EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/vNRFVGQ.png)
"guys, this isn't Jerusalem"
Europa Universalis IV - Page 109
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
"guys, this isn't Jerusalem" | ||
|
Bojas
Netherlands2397 Posts
So is there nobody who I can give the finger until Sweden declares independence, while the PU can theoretically last until 1820? Shouldn't it be, that if I declare independence, the whole chain of unions/vassals joins in against me? That would make sense, at least. I think I figured it out. First I'll declare independence and win the independence war, then I'll release and play as Finland. | ||
|
DrunkenOne
United States302 Posts
On January 14 2015 11:54 RandyL wrote: I WANNA PLAY MULTIPLAYER BUT I DUNNO HOW Find a game here http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?814-EUIV-Multiplayer I'm playing a game organized through some other message board, people post AARs and stuff so its a good read, you could probably join this game if you want to play someone in Asia. We play Sundays at 1800 GMT/1pm EST. A guy is joining the game this week as Bahmanis. Game thread here: http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?18556-EU-4-Eurobowl-Brawl-MP-Sundays-1800-GMT-18-Jan | ||
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
Only MP game I've observed is ddrjake's current one - map seems pretty interesting, but I suspect a lot of that is due to the "15 starting basetax" requirement, leading to a lot of creative strategies you don't really see in standard all-major starts. | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
My goal is to get the entire world by 2000. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/mUbhuBH.png) I've finally gotten the Golden Horde down to its last legs (truce runs out in a few months and I can annex what's left in one go). The other hordes are fighting each other, so I just bit a little piece off each one where it's convenient. I've got a few doomstacks in my Alaskan colony of More Russia to fight off the Spanish DotF. My oldest ally with near maximum trust, Teutonic Order, has become the Defender of the Protestant Faith (I might have helped), so only the Catholics and the Sunnis are my real threats now. Can go nowhere but up. | ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
Some upcoming stuff for the game *Controlling a Colonial Nation that has ten or more provinces gives the motherland one free merchant *New forced march-looking icon under the admin tech ___ In other news, I'm still waiting for SuperStates mod to get 1.9 compatibility. But by reading it's steam page, it looks as if it is not that far of  | ||
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
On January 15 2015 12:21 SKC wrote: It seems to be a rule to prevent early westernatization which could make countries too strong when compared to their low tech neighbours. Still doesn't make much sense to me. Specially when people don't ban France, Ottos, etc. yeah, it seems bizarre, considering that no ROTW start even starts with comparable basetax to any of the big players (besides Ming, Jaunpur is next with a pitiful 56) | ||
|
brezix
Germany13 Posts
| ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
On January 18 2015 03:39 brezix wrote: In my current game i'm fighting France as Portugal but whatever I do France doesn't seem to get a river crossing penalty and YES im 1000% sure there is a river between my provinces when i'm baiting France... or am I missing something important?! Does France have high-maneuver generals? In 1.8 they changed to that the attacker don't get river crossing penalties if they have a general with a higher maneuver than the defenders | ||
|
brezix
Germany13 Posts
On January 18 2015 03:43 WindWolf wrote: Does France have high-maneuver generals? In 1.8 they changed to that the attacker don't get river crossing penalties if they have a general with a higher maneuver than the defenders Oh looks like i missed that patch note, that's it probably. Thanks a lot! | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
| ||
|
Gladness
United States59 Posts
On January 18 2015 11:11 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: How scared should I be of an English DotF if I'm Byzantium and attacking Italians? I'm around 1490 right now. Their navy's pretty shit and I'm more scared of Aragon + Venice pooling together their ships and crushing my victory fleet, but I feel like I can safely sit on my reclaimed Greek territory and take over Venetian or Genoan or Neapolitan trading posts. I kept my eyes to the east while France was DotF, but I feel like now that England has the mantle I can afford to be more ballsy on my western front. I agree about AI England's inept handling of its ground forces. It's worth knowing that the English navy might show up in spite of being very far out of supply range, per the confirmed AI Cheats thread. They say the AI isn't supposed to do this, and it doesn't always, but I've seen it happen in a few parts of the world. Maybe it's different since 1.9 but I doubt it. | ||
|
Bojas
Netherlands2397 Posts
| ||
|
RvB
Netherlands6209 Posts
| ||
|
Simberto
Germany11508 Posts
| ||
pPingu
Switzerland2892 Posts
My best game by far yet, played it back in November or December, the save file is bugged though and the game crashes, didn't bother to load an older save file at the time (regretting it now...) Started as Brandenburg, things went pretty well (thx PU), I was integrating Spain and waiting to be able to integrate Portugal, also have a marriage with Sweden, was waiting for a weak heir to generously take control of their country | ||
|
Silvanel
Poland4729 Posts
Playing as France, i went to war with Aragon (conquest). I am winning easily, and DURING the war ruler of Castile dies. Which trigers event Succesion war France vs Aragon. Of course i click yes. NOW Question, what kind of peace i should be aiming for? I dont have PU on the list. Does it mean i cant form a union regardless of war result? I can cancel vassaldom of Castile for 100%, but that would be something different i think. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
According to reddit | ||
| ||
