EPT[wow] Warlords of Draenor - Page 304
| Forum Index > General Games |
Add yourself to the player list | ||
|
Squat
Sweden7978 Posts
| ||
|
Celial
2602 Posts
pulled last boss a few times, didnt have the dps to get through the first intermission cleanly, called it a day fights are okay i guess, bit boring as melee dps. although im glad, its the first content in 10 years i ever melee dps'd (got a guaranteed mythic raidspot out of it so...). as melee you just tunnel the boss on every single fight. im atleast a bit happy that i get to be the flamethrower guy on that fungus boss. ranges have lots of shit to do though. running a lot, many target swaps, debuff management... kinda glad im not playing my warlock right now. im too old for this shit. got a neck from droz, got the weapon from the bubble/orb boss (sixth). no excuse to not do dps anymore =( | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
 http://www.wowprogress.com/pve/eu/draenor Guild is empire strikes first! The butcher was actually more a difficult fight for us than tectus, tectus very simple really if you can WASDa anyway got 99th best mage logs haha :w | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
On December 04 2014 16:55 FinestHour wrote: from what ive seen arms is pretty good lol Should get buffed, glad overrated! | ||
|
DCRed
Finland435 Posts
On December 04 2014 09:17 Kipsate wrote: Speaking of which, how do you feel about PI vs Shadow Insight VS Twisted fate? PI is always a strong solid choice, Twisted fate seems to be quite of use when there are adds and Shadow Insight I am unsure about. Seems to suck with CoP dotweaving SI is currently useless. PI can be used on Kargath and Butcher, as always, the length of the fight determines the strength of PI a lot but in a single target fight where you've around 30% ToF uptime PI is a valid choice. | ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
On December 04 2014 17:06 Kipsate wrote: From all I heard is that both fury and Arms are boring and relatively mediocre, Glad stance is stronger. No downtime on glad makes it pretty great too imo. | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
| ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34496 Posts
Farvacola can you add me Firebolt145#2418 | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20322 Posts
On December 05 2014 00:38 Requizen wrote: I was not expecting Shadowmoon Burial Grounds to be that difficult. You actually had to pay attention on bosses, this ain't Cata dungeons. Burial grounds launch HC was easier than quite a few cata launch HC's IMO | ||
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
On December 05 2014 00:44 Cyro wrote: Burial grounds launch HC was easier than quite a few cata launch HC's IMO Absolutely, at launch Cata heroics were way harder than these (assuming ~610 ilvl now) | ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
Mages and warriors are doing quite a bit better then I expected initially. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20322 Posts
TBC > Cata/WOD > WOTLK >>> Pandaria Didn't actually run Panda 5-man hc's, but i got to the dungeons post-stat-squish, and at appropriate level, they were literally soloable on my death knight without much trouble (who had no raid gear) and i heard lots of complaints for it being the easiest expansion (short of mythic raids) | ||
|
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
On December 05 2014 00:55 Kipsate wrote: Data is a lot different then sims(well duh, kinda expected) Mages and warriors are doing quite a bit better then I expected initially. Frost was always going to do decently, even according to sims. It's actually an ok spec performance wise, just frustrating to play since it's so bursty and tied to cd's, plus none likes the fact that it's the only viable choice for, well, everything. Fire and Arcane aren't viable compared to Frost because either they don't do any damage (fire) or aren't mobile enough (arcane), which was also easily predictable. https://www.warcraftlogs.com/statistics/6#difficulty=4&dataset=100 https://www.warcraftlogs.com/statistics/6#difficulty=3&dataset=100 I'm actually very impressed by the ~400 brave souls that had the balls to show up in a raid in fire spec, doing 70% dps of everyone else at best. Takes balls to do that. | ||
|
Squat
Sweden7978 Posts
On December 05 2014 00:47 Teoita wrote: Absolutely, at launch Cata heroics were way harder than these (assuming ~610 ilvl now) Stonecore HC at launch with appropriate gear was harder than some raids, at least if you count LFR. | ||
|
Serejai
6007 Posts
The log was also corrupted when I tried to upload it to WCL, which further suggests something wasn't working properly during the fight. | ||
|
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
| ||
|
Serejai
6007 Posts
It's pretty damn impossible to find a normal group, though, when they all want 650+ ilvl for the first boss. I think I've spent about four hours this morning just refreshing the raid finder. I don't think people realize that Normal is Flex, and they still think it's actually the normal raiding mode (which is now Heroic). | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20322 Posts
| ||
|
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
| ||
| ||
