Judge beats daughter for using the internet - Page 23

On November 02 2011 14:49 ThreeAcross wrote:


Classic moron.

As with others, I was raised with corporal punishment. My father never 'spanked' me out of anger or malice. There would be a swat by the hand or belt on the rear. Afterwards he would take us aside and explain to us, calmly, why we were being punished. I can remember being angry at the time, but life has a weird way of opening your eyes to your parents doings. Raising kids of my own now, I use the same principles my father did and will continue to.

That being said, what this 'man' did was horrendous. This is straight child abuse and shouldn't be tolerated.

On November 02 2011 14:58 eu.exodus wrote:
wow i really can't believe some of the replies here. maybe you would like you parents to beat the shit out of you for playing starcraft and watching streams? what kind of stupid logic is this? seriously, Im all for discipline and sometimes there's a need to use a belt. hell I've been beaten with a fist and had shit thrown at me like glasses and ashtrays which i would have reported if i didn't think i deserved it. but for fuck sake. gaming? what shit is that? there are other ways of dealing with that shit. make restrictions or block ports or fucking something. beating your kids for that shit doesn't really accomplish anything.

On November 02 2011 14:58 eu.exodus wrote:
beating your kids for that shit doesn't really accomplish anything.

On November 02 2011 14:59 Robinsa wrote:

My dad took me aside and just explained calmly why something was bad as well. That worked great. I hate say it but the beating part is unnecessary and you only us it as a reason for you to abuse your children. Maybe its the beating as a child that has made you thik its an ok practice in the first place ?

What do you mean? What child abuse?

Well, Judge William Adams has held that a child should be ignored when the child reports what a child psychologist has described as "horrific child abuse."

He has held that a child's report of child abuse is no evidence and that a parent and her lawyer who relies on what a child says should be sanctioned. He has ruled that it is frivolous to believe a child merely because the child is a child.

He has ignored the fact that the child's report of child abuse was corroborated by impartial third party witnesses who confirmed that the child was where he said he was, when he said he was, with people he said abused him, etc. Actually, he lied and said this evidence didn't even exist.

He has even held it is irrelevant a proposed child care provider is psychotic, homicidal, suicidal, hullucinatory, heavily drugged, etc.

Why would a judge do that? It can be inferred that his apparent affair with one of the child abusers may explain this bizarre behavior. He was observed caressing one of the child abuser's shoulders in the hallway outside the courtroom. That's strange.

One that is for sure it takes courage to look after children when the system is corrupt. We must do it.

We still do not know all the contours of the best interests of the child but we do know thanks to Judge William Adams the mental health of the primary child care provider is not relevant to "best interests."

3) Children should never be believed. This includes a child who everybody describes as bright and honest. If a child says he was abused, he should be ignored. If a parent doesn't ignore the child, the parent should be sanctioned (and her lawyer).

4) Similarly, if child says he has been abused, the alleged abuser should be asked whether he abused the child. If the alleged abuser denies the abuse, the issue should be dropped.

5) If the child says various people were present during the abuse, then those people have no relevance as witnesses. If the child's parents attempts to question them, she should be sanctioned (and her lawyer also).

6) If the child says he was abused at a restaurant, but people who abused the child deny having been at the restaurant at the relevant time, it is irrelevant that two waiters at the restaurant say they were there.

7) All children are fantasizers all the time; thus, anyone, who believes a child is frivolous and must be sanctioned.

8) If there is no videotape of something, it should not be presented in Court. No videotape, then it didn't happen.

9) Written communication don't count; only phone calls.

10) If a witness he doesn't have a clue what the charts he present mean or how they were created, then this means the charts are conclusive proof.

These are just a few "Judge William Adams" pearls of judicial wisdom. His wisdom is too vast to be learned in just one lesson.

On November 02 2011 14:33 R3demption wrote:
My parents disciplined me growing up and I wholeheartedly believe it helped me to learn the morals that I have today.

But a few notes. I was only whipped with a belt up until I was like 10. I was whipped when I seriously acted up. After I was 10 I learned to respect my parents so much that I didn't have to be physically punished to learn something from them.

But watching this video makes my heart sink.... FOR ALL PARENTS OUT THERE PLEASE DO NOT DISCIPLINE YOUR KIDS WITH ANGER OR MALICE. If you want them to learn please discipline them in a calm, controlled manner specifically laying out why you are delivering the punishment. That's how my parents did it and that's why I am so thankful they are my parents. One thing I remember so clearly is that my Dad NEVER cussed at me when he punished me. It just sends so many mixed messages.

But like I said in a few pages before. This guy is so angry I wouldn't be surprised if he is intoxicated. This is probably a domestic violence case with alcohol involved. God help that little girl.

On November 02 2011 14:22 jonathan1 wrote:
i thought this sort of thing happened to most kids. i know i got belted several times as a kid.

What makes you think that? America and the EU still have the highest GDPs per capita in the world, while most of Asia is far behind. There is literally no benefit to corporeal punishment, it is a silly relic of a bygone era. Just because you lived through it does not make it good, right or effective.

Hell to throw out an equally subjective example, I don't think myself or my sister were even yelled at as children or teenagers(outside of stop pinching each other in the back seat you hooligans!). The worst we ever got were disproving stares or talks for anything serious. We both went to top tier undergraduate and graduate schools.

On November 02 2011 14:22 jonathan1 wrote:
Everyone who does this is a fucking asshole. Any practice like this or worse is wrong. I don't give a fuck about culture, beating your kids isn't necessary to teach them write and wrong.

On November 02 2011 15:06 No_Roo wrote:
Corporal punishment is like queuing up SCV's. it's better than not building SCV's but it's still really lazy and nowhere as good as building them properly.

This video as others have pointed out though doesn't demonstrate corporal punishment at all, this is a guy beating his daughter in obvious anger.

On November 02 2011 15:06 No_Roo wrote:
Corporal punishment is like queuing up SCV's. it's better than not building SCV's but it's still really lazy and nowhere as good as building them properly.

This video as others have pointed out though doesn't demonstrate corporal punishment at all, this is a guy beating his daughter in obvious anger.

On November 02 2011 15:06 No_Roo wrote:
Corporal punishment is like queuing up SCV's. it's better than not building SCV's but it's still really lazy and nowhere as good as building them properly.

This video as others have pointed out though doesn't demonstrate corporal punishment at all, this is a guy beating his daughter in obvious anger.

On November 02 2011 15:09 Trevoc wrote:
I live in Texas and I am literally getting the urge to find this guy and beat his ass.
Who's with me?