|
On September 22 2016 15:03 FiWiFaKi wrote: What's the most impressive open-source project ever undertaken and completed?
(Trying to learn what kind of organization structures are utilized by the best for this collaborative stuff)
The Bible.
|
On September 22 2016 15:03 FiWiFaKi wrote: What's the most impressive open-source project ever undertaken and completed?
(Trying to learn what kind of organization structures are utilized by the best for this collaborative stuff) In software, I think the Linux kernel still wins that one. Not only in scope and complexity, but also in longevity.
|
On September 22 2016 06:50 JimmiC wrote: I guess I don't. The only thing I had was from Chris Rock and his " I love Black people but hate N-word" routine. The Blacks I hang out with and see, none gangsters, get all gangstered up after work. Its odd they will say they are against it then where the clothes, talk the talk so on. I think to get girls but still. Positive to hear that many are against it.
I think the reason it is much more understates in the "blue" you describe is as a collective we would not allow that type of behavior. For sure it is underlying, and some feel how they feel. But I think it is a disservice to not point out that it is at least not welcomed and I would suggest getting smaller with each generation. That being said with Terrorism, and all the media coverage on racism it does it bring more top of mind and I guess it could make a comeback. I hope it continues to be forced into the "darkness" until hopefully someday it goes more or less away.
I 100% disagree that "blue tribes" (Democrat/Liberals) are not actively acting openly racist, classist, and misogynistic.
Just looking at how people in downtown SF treat blacks and the poor on the streets, the hiring practices by the tech culture in most democrat/urban cities, the emphasis of gentrification on predominantly blue areas, the anti-science vax/gmo haters, etc...
The blue tribe has many shit tonnes of open hate against progress. Its just that most blue tribes don't think that their hateful acts are that hateful and use the "at least its not as bad as red tribes" argument.
|
I give up - how do I hide specific sections of the forum when on liquidheart/liquiddota? It hasn't carried over from teamliquid.net and I can't seem to find the customize sidebar button on the other sites.
|
Zurich15365 Posts
On September 22 2016 15:34 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2016 15:03 FiWiFaKi wrote: What's the most impressive open-source project ever undertaken and completed?
(Trying to learn what kind of organization structures are utilized by the best for this collaborative stuff) In software, I think the Linux kernel still wins that one. Not only in scope and complexity, but also in longevity. It's GNU/Linux !!!!!!!!11!111!!!!!!
|
Anyone ever been at a wedding where the bride or groom backed out after everyone had been seated for the ceremony?
Does anyone ever stay and party at wherever the reception was planned?
|
On September 23 2016 18:10 GreenHorizons wrote: Anyone ever been at a wedding where the bride or groom backed out after everyone had been seated for the ceremony?
Does anyone ever stay and party at wherever the reception was planned? No, I haven't, and presumably not. In any case, it seems like it would be really weird to attend, and I personally would probably go home.
|
All the money to organize the party has been spent anyway, why not party. Plus, the bride/groom who just got humiliated probably wants to end their night drunk as fuck anyway.
|
On September 23 2016 18:19 OtherWorld wrote: All the money to organize the party has been spent anyway, why not party. Plus, the bride/groom who just got humiliated probably wants to end their night drunk as fuck anyway. You can usually get a refund on the booze. And can probably negotiate some kind of discount with the venue (although it of course depends on the arrangement). The catering, decoration, etc. are of course gone, I agree. But I guess it would depend on whether either the bride or the groom wants to continue, or just grab a bottle of vodka and get shitfaced crying their eyes out in the privacy of their home.
|
On September 23 2016 18:10 GreenHorizons wrote: Anyone ever been at a wedding where the bride or groom backed out after everyone had been seated for the ceremony?
Does anyone ever stay and party at wherever the reception was planned? Never been, but I do wonder if instances of jilting at weddings are down or up compared to the past. I could totally see and understand doing this if it were an arranged marriage or even were it a very stiff, "traditional," courtship type of a situation.
At least for the US and most of Europe I imagine most kids getting married these days though wouldn't have had a structured or rigid social expectation leading towards marriage.
|
On September 23 2016 20:35 ThomasjServo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 23 2016 18:10 GreenHorizons wrote: Anyone ever been at a wedding where the bride or groom backed out after everyone had been seated for the ceremony?
Does anyone ever stay and party at wherever the reception was planned? Never been, but I do wonder if instances of jilting at weddings are down or up compared to the past. I could totally see and understand doing this if it were an arranged marriage or even were it a very stiff, "traditional," courtship type of a situation. At least for the US and most of Europe I imagine most kids getting married these days though wouldn't have had a structured or rigid social expectation leading towards marriage.
I'm the opposite. I can't imagine arranged or traditional weddings stopping once the guests arrive, but modern day folks who think of the ceremony as just a ceremony would totally bail.
|
|
|
On September 23 2016 23:24 JimmiC wrote: I think the play if your wife leaves you at the alter is move straight to anger/revenge and throw the party anyways. Then do your absolute best to pick up one of the bridesmaids or family member of the bride. Save your grief stage for later.
Only one of the bridesmaids? Why so little ambition?
|
|
|
On September 23 2016 22:45 Thieving Magpie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 23 2016 20:35 ThomasjServo wrote:On September 23 2016 18:10 GreenHorizons wrote: Anyone ever been at a wedding where the bride or groom backed out after everyone had been seated for the ceremony?
Does anyone ever stay and party at wherever the reception was planned? Never been, but I do wonder if instances of jilting at weddings are down or up compared to the past. I could totally see and understand doing this if it were an arranged marriage or even were it a very stiff, "traditional," courtship type of a situation. At least for the US and most of Europe I imagine most kids getting married these days though wouldn't have had a structured or rigid social expectation leading towards marriage. I'm the opposite. I can't imagine arranged or traditional weddings stopping once the guests arrive, but modern day folks who think of the ceremony as just a ceremony would totally bail. Additional pressure I suppose, I see it.
|
On September 23 2016 23:41 ThomasjServo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 23 2016 22:45 Thieving Magpie wrote:On September 23 2016 20:35 ThomasjServo wrote:On September 23 2016 18:10 GreenHorizons wrote: Anyone ever been at a wedding where the bride or groom backed out after everyone had been seated for the ceremony?
Does anyone ever stay and party at wherever the reception was planned? Never been, but I do wonder if instances of jilting at weddings are down or up compared to the past. I could totally see and understand doing this if it were an arranged marriage or even were it a very stiff, "traditional," courtship type of a situation. At least for the US and most of Europe I imagine most kids getting married these days though wouldn't have had a structured or rigid social expectation leading towards marriage. I'm the opposite. I can't imagine arranged or traditional weddings stopping once the guests arrive, but modern day folks who think of the ceremony as just a ceremony would totally bail. Additional pressure I suppose, I see it.
I also happen to believe that the happiness of the couples is inverse as well.
More traditional couples will force things to work, even when it sucks. Less traditional couples are only staying together because its working.
Whether one is better than the other is an argument of contention--most especially when kids are involved.
|
Alternatively, you can consider that more traditional couples will be afraid of dealing honestly with small couple problems, will sweep things under the rug, and ultimately won't be happy together.
|
On September 24 2016 16:38 OtherWorld wrote: Alternatively, you can consider that more traditional couples will be afraid of dealing honestly with small couple problems, will sweep things under the rug, and ultimately won't be happy together.
I think that falls in line with forcing things to work.
The reason I don't really want to conclude that that means people won't be happy together is because "rest of your life" is a long ass time. So even if you're unhappy for 20 years of it, it doesn't mean you'll be unhappy the next 20 years of it. Things also get complicated when kids are involved, when property is involved, etc... So sometimes "forcing it to work" is also the financial/easy road to go.
Like, imagine if the choice was "Have a 1-10 year lawsuit over who owns the house OR swallow pride and pretend your once a month sex life is fine." Imagine if the choice was "Get divorced so you only get to see your kid half as often as you do now with the hope that having absent parents won't make your child angry with you or the world" etc...
In other words, there are lots of reasons to force things to work outside of social pressures and happiness. And I don't necessarily agree that ignoring those other variables is the right way to think about whether people should stay married or not.
But I do agree with the conclusion that some people are not happy because they don't deal with small couple problems--I just don't think that's an issue that happens statistically more with traditional over non-traditional couples.
|
|
|
Are guys arguing that arranged marriages and staying in unhappy marriages for decades is a good thing? >_>
I honestly don't follow. It's early morning here.
|
|
|
|
|
|