Totally obliterated

On March 24 2011 16:18 FinestHour wrote:
His youtube channel vids all have the comments disabled ROFL
too much hate from the viewers for him to stand ahahaha

On March 24 2011 16:14 Sufficiency wrote:
I have the say the she *is* pretty pretentious. I think she should spend time doing something else instead of shopping and playing with makeup.

In a way I understand why Peter is annoyed. But Peter's "girlfriend" is kind of funny.

On March 24 2011 16:21 No_Roo wrote:
So what? I've been flirting with myself through my fake facebook account for over a year now. I thought everyone did that.

On March 24 2011 16:21 Sufficiency wrote:


His alternative still works.

http://www.youtube.com/peterheads

+ Show Spoiler +

On March 24 2011 16:31 triangle wrote:
They both come across as pretty pathetic tbh.

On March 24 2011 16:31 triangle wrote:
They both come across as pretty pathetic tbh.

On March 24 2011 16:31 triangle wrote:
They both come across as pretty pathetic tbh.

On March 24 2011 16:25 Emon_ wrote:
This guy harasses her to the point where she starts to stalk him - AND THEN she decides to block him!? Makes me wonder if she's not the one behind Peter Coffin and his g/f. . .

If the story is legit, the guy's a tool. The girl doesn't sound like she's that much better. So . . . whatever.

On March 24 2011 16:31 triangle wrote:
They both come across as pretty pathetic tbh.

On March 24 2011 16:50 OopsOopsBaby wrote:
only one winner here. well girl gets paid big bucks just to blog. guy gets humiliated in front of several thousands of blog readers per day.

+ Show Spoiler +

On March 24 2011 16:14 Sufficiency wrote:
I have the say the she *is* pretty pretentious. I think she should spend time doing something else instead of shopping and playing with makeup.

In a way I understand why Peter is annoyed. But Peter's "girlfriend" is kind of funny.

EDIT: try this blog of her (the ending is really funny). http://xiaxue.blogspot.com/2010/11/pill.html
+ Show Spoiler +

On March 24 2011 17:02 infinitestory wrote:
I never thought I'd see Dream)Xero one-upped.

This is really, really sad.

On March 24 2011 17:02 infinitestory wrote:
I never thought I'd see Dream)Xero one-upped.

This is really, really sad.

On March 24 2011 16:40 OneBlueAugust wrote:


The dude is a real person. The whole thing could turn out to be some weird viral marketing scam or something, but the guy is real. He's been posting youtube videos and blogs for years apparently, as sorta've a hipster weird-al ripoff (I'm such an expert, with all this knowledge I've gained from reddit comments ).

On March 24 2011 17:02 infinitestory wrote:
I never thought I'd see Dream)Xero one-upped.

This is really, really sad.

On March 24 2011 19:17 Hynda wrote:
While the guy is obviously some kind of regular internet asshat, it's impossible for me to ever side with someone like that blogger, it's one of those rare moments in life when I can say that I probably side with Josef Fritzl before I ever side with someone like her.

On March 24 2011 19:17 Hynda wrote:
While the guy is obviously some kind of regular internet asshat, it's impossible for me to ever side with someone like that blogger, it's one of those rare moments in life when I can say that I probably side with Josef Fritzl before I ever side with someone like her.

On March 24 2011 16:53 applejuice wrote:
uhhh..well, I don't care what she did, if you try THAT HARD to look WHITE, you have some serious issues. I think just looking at the pic at the top page reduced my IQ a few dozen points.

Famous in singapore you say??? Well my respect for them just flew out the window. She makes Paris Hilton look like a rocket scientist.

While the guy is obviously some kind of regular internet asshat, it's impossible for me to ever side with someone like that blogger, it's one of those rare moments in life when I can say that I probably side with Josef Fritzl before I ever side with someone like her.

On March 24 2011 19:48 Alizee- wrote:
I honestly can't make up my mind about who is worse.

On March 24 2011 19:51 kasumimi wrote:
Those two would actually make a great lovely couple, why can't they see it ;<

On March 24 2011 19:39 Zorkey wrote:


because?

On March 24 2011 19:47 kyzers0ze wrote:

I would she has more haters.

On March 24 2011 20:11 Hynda wrote:

It's not very rational because Josef Fritzl is obviously a monster and she is just some bimbo persona spouting shit on the internet, but it goes against every fiber of my body that someone with that persona actually gets paid for what she does. In the back of my head there is a voice going, at least Fritzl is good for something, as horrible as his actions were at least he knows how to build a suburban bunker and keep a secret, that could possibly become valuable in the future, what she does is utterly pointless.

A pornstar at least know she isn't exactlly a class act but this persona had a post that went "LOOK AT MY BOOBS" and still claims to be classy. I say persona because 90%+ of these bimbo-bloggers are actually smart and very enterprising and just put up an act because that is what their readers want. I guess what it boils down to is that Fritzl makes one man a monster, she makes the public complete and utter morons and I guess I rather deal with one monster than five millions complete idiots.

On March 24 2011 20:17 Jayme wrote:


You know what?

I'm impressed. I've never seen it put quite like that.

On March 24 2011 16:43 wongfeihung wrote:
I wonder if this is his real phone number. Apparently, it even has texting.

+ Show Spoiler +

On March 24 2011 19:22 Gnial wrote:
Hahaha, that was so amazing. Props to her.

People like the blogger I have no negative feelings about.

Guys like Peter Coffin... I just want to give them a swirly. So watching him get an epic internet swirly was amazing.

On March 24 2011 21:09 teamsolid wrote:
The guy is a complete douchebag, but I don't see what all the hate on the girl is all about.

I mean... if she wants to spend tons of cash to improve her looks while making money off blogging, good for her. At least she succeeded in looking somewhat attractive (even if it's fake). Just compare her to one of her friends who literally looks like a plastic figure doll (I actually thought she was standing next to a statue...).

+ Show Spoiler +

On March 24 2011 19:47 kyzers0ze wrote:

I would say she has more haters.

On March 24 2011 20:11 Hynda wrote:

It's not very rational because Josef Fritzl is obviously a monster and she is just some bimbo persona spouting shit on the internet, but it goes against every fiber of my body that someone with that persona actually gets paid for what she does. In the back of my head there is a voice going, at least Fritzl is good for something, as horrible as his actions were at least he knows how to build a suburban bunker and keep a secret, that could possibly become valuable in the future, what she does is utterly pointless.

A pornstar at least know she isn't exactlly a class act but this persona had a post that went "LOOK AT MY BOOBS" and still claims to be classy. I say persona because 90%+ of these bimbo-bloggers are actually smart and very enterprising and just put up an act because that is what their readers want. I guess what it boils down to is that Fritzl makes one man a monster, she makes the public complete and utter morons and I guess I rather deal with one monster than five millions complete idiots.

On March 24 2011 21:21 Emon_ wrote:

Joseph Fritz imprisoned his then 18 y/o daughter in a basement room where he raped her for 24 years. His daughter gave birth to 7 children and had one miscarriage. Three of the children lived with her in the basement for their entire lives up until they got rescued. The oldest child lived there for 19 years.

There is no way you can equate what they went through with what is written in that blog. It's an unjust comparison that belittles the extreme suffering that Elizabeth and her children had to endure.

On March 24 2011 16:21 No_Roo wrote:
So what? I've been flirting with myself through my fake facebook account for over a year now. I thought everyone did that.

On March 24 2011 21:34 Hynda wrote:
That is why I am not doing that.

On March 24 2011 21:59 Wesso wrote:


You said:
I guess what it boils down to is that Fritzl makes one man a monster, she makes the public complete and utter morons and I guess I rather deal with one monster than five millions complete idiots.

If you gave Fritzl daughter those options, I know which one she would pick...

On March 24 2011 22:04 Hynda wrote:
If you Terry Pratchett the decision to cure one disease in this world I know which one he would pick aswell. It's a rather silly argument in itself. Since she would probably choose that option every single time regardless of what the other stakes are.

On March 24 2011 22:08 Wesso wrote:


okay, you know i was just making a point.

I, myself, would choose the second option anytime. Any human being with some empathy would choose the second option. (sorry came off a bit strong here, not implying you don't have any empathy, I just don't see how you can say what you said) What can idiots do? Annoy you? Learn to ignore idiots and let them be happy.

On March 24 2011 22:17 Hynda wrote:

To use your own kind of example, what do you think a mother of a girl that killed herself being bullied because she didn't fill the requirements of these horrible blogs would choose? What do you think someone that cuts herself because she can't find any selfworth due to a society that supports that behaviour would choose? What do you think someone that photoshopped herself so heavily on her deviant art page, so that she'll never ever dare to meet her friends in real life because she can not live up to that standard would choose?

On March 24 2011 22:28 yrag89 wrote:
On petercoffin's twitter,

A cease and desist letter pertaining to the false maligning of my character was sent to Ms. Cheng on 3/23/11.
12 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone

On March 24 2011 22:38 Wesso wrote:


I personally think that all those points are not directly due to people being idiots, I think those problems will always exist in human society (not those specific problems of course, but problems of not fitting in, being bullied, having no self-esteem). But I'm no sociologist or something, so if you do think those problems wouldn't exist in other human cultures, I can understand your viewpoint.

On March 24 2011 16:06 OneBlueAugust wrote:
Synopsis: Dude trolls a chick on twitter, she gets annoyed enough to investigate him and still doesn't understand that he is trolling her and others. Embarassment ensues.

On March 24 2011 22:00 XsebT wrote:
This really just makes me wonna slap these two human beings. What a waste of time, for them aswell as me. Yes, Peter seems like a pathetic loser, but there are so many and I don't care about any of them. This is not at all shocking to me. This is just people disagreeing with each other because they need some content in their lives. It is completely irrelevant for the rest of us. Sadly, many people don't think so because they have no imagination or content in their own lives, and that is how reality TV was born. Fucking freak show. Whether you follow this shit for entertainment or drama, it's gonna eat your fucking brain up.
Sorry for going a little off on a tangent here, but I just get outraged every time I see some this reality or gossip shit - and then consider how many braindead people are actually watching it and continually decreasing the sanity and values of the human race. People aren't living their own lives anymore.

On March 24 2011 17:02 infinitestory wrote:
I never thought I'd see Dream)Xero one-upped.

This is really, really sad.

On March 24 2011 22:47 StarBrift wrote:


Fixed.

I kept reading the post waiting to see her "own" him and never found it.

On March 24 2011 22:54 buhhy wrote:


I'm curious now, what did Dream)Xero do?

On March 24 2011 22:47 StarBrift wrote:

Sure he is a retarded troll that spends his days bothering other people..

On March 24 2011 23:08 Bwenjarin Raffrack wrote:


http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=133695
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=5624103

Required TL reading.

On March 24 2011 23:14 chaokel wrote:
http://xiaxue.blogspot.com/2011/03/peter-coffin-is-his-own-legal-team.html

and so it continues.

On March 24 2011 22:47 StarBrift wrote:


Fixed.

On March 24 2011 23:08 Bwenjarin Raffrack wrote:


http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=133695
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=5624103

Required TL reading.

On March 24 2011 23:21 So no fek wrote:



Holy fuck, he was banned over 2 years ago. o.O

I had thought it was like 6 months back at most. >_>

On March 24 2011 23:08 Bwenjarin Raffrack wrote:


http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=133695
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=5624103

Required TL reading.

On March 24 2011 23:23 koreasilver wrote:

I like how the internet has come to the stage where anyone can just simply say "lol I was trolling you!" whenever someone exposes their idiocy.

On March 24 2011 23:34 Captain Mayhem wrote:

It was almost 10 months ago. You're looking at the "account was created on" part

On March 24 2011 23:25 JWD wrote:
Why are so many people hating on the author of this blog? I don't understand. She's a self-indulgent pornstar who gets plastic surgery? Is that it?

I think it's sad to see people comparing the two of them when she hasn't done anything malicious without provocation (to my knowledge—I know almost nothing about this woman or her blog).

The guy just gives me the creeps.

On March 24 2011 23:39 FliedLice wrote:


that blog is 40 pages, too lazy to look through all them, when did shit begin to get out of his control? :D

On March 24 2011 19:57 oBlade wrote:
He labeled the picture of the girl in Korea as her being in Japan. I find this to be the most inexcusable part of the story. Be a bigot, be an asshole, be an attention whore, be a hypocrite - all these things you might say about just these two people. But neither side executed itself intelligently.

On March 24 2011 23:58 emythrel wrote:
The guy had the exact same reaction that i would if someone on twitter said they were getting cosmetic surgery (except i would keep it to myself)....... I'm not even gonna read the blog because it starts with her talking about a nose job... says everything i need to know about her.... plus she writes like she would speak, blonde ditsy american girl "the videos are like mostly lame parodies or something " i just hear that stereotypical voice in my head that cheerleaders usually have in US Tv shows.

Sorry but if you aren't comfortable with what you were born with, you won't ever be comfortable..... hardly anyone who has cosmetic surgery only has one thing done, its like getting a tattoo, you always want one more (I wanted 1 tatt..... I now have 5, would have more but dont have the money).

Tattoo's I get, you are adding art to your body, not changing it features. Its like putting on make up, you are just decorating. But sugery to alter something, unless you have a deformity, is just plain stupid. Surgery is risky, all surgery, all kinds of things could go wrong inlcuding not waking up ever again.... all for the sake of "beauty" when infact, most of the time, they looked better before, a crooked nose gives character, a surgically altered one just make me not even want to get to know someone.

I have turned down a girl before because she had fake breasts, most guys think this is insane, but my thing is this... if she had to get a boob job to feel good about herself, then she's never gonna be happy with me.

On March 24 2011 23:58 emythrel wrote:
I don't know what this thread is about.

Here is a tangential rambling.

On March 25 2011 00:11 Viciousvx wrote:
Looking beyond TeamLiquid's Rampant sexism
"Hey we just discovered an elaborate conspiracy the likes of Jimmy Hoffa!!
Nah Let's talk about what this girl looks like and how we are all insecure.

On March 25 2011 00:21 Ferrose wrote:
This whole thing seems to be "Wow, I'm glad I'm not as stupid as these people. Self-esteem +10"

On March 24 2011 23:26 buhhy wrote:


How did I miss this o__O. It was so recent too...

A permaban was pretty harsh :<

On March 25 2011 00:44 OriX wrote:

I gained at least 20 self-esteem points when I read that.

Personally, whilst I think this is hilarious and I thoroughly enjoyed reading it, I'm shocked that so many people seem to be surprised that the internet is home to people like this.

On March 25 2011 01:00 qwaykee wrote:
cant really say i agree with how she reacts, if he is trolling she does exactly what he wants.

On March 25 2011 01:32 OneBlueAugust wrote:
Some of your reactions are confusing. I know I'm kinda've rehashing what some other people have already said, but I'm wondering where all the bashing on the chick is coming from.

The chick didn't spend "forever" stalking the dude. She spent at most a day or two (the stuff she found would have taken me an hour or so if I was really looking into the dude, all it is is a few twitter posts and a blog entry or two), as the stuff she's referencing that set her off was only posted a little while ago. And it's her job to post ridiculous crap like this, so her "stalking" was actually journalistic research - and yes, I did shudder when I typed that. I give her a pass on the pseudo-stalking completely, as this kind of stuff is what makes her her money. And, if this whole thing isn't some viral marketing scheme, the dude put himself out there himself with his twitter crap, all the youtube stuff, and the constant bashing of "fake" female celebrities, so he has no one to blame. No one's forcing someone to make up a fake girlfriend and post conversations, bios, pictures, and all that stuff online. No one forced him to bash on famous chicks in an attempt to gain fame and money either. He had it coming.

As for her lifestyle, what's with all the judging? It's her body, her life. For a group of people that are often maligned as no-life losers, basement dwelling nerds, or socially awkward degenerates (not saying any of those are true, just that that's what some people stereotype hardcore gamers as), you'd think there'd be a lot less judgement being levelled at this chick for doing what she likes. I really don't see how plastic surgery or trying to become a physical ideal is a lot worse than being completely uncaring about your body to the point where you're massively overweight and unhealthy.

Anyway, this was just a bit of fluff that I thought was funny. Not something to get into a deep moral discussion over. Just remember that your judgement (sometimes based on the background color of her web page) is missing the point, and often says a lot more about you than you think.

On March 25 2011 02:03 Whomp wrote:
You should google the word perception, then reread your post from a different perspective. We're not doing anything different from what he/she/team liquid posters are doing, it's how the human social interactions go. I'd also like to note you shouldn't write a statement condoning moral discussion when you've written one of those most lengthy posts on it <it's even more blatant because you follow it up with a moral quote>.

On March 25 2011 02:00 BroOd wrote:
With the legs this thing has gotten, I'd probably feel bad for the guy if his "girlfriend" wasn't just a foil for him to bandy about all his racist, jingoistic stabs at humor which seem to be almost universally abysmal.

On March 25 2011 02:29 never_toss wrote:
I read the whole thing and I must say that while I think the douchebag had it coming, this involves so many personal issues that I think it's just plain sad. I feel like this man needs so much attention, and growing up (based on his comments). Poor guy is getting hell for making a fictional friend up for 8 months that would let him feel like he belongs in some way and use this alter ego to dish out his thoughts.

I feel like this guy is definitely in need of heavy psychologic advice, and, upon discovering aaaaaalll the crazy shit, I wouldnt've go on to bashing him publically on my super popular blog. This could/will be a massive blow on him that, given his record on doing weird shit, could end up on him not giving anything more about his life.

I know most people don't give a shit about another person if they act like jerks, but I can't really just ignore the fact that this peter guy is a human being.

On March 25 2011 02:52 Asjo wrote:
To those not understanding the negative comments regarding the girl, let me try to explain a few elements that may play a part:

• Bullyism: Many posters on this forum will have been victims to bullying is some form and will exhibit an adverse reaction to it. This girl placer herself in a position and power because she is seen and heard. What we see play out in the blog is a good parallel to how bullying would occur on the playground. Often bullies will try to ridicule people and make them feel worse about themselves. The natural reaction from those bullied is to rationalize the situation, telling themselves that the bullies are the bad ones - that they are "stupid" or "immature". The victim will want the bullies to feel that way about themselves because it serves to justify this rationalization. In this way, bullying becomes a battle of self-worth and self-image. What we see in the blog is the girl trying to make herself feel good about making someone else feel bad about themselves, exerting power in this way. People will subconsciously draw this parallel and react to it.
  
  
• Superficial persona: This girl represents the lack of empathy and distance that has, for many, come to characterize the modern "internet society". The media constantly shows us different versions of reality in the forum of reality shows and similar entertainment, and with so many different representations of reality there seems to be a disconnect. It gives the feeling that people do not understand it other and live life without a common connection. That previously, people were just people, and everyone could relate, but today people are "personas" and everything becomes surreal and distant. If you look as the way this girl presents herself, communicates or writes in her entries, she represents this disconnect - this emptiness. It all seems to scream of superficial interaction, self-justifications, impersonal presence. The fact that she promotes vile and anger just seems to enhance this.
  
  
• Dissasociation: More "mature" people might simply find the girl's childish outburst or hostile tone, and wish to distance themselves from the girl. They don't really try to understand the motives or circumstance, but simply relate to the raw act. The people who feel this will generally feel that such behavior is disruptive or worse, and therefore feel strongly about calling it out or dissasociating themselves.
  

On March 25 2011 02:52 Asjo wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +.

On March 25 2011 01:14 JWD wrote:

I don't understand this. Dude spends eight months creating an elaborate alter ego online and using it to flirt with himself, and she's the sucker for making one blog post to expose him? Come on.

On March 25 2011 03:08 OneBlueAugust wrote:
Bullying: This guy sent a series of unprovoked attacks to this girl in a public manner for weeks before she responded. If anyone sees her as the bully in this situation, they either didn't take the time to read the whole story or are purposefully ignorant.

On March 25 2011 03:08 OneBlueAugust wrote:
Superficial Persona: Superficiality is completely subjective. What's superficial to you or I can be life or death to someone else. This chick isn't doing something that's outside the norm of society by blogging about her lifestyle, nor is her lifestyle particularly odd within the culture that she's living in. Therefore, negativity that's directed at her is pretty misplaced. The plastic surgery and whatnot that she talks about is sponsored, which basically makes her a walking advertisement for the companies that donated their services. Maybe I swim in different waters than many posters here, but just about every girl I know would take free plastic surgery for the cost of a blog post. Hell, I'd definitely take some free dental work if all I had to do was write about it.

On March 25 2011 03:08 OneBlueAugust wrote:
Disassociation: I think you were going more for noncomprehension or tunnel vision. In other words, people sometimes tend to focus on the act of revenge, without comprehending the events that led up to it. They see an act of violence or whatever and immediately judge it as wrong, without thought for the cause. This always reminds me of a football player getting a personal foul because the ref only saw the retaliatory punch, and not the one that started the fight. If that's the cause of a lot of the negativity, then there's not much to be done about it, as this isn't anything that anyone should really care enough about to research it.

Whatever reason this guy had for doing what he did (seemingly to aid his income from blogging/making videos), it's still a sad situation. Yet, I have to remind myself that it is simply about a awkward girl trying to feel good about herself (see videos to the right in the blog, and you will feel bad for her)

On March 25 2011 03:20 Flew wrote:



It's really interesting to see the different perceptions on this, and read your explanation for why some people relate to that guy. I saw it as an awkward guy who was criticising women in order to feel better about himself. I didn't see the blog as a way for the woman to feel good about herself - it's a way to show that the person criticising her lifestyle was a liar with no credibility.

I admit this woman is certainly not the kind of person I would like to hang out with, and I don't agree with her stance on using plastic surgery to "improve" yourself, but she seems quite aware that she's shallow and fake. In her first blog about this guy she says she knows that he dislikes vapid and vain females (which suggests she knows she's one), and she's fine with that, but to leave her alone.

She has no problem with his beliefs - at no point does she try to defend his accusation that she's fake. She just attacks his attempt to use his twitter and another fake twitter account to bully women who follow a certain lifestyle. I don't agree with the way this woman lives her life, but she's not bothering me in any way. What the guy did though is absolutely wrong.

If someone stole my picture, and put it at the top of a fake personality, then used that twitter or blog to make rascist and vulgar remarks, I'd be hugely pissed off.

On March 25 2011 03:19 Asjo wrote:
She is the bully because she is the one being given support, having the backing of others.

On March 25 2011 03:19 Asjo wrote:
Her often hateful or self-absorbed writing

On March 25 2011 03:19 Asjo wrote:
I'm not justifying anything, simply explaining it. What you said sounds like another version of what I said about focusing on the "raw action".

On March 25 2011 03:41 OneBlueAugust wrote:


I find this hard to believe. I haven't seen any mention of a rational like this in any of the posts or comments I've read on this, and it doesn't make sense. If someone read enough to find out what she said about him (her attack), then they had to have read about him attacking her first. If someone was bullied, this would make them identify more with her, and be glad that she got revenge. I suppose you might be trying to define an entirely irrational reaction as a latent response to past bullying, but it's a pretty weak argument.

Regardless, some people will more easily be able to emphasize with the guy, whether they think of his actions as related to a greedy person looking to make money through false pretense, an "offish" guy exhibiting his own weird sense of humor or a desperate lonely guy trying to feel something where there is nothing.

On March 25 2011 02:00 BroOd wrote:
With the legs this thing has gotten, I'd probably feel bad for the guy if his "girlfriend" wasn't just a foil for him to bandy about all his racist, jingoistic stabs at humor which seem to be almost universally abysmal.

On March 25 2011 03:51 Asjo wrote:

I'll be happy to explain. Of the of the most common things we have seen against the girl is referring to her spending her time on researching this guy. This is not a rational judgment. People can spend time on many things, and as long as it's meaningful or useful to them no further justification is needed. So, why do people post this nonetheless? Because of the need I mentioned to denounce the girl - denounce the "bullies" who use their power of definition. People are probably saying it because it is an "argument" that they have used in other situations to denounce something where they didn't really have a rational reason, simply using the same reasoning again.

[B]On March 25 2011 03:32 Asjo wrote: However, he is powerless. There is no reason to put him down for it, really. His actions speak for themselves, and the ridicule he suffers leaves no doubt about how he will be judged. .

On March 25 2011 03:51 Spacekyod wrote:
Asjo, are you trying to play devil's advocate here?



First, you may have meant "empathize", but i'm wondering why? Sure there is a whole background to why this guy acts how he does, and maybe you're trying to get us to feel sorry for him since somehow his actions aren't his fault based on how he was raised or his life experiences. But i say nay. People still have the cognitave ability to decide their own actions. This man chose to create a false online persona, carry it on over a period of months, and then, being unprovoked, lash out against a woman who is simply living out her life. The obvious consequence is retaliation, and retaliate she did. However, this is just one occurance on her part. meanwhile his attacks on her were multiple. My need for posting is simply that i feel that this is a simple case of a bully (the guy) and the one being bullied (the girl). Rather than turning her cheek which she appeared to do at first she has chosen to retaliate, which i believe is justified given that he chose to keep up his harrassment of her twitter account.

On March 25 2011 03:58 OneBlueAugust wrote:


Once again, as before, your argument is better explained by simple ignorance. IE: Your hypothetical bullying victim really just doesn't understand how little time it would take to do what she did. The biggest time investment would have gone into figuring out who the "girlfriend" really is, and that was done by someone else. The rest is just copy-pasting twitter feeds and a few screenshots, and some pretty simple deduction and logic.

You don't need the bullying part at all for that explanation to work. The simpler explanation is the better one, I think. An irrational argument presented through accidental or willful ignorance has nothing to do with bullying, or at least, it doesn't need bullying as a root cause to occur.

On March 25 2011 04:00 Flew wrote:


I disagree with this - I feel there's every reason to put him down, and I admire the fact that she stood up to her bully.

He's powerless now, but for a long time he made himself feel powerful by picking on people he thought would be easy targets, and using a fake identity he created to give himself credibility.

It's so ironic how he hates women who are "fake", yet he created a fake woman himself in order to support his attacks on others.

On March 25 2011 03:48 Overpowered wrote:
Pwned. Do not fu*k with blonde asian girls.

On March 25 2011 04:14 Asjo wrote:
I do not believe that anyone deserves bad things to happen to them. Thus, regardless of the situation, I will not feel good about anyone being mocked or ridiculed, regardless of what for.

On March 25 2011 04:18 Asjo wrote:
Once again, you are simply echoing what I said; those posts mentioned denouncing the girl are not rational, rather based in feelings (or "ignorance", if you like). No doubt the "willful ignorance" that you speak of requires a motivation.

On March 25 2011 Peter Coffin wrote:

I attempted to stop this privately with Xiaxue, who she seems quite intent on ruining me. Kimi is not me, I'm not sure who she is.

On March 25 2011 Peter Coffin wrote:I honestly wanted to work it out, but you can't make something real. I want her to be real. Desperately, even. In fact, that is all I want.

On March 25 2011 Peter Coffin wrote:But at this moment, you are attacking me for making something up. I didn't. I don't even know how to put what has happened to me.

On March 25 2011 Peter Coffin wrote:You can say what you'd like, but you need to know that yes. I did something blind, stupid and embarrassing hanging on to someone...

On March 25 2011 Peter Coffin wrote:I didn't know that long. But I didn't invent this. I wish I had, but I didn't.

On March 25 2011 Peter Coffin wrote:Listen, if I were that mentally ill to make her up, I'd be dead right now. I didn't. I'm heartbroken and just dead inside.

On March 25 2011 Peter Coffin wrote:I'm not even asking you to do anything. You wanted my explanation, you have it. I probably won't be posting again for a while. Peace.

On March 25 2011 04:29 OneBlueAugust wrote:


You're suffering from the tunnel vision that you spoke of earlier, where your reactions are based on the consequences of an action, without taking the cause of those consequences into account. You're welcome to your belief that no one deserves bad consequences, but it will surely skew your view of the world in relation to most of the people you'll come in contact with.

As to the rest, I'm responding to your post in which you try to explain other people's mindsets. I found two of your explanations to be off-base, especially the one about bullying. It's logically incorrect. My posts had nothing to do with your personal views on the subject, but were instead responses to the ideas you presented.

On March 25 2011 04:35 chaokel wrote:
Looking at the guys latest tweets i feel a little sorry for him now (even though i still think he had something coming to him, if not exactly this). Keep in mind these tweets were all made within the same hour.

On March 25 2011 03:51 Asjo wrote:


I'll be happy to explain. Of the of the most common things we have seen against the girl is referring to her spending her time on researching this guy. This is not a rational judgment. People can spend time on many things, and as long as it's meaningful or useful to them no further justification is needed. So, why do people post this nonetheless? Because of the need I mentioned to denounce the girl - denounce the "bullies" who use their power of definition. People are probably saying it because it is an "argument" that they have used in other situations to denounce something where they didn't really have a rational reason, simply using the same reasoning again.

On March 25 2011 04:46 s.a.y wrote:
I hope she does sue him.

With all the evidence , she would have a strong case. The last email (from the Coffin Lawyer team) could be considered a thread (even if a false one).

So glad that loser got what he deserves.

On March 25 2011 04:36 Asjo wrote:
And yes, my personal views of are quite extreme. Ultra-humanistic, you might say. And can definite be hard to fit into our current society. Nonetheless, you have to remember that "justice", "evil" and many other terms used to pass judgment are simply social constructs led by past developments to be understood the way they are by people today. Therefore, it would be a mistake to say I suffer from "tunnel vision" simply because it does not fit into your rationale. I cannot to myself justify harming others, but that does not mean that I do not understand why others might. I simply means that I feel differently about it.

On March 25 2011 04:59 OneBlueAugust wrote:


Off topic warning

The argument that the idea of justice, evil, right, wrong, etc. are just moral constructs, and therefore their guidelines can be disregarded in some personal instances has always interested me. And your support of it is another thing that we disagree on, at least in part.

I think that justice, the feel of right and wrong, the idea of evil etc. are all learned, which would mean to some that they are "created", and therefore unnatural. However, that's too simplistic, in my opinion. The very ability to create laws and social constructs or universal norms is an evolutionary marvel, and the results of it should not be so easily discarded. The actions, reactions, motivations, and consequences involved in such a system drive the complexity of the world in which we live, to the point in which this "simple social construct" influences everything you do, and much of who you are.

People who say they live outside the world of the social consciousness, who say that they do not subscribe to the ideas of consequences, good and evil, or even right and wrong are always deluded. It's a simple matter of what you're willing to admit to yourself. Whether those things are "real" is up for debate, as the definition of real can change depending on who you're talking to. However, views like yours always prove to be inherently illogical, contradictory, and circular when presented with the correct situation. They tend to removes causal proof, premeditation, or intent from crimes, making consequences impossible. Actions without consequences go against the basic laws of the universe, and therefore the idea must be false.

Don't take this as a personal attack, because it's not. It's just a subject I'm interested in, and since you profess to believe in the idea I thought it'd be interesting to discuss it.

On March 25 2011 05:08 Asjo wrote:
I think you might be reading into my words if you equate them to living "outside the world of social consciousness". I'm simply saying that my values differ from those of most others. There is an endless amount of consequences, and there is no such things as ignoring that fact. However, purposely hurting others is not something I will rationalize as a "natural consequence", but rather something which goes against my base principles. No doubt that some of these base principles would be dangerous if transformed into political ideas, because human nature is a fickle thing, creating endlessly complex dilemmas that are impossible to deal with in absolutes, but nonetheless, all the people around me are likely the better off for what I believe.

On March 25 2011 04:41 ptrpb wrote:
Can someone please explain to me what the mindset of this blogger is?
The dude calls her out for getting a nose job and she proceeds to spend what seems like hours, maybe even solid days digging up as much shit as possible?
Like what the fuck kind of psychotic shit is this?

Gotta love the comments though, white knights galore.

On March 25 2011 04:35 chaokel wrote:
Looking at the guys latest tweets i feel a little sorry for him now (even though i still think he had something coming to him, if not exactly this). Keep in mind these tweets were all made within the same hour.

On March 25 2011 05:46 Milkis wrote:
He has an AMA going on at reddit now, getting destroyed, lol

http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/gaqg7/iama_target_of_a_smear_campaign_peter_coffin_ama/

On March 25 2011 05:53 Hawk wrote:


oh man that is wonderful

On March 25 2011 06:11 ArvickHero wrote:
el soThe person I ferry for the most is that Korean girl who got her pics stolen and used like that (fucking disgusting/creepy captions that went with those pics...). Could care less about the other two honestly

On March 25 2011 06:14 Fenrax wrote:
Not defending him, he obviously made her up, but he has a point at calling Xiaxue bitch and worse:

http://twitter.com/xiaxue/status/47510069591556096

On March 25 2011 06:14 Fenrax wrote:
Not defending him, he obviously made her up, but he has a point at calling Xiaxue bitch and worse:

http://twitter.com/xiaxue/status/47510069591556096