Officials are trying to rescue a 6-year-old boy who climbed into a balloon-like experimental aircraft built by his parents and floated into the sky over eastern Colorado.
It's all over the news channels apparently the Balloon can go as high as 10,000ft and officials have no idea how to get it down.
great newz..for the networks. im mean.. this will keep them glued to the tv for at least two days. if you really gave a damn you would go to colorado and help find the lad.
Apparently the national guard is getting a chopper to see what they could do. Also when/if the thing deflates it will still crash, and apparently the plywood that child may be on is not strong enough to survive such an impact.
On October 16 2009 04:17 LordWeird wrote: Ok, so somehow he got in the balloon and it just floated away? I bet the 'sibling' had something to do with it.
The boy undid the ropes himself after he got in. No sibling involved.
On October 16 2009 04:17 LordWeird wrote: Ok, so somehow he got in the balloon and it just floated away? I bet the 'sibling' had something to do with it.
The boy undid the ropes himself after he got in. No sibling involved.
I sound cruel but he sure learned his lesson
Well the reports say there was a sibling who witnessed it. This kid just made the mistake that will likely cause him his life. Sorry for speculating, I just heard that there was a sibling present.
edit: Watching the thing spin and tilt like that makes me sad.
On October 05 2009 11:21 ilovelosses wrote: are all those balloons filled with helium?
if they are I'd imagine you'd be able to get some serious lift if you held onto both ends of the arch. It might even lift you off the ground.. have you ever tried?
No one in the balloon when it lands. Either he fell out, or the brother was pranking and the kid was never in it. Hopefully it's the latter of course =/
They're worried about whether or not he's sealed in a chamber with pure helium. If that was the case he'd have been dead after a couple of minutes. Here's my question: How the hell did he get in there? I want a diagram.
On October 16 2009 04:50 hixhix wrote: Why are they all talking about how the boy would have fallen somewhere? Did they search his house and confirm that it wasnt the joke ?
I think it would have been the only reasonable thing to do, but I'm sure they are re-checking every corner now...
On October 16 2009 04:50 hixhix wrote: Why are they all talking about how the boy would have fallen somewhere? Did they search his house and confirm that it wasnt the joke ?
Ya they said the boy is not home right now and there were some reports of something falling out of the ballon at one point.
I don't understand how the six-year-old kid could have gotten inside AND untied the ropes (assuming they're anchored outside). So I'm going to be optimistic now :/
There are many cases of people surviving 20,000+ foot falls, i'm assuming 8000 feet would be possible but not probable.
I think a 6-year-old boy's body is necessarily more susceptible to any kind of damage caused by an impact then that of an adults. But here's to hoping.
There are many cases of people surviving 20,000+ foot falls, i'm assuming 8000 feet would be possible but not probable.
I think a 6-year-old boy's body is necessarily more susceptible to any kind of damage caused by an impact then that of an adults. But here's to hoping.
Actually lets hope he's just hiding...
I'm thinking more mathematically about it. Obviously it's not like he would walk out of that fall but the terminal velocity of a 45 pound 6 year old is quite a bit less than that of a 200 pound man. With drag caused by his clothes he would probably only fall at around (doing math...) 3.45 - 3.7525 feet per second, which is about 2.5 miles per hour. He would probably move faster through the rarified air at that altitude but would slow down to around that speed when he got closer to the ground.
On October 16 2009 04:58 Smokin_Squirrel wrote: This story is getting so interesting
I hope the sibling wasn't pranking. That would be such a disappointing twist.
Definitely. It would be much better if he was smashed into several thousand small pieces after falling through the air - oh and also he'd been asphyxiated by the helium in the balloon before he ever fell out. Don't you just love happy endings?
On October 16 2009 04:58 Smokin_Squirrel wrote: This story is getting so interesting
I hope the sibling wasn't pranking. That would be such a disappointing twist.
maybe so. but you gotta pull for it man. i really really hope they were pranking or he survived. but the helium thing they are talking about it... good point. kid may have dead and then fallen out.. door wasn't locked and that shit is spinning and going 30 mph
On October 16 2009 04:58 Smokin_Squirrel wrote: This story is getting so interesting
I hope the sibling wasn't pranking. That would be such a disappointing twist.
maybe so. but you gotta pull for it man. i really really hope they were pranking or he survived. but the helium thing they are talking about it... good point. kid may have dead and then fallen out.. door wasn't locked and that shit is spinning and going 30 mph
Then why was the door still shut. Also I would think air would flood into the balloon and it would have landed earlier.
On October 16 2009 04:58 Smokin_Squirrel wrote: This story is getting so interesting
I hope the sibling wasn't pranking. That would be such a disappointing twist.
Definitely. It would be much better if he was smashed into several thousand small pieces after falling through the air - oh and also he'd been asphyxiated by the helium in the balloon before he ever fell out. Don't you just love happy endings?
No a good ending would be that he fell out and managed to crawl back home after breaking both his legs.
There are many cases of people surviving 20,000+ foot falls, i'm assuming 8000 feet would be possible but not probable.
I think a 6-year-old boy's body is necessarily more susceptible to any kind of damage caused by an impact then that of an adults. But here's to hoping.
Actually lets hope he's just hiding...
I'm thinking more mathematically about it. Obviously it's not like he would walk out of that fall but the terminal velocity of a 45 pound 6 year old is quite a bit less than that of a 200 pound man. With drag caused by his clothes he would probably only fall at around (doing math...) 3.45 - 3.7525 feet per second, which is about 2.5 miles per hour. He would probably move faster through the rarified air at that altitude but would slow down to around that speed when he got closer to the ground.
uh, wtf? gravity accelerates you at 10 m/s. which is 3x faster than you're suggesting.
On October 16 2009 04:58 Smokin_Squirrel wrote: This story is getting so interesting
I hope the sibling wasn't pranking. That would be such a disappointing twist.
maybe so. but you gotta pull for it man. i really really hope they were pranking or he survived. but the helium thing they are talking about it... good point. kid may have dead and then fallen out.. door wasn't locked and that shit is spinning and going 30 mph
Then why was the door still shut. Also I would think air would flood into the balloon and it would have landed earlier.
Yeah good point. Looking it.. i dont know if that thing could have carried a boy.. it looked so flimsy when it landed y'no?
There are many cases of people surviving 20,000+ foot falls, i'm assuming 8000 feet would be possible but not probable.
I think a 6-year-old boy's body is necessarily more susceptible to any kind of damage caused by an impact then that of an adults. But here's to hoping.
Actually lets hope he's just hiding...
I'm thinking more mathematically about it. Obviously it's not like he would walk out of that fall but the terminal velocity of a 45 pound 6 year old is quite a bit less than that of a 200 pound man. With drag caused by his clothes he would probably only fall at around (doing math...) 3.45 - 3.7525 feet per second, which is about 2.5 miles per hour. He would probably move faster through the rarified air at that altitude but would slow down to around that speed when he got closer to the ground.
uh, wtf? gravity accelerates you at 10 m/s. which is 3x faster than you're suggesting.
Gravity is not the only force acting on him though. While I'm not too sure on his numbers, the fact that gravity has free fall acceleration of -9.8 m/s doesn't mean that he HAS to fall at a speed faster than the acceleration of gravity.
There are many cases of people surviving 20,000+ foot falls, i'm assuming 8000 feet would be possible but not probable.
I think a 6-year-old boy's body is necessarily more susceptible to any kind of damage caused by an impact then that of an adults. But here's to hoping.
Actually lets hope he's just hiding...
I'm thinking more mathematically about it. Obviously it's not like he would walk out of that fall but the terminal velocity of a 45 pound 6 year old is quite a bit less than that of a 200 pound man. With drag caused by his clothes he would probably only fall at around (doing math...) 3.45 - 3.7525 feet per second, which is about 2.5 miles per hour. He would probably move faster through the rarified air at that altitude but would slow down to around that speed when he got closer to the ground.
uh, wtf? gravity accelerates you at 10 m/s. which is 3x faster than you're suggesting.
Gravity is not the only force acting on him though. While I'm not too sure on his numbers, the fact that gravity has free fall acceleration of -9.8 m/s doesn't mean that he HAS to fall at a speed faster than the acceleration of gravity.
the clothes of a 6 yr old are not going to create enough resistance to reduce his plummet speed by a factor of 3
There are many cases of people surviving 20,000+ foot falls, i'm assuming 8000 feet would be possible but not probable.
I think a 6-year-old boy's body is necessarily more susceptible to any kind of damage caused by an impact then that of an adults. But here's to hoping.
Actually lets hope he's just hiding...
I'm thinking more mathematically about it. Obviously it's not like he would walk out of that fall but the terminal velocity of a 45 pound 6 year old is quite a bit less than that of a 200 pound man. With drag caused by his clothes he would probably only fall at around (doing math...) 3.45 - 3.7525 feet per second, which is about 2.5 miles per hour. He would probably move faster through the rarified air at that altitude but would slow down to around that speed when he got closer to the ground.
uh, wtf? gravity accelerates you at 10 m/s. which is 3x faster than you're suggesting.
Gravity is not the only force acting on him though. While I'm not too sure on his numbers, the fact that gravity has free fall acceleration of -9.8 m/s doesn't mean that he HAS to fall at a speed faster than the acceleration of gravity.
Ok, get your physics straight, sentences like "falling at a speed faster then the accelaration of gravity" make no sense. Also, when making free-fall velocity calculations, you have to take into consideration that the drag force of the air is linear with speed only up until a certain falling velocity, after that its quadratic. (thats why terminal velocity is kinda stagnating after a certain height.) I dont know much about exact numbers though, nor do I want to calculate such things.
There are many cases of people surviving 20,000+ foot falls, i'm assuming 8000 feet would be possible but not probable.
I think a 6-year-old boy's body is necessarily more susceptible to any kind of damage caused by an impact then that of an adults. But here's to hoping.
Actually lets hope he's just hiding...
I'm thinking more mathematically about it. Obviously it's not like he would walk out of that fall but the terminal velocity of a 45 pound 6 year old is quite a bit less than that of a 200 pound man. With drag caused by his clothes he would probably only fall at around (doing math...) 3.45 - 3.7525 feet per second, which is about 2.5 miles per hour. He would probably move faster through the rarified air at that altitude but would slow down to around that speed when he got closer to the ground.
uh, wtf? gravity accelerates you at 10 m/s. which is 3x faster than you're suggesting.
Gravity is not the only force acting on him though. While I'm not too sure on his numbers, the fact that gravity has free fall acceleration of -9.8 m/s doesn't mean that he HAS to fall at a speed faster than the acceleration of gravity.
the clothes of a 6 yr old are not going to create enough resistance to reduce his plummet speed by a factor of 3
Velocity (speed) does not equal acceleration. Gravity could be 100m/s2 and the terminal velocity could be the same.
On October 16 2009 04:40 ghermination wrote: They're worried about whether or not he's sealed in a chamber with pure helium. If that was the case he'd have been dead after a couple of minutes. Here's my question: How the hell did he get in there? I want a diagram.
Edit: He's not in it.
This post is awesome because it was never actually edited. also kids on the ground somewhere.
Edit: The kid just wanted his second fifteen minutes of fame.
There are many cases of people surviving 20,000+ foot falls, i'm assuming 8000 feet would be possible but not probable.
I think a 6-year-old boy's body is necessarily more susceptible to any kind of damage caused by an impact then that of an adults. But here's to hoping.
Actually lets hope he's just hiding...
I'm thinking more mathematically about it. Obviously it's not like he would walk out of that fall but the terminal velocity of a 45 pound 6 year old is quite a bit less than that of a 200 pound man. With drag caused by his clothes he would probably only fall at around (doing math...) 3.45 - 3.7525 feet per second, which is about 2.5 miles per hour. He would probably move faster through the rarified air at that altitude but would slow down to around that speed when he got closer to the ground.
uh, wtf? gravity accelerates you at 10 m/s. which is 3x faster than you're suggesting.
Gravity is not the only force acting on him though. While I'm not too sure on his numbers, the fact that gravity has free fall acceleration of -9.8 m/s doesn't mean that he HAS to fall at a speed faster than the acceleration of gravity.
the clothes of a 6 yr old are not going to create enough resistance to reduce his plummet speed by a factor of 3
Velocity (speed) does not equal acceleration. Gravity could be 100m/s2 and the terminal velocity could be the same.
o really? i had no idea! is acceleration a change of direction too? even if there's no change in delta velocity? -_-
you think i dont know that? regardless the POINT I'M TRYING TO MAKE is that there's no way the kid is falling at 3 f/s like the OP suggested.
On October 16 2009 05:21 Triple7 wrote: According to the CNN Live Report, authorities think he wasn't in the balloon at all, and are searching the neighborhood.
There are many cases of people surviving 20,000+ foot falls, i'm assuming 8000 feet would be possible but not probable.
I think a 6-year-old boy's body is necessarily more susceptible to any kind of damage caused by an impact then that of an adults. But here's to hoping.
Actually lets hope he's just hiding...
I'm thinking more mathematically about it. Obviously it's not like he would walk out of that fall but the terminal velocity of a 45 pound 6 year old is quite a bit less than that of a 200 pound man. With drag caused by his clothes he would probably only fall at around (doing math...) 3.45 - 3.7525 feet per second, which is about 2.5 miles per hour. He would probably move faster through the rarified air at that altitude but would slow down to around that speed when he got closer to the ground.
uh, wtf? gravity accelerates you at 10 m/s. which is 3x faster than you're suggesting.
do you guys not understand acceleration?... it sounds as if you think acceleration is the same terminal velocity.. No one would survive a fall of 8000 feet... that's like saying people jumping off the Empire State Building all should live since i don't think its even a quarter of a mile high. The terminal velocity of a falling 6 year old boy would not be 3.5 ft/s. I think it would be something closer to 100 mph.
Acceleration is in units of meters per a second SQUARED, which means that for every second you would be moving 9.8 meters faster than before from gravity.
On October 16 2009 05:27 jiabung wrote: No one would survive a fall of 8000 feet... that's like saying people jumping off the Empire State Building all should live.
People have survived falls from higher than that before. Doesn't mean that everyone will survive though (on the contrary, it's a freak accident).
Well, even though we know that terminal velocity is not equal to acceleration, I would like to point out that if Earth accelerates you faster (let's say 20m/s² instead of 10m/s²), that would be because the force Earth exerces on you is 2 times higher, so it would take a 2 time higher force from air resistance to stop you from accelerating, which means that your terminal velocity increases because the force exerced by air resistance depends on your actual velocity.
It's not proportional, but there is still a correlation between acceleration and terminal velocity.
On October 16 2009 05:27 jiabung wrote: No one would survive a fall of 8000 feet... that's like saying people jumping off the Empire State Building all should live.
People have survived falls from higher than that before. Doesn't mean that everyone will survive though (on the contrary, it's a freak accident).
The only people that would survive are ones that landed in snow or a bush, or had something like tree branches or flag poles slowing them down before they hit the ground. Otherwise, there is no way not to die on impact with the ground if you're moving at something like 100mph.
I love how this turned from a discussion about the kid's safety and stupidity to mathematical proofs of his ability to survive.
No matter how much you calculate, it all depends on the time and condition in which they find him. If he fell and it takes too long to get medical attention, it's GG. If he was never up there, then he's all right, except from whipping from parents :D
So I wonder if there was a basket attached to the bottom, if he indeed fell I would think the basket went with him if there ever was one because I was under the impression that he was INSIDE the balloon.
On October 16 2009 05:40 Xstatic wrote: I love how this turned from a discussion about the kid's safety and stupidity to mathematical proofs of his ability to survive.
No matter how much you calculate, it all depends on the time and condition in which they find him. If he fell and it takes too long to get medical attention, it's GG. If he was never up there, then he's all right, except from whipping from parents :D
If he did indeed fall from the balloon, he would be dead. It wouldn't even matter if paramedics were already at the scene. In fact, If he fell on a paramedic from the sky, both the paramedic and the kid would probably die. And since the kid was found not to be in the balloon, it kind of warrants discussion if he could have survived the fall or not. Which he could not have... unless he fell on an inclined mountain of snow... while hitting a bunch of tree branches along the way.
Does anyone else see a resemblence between this and the movie 12 monkeys? With the 'kid who fell down the well' was just a prank and he was hiding in the barn?
On October 16 2009 05:51 CaucasianAsian wrote: Does anyone else see a resemblence between this and the movie 12 monkeys? With the 'kid who fell down the well' was just a prank and he was hiding in the barn?
This is a scenario that has happened many times. Child pranks sometimes get big like this, I recall a few occasions. (reference to a great movie nonetheless:-p)
According to CNN there might have been a box on the bottom of the balloon before it lifted off and obviously isn't there now. Was said it wasn't meant to hold anyone and was poorly attached but isn't on it anymore ;;
I assume that it was quite rural where the balloon flew or am I wrong? Didnt look it up since I'm really tired. Could take a huge while to find the kid if he fell out. And if he were never in the balloon he is a champ when it comes to hide and seek. On the other hand I would stay away too if I had "lost" my parents balloonthingy.
A large part of the American media is just so completely inept. The TV news especially seems consistently behind on this. A couple minutes spent on google searches tell you just about everything you need to know about this family.
This striking thing comes up as a torrent of a movie the parents have created:
2012 Earth Destruction Best Evidence.The Psyience Detectives.2008.60m.flv******* info: 1 full hour!! The Psyience Detectives submit the best evidence from NASA and the World governments to find out if our planet is scheduled for a major catastrophy in 2012. What is our government doing to get ready for planet x, topics include: Southpole telescope,Electromagnetic Fields, Pole reversals, underground cities and 1400 mile an hour maglev.800 fima camps & solar cycles.
Hosts are Richard Heene, Scott Stevens, and Barb Slusser. Edited by Mayumi Heene, The Science Detectives
It turns out they're pretty heavily into pseudoscience (and of course the news keeps labeling them 'scientists' anyway, as if it was their profession). The rest of this stuff is from the Denver Post via AP:
The Post said Heene is part of a group called the Psyience Detectives. The Psyience Detectives "investigate and conduct experiments about the mysteries of science and psychic phenomenon," according to their Web site.
It seems they included the kids into some of the more hands on stuff:
Falcon, along with his two older brothers Ryo and Bradford, have accompanied their father chasing storms out West, the Post reported in a 2007 profile that depicts the entire Heene family as adventurers. Richard Heene described an incident when the family was caught in a tornado that July. "I think I have odd kids. They start screaming with excitement," Heene told the paper.
Right, 'odd kids', not odd parents. Then there's this tidbit:
Bob Licko, 65, a neighbor, said he was leaving home when he heard commotion in the backyard.
He said he saw two boys on the roof with a camera, commenting about their brother.
"One of the boys yelled to me that his brother was way up in the air," Licko said.
On October 16 2009 07:47 BalliSLife wrote: it's crazy someone from another forum called it a publicity stunt 2 hours ago..
The family's strange "psyience" history and being on reality TV aside, its still more probable that the kid(s) let lose his dad's pet project and concocted up this lie rather than catch hell from his dad.
On October 16 2009 05:51 CaucasianAsian wrote: Does anyone else see a resemblence between this and the movie 12 monkeys? With the 'kid who fell down the well' was just a prank and he was hiding in the barn?
I called it!!!!!!
replace barn with garage attic and falling down a well with flying in a balloon
Lol..reminds me of when Heraldo was covering a hurricane a few years ago and filled nearly four hours of air time staring at some boat that got pulled from the harbor into the ocean, saying things like "We need a rescue crew here now! Everyone watching at home, pray for this man and his family, hopefully he can hang on just a little longer!" And of course, it was just s stray boat with nobody on board..lol
yall should stop blaming the boy. his parents are FAMEWHORES. theyve been on wife swap twice...and now they pulled this stunt. the boy was being interviewed and said that his parents told him not to come out because "they did it for the show"
Wow really. Doing it for the show. What a waste of money. The national guard even deployed a blackhawk for it too and all it was was for the parents' show? - -;
On October 16 2009 11:10 koOl wrote: yall should stop blaming the boy. his parents are FAMEWHORES. theyve been on wife swap twice...and now they pulled this stunt. the boy was being interviewed and said that his parents told him not to come out because "they did it for the show"
I haven't read the thread, but I'm pretty sure I saw this family on TLC or something, before. Basically the dad is a retard and lets the kids do whatever they want. The dad works as a storm chase iirc, and the mother just picks up after him and the kids, popping out babies it seems. I think the premise of the show was swapping wives, and these crazy people with no regard for safety were paired up with another family who was on the other end of the spectrum, in that they were afraid to let their kids bounce balls in the house, for example.
I wouldn't be surprised if this was all set up by the parents for some publicity.
On October 16 2009 12:00 Masamune wrote: I haven't read the thread, but I'm pretty sure I saw this family on TLC or something, before. Basically the dad is a retard and lets the kids do whatever they want. The dad works as a storm chase iirc, and the mother just picks up after him and the kids, popping out babies it seems. I think the premise of the show was swapping wives, and these crazy people with no regard for safety were paired up with another family who was on the other end of the spectrum, in that they were afraid to let their kids bounce balls in the house, for example.
I wouldn't be surprised if this was all set up by the parents for some publicity.
He kissed his kid on camera and apologised for yelling at him for ALL THIS. Way to have a backbone, if you can't yell at your kid over something like this, when will you discipline him?
On October 16 2009 12:37 JWD wrote: Looks like a pathetic PR stunt…what an awful thing to subject your child to
disgusting
I don't know. After the tornado and hurricane chasing for fun, claims of aliens living on earth, 2012 world destruction nonsense, wife swap, 'fuck the rules', and more... I'm pretty sure they might have already been through worse. With all the evidence available, I don't see how they're even allowed to raise children. Using them for a publicity stunt like this (including having two of them stand on the roof with a camera to make it more convincing), taking them storm chasing when they apparently think being hit by a tornado is a fun thing? Come on..
Speaking of storm chasing, did anyone catch how it seemed like the van in their driveway had a missing back window? I wouldn't be surprised if they were doing that kind of stuff in a regular car, sadly.
On October 16 2009 15:16 Suc wrote: He kissed his kid on camera and apologised for yelling at him for ALL THIS. Way to have a backbone, if you can't yell at your kid over something like this, when will you discipline him?
That was clearly a stunt just like the rest of this. Though with the dad's messed up personality, I bet the kid will get punished later for letting the cat out of the bag on live TV. It's pretty messed up that anyone would be blaming the kid in this scenario anyway.
One of the stupidest thing to graze the american mass media in a looooong time, and that's saying something ;p, considering what garbage they are usually covering. I asked my friends in other countries and thank god no foreign news wasted time covering this.
And when you consider it actually being fake and that the douche dad just wasted thousands of people's time, that just adds another layer of hilarity.
LOL, I just read this as well. I knew it was a hoax all along. No one can survive a helium filled balloon at 7,000 feet; especially a boy for that long of a period of time.
On October 19 2009 03:56 ShoCkeyy wrote: LOL, I just read this as well. I knew it was a hoax all along. No one can survive a helium filled balloon at 7,000 feet; especially a boy for that long of a period of time.
Well it's not like anyone thought he was gonna survive.
...So, throughout this entire debacle, did NO ONE bother to ask how the child could even be lifted into the air by the balloon? (A non-hot-air balloon, mind you.)
On October 05 2009 11:21 ilovelosses wrote: are all those balloons filled with helium?
if they are I'd imagine you'd be able to get some serious lift if you held onto both ends of the arch. It might even lift you off the ground.. have you ever tried?
imo they shouldnt send the dad/mom to jail, just fine their asses off and then have child protection services and whatnot monitor the family for a couple years
if the parents continue being fucktards, then they should jail them and give the children to protection services
"The sheriff's announcement included an admission that authorities misled the media on Friday when they said they still believed it was not a hoax. After Falcon's remark on CNN Thursday night, "it became very clear to us at that point that they were lying," Alderden said."
On October 17 2009 02:56 Sadistx wrote: One of the stupidest thing to graze the american mass media in a looooong time, and that's saying something ;p, considering what garbage they are usually covering. I asked my friends in other countries and thank god no foreign news wasted time covering this.
And when you consider it actually being fake and that the douche dad just wasted thousands of people's time, that just adds another layer of hilarity.
when you consider the fact that this probably generated boat loads more attention than a better news story -- it's not a very a dumb move by the media at all.
I wouldn't be surprised if social services takes their kids away for this. What a strange, strange set of people. Those interviews were just down right bizarre.
On October 19 2009 10:23 NeverGG wrote: I wouldn't be surprised if social services takes their kids away for this. What a strange, strange set of people. Those interviews were just down right bizarre.
I love watching the one where the kid says "it was for the show"..I laughed so hard, that father learned a hard lesson in the unpredictability of small children.
7I did some research on the Heenes and found some disturbing facts about them. Here's a compilation that gives a good character profile of this family...
Interview with Larry King where the kid admits it's for the show. And he didn't just say, "It was for the show," he said before that, "You guys said..." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI6UONWCq7A
This is the 911 call that was made. In this clip you'll hear the wife at the beginning state that her husband was calling someone. I bet that was him calling the media.
I suspect strong negative sentiments and opinions to follow about this family throughout the world, however it won't stop them bringing in $$$. The best thing we can do is to stop caring and not pay any attention.
Remember Tonya Harding?
She said,
"I may have not gotten any gold in Norway, but I'll be getting it where it counts - in my bank account!"
On October 19 2009 15:40 1tym wrote: I suspect strong negative sentiments and opinions to follow about this family throughout the world, however it won't stop them bringing in $$$. The best thing we can do is to stop caring and not pay any attention.
Remember Tonya Harding?
She said,
"I may have not gotten any gold in Norway, but I'll be getting it where it counts - in my bank account!"
Isn't Tonya Harding now having to do dumbest criminal specials now for $$$ with other washed up actors, and personalities?
lol ^^ that video is awesome. the profit bias in media is so ridiculous and you only have to look at the 12 pages in this thread to realize that people love this garbage lol.
On October 19 2009 15:40 1tym wrote: I suspect strong negative sentiments and opinions to follow about this family throughout the world, however it won't stop them bringing in $$$. The best thing we can do is to stop caring and not pay any attention.
Remember Tonya Harding?
She said,
"I may have not gotten any gold in Norway, but I'll be getting it where it counts - in my bank account!"
Isn't Tonya Harding now having to do dumbest criminal specials now for $$$ with other washed up actors, and personalities?
It must be horrible..
edit: i am glad he got a few punches on the guy in the yellow :[
Mayumi Heene told sheriff's deputies that she and her husband Richard "knew all along that Falcon was hiding in the residence" in Fort Collins, according to an affidavit used to get a search warrant for the home.
She allegedly told investigators the incident was a hoax meant to make them more marketable to the media.
There's so many stupidity and hoax happening in certain parts of america. It must be sad that kid is apparantly in one. It must be sad to have a father that wants to do a publicity stunts for the media.
the yellow shirt guy should be charged, which media corporation is from anyway?
and the rest of the people are being really big dicks as well, just listen to the snide comments made by the off-camera reporters
seriously, the media should stop spending any more time on this and stop bothering all those innocent people
Lol what the hell? I love how the guy in the yellow shirt jumps on his back and everyone is fine with that, but the second the guy fights back, "WOAH WOAHHHH WOAHHHHHH WOAHH HEY HEY!!!!"
the yellow shirt guy should be charged, which media corporation is from anyway?
and the rest of the people are being really big dicks as well, just listen to the snide comments made by the off-camera reporters
seriously, the media should stop spending any more time on this and stop bothering all those innocent people
Lol what the hell? I love how the guy in the yellow shirt jumps on his back and everyone is fine with that, but the second the guy fights back, "WOAH WOAHHHH WOAHHHHHH WOAHH HEY HEY!!!!"
Kinda like the people that will get all in celebrities faces and become aggressive but when one of celebrities knocks the camera away they freak out and threaten lawsuits lol.
guy should've grabbed the yellow shirted guys balls and squeezed as hard as possible, woulda made that douche let go LOL
the yellow shirt guy should be charged, which media corporation is from anyway?
and the rest of the people are being really big dicks as well, just listen to the snide comments made by the off-camera reporters
seriously, the media should stop spending any more time on this and stop bothering all those innocent people
Lol what the hell? I love how the guy in the yellow shirt jumps on his back and everyone is fine with that, but the second the guy fights back, "WOAH WOAHHHH WOAHHHHHH WOAHH HEY HEY!!!!"
Kinda like the people that will get all in celebrities faces and become aggressive but when one of celebrities knocks the camera away they freak out and threaten lawsuits lol.
guy should've grabbed the yellow shirted guys balls and squeezed as hard as possible, woulda made that douche let go LOL
I love how all of this bullshit just gives the media more advertising money. The media companies win even when idiots point out how fail they are by successfully taking advantage of them.