• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:20
CEST 21:20
KST 04:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy9[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple2BSL Season 238Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) 2026 GSTL Announcement RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder SC4ALL II: Brood War Player Announcement 4/4 BSL Season 23 screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 [IPSL] IPSL is Back With Winter 26-27! PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague [ASL22] Ro16 Group D
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Diablo IV EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread All you football fans (soccer)!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Violent-Cooperative Play and…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6917 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 812

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 810 811 812 813 814 1032 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18445 Posts
December 07 2016 14:41 GMT
#16221
Oh wait. When copying to run my own tests, I just saw that in your main method, pb is not a phonebook, it is a TreeMap<String, String>. That is, of course, only going to have <a, 3> in there after your 3 puts...
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
12168 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-07 14:58:52
December 07 2016 14:45 GMT
#16222
On December 07 2016 23:41 Acrofales wrote:
Oh wait. When copying to run my own tests, I just saw that in your main method, pb is not a phonebook, it is a TreeMap<String, String>. That is, of course, only going to have <a, 3> in there after your 3 puts...


Right you are. I made a big mistake there. :/

On December 07 2016 23:40 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2016 23:26 Yurie wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

On December 07 2016 23:18 Acrofales wrote:
Unless you have a very specific reason to use LinkedList, an arraylist is always better. But given that you want numbers to be unique, why not use a HashSet (which will give you most of the functionality you want)?

That said, it should affect performance, and not functionality.

However, I don't quite understand your debugging info. Your phonebook having size one before you add b seems correct: it has one entry: <a, LinkedList object>. Your linked list should have 3 values (1, 2, 3), not your map.


So nested HashSets instead of using a string, arraylist (or linkedlist)? I am not sure how that works but it might be easier since I am required to export it to a set. Else I assume I would have to do something like the following but with the size of the arraylist.
      try {
for(int i = 0; i < size-1; i++) {
set.add(count[i];
}



As for adding the numbers one by one I found the following on stackexchange that I will experiment a bit with:
String key = "mango";
int number = 42;
if (map.get(key) == null) {
map.put(key, new ArrayList<Integer>());
}
map.get(key).add(number);


I only get the last value 3 when I actually check the memory in the variables. So regardless that my code should return 2 it doesn't have the right thing in memory since my put code is wrong.

Edit, thanks for the replies people. I'll try working at it a bit before asking for help again. Great advice.


Sets are the smarter way to do it. A Set is just a List that can't have duplicate values. Having a duplicate phone number does not make sense. I was under the impression that you had to use a List for the assignment, but if you can choose then do use a Set instead of an ArrayList.


Seems to work in a short test code. Thanks for the idea. Now to get the actual thing to work, easier when I get the logic.

public class Testphoneb {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Map<String, Set<String>> pb = new HashMap<String, Set<String>>();
System.out.println("Size: " + pb.size());

Set<String> a = new HashSet<String>();
a.add("1");
a.add("2");
a.add("3");

Set<String> b = new HashSet<String>();
b.add("4");
pb.put("start", a);
pb.put("end", b);
System.out.println("Size: " + pb.size());
System.out.println("Get start: " + pb.get("start"));
System.out.println("Get end: " + pb.get("end"));
}
}

Output is now correct in the short test code on how it works:

Size: 0
Size: 2
Get start: [1, 2, 3]
Get end: [4]
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
12168 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-07 15:43:05
December 07 2016 15:39 GMT
#16223
Got stuck on one last test case of the 26 groups of them and I can't see why it acts that way. Could somebody explain the logic so I can solve the problem? (It is still Java.) Fill() adds 1,2,3 to a, so three values in size. The numbers.add("4"); somehow adds to the main phonebook as well and I don't understand why.


public final void testFindNumbersNamesNoInternalReferencesReturned() {
fill();
Set<String> numbers = pb.findNumbers("a");
assertEquals("Wrong size for number set to a:", 3, pb.findNumbers("a").size());
numbers.add("4");
assertEquals("Reference to internal set returned. Wrong size for number set to a:", 3, pb.findNumbers("a").size());
assertFalse("Reference to internal set returned. Number found in phonebook: a", pb.findNumbers("a").contains("4"));
}


Referring to findNumbers that is a bit longer than it needs to be since I've been tinkering with it to try to solve it.
	public Set<String> findNumbers(String name) {
if(phoneBook.containsKey(name)){
Set<String> number = new HashSet<String>();
number = phoneBook.get(name);
return number;
}
else{
Set<String> number = new HashSet<String>();
return number;
}
}


phoneBook is already set as private, which I thought might be the problem even though it shouldn't be.

public class MapPhoneBook implements PhoneBook{
private Map<String, Set<String>> phoneBook;

public MapPhoneBook() {
phoneBook = new HashMap<String, Set<String>>();
}

Nesserev
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium2760 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-07 16:15:27
December 07 2016 16:02 GMT
#16224
--- Nuked ---
3FFA
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States3931 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-07 16:30:40
December 07 2016 16:29 GMT
#16225
Talked with a few game developers in AAA and Indie studios, and determined that C# with Unity is the right path for me to go(this is something I recommend anyone reading this for advice in their own decision does research into for themselves, as this is a personal decision based on my own strengths and weaknesses), going towards the goal of getting a job in an Indie game studio.

With this in mind, I'd love to know of what resources you guys might recommend for learning C# and Unity, specifically focusing on game programming, not the art at all.

So far I'm going to be using Unity's own free tutorials and this book on C#.
http://www.introprogramming.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Books/CSharpEn/Fundamentals-of-Computer-Programming-with-CSharp-Nakov-eBook-v2013.pdf
"As long as it comes from a pure place and from a honest place, you know, you can write whatever you want."
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18445 Posts
December 07 2016 17:29 GMT
#16226
On December 08 2016 00:39 Yurie wrote:
Got stuck on one last test case of the 26 groups of them and I can't see why it acts that way. Could somebody explain the logic so I can solve the problem? (It is still Java.) Fill() adds 1,2,3 to a, so three values in size. The numbers.add("4"); somehow adds to the main phonebook as well and I don't understand why.


public final void testFindNumbersNamesNoInternalReferencesReturned() {
fill();
Set<String> numbers = pb.findNumbers("a");
assertEquals("Wrong size for number set to a:", 3, pb.findNumbers("a").size());
numbers.add("4");
assertEquals("Reference to internal set returned. Wrong size for number set to a:", 3, pb.findNumbers("a").size());
assertFalse("Reference to internal set returned. Number found in phonebook: a", pb.findNumbers("a").contains("4"));
}


Referring to findNumbers that is a bit longer than it needs to be since I've been tinkering with it to try to solve it.
	public Set<String> findNumbers(String name) {
if(phoneBook.containsKey(name)){
Set<String> number = new HashSet<String>();
number = phoneBook.get(name);
return number;
}
else{
Set<String> number = new HashSet<String>();
return number;
}
}


phoneBook is already set as private, which I thought might be the problem even though it shouldn't be.

public class MapPhoneBook implements PhoneBook{
private Map<String, Set<String>> phoneBook;

public MapPhoneBook() {
phoneBook = new HashMap<String, Set<String>>();
}



This. But to make your life easier, you can use a copy constructor.
BluzMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2006
Russian Federation4235 Posts
December 07 2016 19:07 GMT
#16227
Quick question to those already in the industry: do you really (the truth now!) write comments in your code? All the open source libraries have these docstrings and fancy annotations, but does your actual production code not meant for public eyes have any?
You want 20 good men, but you need a bad pussy.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18445 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-07 19:24:04
December 07 2016 19:23 GMT
#16228
There's production code not meant for others to see? You need to treat your future self as other people, because for choosing purposes you effectively are.

That said, I am pretty terrible at documenting my code and am off the belief that a method should do 1 thing and be named appropriately. If it does lots of other stuff it means that either the other stuff is necessary to do it's main purpose and otherwise unimportant (and only needs to be done if doing the method's stuff), or it was written by an idiot (that idiot may y have been me 2 weeks ago).

I only document when something will need to be fiddled with and is rather complicated and/or non-obvious. Other than that I use comments like post-its: todos, ideas for cleaning up, or refactoring, etc.
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
December 07 2016 19:36 GMT
#16229
On December 08 2016 04:07 BluzMan wrote:
Quick question to those already in the industry: do you really (the truth now!) write comments in your code? All the open source libraries have these docstrings and fancy annotations, but does your actual production code not meant for public eyes have any?

It is fairly easy to enforce comments in a good IDE. Plus code reviews.
Comments are important. You have a team you work with, and you have to understand your own code 6 months from now.

Be careful though: pointless comments are bad, and overly verbose comments are bad too. Try to stick with the stuff that actually adds information.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19257 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-07 19:56:51
December 07 2016 19:54 GMT
#16230
On December 08 2016 04:07 BluzMan wrote:
Quick question to those already in the industry: do you really (the truth now!) write comments in your code? All the open source libraries have these docstrings and fancy annotations, but does your actual production code not meant for public eyes have any?

all the time. a few examples I've personally written:

        try {
$this->em = $this->getManager();
$this->verbose = $verbose;
$this->logger = $this->getContainer()->get('logger');
} catch (\Exception $e) {
// not really anything we can do here, since either the em set fails and logger isn't set,
// or logger fails and logger isn't set
// maybe we just cry here?
dump("something happened");
dump($e);
}



// at some point this should do something productive instead
$request_type = $this->getRequestType($request);


        $rule = $this->getRepository('SharedBundle:ProgramRule')->findActiveRule($dates, $program, $group->getId());
# findActiveRule returns the first rule it can find that matches everything, though the only reason there would be
# multiple is if one of us was futzing with the db


edit: one that was extremely confusing
        if (!is_array($contract->_contract_participant_fees)) {
return 0; # this should probably never happen, except it did, see TD-84
}
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
December 07 2016 19:58 GMT
#16231
On December 08 2016 04:07 BluzMan wrote:
Quick question to those already in the industry: do you really (the truth now!) write comments in your code? All the open source libraries have these docstrings and fancy annotations, but does your actual production code not meant for public eyes have any?

Most code is simple boilerplate code. If the method and variable names are well chosen and descriptive, and the code itself is straight forward and simple, I dont commentate.
Once I use more complicated algorithms to calculate something, or when the code has a strange structure, I write comments explaining what is happening.

Whenever I catch myself doubting code I had written (having to think it over or test it out once more) I comment it just in case I might ever get into this situation again where I am not quite sure what that particular part does. For example when I am more "clever" then usual and come up with some funny data structure at 3 in the morning.
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19257 Posts
December 07 2016 20:02 GMT
#16232
oh and one I didn't write but is all over because the people we outsourced the project to in the beginning suck:
    //$data contains all the changes to the row.
//$new is true if we're inserting a row, and false if we're saving it.
//If anything other than true is returned, validation fails.
//This means you may return an error code or string or anything.
//This is called before the validation rules defined in $_rules.
public static function _validate($data, $new = false)
{
return true;
}
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-07 20:32:33
December 07 2016 20:32 GMT
#16233
I write way more comments at work than privately because we're required to put a comment on every single method. It would be enough to comment all the dll-public classes and methods and all the stuff that isn't immediately obvious. Also be brief. Ideally you are not required to comment more than that, because comments that don't add any value are a waste of time, can get out of sync with the code and create visual clutter. Which teaches you to ignore all comments, even the valuable ones. As much information as possible should be immediately obvious from the code by choosing good names and structuring the code well.

Still, always consider how hard a piece of code will be to understand for your colleague or you in 6 months. Heck, consider it for yourself, 6 months ago (or whatever time you were significantly less skilled). If someone might think a minute about, spend those 10 seconds and write a comment (after you verified that the code is already as clear as you can reasonably write it).
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
mantequilla
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
Turkey781 Posts
December 07 2016 20:47 GMT
#16234
On December 08 2016 05:02 tofucake wrote:
oh and one I didn't write but is all over because the people we outsourced the project to in the beginning suck:
    //$data contains all the changes to the row.
//$new is true if we're inserting a row, and false if we're saving it.
//If anything other than true is returned, validation fails.
//This means you may return an error code or string or anything.
//This is called before the validation rules defined in $_rules.
public static function _validate($data, $new = false)
{
return true;
}



validation is one of the most problematic topics in writing good code imo. Add multilingual support in error messages plus different clients and it gets huge.
Age of Mythology forever!
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19257 Posts
December 07 2016 21:01 GMT
#16235
the data isn't actually validated, it just returns true
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
BluzMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2006
Russian Federation4235 Posts
December 07 2016 21:26 GMT
#16236
Well, I'm asking because after several years of work I find myself avoiding annotating code more and more, and I realize that my inner desire contradicts the "best practices" in software world, and I want to find out if anyone else feels the same way. I actually feel pretty angry when I find comments in code written by others unless there's a specific hack that is really impossible to understand without them.

Whenever I read code, everything is structured, all the tokens are color-coded and it takes me but a small glance to understand what's going on. Furthermore, should something get changed, I've got a massive type system behind my back to halt my compiler if anything is forgotten. Comments are nothing like that. In an IDE, they are a structure-less gray blob that doesn't have any compile-time guarantees to even make sense, let alone tell the truth and be useful.

And they make simple code look complicated because they pollute so much space. Just look at this! This wall of text takes up so much visual space it's actually hard to see that this function just returns true for all input.

On December 08 2016 05:47 mantequilla wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 08 2016 05:02 tofucake wrote:
oh and one I didn't write but is all over because the people we outsourced the project to in the beginning suck:
    //$data contains all the changes to the row.
//$new is true if we're inserting a row, and false if we're saving it.
//If anything other than true is returned, validation fails.
//This means you may return an error code or string or anything.
//This is called before the validation rules defined in $_rules.
public static function _validate($data, $new = false)
{
return true;
}



validation is one of the most problematic topics in writing good code imo. Add multilingual support in error messages plus different clients and it gets huge.


Plus, I've yet to see good auto-generated documentation. I guess C++ kinda skews my vision since I have the luxury of figuring out all the types just from reading the headers (python people must be pretty upset - documentation is needed to know what types functions expect), but all the good documentation I've read was obviously handwritten and went way beyond what typically comes out of a javadoc-like system.
You want 20 good men, but you need a bad pussy.
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-07 21:41:58
December 07 2016 21:35 GMT
#16237
On December 08 2016 06:26 BluzMan wrote:
And they make simple code look complicated because they pollute so much space. Just look at this! This wall of text takes up so much visual space it's actually hard to see that this function just returns true for all input.


To me the comment makes it clear that it is a bug and needs to be changed. Anytime you do something that looks stupid it should be commented anyway like a validation always returning true. There should be an explanation for why that is needed if it was intentional.

It's nice to have a high level design of what you're working on including why and who made certain decisions so people can have a discussion beyond this is how it currently works.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Chocolate
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2350 Posts
December 07 2016 21:45 GMT
#16238
What does a day at work look like for you guys? I'm interviewing at some places and trying to figure out what to expect or look for. I did see a prototypical intern schedule somewhere that was like "arrive at 8 am, brush up on work, eat breakfast" and then some more stuff and then "6pm, go to company event with mentors" and I knew to stay the fuck away.

But like what do you do in a day? How much coding (both in terms of time and amount of code written, not lines but functionality) actually gets done? This past summer I was more of a glorified sysadmin (and it was in a research setting too...) than anything so I didn't really get to write very much.
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19257 Posts
December 07 2016 21:54 GMT
#16239
I do about 5 hours of coding most days out of an 8.5 hour day. There's an hour for lunch, 15 minute standup, maybe another meeting, and a bunch of googling
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
December 07 2016 22:45 GMT
#16240
I don't really know how much actual coding I do. The largest portion of coding is thinking anyways, and I frequently answer questions of colleagues... hard to track how much time you think about your own problems and how much about your colleagues' problems.

Looking at it from the the other side: I have a 15 minute standup a day, I guess 30-60 minutes of scheduled meetings (some of these with customers) per day on average. And then maybe 1-2 hours of discussing stuff with colleages? Rough estimate. So I guess I'm at about 5 hours of coding (including necessary "research") too. Though this can range from 7.5 hours to less than an hour each single day.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Prev 1 810 811 812 813 814 1032 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h 40m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
MindelVK 16
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 21233
Mini 419
ggaemo 162
Dewaltoss 119
soO 38
Shine 5
Dota 2
qojqva2816
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 754
pashabiceps504
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu455
Other Games
summit1g4820
Liquid`RaSZi1977
Beastyqt824
ceh9446
Hui .167
KnowMe153
ArmadaUGS133
C9.Mang0106
IndyStarCraft 55
Mew2King49
Trikslyr40
Chillindude19
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 262
StarCraft 2
angryscii 33
Other Games
BasetradeTV0
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• mYiSmile171
• StrangeGG 17
• Reevou 9
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 31
• HerbMon 20
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2674
Other Games
• Shiphtur362
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
13h 40m
WardiTV Invitational
15h 40m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 8h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 14h
AI Arena Tournament
1d 21h
GSL
2 days
Yamato Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Soma vs Jaedong
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.