EPTEVE Corporation - Page 1552
| Forum Index > General Games |
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34484 Posts
| ||
|
Ramiel
United States1220 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/mtXJuPF.jpg) Sadly I don't think its working. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/UxbsMha.jpg) Dual LSE m8's. The field extenders give a % increase to base shields, which im told LSE's give you more shields. So i shielded while shielding. I am willing to give you PvP lessons. 100 mil / hr if anyone wants so teaching. | ||
|
Ueberlisk
Finland455 Posts
| ||
|
Skilledblob
Germany3392 Posts
| ||
|
Ramiel
United States1220 Posts
I am trying to say that my mid slot tank choice is superior to invuln cap booster. Honestly its a horse s piece, but i was getting hatorade dumped on me because i fit an lse to a bs. | ||
|
jfourz
Ireland421 Posts
you're much harder to rep, can't heat your tank, take 10% more damage from bombs and have one less mid slot. considering you probably want at least 3 of mwd / mjd / booster / scram / point / web i don't know what you're trying to achieve here lses shouldnt be fit to battleships for the most part. they're good on black ops though | ||
|
DefMatrixUltra
Canada1992 Posts
On May 31 2013 21:46 Ramiel wrote: No implants, quad link loki + fittings on screen. I am trying to say that my mid slot tank choice is superior to invuln cap booster. Honestly its a horse s piece, but i was getting hatorade dumped on me because i fit an lse to a bs. Your argument is posed in the most odd way. I hardly believe anyone would say that double LSE with links (intuitively: lots of shield added + link resist bonus) has more tank than single invuln with links (stack-penalized). Let's not fail to mention here that invuln + LSE is sufficiently not different cap-wise from double LSE (and is far superior to either of the previous mentioned cases). Additionally, completely independent of what your other modules are, a nano BS's tank arguably relies as much on its MWD (and thus its capacitor) as it does on its raw EHP. If you showed these two fits to me without making any claims and without a posed argument present, I would say the invuln fit is better - because in all the situations where it matters, it is. Basically what I'm saying is your argument feels like a trick because a rational person will make rational assumptions whereas your argument and the circumstances surrounding it are in silly land. | ||
KwarK
United States41989 Posts
| ||
|
Ramiel
United States1220 Posts
If you are the type of player that really likes the cap booster, then yah- single invuln is better- cap is no longer a problem. Dual prop MJD is not needed on a BS that goes 2.4k/s unheated with amazing tracking, a flight of light drones and heavy neut imo. However agian argument could be made. This fit was not made with logi in mind. If you are flying with logi clearly resitance all of the things. Either way I am just trying to point out that in some interesting situations, LSE's can be used to effect on BS ships. But hey I could be wrong | ||
|
Ramiel
United States1220 Posts
On June 01 2013 00:17 KwarK wrote: another 6% EHP is not worth a mid slot Chessur. You're getting almost 10K more shield HP. In a buffer high speed falloff boat, I think that it is worth it. | ||
|
Galdo
United States338 Posts
| ||
tofucake
Hyrule18979 Posts
| ||
|
jfourz
Ireland421 Posts
| ||
|
Ramiel
United States1220 Posts
On June 01 2013 00:34 Galdo wrote: Wait, the Nightmare doesn't use Gallente BS, what happened to the Nanomare? I only plan to train gallente BS once i am flying a mach. I never plan to fly the NMega, I just think that its going to be very dangerous when shield fit. Nanomare can only be a thing if they buff its speed. The new BS line / Cruise line is just so fast now, that it just can't keep up with the current power creep in its current iteration. On June 01 2013 00:41 tofucake wrote: Chessur, the word you want is "you're" Thanks for pointing that out, it is fixed On June 01 2013 00:49 jfourz wrote: enjoy you're lse's I don't plan on flying a mega, but i will enjoy them. Giving up already? | ||
|
KwarK
United States41989 Posts
| ||
|
Ramiel
United States1220 Posts
On June 01 2013 01:08 KwarK wrote: Chessur, can you post a picture with -1 TE, +1 IN EANM, -1 LSE, +1 TC. I dont' have acsess to my EFT currently. However I will throw it up when i get home. I can tell you from my experiments with the TyFI and Typhoon that the dual tank provides much greater EHP when you are trying to shield fit a 4 slot BS. The navy BS have huge armor buffer to begin with, so enams are nice. Your probably going to be looking at more raw EHP, with better guns as well. | ||
|
tofucake
Hyrule18979 Posts
On June 01 2013 00:49 jfourz wrote: enjoy you're lse's I said "Chessur" and yet you still try to troll. Your troll is unoriginal, simpleminded, and pointless. Everyone is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may god have mercy on your soul. | ||
|
jfourz
Ireland421 Posts
On June 01 2013 01:26 tofucake wrote: I said "Chessur" and yet you still try to troll. Your troll is unoriginal, simpleminded, and pointless. Everyone is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may god have mercy on your soul. jeepers creepers, every time someone makes a joke these days it's trolling. i'm sorry for posting, i'll let you get back to your double lse megas  | ||
|
Shootemup.
United States1044 Posts
On June 01 2013 00:28 Ramiel wrote: Like i said pros and cons either way you fit it. Your dealing with a 4mid shield BS. With mindflood, and a faciton mwd with everything running your looking close to 2:30 cap. That is more than enough room to play with if you have good cap management imo. There for- you dont need to waste the mid slot on a booster. Invuln + LSE which is good, is going to hurt your cap which is JUST barely meeting what is playable IMO The invuln on pushes you below 2:00. (Granted the argument could be made that you don't have to turn on the invuln unless your taking damge ext ext I don't feel like going into all of those possibilitys) So will all of that in mind, dual LSE provides the most EHP buffer with the least amount of cap used. If you are the type of player that really likes the cap booster, then yah- single invuln is better- cap is no longer a problem. Dual prop MJD is not needed on a BS that goes 2.4k/s unheated with amazing tracking, a flight of light drones and heavy neut imo. However agian argument could be made. This fit was not made with logi in mind. If you are flying with logi clearly resitance all of the things. Either way I am just trying to point out that in some interesting situations, LSE's can be used to effect on BS ships. But hey I could be wrong I would imagine that you will have to use your MWD a lot more with a Blaster BS compared to a Cruise Navy Raven or w/e it is you are drooling over nowadays. You need the range control a MWD provides a lot more when your effective damage range is like 35 km and I don't think 2:30 capacitor is enough honestly. | ||
|
KwarK
United States41989 Posts
On June 01 2013 01:21 Ramiel wrote: I dont' have acsess to my EFT currently. However I will throw it up when i get home. I can tell you from my experiments with the TyFI and Typhoon that the dual tank provides much greater EHP when you are trying to shield fit a 4 slot BS. The navy BS have huge armor buffer to begin with, so enams are nice. Your probably going to be looking at more raw EHP, with better guns as well. So why are we doing small fixed increases on a ship with large numbers in those stats already instead of % increases? | ||
| ||
