• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:20
CEST 07:20
KST 14:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall6HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL40Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster14Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? StarCraft Mass Recall: SC1 campaigns on SC2 thread How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL Help: rep cant save BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Where did Hovz go?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 504 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 837

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 835 836 837 838 839 1031 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
Mataru
Profile Joined June 2010
Norway356 Posts
February 07 2017 22:55 GMT
#16721
Correct. I like to visualize it as a tree where at the top level you have your numbers, each having five branches, one for each letter, which again have six branches, one for each color. There you have every possible combination: five times six branches for each number, meaning 4 * 5 * 6.
Proud citizen of ESPORTS
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-07 23:51:43
February 07 2017 23:50 GMT
#16722
Ah, discrete math from university. Mostly good memories. I don't like traditional math from school that much, but when I started studying discrete math at university, it really changed my opinion about doing math. Maybe because it involves a lot of real life problems, so you can more easily see why it could be useful.
dsyxelic
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1417 Posts
February 08 2017 00:40 GMT
#16723
On February 08 2017 06:36 Acrofales wrote:
If you don't have a server, I don't think there's much point to logging in at all, but in that case I can think of 2 ways of doing this:

1) A static database that you ship with the app, in which there are predefined users (some of which are flagged as admin), and within the app some functionality is locked (invisible) if the admin flag is off.

2) Two different apps, one for regular and one for admin users.

Regarding your second question: yes. You can either lock the access (in other words, the button to access the admin stuff is simply not there for regular users), lock the functionality (the users can see the admin functionality, but it doesn't do anything) or both. The most secure option is both, the easiest to implement is just to lock access.


ah thank you this was very helpful. will probably go with the static database + locking access to regular users.

yeah we realized how wildly impractical this app was but the whole project is graded on the process of development and simply for learning the development process so apparently it's ok even if the app is stupidly impractical.

will give it a go this weekend or so and hopefully I get some sort of functionality that I want
TL/SKT
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 00:58:21
February 08 2017 00:54 GMT
#16724
if i have a function


int whatever() {
while(1) {
//do some stuff
if(some condition is met) {
return (some int);
}
}
}


is this oversimplified example an easy way to create a loop in a function that needs to meet some criteria before stopping?
since this will just loop and then when it meets the criteria you can just return whatever it is you want to return ?

or are loops typically done this way?



int whatever() {
while(condition is not met) {
//do stuff
}

return(some int);

}



I guess this is a dumb question. It probably just depends on what's better for what you are trying to do. But really I am trying to make sure that nothing breaks in the first one.
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
February 08 2017 00:56 GMT
#16725
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 00:59:13
February 08 2017 00:57 GMT
#16726
On February 08 2017 09:56 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.


Return works as well, though it's also missing a return at the end of the function.


On February 08 2017 09:40 dsyxelic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2017 06:36 Acrofales wrote:
If you don't have a server, I don't think there's much point to logging in at all, but in that case I can think of 2 ways of doing this:

1) A static database that you ship with the app, in which there are predefined users (some of which are flagged as admin), and within the app some functionality is locked (invisible) if the admin flag is off.

2) Two different apps, one for regular and one for admin users.

Regarding your second question: yes. You can either lock the access (in other words, the button to access the admin stuff is simply not there for regular users), lock the functionality (the users can see the admin functionality, but it doesn't do anything) or both. The most secure option is both, the easiest to implement is just to lock access.


ah thank you this was very helpful. will probably go with the static database + locking access to regular users.

yeah we realized how wildly impractical this app was but the whole project is graded on the process of development and simply for learning the development process so apparently it's ok even if the app is stupidly impractical.

will give it a go this weekend or so and hopefully I get some sort of functionality that I want


Yeah I don't really understand why there is an admin function if it doesn't sync to an server, but if it's just for practice, sure. However there's a potential problem with implementing things in a way that you wouldn't do in a real app, which makes programming decisions strange to debate about. If you're just whitelisting the admin usernames and locally registering the user then any one can become an admin if they figure out the admin usernames. But it's not like being an admin would mean anything.
There is no one like you in the universe.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
February 08 2017 00:59 GMT
#16727
On February 08 2017 09:56 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.


so are you saying that instead of just returning the value from within the loop, first break (to take me out of the loop?) and then return the value?

Is there a reason to not doing the former?
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 01:06:26
February 08 2017 01:04 GMT
#16728
On February 08 2017 09:59 travis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2017 09:56 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.


so are you saying that instead of just returning the value from within the loop, first break (to take me out of the loop?) and then return the value?

Is there a reason to not doing the former?


It depends on your coding standards and the control flow.

+ Show Spoiler +


int fun() {
while (1) {
if (cond) {
break;
}
}
return getCondValue();
}



int fun() {
int result = 0;
while (1) {
if (cond) {
result = getValue(cond);
break;
}
}
return result;
}



int fun() {
while (1) {
if (cond) {
return getValue(cond);
}
}
return 0; // never gets here
}



int fun() {
while (1) {
if (cond) {
return getCondValue();
}
}
return 0; // never gets here
}



etc etc... all equivalent, whatever fits your scenario, whatever code you like more.
There is no one like you in the universe.
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 01:15:33
February 08 2017 01:05 GMT
#16729
On February 08 2017 09:59 travis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2017 09:56 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.


so are you saying that instead of just returning the value from within the loop, first break (to take me out of the loop?) and then return the value?

Is there a reason to not doing the former?


I'm saying don't make a new function that is just a loop so you can terminate it with a return value. It's not wrong, but I don't see why you'd want to write code that way.

If this is just a small part of a larger example, I would suggest using a break statement if this function has more than one possible return. When you're debugging things it is advantageous to have exactly one place that the function returns.
+ Show Spoiler [example code] +

int fun() {
int result = 0;
while (1) {
if (cond) {
result = getValue(cond);
break;
} else if (cond2) {
result = getValue(cond2);
break;
}
}
return result;
}

int fun() {
int result = 0;
while (1) {
if (cond) {
return getValue(cond);
} else if (cond2) {
return getValue(cond2);
}
}
return error;
}


Simple example, but when you're debugging something and the logic becomes more complicated I find it easier to debug with the former than the latter.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 02:07:30
February 08 2017 01:53 GMT
#16730
On February 08 2017 10:05 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2017 09:59 travis wrote:
On February 08 2017 09:56 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
break;


Would be the statement you're looking for I think.


so are you saying that instead of just returning the value from within the loop, first break (to take me out of the loop?) and then return the value?

Is there a reason to not doing the former?


I'm saying don't make a new function that is just a loop so you can terminate it with a return value. It's not wrong, but I don't see why you'd want to write code that way.

If this is just a small part of a larger example, I would suggest using a break statement if this function has more than one possible return. When you're debugging things it is advantageous to have exactly one place that the function returns.
+ Show Spoiler [example code] +

int fun() {
int result = 0;
while (1) {
if (cond) {
result = getValue(cond);
break;
} else if (cond2) {
result = getValue(cond2);
break;
}
}
return result;
}

int fun() {
int result = 0;
while (1) {
if (cond) {
return getValue(cond);
} else if (cond2) {
return getValue(cond2);
}
}
return error;
}


Simple example, but when you're debugging something and the logic becomes more complicated I find it easier to debug with the former than the latter.


First, you shouldn't use while (1). That's awful. You should #include <stdbool.h> and use while (true). Secondly, you never return error. There's no condition to reach that code in your example. Finally, if you really want to do this properly, you'd usually use a thread with a callback function instead of blocking main thread like that (I assume you're doing that).

I also see no problem with this example:


while (true)
{
if (condition)
return getValue(condition);

<brief sleep so you don't waste CPU>
}


Hard to debug? If you find this hard to debug, you need to change your IDE or learn how to do it. It's super easy to debug in IDE like Visual Studio.
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
February 08 2017 02:29 GMT
#16731
On February 08 2017 10:53 Shield wrote:
First, you shouldn't use while (1). That's awful. You should #include <stdbool.h> and use while (true). Secondly, you never return error. There's no condition to reach that code in your example. Finally, if you really want to do this properly, you'd usually use a thread with a callback function instead of blocking main thread like that (I assume you're doing that).


You never return error is precisely why it's an error. I prefer self documenting code instead of adding a comment that says "never gets here" like Blisse, for example ERR_UNREACHABLE.

Travis is just learning C so lets assume his application isn't multi-threaded.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Neshapotamus
Profile Blog Joined May 2006
United States163 Posts
February 08 2017 03:45 GMT
#16732
After seeing travis post his simple question.

I have seen people write this code in every which way (code at bottom)

I listed several of them at the bottom.

Anyone have any preference to which version they write?

More recently, I prefer to write "fun1" way as this is the easiest to reason about meaning it maps directly into math. You also get other benefits as its easier to parallelize. However, you need a TCO language to execute the statement.

The second most intuitive is fun2.

Anyone who writes fun5, I just avoid...



void fun1(){

void fun(int a, int b) {
if (a > b){
return
}
else fun(a, b+1)
}

a = <init>
b = <init>
fun(a,b)
}



void fun2(){
a = <init>
for(int b = <init>; a > b; b++){
}
}

void fun3(){
a = <init>
b = <init>
while(true){
if (a > b){
break;
}
b += 1
}
}

void fun4(){
a = <init>
b = <init>
while(a > b){
b += 1
}
}

void fun5(){
start:
if (a > b){
b += 1
goto start
}
}

Hanh
Profile Joined June 2016
146 Posts
February 08 2017 04:33 GMT
#16733
Well, in this particular case I'd prefer

a = <init>
b = max(<init>, a)


because, why would you even loop?

But in the more general case, I'd go for


for (a = <init>, b = <init>; a > b; b++) ;


In order of best to worse, I'd rate 2, 4, 3, 5, 1. Btw, these functions aren't doing exactly the same thing.
plasmidghost
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgium16168 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 05:23:44
February 08 2017 05:22 GMT
#16734
I'm new to C and am trying to create a struct that will take a name input as well as take two integers then subtract the second from the first and output the result. I have the inputting and outputting of the char string working fine (could be made better, noted in code comments) but the subtraction function doesn't come close to working (any two numbers I input gives me a result of 134615508). Any help is greatly appreciated

#include<sys/stat.h>
#include<unistd.h>
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#include<string.h>
#include<sys/errno.h>
#include<fcntl.h>
struct Test //creates a structure
{
char name[10]; //a 10-character array
int num1; //the first integer
int num2; //the second integer
int sum; //the result of the subtraction of num2 from num1
}
inst; //instance of the struct
int main() //main function
{
printf("This program will prompt the user to input a name then two numbers.\n");
printf("The output will be the name and the result of the first number subtracted by the second number.\n");
struct Test; //links the struct to the main function
printf("Enter a name (up to 10 characters): ");
fgets(inst.name, 11, stdin); //if takes more than 10 characters, it ruins the rest of the code
printf("Enter the first integer: ");
scanf("%d", &inst.num1); //scans a number
printf("Enter the second integer: ");
scanf("%d", &inst.num2); //scans a second number
printf("The name is: %s", inst.name); //works correctly
inst.sum = &inst.num1 - &inst.num2;
printf("The result is: %d\n", &inst.sum); //doesn't output the correct answer
}
Yugoslavia will always live on in my heart
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 05:33:54
February 08 2017 05:33 GMT
#16735
struct Test //creates a structure
{
char name[10]; //a 10-character array
int num1; //the first integer
int num2; //the second integer
int sum; //the result of the subtraction of num2 from num1
}
inst; //instance of the struct

...

inst.sum = &inst.num1 - &inst.num2;
printf("The result is: %d\n", &inst.sum);


So first question is, why you are using ampersands here? Which should tell you the exact answer about why this isn't working.

+ Show Spoiler +
Hint: 134615508 is a memory address.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
plasmidghost
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgium16168 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-08 05:48:57
February 08 2017 05:36 GMT
#16736
On February 08 2017 14:33 WolfintheSheep wrote:
struct Test //creates a structure
{
char name[10]; //a 10-character array
int num1; //the first integer
int num2; //the second integer
int sum; //the result of the subtraction of num2 from num1
}
inst; //instance of the struct

...

inst.sum = &inst.num1 - &inst.num2;
printf("The result is: %d\n", &inst.sum);


So first question is, why you are using ampersands here? Which should tell you the exact answer about why this isn't working.

+ Show Spoiler +
Hint: 134615508 is a memory address.

Wow, okay, that fix was actually incredibly simple. Whenever I executed it before, I got the error "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" and I saw someone say that putting an ampersand fixed it
Now that everything's working fine, I do have a question about this statement:

printf("Enter a name (up to 10 characters): ");
fgets(inst.name, 11, stdin);

It currently will work correctly if the user hits the enter key with 10 characters or less inputted, but if they input 11 or more characters and hit Enter, the rest of the code immediately executes, meaning the user can't put in any numbers. Is there a way to fix that? I tried doing a for loop to accept 10 characters, 1 at a time, but it had the problem that if you inputted 4 characters, you had to press enter 6 times to get to the next part of the code, as well as it would take more than 10 characters if you inputted them all at once
Yugoslavia will always live on in my heart
Neshapotamus
Profile Blog Joined May 2006
United States163 Posts
February 08 2017 06:21 GMT
#16737
On February 08 2017 13:33 Hanh wrote:
Well, in this particular case I'd prefer

a = <init>
b = max(<init>, a)


because, why would you even loop?

But in the more general case, I'd go for


for (a = <init>, b = <init>; a > b; b++) ;


In order of best to worse, I'd rate 2, 4, 3, 5, 1. Btw, these functions aren't doing exactly the same thing.


I should have added a little more in the template. I was just making a point that you can loop in multiple ways. From a compiler perspective, yes, they aren't doing the same thing. From an abstraction perspective, they are. Unless you can tell me otherwise?
Hanh
Profile Joined June 2016
146 Posts
February 08 2017 06:38 GMT
#16738
In fun1 (assuming you could nest functions in C), arguments are passed by value so at the end, a & b aren't changed. In 2, 3, 4, 5 sometimes a > b is the condition for breaking out of the loop, and sometimes it is the condition for continuing looping.

Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
February 08 2017 07:13 GMT
#16739
On February 08 2017 12:45 Neshapotamus wrote:
After seeing travis post his simple question.

I have seen people write this code in every which way (code at bottom)

I listed several of them at the bottom.

Anyone have any preference to which version they write?

More recently, I prefer to write "fun1" way as this is the easiest to reason about meaning it maps directly into math. You also get other benefits as its easier to parallelize. However, you need a TCO language to execute the statement.

The second most intuitive is fun2.

Anyone who writes fun5, I just avoid...
+ Show Spoiler +



void fun1(){

void fun(int a, int b) {
if (a > b){
return
}
else fun(a, b+1)
}

a = <init>
b = <init>
fun(a,b)
}



void fun2(){
a = <init>
for(int b = <init>; a > b; b++){
}
}

void fun3(){
a = <init>
b = <init>
while(true){
if (a > b){
break;
}
b += 1
}
}

void fun4(){
a = <init>
b = <init>
while(a > b){
b += 1
}
}

void fun5(){
start:
if (a > b){
b += 1
goto start
}
}



fun2 is the only one I would ever conceivably write. The rest are complete no-gos and i'd never accept fun3-5 in a code review when there exists an equivalent form in fun2. It's my anti-while loop bias.
There is no one like you in the universe.
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
February 08 2017 07:23 GMT
#16740
On February 08 2017 11:29 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2017 10:53 Shield wrote:
First, you shouldn't use while (1). That's awful. You should #include <stdbool.h> and use while (true). Secondly, you never return error. There's no condition to reach that code in your example. Finally, if you really want to do this properly, you'd usually use a thread with a callback function instead of blocking main thread like that (I assume you're doing that).


You never return error is precisely why it's an error. I prefer self documenting code instead of adding a comment that says "never gets here" like Blisse, for example ERR_UNREACHABLE.

Travis is just learning C so lets assume his application isn't multi-threaded.


Well, in that case it's nice to have assert(false).
Prev 1 835 836 837 838 839 1031 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 40m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 231
StarCraft: Brood War
PianO 391
Snow 103
Aegong 65
JulyZerg 61
Nal_rA 45
Rock 31
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
Noble 9
Icarus 7
Bale 6
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm116
League of Legends
JimRising 779
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K726
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King201
amsayoshi47
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor98
Other Games
summit1g9128
shahzam719
hungrybox380
WinterStarcraft368
RuFF_SC266
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1007
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH330
• practicex 48
• OhrlRock 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1280
• Lourlo883
• Stunt388
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
4h 40m
RSL Revival
4h 40m
ByuN vs Classic
Clem vs Cham
WardiTV European League
10h 40m
Replay Cast
18h 40m
RSL Revival
1d 4h
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
WardiTV European League
1d 10h
FEL
1d 10h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 21h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
[ Show More ]
FEL
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL: ProLeague
3 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.