftwaffe is extremely overrated, however, there were amazing pilots for all sides involved.
|
On December 28 2011 11:57 CrimsonLotus wrote:The Luftwaffe gave preference to bomber aircraft until late in the war, so they didn't assigned their best pilot to fighters until then. The reason why the germans had so many aces was because most of their fighter planes where rather good, and faced very little opposition from the poorly trained soviet fighters using crap planes during 1941-1942. The western pilots fared a lot better against the Luftwaffe
That sounds like one good argument for the point you want to make, but not like one which could stand alone.
|
On December 28 2011 11:58 Sufficiency wrote: I think the lesson for Hitler (and for Napoleon) is that do not ever mess with the Russians.
It's not even "don't mess with Russia", it's "don't mess with Russia during the fucking Winter"
You'd think someone would learn that by now. That territory is literally the worst, logistically, to invade.
|
On December 28 2011 12:02 Fruscainte wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2011 11:58 Sufficiency wrote: I think the lesson for Hitler (and for Napoleon) is that do not ever mess with the Russians. It's not even "don't mess with Russia", it's "don't mess with Russia during the fucking Winter" You'd think someone would learn that by now. That territory is literally the worst, logistically, to invade.
It's kind of hard to work out the time frame though, to mass all the materiel required and time it so you're ready to invade by spring time.
Hitler started the invasion of Russia in June IIRC, but I still doubt he would have won if he started in March.
|
Hmm just watched some WW2 in HD (history channel), then stumbled upon this thread, seems like a really well put together documentary, composed entirely of film taken during ww2, those who haven't seen it should check it out.
|
On December 28 2011 11:51 esperanto wrote:
My other grandfather was not that peacefully. He actually was born in romania but in a part where german settelers migrated to hundreds of years ago. When the war started he was young and dumb, he was really athletic and believed that cause he had "german blood" he was better and that he would have to join the fight. He joined the "Waffen-SS" when he was only 17. He got in so many battles that he actually recieved the "Nahkampfspange" in silver, a decoration for beeing really successful in alot of close combats. His unit was captured and when they were about to be brought to a gulag, he and some friends manage to flee. Later he tried to emmigrate to canada, but he couldnt when his SS-tattoo was found. He died before I was born, so I was never able to ask him questions. I dont know if I could have forgiven him for what he had done.
I find stories like this fascinating. From what I know about the waffen-ss it was mainly used as an elite unit to fight battles and the vast majority of the waffen-ss soldiers had nothing to do with war crimes. I hope no one takes this the wrong way but I think you should be proud of your grandfather for fighting for what he believed in and being a brave soldier. Also if you have any waffen-ss memorabilia laying around it is probably worth a fortune. I know a guy who makes a living buying/selling Nazi stuff and his biggest ticket items are waffen-ss and hitler jugend stuff.
|
The Luftwaffe gave preference to bomber aircraft until late in the war, so they didn't assigned their best pilot to fighters until then.
The reason why the germans had so many aces was because most of their fighter planes where rather good, and faced very little opposition from the poorly trained soviet fighters using crap planes during 1941-1942.
The western pilots fared a lot better against the Luftwaffe
most of the big number aces got their "kills" in the north african fights against british spitfires actually, and while the messerschmidts where superior their is just no way in hell to get those kind of numbers without actuall skill.
most of the russian airforce was bombed or captured on the ground actually, and the link even state that the german airforce did not count such as kills, only actual air to air combat. german tanks on the other hand are overrated, while being very powerfull they where slow and needed a lot of maintence which made it hard to use them in the actuall blitzkrieg strategy. the succesfull tanks in the early stages against france etc. where actually quit small and fast and very different from the famous tiger and panther models
|
On December 28 2011 09:13 Fruscainte wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2011 09:12 atwar wrote: lol at kidz saying russia didnt it all , ill give you an example russia was like the deathball coming to kill you and US was like the marine drops coming to kill a few drones and annoy you for germany. Both sides would have been fucked if it were not for the other. Stop trying to quantify "who did more"
/facepalm
No matter how many times people say it. Some Americans are just too deeply brainwashed/ignorant.
|
On December 28 2011 12:24 Feartheguru wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2011 09:13 Fruscainte wrote:On December 28 2011 09:12 atwar wrote: lol at kidz saying russia didnt it all , ill give you an example russia was like the deathball coming to kill you and US was like the marine drops coming to kill a few drones and annoy you for germany. Both sides would have been fucked if it were not for the other. Stop trying to quantify "who did more" /facepalm No matter how many times people say it. Some Americans are just too deeply brainwashed/ignorant.
...That Russia would have been in deep shit without America's help both logistically (with weapons, repairs, jeeps, etc.) and militarily (on the Western Front). And that America/Britain/Canada would have been in deeper shit without Russia preoccupying like 70-80% of Germany's military?
That makes me brainwashed?
*confused*
Do explain. Because you only make yourself out to be ignorant when you come in with a one liner going "THAT'S WRONG YOU'RE JUST AN IGNORANT AMERICAN LOL ALL AMERICANS ARE BRAINWASHED IDIOTS"
|
On December 28 2011 12:28 Fruscainte wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2011 12:24 Feartheguru wrote:On December 28 2011 09:13 Fruscainte wrote:On December 28 2011 09:12 atwar wrote: lol at kidz saying russia didnt it all , ill give you an example russia was like the deathball coming to kill you and US was like the marine drops coming to kill a few drones and annoy you for germany. Both sides would have been fucked if it were not for the other. Stop trying to quantify "who did more" /facepalm No matter how many times people say it. Some Americans are just too deeply brainwashed/ignorant. Do explain. Because you only make yourself out to be ignorant when you come in with a one liner going "THAT'S WRONG YOU'RE JUST AN IGNORANT AMERICAN LOL ALL AMERICANS ARE BRAINWASHED IDIOTS"
Well it's hard to argue against someone who cannot properly read but for my own entertainment I will reason with you.
By D-day (Africa and Italy only forced the Germans to allocate maybe 20 divisions) the Wehrmach was defeated. I'm sure the vast majority of the people in this thread agrees with this statement and if you do then my point is already proven. After Kursk in 1943 the Soviet Union had won the East, never once did Germany launch a major offensive after this (except Spring Awakening which failed horribly as expected). By D-Day time Russia had retaken the majority of lost territory and it was obvious that the war was going to end in Russia's favour. 500 fully strengthed divisions were destroyed in Russia as well as the entire airforce and most of the tankforce, the Western allies destroyed about 150 understrengthed divisions filled with new recruits given a few weeks training.
Now that we've established that, the only other influence the Western allies had was in resources. This consisted of some tens of thousands of jeeps, medium tanks and artillery (of far lower quality than those made in Russia) during the entire war compared to 60-80k tanks produced monthly in the Soviet Union.
Conclusion ---> Russia did all the work, Western allies did D-Day ONLY to make sure that all of Europe is not dominated by the Soviet Union once the war was over.
|
my great-grandfather fought in stalingrad and kicked some nazi ass, got captured tho lol
|
Netherlands45349 Posts
I am not 100% sure of this, but wasn't the reason that the Pearl Harbor attack ultimately failed is because an aircraft carrier(or more then one I forgot) was supposed to be docked at Pearl Harbor but was not?allowing the US to fight back?
|
On December 28 2011 11:19 GodOfWar wrote: Holocaust, Nanking Massacre and Unit731 were basically the most gruesome and horrific chapters in World War 2.
Chinese and Jews were the biggest victims of modern history, totally insane to believe they have treated whole cultures like animals, but thats the way of those crazy emperors.
The most ironic part is the Ashkenazi Jew is the number one in the world in terms of income and level of education and wield an enormous amount of power for such a minority. The other ironic part is the Chinese person will overtake the number two spot in this list of education/income (possibly first with time) and will certainly be perceived as THE most powerful ethnicity very soon.
From biggest victims to some of the most influential people in the world... quite amazing. Maybe karma? (if you go for that sort of thing )
|
|
|
|