Totally obliterated - Page 11
Forum Index > General Forum |
Kentor
![]()
United States5784 Posts
| ||
Emon_
3925 Posts
| ||
QuanticHawk
United States32027 Posts
On March 25 2011 04:35 chaokel wrote: Looking at the guys latest tweets i feel a little sorry for him now (even though i still think he had something coming to him, if not exactly this). Keep in mind these tweets were all made within the same hour. why feel sorry for an idiot who you dont know, who feeds off the misery of others??? | ||
teamsolid
Canada3668 Posts
On March 25 2011 03:51 Asjo wrote: I'll be happy to explain. Of the of the most common things we have seen against the girl is referring to her spending her time on researching this guy. This is not a rational judgment. People can spend time on many things, and as long as it's meaningful or useful to them no further justification is needed. So, why do people post this nonetheless? Because of the need I mentioned to denounce the girl - denounce the "bullies" who use their power of definition. People are probably saying it because it is an "argument" that they have used in other situations to denounce something where they didn't really have a rational reason, simply using the same reasoning again. You are seriously trying to call her the bully, when the idiot guy instigated the whole thing? What ? If that same blog post was done by some nerd, I think he'd be lauded as a hero in this thread instead of being villainized. My problem with all this hating on this girl's lifestyle is that it's incredibly hypocritical. Sure, you think she's wasting her time "buying looks" and blogging about it. Well guess what, Western society in general also think it's a waste of time playing a video game/posting on a forum about it/blogging about it. | ||
ptrpb
Canada753 Posts
The dude calls her out for getting a nose job and she proceeds to spend what seems like hours, maybe even solid days digging up as much shit as possible? Like what the fuck kind of psychotic shit is this? Gotta love the comments though, white knights galore. | ||
Jayson X
Switzerland2431 Posts
Btw. there was a cracked story of a msg-board where only one member posted and replied to him/herself. Something like 40k posts from the same frigging account over six years :D | ||
mardi
United States1164 Posts
| ||
SpiritAshura
United States1271 Posts
| ||
s.a.y
Croatia3840 Posts
With all the evidence , she would have a strong case. The last email (from the Coffin Lawyer team) could be considered a thread (even if a false one). So glad that loser got what he deserves. | ||
Latham
9551 Posts
Peter's a douche? I don't care. Xiaxue being an attention whore by posting all this? I don't care. Peter being or not being a sad fuck for insulting people who get plastic surgery and making up an imaginary GF? I don't care. All I care are the lulz I got from this. It was entertaining =) The title had me skeptical about the quality of this thread, but it turned out better than expected ^^ Guy got served something wicked ![]() | ||
Fruscainte
4596 Posts
On March 25 2011 04:46 s.a.y wrote: I hope she does sue him. With all the evidence , she would have a strong case. The last email (from the Coffin Lawyer team) could be considered a thread (even if a false one). So glad that loser got what he deserves. Yeah, someone talks bad about your nose job so you stalk him and defame him. It's not like that's wrong or anything. | ||
Hadraziel
Russian Federation114 Posts
| ||
N.geNuity
United States5111 Posts
On March 25 2011 04:41 ptrpb wrote: Can someone please explain to me what the mindset of this blogger is? The dude calls her out for getting a nose job and she proceeds to spend what seems like hours, maybe even solid days digging up as much shit as possible? Like what the fuck kind of psychotic shit is this? Gotta love the comments though, white knights galore. well, say you're a bit of a pretentious blogger. You get insulted, so you get a bit mad. But, at least according to the blog, she blocked him and w/e. Then the kimi kobayashi insults her (according to what is written). So you take half a look at the kimi ordeal. And you see something curious. If you're a pretentious blogger who tries to make half a job out of blogging (I'm guessing, I don't know wtf this girl does), wouldn't the potential of exposing a loser/douche/whatever making a fake girlfriend peak your interest? And considering it is getting her blog a lot of traffic I imagine... Plus ooh wow, a couple hours. For most people on the internet that isn't a lot of time. | ||
OneBlueAugust
United States153 Posts
On March 25 2011 04:36 Asjo wrote: And yes, my personal views of are quite extreme. Ultra-humanistic, you might say. And can definite be hard to fit into our current society. Nonetheless, you have to remember that "justice", "evil" and many other terms used to pass judgment are simply social constructs led by past developments to be understood the way they are by people today. Therefore, it would be a mistake to say I suffer from "tunnel vision" simply because it does not fit into your rationale. I cannot to myself justify harming others, but that does not mean that I do not understand why others might. I simply means that I feel differently about it. Off topic warning The argument that the idea of justice, evil, right, wrong, etc. are just moral constructs, and therefore their guidelines can be disregarded in some personal instances has always interested me. And your support of it is another thing that we disagree on, at least in part. I think that justice, the feel of right and wrong, the idea of evil etc. are all learned, which would mean to some that they are "created", and therefore unnatural. However, that's too simplistic, in my opinion. The very ability to create laws and social constructs or universal norms is an evolutionary marvel, and the results of it should not be so easily discarded. The actions, reactions, motivations, and consequences involved in such a system drive the complexity of the world in which we live, to the point in which this "simple social construct" influences everything you do, and much of who you are. People who say they live outside the world of the social consciousness, who say that they do not subscribe to the ideas of consequences, good and evil, or even right and wrong are always deluded. It's a simple matter of what you're willing to admit to yourself. Whether those things are "real" is up for debate, as the definition of real can change depending on who you're talking to. However, views like yours always prove to be inherently illogical, contradictory, and circular when presented with the correct situation. They tend to removes causal proof, premeditation, or intent from crimes, making consequences impossible. Actions without consequences go against the basic laws of the universe, and therefore the idea must be false. Don't take this as a personal attack, because it's not. It's just a subject I'm interested in, and since you profess to believe in the idea I thought it'd be interesting to discuss it. | ||
Asjo
Denmark664 Posts
On March 25 2011 04:59 OneBlueAugust wrote: Off topic warning The argument that the idea of justice, evil, right, wrong, etc. are just moral constructs, and therefore their guidelines can be disregarded in some personal instances has always interested me. And your support of it is another thing that we disagree on, at least in part. I think that justice, the feel of right and wrong, the idea of evil etc. are all learned, which would mean to some that they are "created", and therefore unnatural. However, that's too simplistic, in my opinion. The very ability to create laws and social constructs or universal norms is an evolutionary marvel, and the results of it should not be so easily discarded. The actions, reactions, motivations, and consequences involved in such a system drive the complexity of the world in which we live, to the point in which this "simple social construct" influences everything you do, and much of who you are. People who say they live outside the world of the social consciousness, who say that they do not subscribe to the ideas of consequences, good and evil, or even right and wrong are always deluded. It's a simple matter of what you're willing to admit to yourself. Whether those things are "real" is up for debate, as the definition of real can change depending on who you're talking to. However, views like yours always prove to be inherently illogical, contradictory, and circular when presented with the correct situation. They tend to removes causal proof, premeditation, or intent from crimes, making consequences impossible. Actions without consequences go against the basic laws of the universe, and therefore the idea must be false. Don't take this as a personal attack, because it's not. It's just a subject I'm interested in, and since you profess to believe in the idea I thought it'd be interesting to discuss it. Yes, a bit off topic here - starting to feel a bit guilty (and I thought that you were giving me an off-topic warning for a second there :D) ... It is not a matter of discarding these notions. That isn't actually possible. However, I'm talking about deviating from the common consensus that has been reached through a long development. Keep in mind that this development is still ongoing, and I believe the human race still has a long way to go. I think you might be reading into my words if you equate them to living "outside the world of social consciousness". I'm simply saying that my values differ from those of most others. There is an endless amount of consequences, and there is no such things as ignoring that fact. However, purposely hurting others is not something I will rationalize as a "natural consequence", but rather something which goes against my base principles. No doubt that some of these base principles would be dangerous if transformed into political ideas, because human nature is a fickle thing, creating endlessly complex dilemmas that are impossible to deal with in absolutes, but nonetheless, all the people around me are likely the better off for what I believe. | ||
OneBlueAugust
United States153 Posts
On March 25 2011 05:08 Asjo wrote: I think you might be reading into my words if you equate them to living "outside the world of social consciousness". I'm simply saying that my values differ from those of most others. There is an endless amount of consequences, and there is no such things as ignoring that fact. However, purposely hurting others is not something I will rationalize as a "natural consequence", but rather something which goes against my base principles. No doubt that some of these base principles would be dangerous if transformed into political ideas, because human nature is a fickle thing, creating endlessly complex dilemmas that are impossible to deal with in absolutes, but nonetheless, all the people around me are likely the better off for what I believe. As I said before, ideals like yours seem great, but they always result in contradictions and circular logic. Extreme example: You have a child, and someone is attacking him / her. You are faced with the choice of defending your child with violence (there is no one around to help you or do the violence for you), or sticking to your ideals that violence is never the answer, which results in your child's death, maiming, whatever. With ideals like yours, neither answer is "correct", as both end in violence. Everyday example: You are on a jury of peers in a murder trial. The judge and prosecutor are pushing for the death penalty (say you're in a death penalty state), which you cannot agree with. Therefore, you will not agree to a guilty verdict for the main crime - anything that would result in capital punishment - , as you would be causing a man's death. So, you hang the jury, and the man goes back to jail to await another trial, or goes free. You saved this man's life, but you purposefully caused deep emotional pain and anguish to the family of the victim. Not only that, but you allowed a murderer to remain alive, putting his cellmates at risk of violence or death. It's just a matter of how much you'll admit to yourself. These are just examples, but policies like yours do not actually help the people around you. They turn you into a nonfactor, or a negative where people expect a positive, when often people are depending on you for help. These situations may not have ever occurred in your life, and they may not ever occur at all, but I'm not really talking about you specifically, but the ideals you claim. They are utopian, idealistic, and totally unrealistic in a social setting, and their widespread adoption would result in anarchy and unknowable pain and strife. | ||
wzzit
United States201 Posts
On March 25 2011 04:41 ptrpb wrote: Can someone please explain to me what the mindset of this blogger is? The dude calls her out for getting a nose job and she proceeds to spend what seems like hours, maybe even solid days digging up as much shit as possible? Like what the fuck kind of psychotic shit is this? Gotta love the comments though, white knights galore. This kind of illogic makes my head hurt. A girl gets back at a guy who has harassed and insulted her on multiple occasions by spending (at most) a day exposing his ridiculous backstory, so she's a psychotic bitch? Really? And I love the accusation of white-knighting. Apparently anyone who shows any kind of support to a woman on the Internet is a white knight in your eyes. | ||
FliedLice
Germany7494 Posts
On March 25 2011 04:35 chaokel wrote: Looking at the guys latest tweets i feel a little sorry for him now (even though i still think he had something coming to him, if not exactly this). Keep in mind these tweets were all made within the same hour. I attempted to stop this privately with Xiaxue, who she seems quite intent on ruining me. Didn't he just do the same shit before that himself? | ||
![]()
Milkis
5003 Posts
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/gaqg7/iama_target_of_a_smear_campaign_peter_coffin_ama/ | ||
QuanticHawk
United States32027 Posts
On March 25 2011 05:46 Milkis wrote: He has an AMA going on at reddit now, getting destroyed, lol http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/gaqg7/iama_target_of_a_smear_campaign_peter_coffin_ama/ oh man that is wonderful | ||
| ||