|
On September 10 2009 16:55 Pholon wrote: I completely agree with cz - by all means read it, it's fun enough and has historic value, but dont expect it to revolutionize your SC play in any way I'm pretty sure everyone is on the same page here. No one thinks it'll do wonders.
|
Sorry to be a hater, but the liquipedia is really pointless to read for educational or improvement reasons. Everything in it is very, very obvious and is stuff you already know. It's one of those wikis that the gosu like to brag about reading/applying but don't realize how worthless it actually is. There is historical value in it, though.
If you disagree I challenge you to quote something from the wiki that is both useful and not obvious.
----
Apologies for the recycled ridicule. At the risk of being silly in doing so the point to be made was that one could just as easily have memorized build orders, units sizes, building/ability/upgrade costs and still be a complete simpleton in regards to basic strategy. "Not likely," you might say, but not all that far-fetched either. I'm sure plenty of players can proxy dark temps in five minutes but if they still lose every time regardless of a flawlessly executed build order then the issue falls back on the very basics that have been assumed to be common knowledge. I hold no doubt that plenty of players have played through the campaign modes managing to either turtle, out-mass or fluke their way to wins without ever developing upon their knowledge of strategy, only to turn around get stomped game after game online.
tl;dr:
On September 10 2009 16:12 viewer wrote: whats obvious to you isnt always obvious to everyone else.
|
the chinese version of this is highly detailed, and quite informative. i do believe the uses of this goes beyond just improving your game, but it also helps you in life as well, e.g office politics. its more about how you look at it though.
|
The book is a work of philosophy, not strategy. Therefore, it is to prepare your general mind-set, rather than your specific game-plan.
Yes, a lot of it is common sense and logic, but that's just what philosophy is. As Kwark said earlier, most mistakes that players make (this applies even at pro level too) are obvious ones.
So what's the merit of reading this book? Well, reading it and studying it can help you to keep it's philosophies in mind, leading to more effective decision-making, in and out of the game. We all need constant reminders.
Why are military commanders and business strategists around the world still encouraged to know that book off-by-heart? Because it's information is effective and useful.
I've written extensively in my blog (on another Starcraft site), applying Sun Tzu's quotes directly to SC and received positive feedback.
You never know, reading the book might help you think of a new (or at least, new to you) strategy or tactic that can help you to be more successful in future SC matches.
|
It's fun until you have to read it in classical Chinese and have to translate it on your exam. ^^
|
On September 10 2009 21:17 jtype wrote: I've written extensively in my blog (on another Starcraft site), applying Sun Tzu's quotes directly to SC and received positive feedback.
Do you have a link to those articles?
|
When this was posted I was thinking about how much I thought this book was overrated. After I reread it last night I was totally wrong. Perhaps I was too young when I read it last. Many of those little sections have overreaching messages you can apply in real life as well as in starcraft.
|
On September 10 2009 23:48 gnuvince wrote:Show nested quote +On September 10 2009 21:17 jtype wrote: I've written extensively in my blog (on another Starcraft site), applying Sun Tzu's quotes directly to SC and received positive feedback.
Do you have a link to those articles?
http://starfeeder.gameriot.com/blogs/Mastering-The-Art - I must warn you though, they are very basic and aimed at newbies.
|
I SHOULD have the audiobook one somewhere on my hdd`s if anyone is interested
|
very much appreciated, thanks sir.
|
The key difference between the heuristics laid out in AOW and practical application in BW is that while the heuristic may be obvious, its cumulative implementation at a marginal level is certainly not.
For example, if in PvP, your opponent goes proxy pylon into 2-gate proxy rush, knowing those general principles will be insufficient to achieve victory. In fact: there are 2 contradicting goals: 1.) to destroy the production facilities 2.) to make sure your economy is stronger than your opponent's.
Both of these points have proverbs describing how to accomplish these goals, but lacking knowledge of the very small space that sufficiently optimizes the two parameters... You are not going to win.
|
|
haha, I wish you had posted this a week ago, I just bought the book t.t Still nice to have a hardcopy tho ^^
|
I think it's both sad and amusing that gnuvince pointed out that linking to a 2500 year-old book online is both free and legal. Our copyright laws haven't gotten that out of hand yet...
+ Show Spoiler +The translation used was done in 1910, but still.
|
On September 10 2009 14:59 cz wrote:Show nested quote +On September 10 2009 14:38 m4gdelen4 wrote:On September 10 2009 13:37 cz wrote:On September 10 2009 13:34 Scooge wrote:On September 10 2009 13:19 cz wrote: Sorry to be a hater, but the book is really pointless to read for educational or improvement reasons. Everything in it is very, very obvious and is stuff you already know. It's one of those books that the intelligista like to brag about reading/applying but don't realize how worthless it actually is. There is historical value in it, though.
If you disagree I challenge you to quote something from the book that is both useful and not obvious.
for someone so in touch with what the intelligentsia likes, you don't seem that familiar with burden of proof! Just quote something that is both useful and not obvious. I suppose I could rephrase my earlier to post to ask the OP to back up his claims, thus putting the burden of proof on him, but that would take more work. Just don't fucking come and post in a thread about something you don't like. The thread was titled correctly, it was obvious to you what it was, stay away. This has got to be ban-worthy.
TEACHER YOU FORGOT TO GIVE US HOMEWORK
|
|
On September 10 2009 16:10 Licmyobelisk wrote:Show nested quote +On September 10 2009 16:04 lazz wrote:On September 10 2009 15:57 Licmyobelisk wrote: Damn! Thank you going to read this...
Here is quote I though of:
"He who uses protoss, takes life too easy" "He who uses terran is anti-conformist" "He who uses zerg is a decision-maker" He who plays starcraft, is baller. he who is aussie, is always awesome  <3 lazz! Anyway, here is something we can use in theorycrafting: 5. Thus, though we have heard of stupid haste in war, cleverness has never been seen associated with long delays. So meaning, it's not about cheesing and waiting for too long to go 200/200 push, but to provide excellent timing when opponents has his pants down is the way to victory 
haha, and i thought you was referring to blizzards delay xD
|
On September 10 2009 11:46 BalliSLife wrote: He who has 1-1 upgrades should move out ROFL
|
he who calls himself the god, the savior, the maestro, or something along those lines will lose to invisible and flying shit.
|
On September 10 2009 13:48 heyoka wrote:Its worth reading but yeah its really overrated. Its really more a "philosophy of how to set your mind when you go into battle" than anything but people seem to treat it like it actually has advice on how tactics work or something. Thanks for the file 
It's hardly overrated because of the reason you stated. A young strategist reading this book can learn lessons that might otherwise take years. When I was a little kid, I played video games all the time. When I got into competitive gaming (fighting games), I almost always considered very powerful moves 'cheap' or exploiting existing bugs 'cheating'. But if I had just read this book, I could see that when in a competitive situation, it's not about following the rule book, it's about winning despite the rule book. This kind of philosophical outlook is capable of turning a bad strategist into a master strategist practically overnight.
I've never seen anyone recommend this book based on their learning of battle tactics or some nonsense like that. This book is recommended across many industries because of the mindset that it inspires. Reading this book will not make you a better manager or first base or Starcraft player directly, but it will open your mind up to what 'strategy' really means and how to optimize your path to your goals intelligently and consistently. I mean sure, if you've played chess for 35 years, you could probably write this book yourself, but the point is I can give this to someone that's never had any real inkling of what 'strategy' actually is, and it will blow their mind and give them incredible insight into problem-solving.
Everything in the book is, as others have said, completely obvious in hindsight, but the organization of thoughts will teach you how to think instead of what to think. That is really the key to this book.
|
|
|
|