EPTEVE Corporation - Page 1885
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
HSM V is the difference of a few tens of m/s I want to resub and tell this guy he is a dumb motherfucker its like people don't realize that looking engageable is how you end up getting real fights | ||
|
0m3ga
Serbia322 Posts
On September 09 2014 10:30 419 wrote: I want to resub and tell this guy he is a dumb motherfucker its like people don't realize that looking engageable is how you end up getting real fights RLML Caracal # 1 | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
Dranak
United States464 Posts
On September 09 2014 10:30 419 wrote: I want to resub and tell this guy he is a dumb motherfucker its like people don't realize that looking engageable is how you end up getting real fights But he could bring a different ship (that no one would fight and is also underperforming) instead of a vastly inferior version of a given ship! The value! | ||
|
incifan
Germany138 Posts
On September 09 2014 10:30 419 wrote: I want to resub and tell this guy he is a dumb motherfucker its like people don't realize that looking engageable is how you end up getting real fights why? because he and noone else in that thread realizes that HSM is the skill for MWD cap use instead of speed or because he thinks those "few" m/s don't matter. Probably both. Maybe I should give this game another try. | ||
|
abominare
United States1216 Posts
On September 10 2014 19:35 incifan wrote: why? because he and noone else in that thread realizes that HSM is the skill for MWD cap use instead of speed or because he thinks those "few" m/s don't matter. Probably both. Maybe I should give this game another try. Not that I really had that much to stand on with a really outdated understanding of the game, but thats why I admitted to being trolled when she posted the few m/s thing. From there it was rooks all the way down. On today's positive note, I found out the my stock pile of free aurum from the years is worth 5.6b so hooray aurum windfall finally paying off. | ||
|
Dranak
United States464 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States43468 Posts
On September 11 2014 01:25 Dranak wrote: Kwark/monkey/tofu thanks for your writeup of your Tough Mudder experience. It helped push me to stop being a puss and go do one, and I just completed my first one last weekend in 3:30. Awesome, well done. On an eve note CCP GMs just confirmed that titan pos bowling of titans fully within the shields is a legitimate mechanic which will have to be addressed by developers if it is addressed, rather than an exploit that will be undone by GMs. It is now no longer safe to bridge from within pos. The GM added in a classic :CCP: way that this is fair because the pos bowling force is exposed to significant risk too and therefore it's not really a problem. After all, why can't random smallgang group 17 just counter drop NC.'s 20 titans and punish them for pos bowling? | ||
|
DefMatrixUltra
Canada1992 Posts
On September 11 2014 05:38 KwarK wrote: Awesome, well done. On an eve note CCP GMs just confirmed that titan pos bowling of titans fully within the shields is a legitimate mechanic which will have to be addressed by developers if it is addressed, rather than an exploit that will be undone by GMs. It is now no longer safe to bridge from within pos. The GM added in a classic :CCP: way that this is fair because the pos bowling force is exposed to significant risk too and therefore it's not really a problem. After all, why can't random smallgang group 17 just counter drop NC.'s 20 titans and punish them for pos bowling? If [random small group] does this, something tells me they might be banned anyway. | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
KwarK
United States43468 Posts
This is a huge change in CCP policy from "don't exploit" to "it depends how many units of risk it creates". It's literally "all titans emit risk and large groups of titans emit way more risk than small groups and if you generate enough of it by your exploit then it probably all works out in the end". There is so much wrong with that I don't know where to begin. | ||
|
Shootemup.
United States1044 Posts
On September 11 2014 13:35 Jaaaaasper wrote: so ccp cracked down on people being mean on the internet, any of you guys get the hammer? From what I understand, some of the people banned went a little beyond "being mean on the internet". | ||
|
Warri
Germany3208 Posts
| ||
|
hagon
United Kingdom556 Posts
It means that to safely bridge fleets that contain members of multiple alliances you have to bridge with the titan well inside the pos and a password set, the titan pilot with the ability to manage the password. Obviously this can go wrong, but it is not unworkable. My problem is that CCP made a statement on this: Bumping ships, that are located within password protected starbase force-fields, out of the force-field from outside without having the correct password or corporation/alliance permissions as configured in the tower settings, is considered an exploit. That is super clear. In my opinion this video is super clear. This is what NC. have been doing. CCP is being typically gutless, full of bullshit and lacking in knowledge of their own game. Also some people got banned [apparently some of them for out of game harassment], as is usual I think it is reasonable to assume some of them deserved to get banned, some of them have never had anything to do with an activity that could get them banned and some people who should have been banned multiple times months ago didn't get banned. | ||
|
DiracMonopole
United States1555 Posts
On September 11 2014 13:35 Jaaaaasper wrote: so ccp cracked down on people being mean on the internet, any of you guys get the hammer? Bernie Madoff took some colored bits of paper from people. | ||
|
KwarK
United States43468 Posts
On September 12 2014 07:51 hagon wrote: That is super clear. In my opinion this video is super clear. This is what NC. have been doing. CCP is being typically gutless, full of bullshit and lacking in knowledge of their own game. But risk! | ||
|
Lysenko
Iceland2128 Posts
On September 12 2014 07:51 hagon wrote: Also some people got banned [apparently some of them for out of game harassment], as is usual I think it is reasonable to assume some of them deserved to get banned, some of them have never had anything to do with an activity that could get them banned and some people who should have been banned multiple times months ago didn't get banned. It's way too bad they don't do what Blizzard has done on occasion with "I was banned for no reason!" posts. They have pointed out that it's against forum TOS to discuss bans on the forum but then say "as long as you're going to open the issue up to the public..." and describe exactly what evidence led to the ban. It's almost always 180 degrees from the original poster's story. | ||
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
Seems like a pretty good idea. | ||
|
Rengas
United States169 Posts
On September 12 2014 14:02 419 wrote: So a mechanic that greatly discourages random people titan bridging. Seems like a pretty good idea. The goodest of ideas. | ||
| ||
