• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:02
CEST 02:02
KST 09:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202530RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams2Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Corsair Pursuit Micro?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 628 users

The future of graphics in games - Page 5

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 16 17 18 Next All
MrCon
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
France29748 Posts
August 01 2011 17:34 GMT
#81
Isn't this "atom" thing was used in outcast ? They used no polygon and all the rendering was done by the CPU.
Danjoh
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden405 Posts
August 01 2011 17:35 GMT
#82
On August 02 2011 02:24 DeltaSigmaL wrote:
Many people seem to doubt the demonstration based on the supposed memory requirements the system would need. Is there a demonstration using polygons that can acheive detail like this? Even if this does take up absurd amounts of memory, it's still cool that you can render those scenes so quickly.

A presentation could probably be done in microstation/autocad quite easely with point cloud that they're using. Since most of the things they showed were exactly thesame thing, they could've just attached a whole bunch of references.
Never made a presentation movie in MicroStation myself, but I saw one made over a road... I think it was 2 minutes long, highly detailed and very fluent in I think it was 20fps also. But they said that after they had the whole thing referenced in, and had layed out the camera path. It took the computer 18 hours or something like that to create it.
Deleted User 101379
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
4849 Posts
August 01 2011 17:37 GMT
#83
On August 02 2011 02:34 MrCon wrote:
Isn't this "atom" thing was used in outcast ? They used no polygon and all the rendering was done by the CPU.


It was Voxel Space Technology, basically the same thing. The first game using it was released in 1992 (so several years older than SC).

It was later made obsolete because Polygon graphics were a lot more Memory and CPU efficient than Voxels and graphic cards only supported polygons.
Bibdy
Profile Joined March 2010
United States3481 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-01 17:43:03
August 01 2011 17:41 GMT
#84
On August 02 2011 02:34 MrCon wrote:
Isn't this "atom" thing was used in outcast ? They used no polygon and all the rendering was done by the CPU.


Yep. Voxels. Used in Delta Force, Command and Conquer: Tiberian Sun and many others back in the 90s.

I think I'm with this guy and the quote he dug up:

On August 02 2011 02:00 arbitrageur wrote:
A comment on the video:

"The word you're looking for is Voxels, and its a technology that's as old as polygons. You've got nothing new here.

You're passing off basic fundamental well-known 3d rendering techniques as something new and fascinating by making up your own words for decades old technology and fluffing it up with... fluffy meaningless phrases like "UNLIMITED POWAR!!!".

Oh well, have fun fleecing your investors then disappearing with the money as all modern snake oil salesman do.
NinjaSeg 2 months ago 20 "


It just looks like voxels. Smaller voxels, thanks to more powerful processors, but voxels nevertheless. The limitations of which have already been explored and thus the industry more readily adopted polygons as the primary rendering technique. Hell, that's all GPUs do. Render polygons by doing a metric fuckton of vector and matrix math in real-time, so essentially the whole thing HAS to be rendered by the CPU, because the GPU isn't built for it. I don't find it a coincidence that the video is rendered at a piss-poor level of detail in order to hide it's shortcomings. Come up with 'IMPOSSIBLE DETAIL' and only render in 480p? Really?

The whole thing seems like a means to grab investor money and then bail.
rasnj
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1959 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-01 17:43:25
August 01 2011 17:42 GMT
#85
On August 02 2011 02:32 RageOverdose wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 01:57 Blyadischa wrote:
I don't understand this...

Does anyone think that their "atom"-based graphics look like graphics from games from like 7 years ago?


Like they said, they aren't artists.

A lot of what you see today is just artistic, from the high contrast to the exaggerated blurs. They don't seem to have very interesting lighting or specular mapping so it looks boring and bland, but the detail is a lot higher otherwise.

Also, he's throwing around unlimited and unlimited is, of course, technically impossible because even with compression and decompression and streaming, you still need to have space for it all.

In all likelihood, just like all graphics technology, you'll be able to utilize this technology in bits and pieces where it seems fit and not just render a whole world with it and every little granulation of it you can think of. I would expect maybe world objects, like trees or leaves, to be utilizing point-cloud atoms while the character models still use normal polygons (if it's an FPS, probably the gun would also use atoms). The dirt would probably still be a textured surface of polygons done in a more regular fashion, with maybe certain objects (still objects) utilizing atoms.

Maybe someday it can be utilized for everything. Maybe.

Still, I want to see a better tech demo than this. I'm skeptical, but the cries of "impossible" are as exaggerated as this promo video.

They seem to have no real claims beyond their UNLIMITED power which is obviously bogus.

The only "technical" details do not explain how this is different from any voxel rendering system (perhaps with a sparse representation of graphics).

The video has very little actual content. What it has is either clearly incorrect, meaningless, or not impressive. The video itself could obviously easily be created with existing polygonal technology and may even be prerendered. We have no evidence that this video is or is not genuine, but even if genuine it does not seem impressive from a classical standpoint.

Just like with people claiming to have constructed perpetual motion machines, techniques for turning water into wine, and creating gold from common metals these claims are hard to refute because we are given very few details. From what little is given it seems unlikely to work anything like advertised. Until a proper technical explanation is provided there is no reason to assume this is anything spectacular.
Hobosnipe
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada13 Posts
August 01 2011 17:42 GMT
#86
This probably won't be out for a long time.
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
August 01 2011 17:43 GMT
#87
Considering this was all static/unanimated, I would be tempted to believe that they CAN render it real time. Animation/physics? Unlikely.

The real issue I have with this is: Data transfer rate. EVERY big render they showed was full of clones. It makes loading and storing that data trivial. Load data for one object, render it 10000 times.
But what happens when you want to have graphics where everything is unique? Well, at least WAY less repetitive than what they showed? There is no way you can stream data THIS quickly with current (affordable) technology. You can't pre-load it either because the sheer amount of data will be too much.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Disquiet
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia628 Posts
August 01 2011 17:48 GMT
#88
So basically they say that companies spend millions of dollars on this, then proceed to explain the theory behind it, and that its already used in other industries. Then they expect us to believe they are are the only ones who can adapt this to video games? Yeah right, theres probably very good technical reasons why this isn't used. If were really groundbreaking like they say they would not need to make public videos on youtube to hype it, and major games companies would already be all over them in negotiations.
sVnteen
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany2238 Posts
August 01 2011 17:50 GMT
#89
woooooooooooooooooooow
sick
MY LIFE STARTS NOW ♥
maartendq
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Belgium3115 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-01 17:53:31
August 01 2011 17:51 GMT
#90
On August 02 2011 02:24 GizmoPT wrote:
i think polygons work just great tbh



lol

I've said it a lot before and I'll repeat it again: UE3 is one of the most powerful, beautiful and long lasting engines out there. If I didn't know it was UE3, I'd say it was some kind of top-notch hollywood CGI..

The first time I played Bulletstorm I had to collect my jaw from the floor..
Desti
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany138 Posts
August 01 2011 17:54 GMT
#91
I guess they have already patented this math, so no one will be able to use it in the next 20 years. Bye bye future games.
leecH
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany385 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-01 18:02:46
August 01 2011 17:55 GMT
#92
On August 02 2011 00:44 Liveon wrote:

What I don't understand though, is how they can 'import' rocks/cacti from reality. Do they just scan and figure out where the atoms are to recreate it in their simulation? It looked really impressive though.

official site


there are 3d scanners for a long long time. for example police/military use them to scan certain areas they dont want to go in before making sure its safe. for example a crashed building. also its used to scan cars/objects. there are companies who scan in cars for a PRE-MODEL. you only get the dimension. you have to rebuild it by hand to get a clean 3d-model. a scanned 3D model is nothing you can directly import in a game. NO WAY. its a piece of polygon bullshit. its only for measuring.

figuring atoms? no no no.. this is science fiction. were not in geneva letting fucking atoms and shit collide just for the fun of it.

this video is full of bullshit and has nothing to do with a breakthrough. and by the looks of the video and by the homepage this is less than professional and purely a joke. literally. a joke.

sorry for breaking the news..
LegendaryZ
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1583 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-01 18:03:16
August 01 2011 18:00 GMT
#93
On August 02 2011 02:14 Keitzer wrote:
so if the only thing they can do with this is render epic-looking cinematics, then sweet, now we have better cinematics.... why do you assume nothing? are you the terminator back from the future to make sure it doesn't happen?


Cinematics are pre-rendered anyway (which is why they always look so much better than actual in-game graphics) so this technology would be of no consequence on that end. You can already render absurdly good cinematics using current techniques and it's really only limited by the actual budget you have available. The only way this "new" (questionable) technology would matter is if it was somehow applicable to actual gameplay where we're currently bottle-necked by the capabilities of our computer components (CPU, graphics cards, RAM, etc.). Either that, or if this somehow drastically reduced the cost of creating content, which really doesn't seem to be the case so far as I can tell.

Obviously if this represents a leap forward in freeing up resources on any front, it's a welcome development, but I don't think you can fault the skeptics given the limited amount of actual information in that video.
THE_oldy
Profile Joined July 2010
Australia97 Posts
August 01 2011 18:02 GMT
#94
I think they're doing something different than standard polygon tech. Its not just going to be something as simple as just lots and lots of polygons, only smaller.

A computer wont be required to consistently keep the location of every atom in memory, or some other brute force way of doing things. I don't know how they would go about it, but that's just the point; They're developing a new method.

If they're method was obvious someone would have done it already. So to all skeptics of this, i doubt its going to be anything like a method that might jump into your head when your saw the video, like using terrabites of raw data of something.
Strategy is the motivation for tactics
superjoppe
Profile Joined December 2004
Sweden3683 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-01 18:05:27
August 01 2011 18:05 GMT
#95
All I’m sure of is that games using this will set my laptop on fire.
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-01 18:11:47
August 01 2011 18:06 GMT
#96
On August 02 2011 00:54 WniO wrote:
the problem with this is they cant render it in real time, or animate for that matter.

^^^ animate how does object interaction works for them seems to have been glazed over.

Anyways we increase polygon count dynamically now though tessellation which is bound to be much more memory efficient, in-fact most rendering is done though streaming increasing detail as you get closer to something because it saves on memory and cost to run the game.
leecH
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany385 Posts
August 01 2011 18:07 GMT
#97
On August 02 2011 03:02 THE_oldy wrote:
I think they're doing something different than standard polygon tech. Its not just going to be something as simple as just lots and lots of polygons, only smaller.

A computer wont be required to consistently keep the location of every atom in memory, or some other brute force way of doing things. I don't know how they would go about it, but that's just the point; They're developing a new method.

If they're method was obvious someone would have done it already. So to all skeptics of this, i doubt its going to be anything like a method that might jump into your head when your saw the video, like using terrabites of raw data of something.


you dont know what a polygon is. you have no clue what your talking about.

i play the buzzkiller in this thread.
im a dick. youre welcome.
Cold-Blood
Profile Joined March 2010
United States200 Posts
August 01 2011 18:07 GMT
#98
I would love to see all the math they have behind this compared to the polygon math, but that would most likely give away something they don't want given away.

Giving the reason why they have been silent for so long.
Forever and Always #1 YellOw fan.
Slaytilost
Profile Joined October 2010
Netherlands968 Posts
August 01 2011 18:10 GMT
#99
On August 02 2011 02:08 exog wrote:
It appears to be rendered in real time by the way the camera moves. They also answered that you dont need a supercomputer to run it... There, thrashed all the arguments in the thread.

Will be interesting to see how it goes.


Because the camera moves it is in real time? Right, movies like Toy Story and Independance Day are just stills, because they sure as hell arent real time!

Santacause is real, there, just trashed all the arguments made ever.
Southlight
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
United States11767 Posts
August 01 2011 18:10 GMT
#100
If you look at their site they're quite open about it being voxels; the technology they're parading is processing efficiency... whether THAT actually works or not is the big question.
oraoraoraoraoraoraoraora
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 16 17 18 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 58m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 1074
NaDa 71
Aegong 38
Dota 2
monkeys_forever241
League of Legends
syndereN536
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1342
flusha386
Coldzera 146
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox295
AZ_Axe93
Other Games
tarik_tv8861
Grubby2293
Day[9].tv1124
shahzam567
C9.Mang0282
ViBE207
Maynarde151
Livibee76
Liquid`Ken9
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1211
BasetradeTV30
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 62
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22278
League of Legends
• Doublelift5201
Other Games
• Scarra1707
• Day9tv1124
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
9h 58m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 9h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.