|
Yo, you dont contribtute ANYTHING either so , stop this useless attempt at trying to care about the world when you got fuck all idea.
Ok
Goodnight.
|
The saddest part is: it will not crack mainstream U.S. news because U.S. stations don't feel an obligation to report "small problems like these." It's truly sad that the U.S. considers entertainment news on their favorite celebrities more important than news about people in the world who are living lives a worse condition than they themselves. It is sad to say, but the truth be told, people just don't seem to value these kinds of stories all too much. Most people only care about their lives and their problems. While it might be in relation to the culture that we are in. We strive to succeed for ourselves, when we want something as the U.S. we are going to do whatever it is to get it (Our gas is cheaper than almost every other country in the world...). In that same respect, unless we are spoon fed news, we don't really care about people in Europe having an economic meltdown, or the latest breaking of Geneva convention rules. Only when it might directly affect us by having our economy go down or have a potential war that we are supposed to prevent on our hands, do we finally get involved.
Now, my opinion: It's ridiculous for Israel to continually prevent the building of homes. The easiest way to make a radical is to deprive them of necessities, kill close individuals to that person, and give group more leverage in convincing individuals... It almost feels like Israel is trying to make a self-imposed Holocaust on residents of the Gaza strip, keeping them in a situation where traditional feelings of freedom that once echoed in America is continually alive, yet said wish for freedom results in the deaths of individuals which eventually becomes a self-imposed Holocaust of Palestinians trapped within a territory.
|
On May 31 2010 15:58 illu wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2010 15:48 EmeraldSparks wrote: I believe the Israeli response was disproportionate.
My guess as to Israeli policy was:
Non-resistance will be met by non-violence. Non-lethal resistance ill be met by non-lethality. Lethal resistance will be met by lethality.
I agree with that. That ship looks perfectly harmless and it's certainly not a battleship. However, all of the suicide bombers look 'harmless' too. They either go by themselves, or drive a car (which is not a conventional weapon). These ships are carrying members of parliaments across Europe, former American congressmen, Nobel Laureates and the like. It would be absurdly unlikely that they would be bearing firearms or explosives.
[[EDIT]] OH MEIN GOTT, WHAT A TREMENDOUS WASTE OF POST #1000
|
On May 31 2010 16:02 EmeraldSparks wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2010 15:58 illu wrote:On May 31 2010 15:48 EmeraldSparks wrote: I believe the Israeli response was disproportionate.
My guess as to Israeli policy was:
Non-resistance will be met by non-violence. Non-lethal resistance ill be met by non-lethality. Lethal resistance will be met by lethality.
I agree with that. That ship looks perfectly harmless and it's certainly not a battleship. However, all of the suicide bombers look 'harmless' too. They either go by themselves, or drive a car (which is not a conventional weapon). These ships are carrying members of parliaments across Europe, former American congressmen, Nobel Laureates and the like. It would be absurdly unlikely that they would be bearing firearms or explosives.
Suicide bombers have to disguise themselves somehow.
I know my argument is kind of sketchy, but my point is that the Israeli army do feel greater threats due to terrorism.
|
17010 Posts
On May 31 2010 16:02 EmeraldSparks wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2010 15:58 illu wrote:On May 31 2010 15:48 EmeraldSparks wrote: I believe the Israeli response was disproportionate.
My guess as to Israeli policy was:
Non-resistance will be met by non-violence. Non-lethal resistance ill be met by non-lethality. Lethal resistance will be met by lethality.
I agree with that. That ship looks perfectly harmless and it's certainly not a battleship. However, all of the suicide bombers look 'harmless' too. They either go by themselves, or drive a car (which is not a conventional weapon). These ships are carrying members of parliaments across Europe, former American congressmen, Nobel Laureates and the like. It would be absurdly unlikely that they would be bearing firearms or explosives.
This puts Israel in a really tough spot diplomatically. What IF weapons were found on some of those ships carrying those notable people? Lusitania style :/
|
On May 31 2010 15:19 IntoTheWow wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2010 15:17 T.O.P. wrote:On May 31 2010 15:13 illu wrote: Are we going to compare Israel with North Korea?
Both with huge army? Yes Both with nukes? Yes Both like to sink ships? Yes Both with great power behind their back? Yes But Israel is on the Good side and North Korea is part of the axis of evil. lol
I wonder why you lol'ed...
|
On May 31 2010 16:06 Empyrean wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2010 16:02 EmeraldSparks wrote:On May 31 2010 15:58 illu wrote:On May 31 2010 15:48 EmeraldSparks wrote: I believe the Israeli response was disproportionate.
My guess as to Israeli policy was:
Non-resistance will be met by non-violence. Non-lethal resistance ill be met by non-lethality. Lethal resistance will be met by lethality.
I agree with that. That ship looks perfectly harmless and it's certainly not a battleship. However, all of the suicide bombers look 'harmless' too. They either go by themselves, or drive a car (which is not a conventional weapon). These ships are carrying members of parliaments across Europe, former American congressmen, Nobel Laureates and the like. It would be absurdly unlikely that they would be bearing firearms or explosives. This puts Israel in a really tough spot diplomatically. What IF weapons were found on some of those ships carrying those notable people? Lusitania style :/ This would, full stop, be the best possible thing that could happen for Israel diplomatically.
Total public relations coup. Tremendous victory. Terrible terrible discrediting of anti-Israel factions.
|
17010 Posts
On May 31 2010 16:10 EmeraldSparks wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2010 16:06 Empyrean wrote:On May 31 2010 16:02 EmeraldSparks wrote:On May 31 2010 15:58 illu wrote:On May 31 2010 15:48 EmeraldSparks wrote: I believe the Israeli response was disproportionate.
My guess as to Israeli policy was:
Non-resistance will be met by non-violence. Non-lethal resistance ill be met by non-lethality. Lethal resistance will be met by lethality.
I agree with that. That ship looks perfectly harmless and it's certainly not a battleship. However, all of the suicide bombers look 'harmless' too. They either go by themselves, or drive a car (which is not a conventional weapon). These ships are carrying members of parliaments across Europe, former American congressmen, Nobel Laureates and the like. It would be absurdly unlikely that they would be bearing firearms or explosives. This puts Israel in a really tough spot diplomatically. What IF weapons were found on some of those ships carrying those notable people? Lusitania style :/ This would, full stop, be the best possible thing that could happen for Israel diplomatically. Total public relations coup. Tremendous victory. Terrible terrible discrediting of anti-Israel factions.
I suppose you're right, actually. In any case, I highly doubt there were weapons or any other things that could be used to aid militants. It could be argued that food or whatever could be used to feed radical Islamist groups, but that's just reeeeally stretching it at that point.
|
On May 31 2010 16:12 Empyrean wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2010 16:10 EmeraldSparks wrote:On May 31 2010 16:06 Empyrean wrote:On May 31 2010 16:02 EmeraldSparks wrote:On May 31 2010 15:58 illu wrote:On May 31 2010 15:48 EmeraldSparks wrote: I believe the Israeli response was disproportionate.
My guess as to Israeli policy was:
Non-resistance will be met by non-violence. Non-lethal resistance ill be met by non-lethality. Lethal resistance will be met by lethality.
I agree with that. That ship looks perfectly harmless and it's certainly not a battleship. However, all of the suicide bombers look 'harmless' too. They either go by themselves, or drive a car (which is not a conventional weapon). These ships are carrying members of parliaments across Europe, former American congressmen, Nobel Laureates and the like. It would be absurdly unlikely that they would be bearing firearms or explosives. This puts Israel in a really tough spot diplomatically. What IF weapons were found on some of those ships carrying those notable people? Lusitania style :/ This would, full stop, be the best possible thing that could happen for Israel diplomatically. Total public relations coup. Tremendous victory. Terrible terrible discrediting of anti-Israel factions. I suppose you're right, actually. In any case, I highly doubt there were weapons or any other things that could be used to aid militants. It could be argued that food or whatever could be used to feed radical Islamist groups, but that's just reeeeally stretching it at that point. I feel as though Israel doesn't believe for a second that there is anything dangerous on the boats. However, Isreal will not allow even convoys it thinks are not dangerous to simply flout their blockade with impunity, for whatever reason - I believe Israel believes that allowing them through would critically undermine the existing blockade, or that it would be a show of weakness or surrender.
Well, ten to twenty well-meaning, compassionate Westerners are dead due to this clusterfuck of an incident. Turkey is fucking pissed; other nations may be as well. We'll see what happens.
|
On May 31 2010 16:10 EmeraldSparks wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2010 16:06 Empyrean wrote:On May 31 2010 16:02 EmeraldSparks wrote:On May 31 2010 15:58 illu wrote:On May 31 2010 15:48 EmeraldSparks wrote: I believe the Israeli response was disproportionate.
My guess as to Israeli policy was:
Non-resistance will be met by non-violence. Non-lethal resistance ill be met by non-lethality. Lethal resistance will be met by lethality.
I agree with that. That ship looks perfectly harmless and it's certainly not a battleship. However, all of the suicide bombers look 'harmless' too. They either go by themselves, or drive a car (which is not a conventional weapon). These ships are carrying members of parliaments across Europe, former American congressmen, Nobel Laureates and the like. It would be absurdly unlikely that they would be bearing firearms or explosives. This puts Israel in a really tough spot diplomatically. What IF weapons were found on some of those ships carrying those notable people? Lusitania style :/ This would, full stop, be the best possible thing that could happen for Israel diplomatically. Total public relations coup. Tremendous victory. Terrible terrible discrediting of anti-Israel factions. So what happens if Israel decides to plant weapons on the ship and say they found them there?
|
On May 31 2010 16:20 Vivi57 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2010 16:10 EmeraldSparks wrote:On May 31 2010 16:06 Empyrean wrote:On May 31 2010 16:02 EmeraldSparks wrote:On May 31 2010 15:58 illu wrote:On May 31 2010 15:48 EmeraldSparks wrote: I believe the Israeli response was disproportionate.
My guess as to Israeli policy was:
Non-resistance will be met by non-violence. Non-lethal resistance ill be met by non-lethality. Lethal resistance will be met by lethality.
I agree with that. That ship looks perfectly harmless and it's certainly not a battleship. However, all of the suicide bombers look 'harmless' too. They either go by themselves, or drive a car (which is not a conventional weapon). These ships are carrying members of parliaments across Europe, former American congressmen, Nobel Laureates and the like. It would be absurdly unlikely that they would be bearing firearms or explosives. This puts Israel in a really tough spot diplomatically. What IF weapons were found on some of those ships carrying those notable people? Lusitania style :/ This would, full stop, be the best possible thing that could happen for Israel diplomatically. Total public relations coup. Tremendous victory. Terrible terrible discrediting of anti-Israel factions. So what happens if Israel decides to plant weapons on the ship and say they found them there? They know better than to try, because there's no way the story would stick. Too many international organizations, government officials, and other big names have thrown their weight behind it, and it's all of their combined words against Israel's.
|
When did the Jews get so fucking violent? Oh wait, that's because we gave them weapons and they started pwning all of the middle east...
|
"Al-Jazeera earlier reported that the ships initially changed course to try to avoid a nighttime confrontation, preferring a daylight showdown for better publicity.
The flotilla, which includes three cargo ships and three passenger ships, is trying to draw attention to Israel's three-year blockade of the Gaza Strip."
good way to draw attention, risking your life... I would expect that at least the nobel prize winner would say "hey, this is not a smart decision! not smart! people can die here! lets try something different, really, this is not smart at all!"
10 people died. this is just retarded. I know israel army was too harsh, but they knew it could happen...
|
On May 31 2010 16:08 ilbh wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2010 15:19 IntoTheWow wrote:On May 31 2010 15:17 T.O.P. wrote:On May 31 2010 15:13 illu wrote: Are we going to compare Israel with North Korea?
Both with huge army? Yes Both with nukes? Yes Both like to sink ships? Yes Both with great power behind their back? Yes But Israel is on the Good side and North Korea is part of the axis of evil. lol I wonder why you lol'ed... It's sarcastic since the "axis of evil" is made up by Bush.
|
Protesters armed with axes and knives attacked Israeli commandos armed with guns. What did they think was going to happen? Are the commandos somehow obligated to let the protesters kill a few of them first before shooting back to maintain an equal kill ratio and therefore appeal to some people's sense of proportionate force?
|
On May 31 2010 16:27 General Nuke Em wrote: They attacked Israeli commandos with axes and knives. What did they think was going to happen? Source?
|
United States22883 Posts
Why do you think this is going to change the situation in Gaza?
It's been in this state for years, and it's not just the Israelis to blame for creating this humanitarian crisis. Egypt is the one who built the wall. Saudis help finance it. The AKP will probably use it for political victory in Turkey once again, but they're not really concerned with Palestinians; they just have their own geo-political conflict going on with Israel.
It's horrible what happened, but why would anything change? Assuming Israel wants to continue on a path of statism, it has the leverage and is really not dependent on the US anymore.
EDIT: Gideon Levi's editorial in Haaretz. This was from before the attack.
Gaza flotilla drives Israel into a sea of stupidity Of course the peace flotilla will not bring peace, and it won't even manage to reach the Gaza shore. The action plan has included dragging the ships to Ashdod port, but it has again dragged us to the shores of stupidity and wrongdoing
By Gideon Levy The Israeli propaganda machine has reached new highs its hopeless frenzy. It has distributed menus from Gaza restaurants, along with false information. It embarrassed itself by entering a futile public relations battle, which it might have been better off never starting. They want to maintain the ineffective, illegal and unethical siege on Gaza and not let the "peace flotilla" dock off the Gaza coast? There is nothing to explain, certainly not to a world that will never buy the web of explanations, lies and tactics.
Only in Israel do people still accept these tainted goods. Reminiscent of a pre-battle ritual from ancient times, the chorus cheered without asking questions. White uniformed soldiers got ready in our name. Spokesmen delivered their deceptive explanations in our name. The grotesque scene is at our expense. And virtually none of us have disturbed the performance.
The chorus has been singing songs of falsehood and lies. We are all in the chorus saying there is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza. We are all part of the chorus claiming the occupation of Gaza has ended, and that the flotilla is a violent attack on Israeli sovereignty - the cement is for building bunkers and the convoy is being funded by the Turkish Muslim Brotherhood. The Israeli siege of Gaza will topple Hamas and free Gilad Shalit. Foreign Ministry spokesman Yossi Levy, one of the most ridiculous of the propagandists, outdid himself when he unblinkingly proclaimed that the aid convoy headed toward Gaza was a violation of international law. Right. Exactly.
It's not the siege that is illegal, but rather the flotilla. It wasn't enough to distribute menus from Gaza restaurants through the Prime Minister's Office, (including the highly recommended beef Stroganoff and cream of spinach soup ) and flaunt the quantities of fuel that the Israeli army spokesman says Israel is shipping in. The propaganda operation has tried to sell us and the world the idea that the occupation of Gaza is over, but in any case, Israel has legal authority to bar humanitarian aid. All one pack of lies.
Only one voice spoiled the illusory celebration a little: an Amnesty International report on the situation in Gaza. Four out of five Gaza residents need humanitarian assistance. Hundreds are waiting to the point of embarrassment to be allowed out for medical treatment, and 28 already have died. This is despite all the Israeli army spokesman's briefings on the absence of a siege and the presence of assistance, but who cares?
And the preparations for the operation are also reminiscent of a particularly amusing farce: the feverish debate among the septet of ministers; the deployment of the Masada unit, the prison service's commando unit that specializes in penetrating prison cells; naval commando fighters with backup from the special police anti-terror unit and the army's Oketz canine unit; a special detention facility set up at the Ashdod port; and the electronic shield that was supposed to block broadcast of the ship's capture and the detention of those on board.
And all of this in the face of what? A few hundred international activists, mostly people of conscience whose reputation Israeli propaganda has sought to besmirch. They are really mostly people who care, which is their right and obligation, even if the siege doesn't concern us at all. Yes, this flotilla is indeed a political provocation, and what is protest action if not political provocation?
And facing them on the seas has been the Israeli ship of fools, floating but not knowing where or why. Why detain people? That's how it is. Why a siege? That's how it is. It's like the Noam Chomsky affair all over again, but big time this time. Of course the peace flotilla will not bring peace, and it won't even manage to reach the Gaza shore. The action plan has included dragging the ships to Ashdod port, but it has again dragged us to the shores of stupidity and wrongdoing. Again we will be portrayed not only as the ones that have blocked assistance, but also as fools who do everything to even further undermine our own standing. If that was one of the goals of the peace flotilla's organizers, they won big yesterday.
Five years ago, the noted Peruvian writer Mario Vargas Llosa, who is a Jerusalem Prize laureate, after concluding his visit to Israel, said the Israeli occupation was approaching its grotesque phase. Over the weekend Vargas Llosa, who considers himself a friend of Israel, was present to see that that phase has since reached new heights of absurdity.
|
This is simply going to result in both sides pointing at each other for the blame of the event. It's sad people had to lose lives over this.
|
|
|
People saying Israel has right to defend itself needs to get some information on the area. They get attacked precisely because of behaviors like this. They literally assume every Palestinians are potential threat. Israeli military drive Palestinians from their home, blockade them from Israel (literally walling them off) and segregate entire Palestinians living in Israel. Most Americans are oblivious to these things because American media avoid any negative news from Israel, and focuses on how Hamas and other Palestinian extremist groups attack Israel from all sides.
What Israelis are doing to the Palestinian population is fueling the extremist groups. Wouldn't you be angry if one day, army tank shows up and demolish your neighborhood and told you to leave the area because you are not authorized to live there?
This is almost positively another example of overreaction from Israel. I really hope the International community grows a pair to criticize and punish their action if it turns out to be the case.
|
|
|
|
|
|