Universitys in California? - Page 2
Forum Index > General Forum |
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
tredmasta
China152 Posts
I went to Caltech for 2 years, and personally I would not recommend it. Ridiculously expensive, unnecessarily difficult, and the profs don't care about teaching. Don't go there unless you want a huge hit to your GPA. It's also extremely hard to get in as a transfer student. | ||
ZpuX
Sweden1230 Posts
| ||
![]()
LosingID8
CA10824 Posts
| ||
Braintricks
137 Posts
| ||
searcher
277 Posts
Stanford is nice too, a much larger, self-contained campus with plenty to see and students of specialization. A nice culture too that owes much to the impeccable weather, I would choose Stanford if you want to avoid the sprawling eyesore that is LA. Then again both schools are exceedingly difficult to get into, regardless of how good you are a significant portion of acceptance will be down to luck. Hope you go somewhere you enjoy. | ||
klizzer
517 Posts
Seriously, most of the schools mentioned in this thread offer good education, but the question really is if you can really get in AND afford it. | ||
Underwhelmed
United States207 Posts
UCSD is fairly well regarded, particularly for Aerospace I think Cal Poly San Luis Obispo is supposed to be more geared towards practice than theory, compared to the UCs, but has a good reputation regardless. Harvey Mudd (Undergrad only, supposed to be one of the best undergraduate programs in the country) I do Mechanical Engineering at UCSB, and it has failed to impress me | ||
caldo149
United States469 Posts
I'd recommend UCSB =) It's a lot of fun here too and there's great weather all the time. | ||
joewest
United States167 Posts
I promote these two because they are completely devoted to the undergraduate student. Mudd will also take good care of you since enrollment is at 765 students, and Mudd takes a liberal arts approach to running a college (ranked 14th for liberal arts colleges in the US). The unique combination of top-tier engineering and liberal arts is not a combination you will find anywhere else in CA or the United States The only downside to Mudd is the cost, which, without scholarships, will run over $50,000 a year. And don't expect you gpa to go up if you come here. I'm currently attending Mudd for chemistry, hence my shameless plug. Edit: answering a few more of your questions: I would estimate Harvey Mudd will require at least a 3.5 gpa to attend. Also, there is no specific engineering majors here, you just have to learn a little bit of everything. I don't know what type of courses you would require, but you can check it out here http://www.hmc.edu/academicsclinicresearch/academicdepartments/engineering.html Cal Poly San Luis Obispo will cost less and require a lower gpa to get in. I don't know the exact cost for somebody paying out of state tuition, I would expect around $25,000. | ||
Vilda
Sweden111 Posts
| ||
![]()
thedeadhaji
![]()
39489 Posts
On August 18 2009 01:44 Last Romantic wrote: ._. I remember when CIT was still acme. What happened, guys?! Outranked by Georgia? Though I suppose since it's a USNews ranking, it would behoove you to take it with a grain of salt. ... LR you clearly aren't an engineer ![]() Georgia Tech has consistently been one of the best engineering schools over the last decade, and if anything they've dropped a few spots (back in like 2005, they were #4 behind the big 3 - MIT Stanford Cal). California Engineering schools: 1) Stanford 2) University of California Berkeley 3) Cal Tech 4) Harvey Mudd after this I think it'd be 5) UCLA simply b/c ... there just aren't that may top top top tier schools left in the state. But then again it'd also depend on what lv of program you'd be intersted in too. | ||
| ||