|
On December 10 2009 18:23 Osmoses wrote:
There's a light in the sky and people immediately go to wormholes, something completely science fictional for which there has never been any kind of proof or deductive studies. UGH I NEED BREAKFAST!!
Lights in the sky are cool though.
Oh? I didn't know that. I thought that, "In physics, a wormhole is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that is, fundamentally, a 'shortcut' through space and time. Simply, spacetime is a two-dimensional (2-D) surface that, when 'folded' over, allows the formation of a wormhole bridge."
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormholes).
Now sure, I pulled that from Wikipedia and you're probably gonna say "Lawl Wikipedia is never right" which is wrong within itself, but thats simply not true. Its not "completely science fictional".
|
On December 10 2009 13:15 endGame wrote:
Prepare for real life TvP?
C'mon Flash. You can do this!
|
On December 11 2009 05:53 endGame wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2009 18:23 Osmoses wrote:
There's a light in the sky and people immediately go to wormholes, something completely science fictional for which there has never been any kind of proof or deductive studies. UGH I NEED BREAKFAST!!
Lights in the sky are cool though. Oh? I didn't know that. I thought that, "In physics, a wormhole is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that is, fundamentally, a 'shortcut' through space and time. Simply, spacetime is a two-dimensional (2-D) surface that, when 'folded' over, allows the formation of a wormhole bridge." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormholes). Now sure, I pulled that from Wikipedia and you're probably gonna say "Lawl Wikipedia is never right" which is wrong within itself, but thats simply not true. Its not "completely science fictional".
They have never been observed and only exist on paper as far as we know. Why would one suddenly appear in the sky above Norway when one hasn't been spotted anywhere in the universe ever before? Occam's razor ffs.
|
On December 11 2009 06:04 DrainX wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2009 05:53 endGame wrote:On December 10 2009 18:23 Osmoses wrote:
There's a light in the sky and people immediately go to wormholes, something completely science fictional for which there has never been any kind of proof or deductive studies. UGH I NEED BREAKFAST!!
Lights in the sky are cool though. Oh? I didn't know that. I thought that, "In physics, a wormhole is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that is, fundamentally, a 'shortcut' through space and time. Simply, spacetime is a two-dimensional (2-D) surface that, when 'folded' over, allows the formation of a wormhole bridge." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormholes). Now sure, I pulled that from Wikipedia and you're probably gonna say "Lawl Wikipedia is never right" which is wrong within itself, but thats simply not true. Its not "completely science fictional". They have never been observed and only exist on paper as far as we know. Why would one suddenly appear in the sky above Norway when one hasn't been spotted anywhere in the universe ever before? Occam's razor ffs.
One has never been seen. Therefore it must not exist.
EDIT: Also worth noting that I wasn't arguing that this case is proof of the existence of wormholes. I was arguing that 'science fiction' isn't the only instance of wormholes as my quote suggested.
|
On December 11 2009 06:08 endGame wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2009 06:04 DrainX wrote:On December 11 2009 05:53 endGame wrote:On December 10 2009 18:23 Osmoses wrote:
There's a light in the sky and people immediately go to wormholes, something completely science fictional for which there has never been any kind of proof or deductive studies. UGH I NEED BREAKFAST!!
Lights in the sky are cool though. Oh? I didn't know that. I thought that, "In physics, a wormhole is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that is, fundamentally, a 'shortcut' through space and time. Simply, spacetime is a two-dimensional (2-D) surface that, when 'folded' over, allows the formation of a wormhole bridge." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormholes). Now sure, I pulled that from Wikipedia and you're probably gonna say "Lawl Wikipedia is never right" which is wrong within itself, but thats simply not true. Its not "completely science fictional". They have never been observed and only exist on paper as far as we know. Why would one suddenly appear in the sky above Norway when one hasn't been spotted anywhere in the universe ever before? Occam's razor ffs. One has never been seen. Therefore it must not exist. EDIT: Also worth noting that I wasn't arguing that this case is proof of the existence of wormholes. I was arguing that 'science fiction' isn't the only instance of wormholes as my quote suggested.
Are you not familiar with the meaning of the word hypothetical?
|
!!!!! OMFG ITS A GIANT MISPLACED EARTHSWALLOWING CONSUME !!!!!!
(lol thtere is no O.O smiley)
|
On December 11 2009 06:18 Biochemist wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2009 06:08 endGame wrote:On December 11 2009 06:04 DrainX wrote:On December 11 2009 05:53 endGame wrote:On December 10 2009 18:23 Osmoses wrote:
There's a light in the sky and people immediately go to wormholes, something completely science fictional for which there has never been any kind of proof or deductive studies. UGH I NEED BREAKFAST!!
Lights in the sky are cool though. Oh? I didn't know that. I thought that, "In physics, a wormhole is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that is, fundamentally, a 'shortcut' through space and time. Simply, spacetime is a two-dimensional (2-D) surface that, when 'folded' over, allows the formation of a wormhole bridge." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormholes). Now sure, I pulled that from Wikipedia and you're probably gonna say "Lawl Wikipedia is never right" which is wrong within itself, but thats simply not true. Its not "completely science fictional". They have never been observed and only exist on paper as far as we know. Why would one suddenly appear in the sky above Norway when one hasn't been spotted anywhere in the universe ever before? Occam's razor ffs. One has never been seen. Therefore it must not exist. EDIT: Also worth noting that I wasn't arguing that this case is proof of the existence of wormholes. I was arguing that 'science fiction' isn't the only instance of wormholes as my quote suggested. Are you not familiar with the meaning of the word hypothetical?
Sure. Hypothetical. I did make a mistake in my reasoning. I figured that he meant fictional in the sense of literature. But if he means fictional as in suggested then yeah, its fictional.
|
On December 10 2009 13:28 Slow Motion wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2009 13:26 Fontong wrote:On December 10 2009 13:24 Slow Motion wrote:
It's ok, Norway is one of our more useless expansions. We're good as long as our production facilities in China and U.S. are safe. It's kinda stupid though that we only mined up our unimportant expos like Vietnam and Afghanistan. Don't forget America's natural expo, Canada.
I lol'ed so hard at the SC references.
Just... simply rofl.
|
I guess I have grown old cause I was only rolling my head around, like this -> 
|
lololololollllllllll.
i like the "recall" idea
xD
|
|
|
marcoso
Brazil818 Posts
On December 11 2009 04:22 koreasilver wrote:
ironically, the missile is named Peacekeeper (assuming from pic name).
|
That's not a picture of the exact missile that was being talked about, but it's one of the American MIRV missiles that was retired in the past. I always found that picture to be very striking and beautiful, even.
The name "Peacekeeper" is mad lols though.
|
Yeah, the whole peacekeeper thing is a reference to the idea that a single "knockout punch" will defeat a nation's will to fight. It's like we haven't learned anything since world war one.
|
|
|
It's obviously god. The apocalypse is coming.
Repent, everyone.
|
anyone else thinking that someones just made a really good firework as a hoax?
|
I bet Russia was just developing this the whole time that Bush was planning to make that missile shield.
|
it's the american missile defense system in action. iran or north korea launched a nuke and our advanced american technology created a black hole to swallow the missile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://www.hypnoticaddiction.com/images/stories/spiralcolorchart/spirals/000000.gif)
![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5f/Peacekeeper-missile-testing.jpg/792px-Peacekeeper-missile-testing.jpg)
