• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 01:39
CET 07:39
KST 15:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners9Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11
Community News
StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!33$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship6[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win10
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BW General Discussion [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Grand Finals [BSL21] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Why we need SC3
Hildegard
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1554 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 837

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 835 836 837 838 839 1032 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
Mataru
Profile Joined June 2010
Norway356 Posts
February 07 2017 22:55 GMT
#16721
Correct. I like to visualize it as a tree where at the top level you have your numbers, each having five branches, one for each letter, which again have six branches, one for each color. There you have every possible combination: five times six branches for each number, meaning 4 * 5 * 6.
Proud citizen of ESPORTS
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-07 23:51:43
February 07 2017 23:50 GMT
#16722
Ah, discrete math from university. Mostly good memories. I don't like traditional math from school that much, but when I started studying discrete math at university, it really changed my opinion about doing math. Maybe because it involves a lot of real life problems, so you can more easily see why it could be useful.
dsyxelic
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1417 Posts
February 08 2017 00:40 GMT
#16723
On February 08 2017 06:36 Acrofales wrote:
If you don't have a server, I don't think there's much point to logging in at all, but in that case I can think of 2 ways of doing this:

1) A static database that you ship with the app, in which there are predefined users (some of which are flagged as admin), and within the app some functionality is locked (invisible) if the admin flag is off.

2) Two different apps, one for regular and one for admin users.

Regarding your second question: yes. You can either lock the access (in other words, the button to access the admin stuff is simply not there for regular users), lock the functionality (the users can see the admin functionality, but it doesn't do anything) or both. The most secure option is both, the easiest to implement is just to lock access.


ah thank you this was very helpful. will probably go with the static database + locking access to regular users.

yeah we realized how wildly impractical this app was but the whole project is graded on the process of development and simply for learning the development process so apparently it's ok even if the app is stupidly impractical.

will give it a go this weekend or so and hopefully I get some sort of functionality that I want
TL/SKT
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 00:58:21
February 08 2017 00:54 GMT
#16724
if i have a function


int whatever() {
while(1) {
//do some stuff
if(some condition is met) {
return (some int);
}
}
}


is this oversimplified example an easy way to create a loop in a function that needs to meet some criteria before stopping?
since this will just loop and then when it meets the criteria you can just return whatever it is you want to return ?

or are loops typically done this way?



int whatever() {
while(condition is not met) {
//do stuff
}

return(some int);

}



I guess this is a dumb question. It probably just depends on what's better for what you are trying to do. But really I am trying to make sure that nothing breaks in the first one.
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
February 08 2017 00:56 GMT
#16725
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 00:59:13
February 08 2017 00:57 GMT
#16726
On February 08 2017 09:56 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.


Return works as well, though it's also missing a return at the end of the function.


On February 08 2017 09:40 dsyxelic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2017 06:36 Acrofales wrote:
If you don't have a server, I don't think there's much point to logging in at all, but in that case I can think of 2 ways of doing this:

1) A static database that you ship with the app, in which there are predefined users (some of which are flagged as admin), and within the app some functionality is locked (invisible) if the admin flag is off.

2) Two different apps, one for regular and one for admin users.

Regarding your second question: yes. You can either lock the access (in other words, the button to access the admin stuff is simply not there for regular users), lock the functionality (the users can see the admin functionality, but it doesn't do anything) or both. The most secure option is both, the easiest to implement is just to lock access.


ah thank you this was very helpful. will probably go with the static database + locking access to regular users.

yeah we realized how wildly impractical this app was but the whole project is graded on the process of development and simply for learning the development process so apparently it's ok even if the app is stupidly impractical.

will give it a go this weekend or so and hopefully I get some sort of functionality that I want


Yeah I don't really understand why there is an admin function if it doesn't sync to an server, but if it's just for practice, sure. However there's a potential problem with implementing things in a way that you wouldn't do in a real app, which makes programming decisions strange to debate about. If you're just whitelisting the admin usernames and locally registering the user then any one can become an admin if they figure out the admin usernames. But it's not like being an admin would mean anything.
There is no one like you in the universe.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
February 08 2017 00:59 GMT
#16727
On February 08 2017 09:56 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.


so are you saying that instead of just returning the value from within the loop, first break (to take me out of the loop?) and then return the value?

Is there a reason to not doing the former?
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 01:06:26
February 08 2017 01:04 GMT
#16728
On February 08 2017 09:59 travis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2017 09:56 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.


so are you saying that instead of just returning the value from within the loop, first break (to take me out of the loop?) and then return the value?

Is there a reason to not doing the former?


It depends on your coding standards and the control flow.

+ Show Spoiler +


int fun() {
while (1) {
if (cond) {
break;
}
}
return getCondValue();
}



int fun() {
int result = 0;
while (1) {
if (cond) {
result = getValue(cond);
break;
}
}
return result;
}



int fun() {
while (1) {
if (cond) {
return getValue(cond);
}
}
return 0; // never gets here
}



int fun() {
while (1) {
if (cond) {
return getCondValue();
}
}
return 0; // never gets here
}



etc etc... all equivalent, whatever fits your scenario, whatever code you like more.
There is no one like you in the universe.
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 01:15:33
February 08 2017 01:05 GMT
#16729
On February 08 2017 09:59 travis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2017 09:56 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.


so are you saying that instead of just returning the value from within the loop, first break (to take me out of the loop?) and then return the value?

Is there a reason to not doing the former?


I'm saying don't make a new function that is just a loop so you can terminate it with a return value. It's not wrong, but I don't see why you'd want to write code that way.

If this is just a small part of a larger example, I would suggest using a break statement if this function has more than one possible return. When you're debugging things it is advantageous to have exactly one place that the function returns.
+ Show Spoiler [example code] +

int fun() {
int result = 0;
while (1) {
if (cond) {
result = getValue(cond);
break;
} else if (cond2) {
result = getValue(cond2);
break;
}
}
return result;
}

int fun() {
int result = 0;
while (1) {
if (cond) {
return getValue(cond);
} else if (cond2) {
return getValue(cond2);
}
}
return error;
}


Simple example, but when you're debugging something and the logic becomes more complicated I find it easier to debug with the former than the latter.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 02:07:30
February 08 2017 01:53 GMT
#16730
On February 08 2017 10:05 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2017 09:59 travis wrote:
On February 08 2017 09:56 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.


so are you saying that instead of just returning the value from within the loop, first break (to take me out of the loop?) and then return the value?

Is there a reason to not doing the former?


I'm saying don't make a new function that is just a loop so you can terminate it with a return value. It's not wrong, but I don't see why you'd want to write code that way.

If this is just a small part of a larger example, I would suggest using a break statement if this function has more than one possible return. When you're debugging things it is advantageous to have exactly one place that the function returns.
+ Show Spoiler [example code] +

int fun() {
int result = 0;
while (1) {
if (cond) {
result = getValue(cond);
break;
} else if (cond2) {
result = getValue(cond2);
break;
}
}
return result;
}

int fun() {
int result = 0;
while (1) {
if (cond) {
return getValue(cond);
} else if (cond2) {
return getValue(cond2);
}
}
return error;
}


Simple example, but when you're debugging something and the logic becomes more complicated I find it easier to debug with the former than the latter.


First, you shouldn't use while (1). That's awful. You should #include <stdbool.h> and use while (true). Secondly, you never return error. There's no condition to reach that code in your example. Finally, if you really want to do this properly, you'd usually use a thread with a callback function instead of blocking main thread like that (I assume you're doing that).

I also see no problem with this example:


while (true)
{
if (condition)
return getValue(condition);

<brief sleep so you don't waste CPU>
}


Hard to debug? If you find this hard to debug, you need to change your IDE or learn how to do it. It's super easy to debug in IDE like Visual Studio.
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
February 08 2017 02:29 GMT
#16731
On February 08 2017 10:53 Shield wrote:
First, you shouldn't use while (1). That's awful. You should #include <stdbool.h> and use while (true). Secondly, you never return error. There's no condition to reach that code in your example. Finally, if you really want to do this properly, you'd usually use a thread with a callback function instead of blocking main thread like that (I assume you're doing that).


You never return error is precisely why it's an error. I prefer self documenting code instead of adding a comment that says "never gets here" like Blisse, for example ERR_UNREACHABLE.

Travis is just learning C so lets assume his application isn't multi-threaded.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Neshapotamus
Profile Blog Joined May 2006
United States163 Posts
February 08 2017 03:45 GMT
#16732
After seeing travis post his simple question.

I have seen people write this code in every which way (code at bottom)

I listed several of them at the bottom.

Anyone have any preference to which version they write?

More recently, I prefer to write "fun1" way as this is the easiest to reason about meaning it maps directly into math. You also get other benefits as its easier to parallelize. However, you need a TCO language to execute the statement.

The second most intuitive is fun2.

Anyone who writes fun5, I just avoid...



void fun1(){

void fun(int a, int b) {
if (a > b){
return
}
else fun(a, b+1)
}

a = <init>
b = <init>
fun(a,b)
}



void fun2(){
a = <init>
for(int b = <init>; a > b; b++){
}
}

void fun3(){
a = <init>
b = <init>
while(true){
if (a > b){
break;
}
b += 1
}
}

void fun4(){
a = <init>
b = <init>
while(a > b){
b += 1
}
}

void fun5(){
start:
if (a > b){
b += 1
goto start
}
}

Hanh
Profile Joined June 2016
146 Posts
February 08 2017 04:33 GMT
#16733
Well, in this particular case I'd prefer

a = <init>
b = max(<init>, a)


because, why would you even loop?

But in the more general case, I'd go for


for (a = <init>, b = <init>; a > b; b++) ;


In order of best to worse, I'd rate 2, 4, 3, 5, 1. Btw, these functions aren't doing exactly the same thing.
plasmidghost
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgium16168 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 05:23:44
February 08 2017 05:22 GMT
#16734
I'm new to C and am trying to create a struct that will take a name input as well as take two integers then subtract the second from the first and output the result. I have the inputting and outputting of the char string working fine (could be made better, noted in code comments) but the subtraction function doesn't come close to working (any two numbers I input gives me a result of 134615508). Any help is greatly appreciated

#include<sys/stat.h>
#include<unistd.h>
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#include<string.h>
#include<sys/errno.h>
#include<fcntl.h>
struct Test //creates a structure
{
char name[10]; //a 10-character array
int num1; //the first integer
int num2; //the second integer
int sum; //the result of the subtraction of num2 from num1
}
inst; //instance of the struct
int main() //main function
{
printf("This program will prompt the user to input a name then two numbers.\n");
printf("The output will be the name and the result of the first number subtracted by the second number.\n");
struct Test; //links the struct to the main function
printf("Enter a name (up to 10 characters): ");
fgets(inst.name, 11, stdin); //if takes more than 10 characters, it ruins the rest of the code
printf("Enter the first integer: ");
scanf("%d", &inst.num1); //scans a number
printf("Enter the second integer: ");
scanf("%d", &inst.num2); //scans a second number
printf("The name is: %s", inst.name); //works correctly
inst.sum = &inst.num1 - &inst.num2;
printf("The result is: %d\n", &inst.sum); //doesn't output the correct answer
}
Yugoslavia will always live on in my heart
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 05:33:54
February 08 2017 05:33 GMT
#16735
struct Test //creates a structure
{
char name[10]; //a 10-character array
int num1; //the first integer
int num2; //the second integer
int sum; //the result of the subtraction of num2 from num1
}
inst; //instance of the struct

...

inst.sum = &inst.num1 - &inst.num2;
printf("The result is: %d\n", &inst.sum);


So first question is, why you are using ampersands here? Which should tell you the exact answer about why this isn't working.

+ Show Spoiler +
Hint: 134615508 is a memory address.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
plasmidghost
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgium16168 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 05:48:57
February 08 2017 05:36 GMT
#16736
On February 08 2017 14:33 WolfintheSheep wrote:
struct Test //creates a structure
{
char name[10]; //a 10-character array
int num1; //the first integer
int num2; //the second integer
int sum; //the result of the subtraction of num2 from num1
}
inst; //instance of the struct

...

inst.sum = &inst.num1 - &inst.num2;
printf("The result is: %d\n", &inst.sum);


So first question is, why you are using ampersands here? Which should tell you the exact answer about why this isn't working.

+ Show Spoiler +
Hint: 134615508 is a memory address.

Wow, okay, that fix was actually incredibly simple. Whenever I executed it before, I got the error "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" and I saw someone say that putting an ampersand fixed it
Now that everything's working fine, I do have a question about this statement:

printf("Enter a name (up to 10 characters): ");
fgets(inst.name, 11, stdin);

It currently will work correctly if the user hits the enter key with 10 characters or less inputted, but if they input 11 or more characters and hit Enter, the rest of the code immediately executes, meaning the user can't put in any numbers. Is there a way to fix that? I tried doing a for loop to accept 10 characters, 1 at a time, but it had the problem that if you inputted 4 characters, you had to press enter 6 times to get to the next part of the code, as well as it would take more than 10 characters if you inputted them all at once
Yugoslavia will always live on in my heart
Neshapotamus
Profile Blog Joined May 2006
United States163 Posts
February 08 2017 06:21 GMT
#16737
On February 08 2017 13:33 Hanh wrote:
Well, in this particular case I'd prefer

a = <init>
b = max(<init>, a)


because, why would you even loop?

But in the more general case, I'd go for


for (a = <init>, b = <init>; a > b; b++) ;


In order of best to worse, I'd rate 2, 4, 3, 5, 1. Btw, these functions aren't doing exactly the same thing.


I should have added a little more in the template. I was just making a point that you can loop in multiple ways. From a compiler perspective, yes, they aren't doing the same thing. From an abstraction perspective, they are. Unless you can tell me otherwise?
Hanh
Profile Joined June 2016
146 Posts
February 08 2017 06:38 GMT
#16738
In fun1 (assuming you could nest functions in C), arguments are passed by value so at the end, a & b aren't changed. In 2, 3, 4, 5 sometimes a > b is the condition for breaking out of the loop, and sometimes it is the condition for continuing looping.

Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
February 08 2017 07:13 GMT
#16739
On February 08 2017 12:45 Neshapotamus wrote:
After seeing travis post his simple question.

I have seen people write this code in every which way (code at bottom)

I listed several of them at the bottom.

Anyone have any preference to which version they write?

More recently, I prefer to write "fun1" way as this is the easiest to reason about meaning it maps directly into math. You also get other benefits as its easier to parallelize. However, you need a TCO language to execute the statement.

The second most intuitive is fun2.

Anyone who writes fun5, I just avoid...
+ Show Spoiler +



void fun1(){

void fun(int a, int b) {
if (a > b){
return
}
else fun(a, b+1)
}

a = <init>
b = <init>
fun(a,b)
}



void fun2(){
a = <init>
for(int b = <init>; a > b; b++){
}
}

void fun3(){
a = <init>
b = <init>
while(true){
if (a > b){
break;
}
b += 1
}
}

void fun4(){
a = <init>
b = <init>
while(a > b){
b += 1
}
}

void fun5(){
start:
if (a > b){
b += 1
goto start
}
}



fun2 is the only one I would ever conceivably write. The rest are complete no-gos and i'd never accept fun3-5 in a code review when there exists an equivalent form in fun2. It's my anti-while loop bias.
There is no one like you in the universe.
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
February 08 2017 07:23 GMT
#16740
On February 08 2017 11:29 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2017 10:53 Shield wrote:
First, you shouldn't use while (1). That's awful. You should #include <stdbool.h> and use while (true). Secondly, you never return error. There's no condition to reach that code in your example. Finally, if you really want to do this properly, you'd usually use a thread with a callback function instead of blocking main thread like that (I assume you're doing that).


You never return error is precisely why it's an error. I prefer self documenting code instead of adding a comment that says "never gets here" like Blisse, for example ERR_UNREACHABLE.

Travis is just learning C so lets assume his application isn't multi-threaded.


Well, in that case it's nice to have assert(false).
Prev 1 835 836 837 838 839 1032 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Korean StarCraft League
03:00
Week 82
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 206
ProTech122
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 928
Zeus 585
Noble 21
Hm[arnc] 21
Bale 13
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm94
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 634
Reynor19
Counter-Strike
fl0m320
Other Games
summit1g16780
tarik_tv13013
WinterStarcraft376
C9.Mang0373
FrodaN182
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick750
Counter-Strike
PGL151
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki14
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt709
Other Games
• Shiphtur173
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
3h 22m
IPSL
11h 22m
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
LAN Event
11h 22m
Lambo vs Clem
Scarlett vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs TBD
Zoun vs TBD
BSL 21
13h 22m
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs OyAji
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
Replay Cast
16h 22m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 3h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 5h
IPSL
1d 11h
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
LAN Event
1d 11h
BSL 21
1d 13h
spx vs rasowy
HBO vs KameZerg
Cross vs Razz
dxtr13 vs ZZZero
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.