|
Baltimore, USA22251 Posts
Coolest mom ever, amirite? 
Mom Indicted for Hiring Stripper for Teen
Saturday, May 28, 2005
NASHVILLE, Tenn. - A mother faces criminal charges after she hired a stripper to dance at her 16-year-old son's birthday party.
Anette Pharris, 34, has been indicted by a grand jury on charges of contributing to the delinquency of a minor and involving a minor in obscene acts. The boy's father, the stripper and two others also face charges.
"I tried to do something special for my son," Pharris said. "It didn't harm him."
About 10 people under the age of 18 were at the birthday party in September, including minors who were not related to the family, authorities said.
Police spokesman Don Aaron said minors are not permitted in adult establishments.
"A person shouldn't be allowed to circumvent that law by hiring a stripper, a lady who took all her clothes off and spent a good amount of time dancing around minors," he said.
Anette Pharris took photos at the party and tried to have them developed at a nearby drug store. Drug store employees notified authorities, police said.
"Who are they to tell me what I can and can't show to my own children?" the mother said.
|
If I asked my mom to hire a stripper for my birthday party, she'd say "yeah sure thing". I don't really see the big deal there. I didn't know that this type of this was illegal for minors...
damn
|
fuck, all my mom got me was a clown. :/
|
Awesome mom!
"Who are they to tell me what I can and can't show to my own children?" the mother said.
That's true, but there were other minors there, as well.
|
Hm...I wonder how this will go.
For one, it's not that big of a deal, but two, some activists or whatever the fuck you want to call them will protest to make an example out of this.
Damn them, you can't even bump into someone anymore without facing charges.
|
34 minus 16 = 18, subtract another 9 months plus 1-2 give or take for the accident to occur and it`s really not too difficult to see what`s going on with the family. ; )
|
On May 28 2005 20:36 Eclipse.fX wrote:
34 minus 16 = 18, subtract another 9 months plus 1-2 give or take for the accident to occur and it`s really not too difficult to see what`s going on with the family. ; )
LOL good observation...
|
On May 28 2005 20:36 Eclipse.fX wrote:
34 minus 16 = 18, subtract another 9 months plus 1-2 give or take for the accident to occur and it`s really not too difficult to see what`s going on with the family. ; )
I don't understand at all... Elaborate plz
|
On May 28 2005 20:40 neSix wrote:Show nested quote +On May 28 2005 20:36 Eclipse.fX wrote:
34 minus 16 = 18, subtract another 9 months plus 1-2 give or take for the accident to occur and it`s really not too difficult to see what`s going on with the family. ; ) I don't understand at all... Elaborate plz
The mother is 34.
The son is 16, so she had her son when she was around 17.
|
On May 28 2005 20:44 ieatkids5 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 28 2005 20:40 neSix wrote:On May 28 2005 20:36 Eclipse.fX wrote:
34 minus 16 = 18, subtract another 9 months plus 1-2 give or take for the accident to occur and it`s really not too difficult to see what`s going on with the family. ; ) I don't understand at all... Elaborate plz The mother is 34. The son is 16, so she had her son when she was around 17.
ROFLMAO wow this situation has become 10 times clearer for me
|
Wow.
Who is wrong?
As it happened,the matter of fact had harmed everyone.
|
On May 28 2005 20:26 EvilTeletubby wrote:Coolest mom ever, amirite?
"Who are they to tell me what I can and can't show to my own children?" the mother said.
THis statement I agree with, but the problem is, she didn't just show her to her own child, I think thats fine, but:
"About 10 people under the age of 18 were at the birthday party in September, including minors who were not related to the family, authorities said."
If she cleared it with their parents, then thats fine too, but I have a feeling that she didn't
|
On May 28 2005 20:26 EvilTeletubby wrote:
Anette Pharris took photos at the party and tried to have them developed at a nearby drug store. Drug store employees notified authorities, police said.
Is that legal
|
Yes, if the activity in question is illegal.
|
Baltimore, USA22251 Posts
On May 28 2005 22:39 NettleS wrote:Show nested quote +On May 28 2005 20:26 EvilTeletubby wrote:
Anette Pharris took photos at the party and tried to have them developed at a nearby drug store. Drug store employees notified authorities, police said.
Is that legal
Legal, yes, so long as the incident occured legally... however, my understanding was like 99% of strippers don't allow pictures (or at least, their "pimps" don't).
|
her son must have had a gay friend in the closet who ratted them out
|
On May 28 2005 23:00 hasuwar wrote:
her son must have had a gay friend in the closet who ratted them out
Read a couple of posts above yours...it seems the person developing the photo's ratted them out.
Anyways, even if it was one of his friends, it probably would have been because he told his parents for some reaosn(shit happens) and they forced him to tell the police. That's how it works, right?
|
On May 28 2005 20:31 Ha.cK wrote:
If I asked my mom to hire a stripper for my birthday party, she'd say "yeah sure thing". I don't really see the big deal there. I didn't know that this type of this was illegal for minors...
damn
Not mine...
|
On May 28 2005 22:57 EvilTeletubby wrote:Show nested quote +On May 28 2005 22:39 NettleS wrote:On May 28 2005 20:26 EvilTeletubby wrote:
Anette Pharris took photos at the party and tried to have them developed at a nearby drug store. Drug store employees notified authorities, police said.
Is that legal Legal, yes, so long as the incident occured legally... however, my understanding was like 99% of strippers don't allow pictures (or at least, their "pimps" don't).
he was asking if its legal for people who develop them to use that information.
i wonder that too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
