• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:07
CEST 01:07
KST 08:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy7[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple1BSL Season 235Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
new ranked ladder hack? Bot on ladder New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! [ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy an AI researcher's take on the ladder bot
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 1 [IPSL] IPSL is Back With Winter 26-27! [BSL23] SM: Ret vs TerrOr -> DragOn vs StRyKeR [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine All you football fans (soccer)! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Gaming Intensity, Problemati…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7998 users

NASA and the Private Sector - Page 114

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 112 113 114 115 116 250 Next
Keep debates civil.
CuddlyCuteKitten
Profile Joined January 2004
Sweden2889 Posts
March 29 2017 18:20 GMT
#2261
I am not that intrested in going to Mars or the moon either way. Real progress is about costs and logistics. Reducing launch costs is more important than going to Mars. Efficent and reliable robotic exploration is preferable to manned travel. Partial orbital assembly and refueling is much more intresting than fairly useless PR stunts.

The real goals should be to get launch costs low enough for a station that can assemble and fuel robotic spacecraft, use those to set up waystations where we want to go and assemble what we need there. And then the trip is still pure PR because the robots could have done the actual research on site. But its a good start for actual meaningfull exploration. If we could extract, refine and use materials in space that would be huge. Even just getting a large chunk of water into orbit that could be split into hydrogen and oxygen would be amazing.
Unity, support, family, and kneecapping bitches.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
March 29 2017 18:40 GMT
#2262
Yes, logistical improvements are pretty good and useful. For all the things I dislike about SpaceX I can definitely give them credit for the fact that they made very banal logistical improvements look exciting (partially through bullshitting and delusions of grandeur, but still). But we are simple people who need big achievements to look forward to - which wouldn't even be possible without pipe dream missions like Mars.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
thePunGun
Profile Blog Joined January 2016
598 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-29 18:53:06
March 29 2017 18:42 GMT
#2263
Well, getting water into orbit will probably be tediously impractical and again..expensive, there's plenty of hydrogen on the moon.
"You cannot teach a man anything, you can only help him find it within himself."
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-29 18:44:12
March 29 2017 18:43 GMT
#2264
Hell, there's water on the moon. Probably more logistically viable to set up a pump on the moon to make a shield. I'd say that shipping up the actual container would be a toughie though.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
CuddlyCuteKitten
Profile Joined January 2004
Sweden2889 Posts
March 29 2017 18:54 GMT
#2265
On March 30 2017 03:42 thePunGun wrote:
Well, getting water into orbit will probably be impractical and again..expensive, there's plenty of hydrogen on the moon.


I mean something more like finding it in the asteroid belt and towing it (actually probably converting chunks of it into mini spacecraft that drive themselves home). Mining the moon could work too. Just anything that avoids the massive energy sink of getting shit into earth orbit.
Unity, support, family, and kneecapping bitches.
ShoCkeyy
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
7815 Posts
March 29 2017 19:11 GMT
#2266
I mean if you think about it, surrounding yourself with water, that you can drink (shield + storage), while pumping new water from said locations (at least on the moon, or ceres).
Life?
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
March 29 2017 19:13 GMT
#2267
Potable water without gravity? Sounds like energy costs.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
zatic
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Zurich15366 Posts
March 29 2017 19:16 GMT
#2268
Well, that's exactly what all estimates seem to be saying. But in reality that means to travel for any extended amount of time away from Earth safely, we would have to sorround us with so much water for shielding, that it's just not going to happen until really scifiy stuff like space elevator or lunar mass driver.

I personally find it pretty depressing that we have to leave all space exploration to the robots, and might be stuck on Earth for who knows how long
ModeratorI know Teamliquid is known as a massive building
ShoCkeyy
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
7815 Posts
March 29 2017 19:22 GMT
#2269
On March 30 2017 04:16 zatic wrote:
Well, that's exactly what all estimates seem to be saying. But in reality that means to travel for any extended amount of time away from Earth safely, we would have to sorround us with so much water for shielding, that it's just not going to happen until really scifiy stuff like space elevator or lunar mass driver.

I personally find it pretty depressing that we have to leave all space exploration to the robots, and might be stuck on Earth for who knows how long


What about a space suit with a layer of water? Less weight, can last a lot longer for shielding purposes.
Life?
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-29 19:25:58
March 29 2017 19:25 GMT
#2270
Why not just lead? Shielding is generally a function of density so you're hardly going to be able to overcome the mass problem.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
March 29 2017 19:50 GMT
#2271
On March 30 2017 04:25 LegalLord wrote:
Why not just lead? Shielding is generally a function of density so you're hardly going to be able to overcome the mass problem.


Half truth. How well something shields radiation is a mix of density and number in the atomic table.

Second, lead actually would be bad as a radiation shield for interplanetary travel. Not because of weight/mass, but simply because it's good as a shield against x-ray and gamma-ray radiation - which are not the primary problem. Cosmic background radiation is, next to highly penetrative neutron radiation, beta particles etc. It also changes some radiation into worse stuff, for example beta radiation will hit on one side, unshielded x-ray radiation comes out the other (the inside of the ship in that case).

You'd also have to make it easy to access and easy to switch out (like the tiles on the shuttle), since it will degrade.

Lead won't happen. My bet is on LOX/Water as well. Mainly because it's effective and relatively easy to refurbish.
On track to MA1950A.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-29 20:02:22
March 29 2017 19:59 GMT
#2272
LOX... that's an odd one. You'd have to cool it if you wanted it to stay liquid for a prolonged period of time.

The biggest problem with water is that it's too bulky for the purposes desired. Container mass is going to cause trouble, but if you need a meter-thick water shield (based on that SE calculation)... well I guess you can be a blob in a space suit?

Fair point on the issues of lead though.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
March 29 2017 20:07 GMT
#2273
On March 30 2017 04:59 LegalLord wrote:
LOX... that's an odd one. You'd have to cool it if you wanted it to stay liquid for a prolonged period of time.

The biggest problem with water is that it's too bulky for the purposes desired. Container mass is going to cause trouble, but if you need a meter-thick water shield (based on that SE calculation)... well I guess you can be a blob in a space suit?


I wasn't talking space suits, the ship needs to be shielded, or at least the "compartment" where electronics/humans sit. On mars, i'd assume that a normal space suit will do the trick since you'll be outside shielded stuff only for a short while, but don't quote me on that. Again, mars colonisation/exploration doesn't really excite me much anymore.

I agree, water is very bulky, and comparatively very heavy (not compared to lead, but compared to what we're able to shoot up without prolonged orbital construction). LOX is odd because i'm dumb, i meant LH2.
On track to MA1950A.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
March 29 2017 20:08 GMT
#2274
Did some digging and found out that NASA has actually thought about this in far more depth than we did. Their answer? Hydrogen, and specifically a hydrogen-containing composite.

General background of the issue for those curious:
Nearly everything we know about the radiation exposure on a trip to Mars we have learned in the past 200 days.

For much longer, we have known that space is a risky place to be, radiation being one of many reasons. We believed that once our explorers safely landed on the surface of Mars, the planet would provide shielding from the ravages of radiation. We didn’t how much, or how little, until very recently. Radiation and its variations impact not only the planning of human and robotic missions, but also the search for life taking place right now.

The first-ever radiation readings from the surface of another planet were published last month in the journal Science. The take-home lesson, as well as the getting-there lesson and the staying-there lesson, is this: don’t forget to pack your shielding. [Mars Radiation Threat to Astronauts Explained (Infographic)]

"Radiation is the one environmental characteristic that we don’t have a lot of experience with on Earth because we’re protected by our magnetosphere and relatively thick atmosphere. But it’s a daily fact of life on Mars," said Don Hassler, the lead author on the paper, "Mars’ Surface Radiation Environment Measured with the Mars Science Laboratory’s Curiosity Rover."

Source

NASA commentary:
On Aug. 7, 1972, in the heart of the Apollo era, an enormous solar flare exploded from the sun’s atmosphere. Along with a gigantic burst of light in nearly all wavelengths, this event accelerated a wave of energetic particles. Mostly protons, with a few electrons and heavier elements mixed in, this wash of quick-moving particles would have been dangerous to anyone outside Earth’s protective magnetic bubble. Luckily, the Apollo 16 crew had returned to Earth just five months earlier, narrowly escaping this powerful event.

In the early days of human space flight, scientists were only just beginning to understand how events on the sun could affect space, and in turn how that radiation could affect humans and technology. Today, as a result of extensive space radiation research, we have a much better understanding of our space environment, its effects, and the best ways to protect astronauts—all crucial parts of NASA's mission to send humans to Mars.

"The Martian" film highlights the radiation dangers that could occur on a round trip to Mars. While the mission in the film is fictional, NASA has already started working on the technology to enable an actual trip to Mars in the 2030s. In the film, the astronauts’ habitat on Mars shields them from radiation, and indeed, radiation shielding will be a crucial technology for the voyage. From better shielding to advanced biomedical countermeasures, NASA currently studies how to protect astronauts and electronics from radiation – efforts that will have to be incorporated into every aspect of Mars mission planning, from spacecraft and habitat design to spacewalk protocols.

“The space radiation environment will be a critical consideration for everything in the astronauts’ daily lives, both on the journeys between Earth and Mars and on the surface,” said Ruthan Lewis, an architect and engineer with the human spaceflight program at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. “You’re constantly being bombarded by some amount of radiation.”

...

Using materials that shield more efficiently would cut down on weight and cost, but finding the right material takes research and ingenuity. NASA is currently investigating a handful of possibilities that could be used in anything from the spacecraft to the Martian habitat to space suits.

“The best way to stop particle radiation is by running that energetic particle into something that’s a similar size,” said Pellish. “Otherwise, it can be like you’re bouncing a tricycle off a tractor-trailer.”

Because protons and neutrons are similar in size, one element blocks both extremely well—hydrogen, which most commonly exists as just a single proton and an electron. Conveniently, hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, and makes up substantial parts of some common compounds, such as water and plastics like polyethylene. Engineers could take advantage of already-required mass by processing the astronauts’ trash into plastic-filled tiles used to bolster radiation protection. Water, already required for the crew, could be stored strategically to create a kind of radiation storm shelter in the spacecraft or habitat. However, this strategy comes with some challenges—the crew would need to use the water and then replace it with recycled water from the advanced life support systems.

Polyethylene, the same plastic commonly found in water bottles and grocery bags, also has potential as a candidate for radiation shielding. It is very high in hydrogen and fairly cheap to produce—however, it’s not strong enough to build a large structure, especially a spacecraft, which goes through high heat and strong forces during launch. And adding polyethylene to a metal structure would add quite a bit of mass, meaning that more fuel would be required for launch.

“We’ve made progress on reducing and shielding against these energetic particles, but we’re still working on finding a material that is a good shield and can act as the primary structure of the spacecraft,” said Sheila Thibeault, a materials researcher at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia.

One material in development at NASA has the potential to do both jobs: Hydrogenated boron nitride nanotubes—known as hydrogenated BNNTs—are tiny, nanotubes made of carbon, boron, and nitrogen, with hydrogen interspersed throughout the empty spaces left in between the tubes. Boron is also an excellent absorber secondary neutrons, making hydrogenated BNNTs an ideal shielding material.

Computer simulation of Martian polar plume
This computer simulation, based on data from NASA’s Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution, or MAVEN, spacecraft, shows the interaction of the streaming solar wind with Mars’ upper atmosphere. MAVEN is gathering information on the space environment at Mars—information that will be key to planning a human mission to Mars in the 2030s.
Credits: X. Fang, University of Colorado, and the MAVEN science team
Read more about MAVEN's atmospheric particle mapping

“This material is really strong—even at high heat—meaning that it’s great for structure,” said Thibeault.

Remarkably, researchers have successfully made yarn out of BNNTs, so it’s flexible enough to be woven into the fabric of space suits, providing astronauts with significant radiation protection even while they’re performing spacewalks in transit or out on the harsh Martian surface. Though hydrogenated BNNTs are still in development and testing, they have the potential to be one of our key structural and shielding materials in spacecraft, habitats, vehicles, and space suits that will be used on Mars.

Source

Also force fields.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-29 20:16:11
March 29 2017 20:14 GMT
#2275
Sounds smart. Smarter than i am in that regard, so i can't comment on it. My thought process is considerably easier, in the realms of "well, liquid hydrogen is a good shield, easy-ish to store and has three rather important sideeffects: A: it's cool. Heat is a big problem in space because it's hard to get rid off. B: could be used as fuel for retro/lithobraking once there" (again, no idea how they plan to descent etc), C: well, it can be turned into water, which would be of importance if humans are involved.

That's what it boils down to, i'm by no means what i'd even call a layman in rocket science. I'm a 1000 hours KSP veteran, is the best way to put it. :D

edit: force fields actually are possible. They just consume too much energy for now, with which comes heat as well. If we ever were to harness fusion, "force fields" (artificial electromagnetic shielding) are actually the best solution. We just take our magnetosphere with us.
On track to MA1950A.
ShoCkeyy
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
7815 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-29 20:16:31
March 29 2017 20:15 GMT
#2276
Nice, hydrogenated BNNTs sounds really interesting.
Life?
zatic
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Zurich15366 Posts
March 29 2017 20:17 GMT
#2277
According to the NASA study citied here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_threat_from_cosmic_rays#Mitigation you would need several tons of shielding material per square meter.

Even if we could ship that much mass into hypothetical orbit assembly, the prospect of flying around in a giant blob of hydrogen is decidedly unsexy.
ModeratorI know Teamliquid is known as a massive building
thePunGun
Profile Blog Joined January 2016
598 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-29 20:44:31
March 29 2017 20:23 GMT
#2278
There's actually a more feasible solution out there, superconducting shields:
A team at CERN is working with the European Space Radiation Superconducting Shield (link is external) (SR2S) project to develop a superconducting magnet that could protect astronauts from cosmic radiation during deep-space missions. The idea is to create an active magnetic field to shield spacecraft from high-energy particles.

The superconductor coils for the prototype magnet will be made of magnesium diboride (MgB2), the same type of conductor that was developed in the form of wire for the High Luminosity Cold Powering project at CERN's Large Hadron Collider.
....

Source
"You cannot teach a man anything, you can only help him find it within himself."
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-29 20:25:44
March 29 2017 20:24 GMT
#2279
On March 30 2017 05:17 zatic wrote:
According to the NASA study citied here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_threat_from_cosmic_rays#Mitigation you would need several tons of shielding material per square meter.

Even if we could ship that much mass into hypothetical orbit assembly, the prospect of flying around in a giant blob of hydrogen is decidedly unsexy.


Erm..

You do know what space station this is quoting, right?

edit: this one here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O'Neill_cylinder

And yeah.. I'd not go with those estimates. ^^
On track to MA1950A.
Sn0_Man
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
Tebellong44238 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-29 20:25:40
March 29 2017 20:25 GMT
#2280
I wonder precisely how powerful a magnetic field you'd need to emulate earth's magnetosphere on a small scale (just large enough do dissuade a decent % of radiation from hitting a relatively small object like a spacecraft)
LiquidDota StaffSCIENTISTS BAFFLED | 3275929302
Prev 1 112 113 114 115 116 250 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10h 53m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JuggernautJason93
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 520
firebathero 86
910 35
Dota 2
monkeys_forever427
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King82
PPMD36
Other Games
summit1g9250
Liquid`RaSZi3957
Grubby2374
FrodaN1405
shahzam538
JimRising 442
C9.Mang0270
B2W.Neo228
SteadfastSC86
Trikslyr63
CosmosSc2 21
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick363
BasetradeTV39
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 80
• mYiSmile115
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22445
League of Legends
• Scarra878
Other Games
• imaqtpie606
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10h 53m
Afreeca Starleague
10h 53m
Light vs EffOrt
OSC
12h 53m
PiGosaur Cup
1d
Kung Fu Cup
1d 11h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
GSL
5 days
[ Show More ]
Yamato Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.