| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On May 11 2016 10:45 Epishade wrote: If I stick something up my butt and it gets stuck, can I save up my poop over a few days and use the force of my poop clump to poop it out? You may find this anecdotally interesting | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46243 Posts
On May 11 2016 17:17 Cascade wrote: See, this is the kind of things they don't teach you in school. Only experience, and stupid questions thread, will bring you this kind of wisdom. I can confirm this, at least in the United States... neither the individual state education standards nor Common Core say anything about proper butt plug care. On the other hand, Tyler Durden has told us that sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken. | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On May 11 2016 19:10 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: I can confirm this, at least in the United States... neither the individual state education standards nor Common Core say anything about proper butt plug care. On the other hand, Tyler Durden has told us that sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken. I hope he has a scientific study to prove that | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On May 11 2016 22:34 OtherWorld wrote: I hope he has a scientific study to prove that Nature Medicine "Depth of rectal insertion predicts medical complications" Arthur Nuss, Felicia Ecces DOI: 456.8156.1265 | ||
|
AbouSV
Germany1278 Posts
On May 12 2016 00:01 Cascade wrote: Nature Medicine "Depth of rectal insertion predicts medical complications" Arthur Nuss, Felicia Ecces DOI: 456.8156.1265 The question now is 'did you hide something in the said DOI number?' :p | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On May 12 2016 00:15 AbouSV wrote: The question now is 'did you hide something in the said DOI number?' :p Haha, no sorry. I was considering it, but didn't know what to point to.  In the end I just made up numbers. Probably not a valid DOI. | ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5299 Posts
the jest being that "The Romance languages" don't come from latin but was the language spoken by ... natives. wiki Today, around 800 million people are native speakers worldwide, mainly in Europe and the Americas, ... The five most widely spoken Romance languages by number of native speakers are Spanish (410 million), Portuguese (216 million), French (80 million), Italian (60 million), and Romanian (25 million) | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On May 14 2016 04:14 xM(Z wrote: any language hipsters here with a take on Carme Jiménez Huertas: "No venimos del latín" book?. the jest being that "The Romance languages" don't come from latin but was the language spoken by ... natives. wiki So taking it simply, he is implying that antiquated forms of romance languages predate Roman involvement in Europe? I'm on mobile so forgive the clarifying question. | ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5299 Posts
yes, she is. she talks about a spoken iberic language which predates latin (for romanian language/dialects she implies Thrace-daco-getae roots (Cucuteni-Trypillian culture and/or Turdaș-Vinča culture)). she talks about syntax, grammar in general and has some analogies between then and now with examples in Africa where english or french(based on colonization) is written but not spoken, creole languages in America and so on. she does not go as far as to name a common ancestor as far as i know; it's all fairly technical. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18394 Posts
| ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5299 Posts
latin was the official written language but people were not speaking it. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_the_Roman_Empire#Latin Would make sense that they just played off one another throughout the different parts of the empire and intermingled over the centuries. | ||
|
Epishade
United States2267 Posts
| ||
|
Epishade
United States2267 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18394 Posts
On May 16 2016 11:07 Epishade wrote: If I shoot someone in self defense for breaking into my house or something and call the police afterwards, should I tell them what happened? I've always heard not to talk to the police, but would a dead body in my house and no explanation for it cause further problems if I didn't talk? Should I tell them I shot in self defense, and leave it at that? What's the best course of action here? Saw the victim up into little pieces and feed him to your pet pigs. | ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5299 Posts
On May 16 2016 03:59 ThomasjServo wrote: How does that drastically differ from the current interpretation?, Looking around on Wikipedia it seems like there was just general local adaptation rather than Roman's imposing the language on others. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_the_Roman_Empire#Latin Would make sense that they just played off one another throughout the different parts of the empire and intermingled over the centuries. you don't know the implications of that(her) claim nor the meaning of "How does that drastically differ from the current interpretation". for the former - romans are considered the bringers of civilization onto them incult pagans, them neanderthals. not only that is total bullshit and that there were other equal and/or even better/greater civilizations than the roman one but also it'll make the romans be seen for what they were: robbers and murderers of nations/tribes/cultures. just wait 'till latin will be seen as coming from/derived from the common/early romance language. for the later - you incorporating some words from english into your language, does not make your language a local adaptation of english; your language structure remains intact; the verbs, adverbs, vowels, accent, syntax in general, etcetcetc. since the fall of communists in E-EU, nations around here started looking for their origins and such. it's a highly politicized mess but very revealing it's all i'll say. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On May 16 2016 11:21 Acrofales wrote: Saw the victim up into little pieces and feed him to your pet pigs. Easy there Bricktop | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On May 16 2016 19:45 xM(Z wrote: you don't know the implications of that(her) claim nor the meaning of "How does that drastically differ from the current interpretation". for the former - romans are considered the bringers of civilization onto them incult pagans, them neanderthals. not only that is total bullshit and that there were other equal and/or even better/greater civilizations than the roman one but also it'll make the romans be seen for what they were: robbers and murderers of nations/tribes/cultures. just wait 'till latin will be seen as coming from/derived from the common/early romance language. for the later - you incorporating some words from english into your language, does not make your language a local adaptation of english; your language structure remains intact; the verbs, adverbs, vowels, accent, syntax in general, etcetcetc. since the fall of communists in E-EU, nations around here started looking for their origins and such. it's a highly politicized mess but very revealing it's all i'll say. I'll have to wait and see if an English version turns up for this book and try to get a sense of what they are saying. | ||
|
SoSexy
Italy3725 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
INu's Battles
Cure vs herO
ByuN vs Rogue
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Kung Fu Cup
Patches Events
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
