|
On January 29 2015 04:35 yokohama wrote: Here is my collection since the holidays~ How are the Macallans? I'd like to try one, big Speyside fan here, but sadly they don't have the Macallans with age statements here ;(
Macallan "Gold" for $65... meh
|
infinity21
Canada6683 Posts
On January 29 2015 05:17 Djzapz wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2015 04:35 yokohama wrote: Here is my collection since the holidays~ How are the Macallans? I'd like to try one, big Speyside fan here, but sadly they don't have the Macallans with age statements here ;( Macallan "Gold" for $65... meh I went to a tasting for Macallan's new line and was not impressed. The Macallan 12 is one of my favourite whiskys but that taste is only available in the $250+ bottles in the new line. The lower ones were pretty light and not that interesting imo.
|
On January 29 2015 04:35 yokohama wrote:Here is my collection since the holidays~ + Show Spoiler + Now, here is someone who drinks their whisky! Love it.
Just a pet peeve of mine. Someone shows a nice photo of their collection on the internet, has about 30 bottles, and all are open missing only 2 drinks!! Seriously?!!?!? The thought of all that good whisky just oxidizing away just gives me the willies.
I have at least 2, sometimes 3 or 4 bottles open at 1 time. Never more than that. Only after I finish one can I open another. Just enjoy a wee dram or 2 every other night, it only takes a bit over a month to get through a bottle.
My reserves:
+ Show Spoiler [Bottles I have Open] +- Devils Cut (Jim Beam)
- Evan Williams single Barrel (almost gone)
- Ardbeg Corryvreckan
+ Show Spoiler [Bottles waiting] +- Ones I've had before I know I'll love:
Glenmorangie Original Evan Williams Original Wild Turkey 101 Ardbeg 10 Glenfiddich 15yo Solera Speyburn 10 (2x) Balvenie 15yo single barrel (discontinued) Monkey Shoulder George Dickel 12yo
- Bottles that will be a first try:
RedBreast 12 Longrow (white/gold label) Johnny Walker Green Label (discontinued) Montgomerie’s "Rare Select" - Ben Nevis 1995, 17 years Finlaggan Benromach 10yo (but I've had the Peat Smoke before, both batch 2 and 4, and it was superb) Old Pultney 12
|
Zurich15310 Posts
You can easily keep a bottle open for a year without anyone being able to tell the difference to an unopened bottle.
Even after oxidation sets in, it doesn't mean at all that the whiskey will go bad. It will gradually, very slowly change. And again this will hardly be noticeable to most people. Even if it is noticeable it's simply a change first, not necessarily for the worse. The bottle might even taste better. If you are super concerned get a $5 nitrogen can and spray that into your most expensive bottles.
|
Also if someone has 30+ bottles, they're probably not all opened. But yeah, seeing how a bottle changes over time is pretty fun.
By the way, I'm not a big fan of rye whiskies. I have a bunch of opened bottles of ryes right now and they won't change to be better, sadly. But a good one is the Alberta Premium Dark Horse. A strange whisky, I haven't tried anything like it before.
|
On January 29 2015 05:17 Djzapz wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2015 04:35 yokohama wrote: Here is my collection since the holidays~ How are the Macallans? I'd like to try one, big Speyside fan here, but sadly they don't have the Macallans with age statements here ;( Macallan "Gold" for $65... meh
The 12 year and 15 year Macallan I have are amazing! The 12 year is a good enough price to drink whenever I want, and the 15 year for special occasions is as smooth as velvet. I love the hint of buttery taste I get from them when they first hit my tongue, and it turns into a sweeter almost cherry taste at the end.
|
On January 30 2015 07:11 yokohama wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2015 05:17 Djzapz wrote:On January 29 2015 04:35 yokohama wrote: Here is my collection since the holidays~ How are the Macallans? I'd like to try one, big Speyside fan here, but sadly they don't have the Macallans with age statements here ;( Macallan "Gold" for $65... meh The 12 year and 15 year Macallan I have are amazing! The 12 year is a good enough price to drink whenever I want, and the 15 year for special occasions is as smooth as velvet. I love the hint of buttery taste I get from them when they first hit my tongue, and it turns into a sweeter almost cherry taste at the end. Excellent, maybe I'll have to travel to pick them up
|
Zurich15310 Posts
Really all Macallans are great and they scale pretty well with price. But even the 12yo is already excellent.
|
On January 30 2015 23:59 zatic wrote: Really all Macallans are great and they scale pretty well with price. But even the 12yo is already excellent. Is the NAS "Gold" Macallan any good though? I've read pretty mixed reviews and I'm not a big fan of categorizing scotch based on the color of the artificial color that's put in it... Hell, no age statement + categorization by color, I can't morally justify buying that product. I'll have to find the 12 or 15 years.
Sadly the Macallans with age statements are not available anywhere close actually
|
On January 30 2015 23:59 zatic wrote: Really all Macallans are great and they scale pretty well with price. But even the 12yo is already excellent. I consider Macallans to be the gold standards at their respective ages. They all are consistently excellent. You do pay a little bit of a premium for them, though. Frankly, if you want to get a whiskey-lover a nice gift (particularly professional colleagues), Macallan should be your go-to single malt. Everyone knows what it is and likes it.
|
I keep 8-10 bottles opened at a time. It's good to have a variety of everything both for yourself and for old friends.
Bottles only really get bad after you're over half-way done with it, at which point I make a concerted effort to finish it off. I know some people will split it into smaller containers at this point, or cork it with an inert gas, but I think finishing it in fine company does an old bottle much more justice.
|
On January 29 2015 21:44 Djzapz wrote: Also if someone has 30+ bottles, they're probably not all opened. But yeah, seeing how a bottle changes over time is pretty fun.
By the way, I'm not a big fan of rye whiskies. I have a bunch of opened bottles of ryes right now and they won't change to be better, sadly. But a good one is the Alberta Premium Dark Horse. A strange whisky, I haven't tried anything like it before. It's true sometimes they are better after being open for a couple weeks or more ... especially for Glenfiddich 15 ... so interesting. I think the most change I've seen from start to finish in a bottle is Benromach Peat Smoke. The thing starts of with a kind of sour, lime type taste. The smoke starts to come out more as it oxidizes and the sour taste fades. At a month or so you really loose a bit of the smoke and start to get a really rounded sweetness. Man that's a fantastic bottle every time.
|
On February 01 2015 10:51 CursOr wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2015 21:44 Djzapz wrote: Also if someone has 30+ bottles, they're probably not all opened. But yeah, seeing how a bottle changes over time is pretty fun.
By the way, I'm not a big fan of rye whiskies. I have a bunch of opened bottles of ryes right now and they won't change to be better, sadly. But a good one is the Alberta Premium Dark Horse. A strange whisky, I haven't tried anything like it before. It's true sometimes they are better after being open for a couple weeks or more ... especially for Glenfiddich 15 ... so interesting. I think the most change I've seen from start to finish in a bottle is Benromach Peat Smoke. The thing starts of with a kind of sour, lime type taste. The smoke starts to come out more as it oxidizes and the sour taste fades. At a month or so you really loose a bit of the smoke and start to get a really rounded sweetness. Man that's a fantastic bottle every time. Good to know :D multiple experiences in one bottle, it's a great deal ^^
|
Hey, sorry to bump this (not really).
I like Glenlivet and I'm thinking of picking up the limited edition of Glenlivet Guardian's Chapter. Any opinions? I'd be surprised if anybody here had tried but but there you go!
|
Tried the Black Art 04.1 yesterday. It was nice but I enjoyed the Black Art 3 more, and that one was much cheaper. Overall a very nice whisky though. Bruichladdich is a close second to Ardbeg for me, and if they keep this up they might surpass them.
|
On February 09 2015 21:50 OminouS wrote: Tried the Black Art 04.1 yesterday. It was nice but I enjoyed the Black Art 3 more, and that one was much cheaper. Overall a very nice whisky though. Bruichladdich is a close second to Ardbeg for me, and if they keep this up they might surpass them. Out of interest I went to see what the internet has to say about Bruichladdich and that particular edition. Google Black Art 3. On the official site: + Show Spoiler +THE “BLACK ART” OF DISTILLER JIM MCEWAN:EVEN WE DON’T KNOW HOW JIM HAS CONJURED-UP THIS SUBLIME DRAM – THIS IS SOMETHING HE ALONE HAS CRAFTED (IN DEAD OF NIGHT?) A DARK, SENSUOUS WHISKY, VERY FINE, INCREDIBLY ELEGANT, DECADENTLY HUED, PERPLEXINGLY COMPLEX, MISCHEVIOUSLY PREPARED AND SUBTLY PROVOCATIVE. BEGUILING, OTHER-WORLDLY... INSPIRED
What color is it? Moroccan sunset (Morocco specifically, not any other bitch ass sunset) And how is the finish? The finish is heart-warming, lasting long into the night. The flavours are like friends who listen and never disagree; who give comfort and companionship when there is no one else around; or in company, they bring out the best in all who partake of the Black Art.
Far from me to be dissuaded from buying something because of silly marketing (we're all human), this description is annoying the fuck out of me. Paul bring me the great book of adjectives. The guy who writes on the Bruichladdich site should go write high fantasy
|
On January 29 2015 17:24 zatic wrote: You can easily keep a bottle open for a year without anyone being able to tell the difference to an unopened bottle.
Even after oxidation sets in, it doesn't mean at all that the whiskey will go bad. It will gradually, very slowly change. And again this will hardly be noticeable to most people. Even if it is noticeable it's simply a change first, not necessarily for the worse. The bottle might even taste better. If you are super concerned get a $5 nitrogen can and spray that into your most expensive bottles.
I disagree. Are you the kind of person who will leave a bottle of wine open over night and drink it the next day though?
|
On February 10 2015 13:49 IgnE wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2015 17:24 zatic wrote: You can easily keep a bottle open for a year without anyone being able to tell the difference to an unopened bottle.
Even after oxidation sets in, it doesn't mean at all that the whiskey will go bad. It will gradually, very slowly change. And again this will hardly be noticeable to most people. Even if it is noticeable it's simply a change first, not necessarily for the worse. The bottle might even taste better. If you are super concerned get a $5 nitrogen can and spray that into your most expensive bottles. I disagree. Are you the kind of person who will leave a bottle of wine open over night and drink it the next day though? You are outright wrong . If you want to drink the whisky in its "original" form you have to do it quickly, but you can leave it for months and it'll change gradually, without going bad necessarily. If your bottle is almost empty, then it'll oxidize quickly and you keep it for too long, but if you still have say 375ml in a 750ml bottle, it'll stay "good" for a few months. Whisky doesn't break down quite as fast as wine does.
|
Talisker Destillers Edition is my favorite followed by Ardbeg 10. Delicious stuff!
Protip: If u want to party without headache the next day, try german beer (Reinheitsgebot), preferably a bavarian one and quality single malt. Don't combine it in a drink, lol :D one after another.
|
Went to buy a bottle today and they let me try the Eagle Rare single barrel 10 years from Kentucky. Wow. Tempted to pick it up even though I'm well over budget already.
I only had a tiny little sample sized glass but oh my god. Sweet, powerful arrival with the dark fruit notes of the Elijah Craig, except with twice the intensity, with a slightly harsh but not unpleasant finish that would possibly go away given a few more years (I believe an older version is available and I bet it's fantastic).
|
|
|
|