EPTSamurai Sword kills Thief - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Tensai176
Canada2061 Posts
| ||
|
Polyphasic
United States841 Posts
On September 16 2009 10:03 sith wrote: No such thing when someone is in your house stealing your shit. And besides, it's not like he hacked away at him, it was one strike and it just happened to be a good one. ya, the burglar dived at him. anything short of defending himself would have resulted in being beat the shit up. besides, the burglar would have stolen the sword and who knows what the burglar would do then. | ||
|
Johnny B
United States76 Posts
On September 16 2009 10:07 FragKrag wrote: shut up micro without me you wouldn't have this beautiful article Not for 40 whole minutes he wouldn't: http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=102029 @Thread title: Samurai kills the "if," ninja kills the "and," assassin kills the "but"! + Show Spoiler + So whenever I got a scolding, my parents expected me to become a samurai-ninja-assassin. + Show Spoiler [In case you didn't get it] + 'Cause parents say "No ifs, ands, or buts." | ||
|
BanZu
United States3329 Posts
Completely justified murder. | ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
For example I go downstairs to see someone prowling, my automatic assumption is they are armed with a firearm. Whether or not it's true, I'm not going to get closer and try to find out. I'm going to take him out if possible (or run away really scared and call the police as he takes off with my shit). | ||
|
funkie
Venezuela9376 Posts
Nerd Samurai 1 - 0 Thiefs. Beware Baltimore thiefs, Nerd samurai has arriveddddd | ||
|
SOB_Maj_Brian
United States522 Posts
| ||
|
Ideas
United States8122 Posts
Also, the police are just making sure that the kid's story about the burglar lunging at him is true. The burglar could of (but probably not) put his hands up and surrendered but then the kid just slashed him anyway killing him and then say that he lunged at him. It's happened a lot before (except with a gun and not a sword LOL). He'll probably be released pretty soon. | ||
|
ReDShiFT
United States106 Posts
| ||
|
meegrean
Thailand7699 Posts
| ||
|
Sprite
United States1015 Posts
| ||
|
skronch
United States2717 Posts
On September 16 2009 10:30 micronesia wrote: There is no reason to use such an approach to justifying whichever side you align with. Whether if he was a repeated criminal or not does not change how the law should deal with this incident. that's why i don't make the laws  (and it's probably a good thing)but as a student, i have a much easier time empathizing with a peer. like it's really scary how you can be a 'good' citizen your entire life, but one crazy fucked up incident can mess up the rest of your life. for his sake, i hope that this whole situation doesn't get too messy. | ||
|
AssuredVacancy
United States1167 Posts
| ||
|
theron[wdt]
United States395 Posts
| ||
|
iloveHieu
United States1919 Posts
Well deserved. | ||
|
Saddened Izzy
United States198 Posts
Unless he saw a gun or some sort of weapon from the guy seriously something wrong there the kid fucked up the situation even more by bring a sword, if it was a gun it be a different story he lunges at him he get shot depending on the shoot the guy dies in a min or in a few hours, but a sword is just asking for some fucked up shit. Sorry but my logic works unless the guy was like 8 feet tall and was built like Eugen Sandow that is excessive force in my rule book. The kid is confident enough to slash away at the guy but can't think like listening to the door opening it seeing the thief then running to call the police, it is not up to the kid to confront the thief unless he believes he can control the situation which he obviously could not. Obviously that college education isn't doing much for his critical thinking. #rant rant rant# | ||
|
BlackJack
United States10574 Posts
| ||
|
MamiyaOtaru
United States1687 Posts
Guy jumped at student, student defended. End of story. No wrong doing. If the burglar didn't want to get sworded, he could have not lunged, or better yet, not broken into a house with the intention of stealing shit. | ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On September 16 2009 11:46 Saddened Izzy wrote: What's wrong with that kid he doesn't own a bat like a normal person but instead keeps a samurai sword by his bed side. Unless he saw a gun or some sort of weapon from the guy seriously something wrong there the kid fucked up the situation even more by bring a sword, if it was a gun it be a different story he lunges at him he get shot depending on the shoot the guy dies in a min or in a few hours, but a sword is just asking for some fucked up shit. Sorry but my logic works unless the guy was like 8 feet tall and was built like Eugen Sandow that is excessive force in my rule book the kid is confident enough to slash away at the guy but can't think like listening to the door opening it seeing the thief then running to call the police, it is not up to the kid to confront the thief unless he believes he can control the situation which he obviously could not. Obviously that college education isn't doing much for his critical thinking. #rant rant rant# If he calls the police - the robber gets away in time, and you lose your shit. Why would you have to see a gun if someone broke into your place to steal your stuff. You take the pussy way out like you're saying, you just lost $50-100 of stuff. I'd sooner kill the guy who broke into my property in the first place, who most likely wouldn't hesitate to use force against me. That is assuming I had the chance. I might call the police simply out of fear, but just because this kid didn't, doesn't mean he made the wrong choice imo. | ||
|
AcrossFiveJulys
United States3612 Posts
On September 16 2009 11:47 BlackJack wrote: I hope this kid gets the electric chair. NOBODY has the right to take another person's life. ![[image loading]](http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr314/kvan1917/FacePalm_picard.jpg) | ||
| ||
