Battlefield 4 - Page 6

On March 21 2013 16:30 TheDraken wrote:
they destroyed this series. i genuinely had a ton of fun with bf1942 even though it seems dated and lackluster now. it was a balanced game and there was a distinct battlefield feel to it that is entirely absent now. it used to be so rewarding to work as a team since every class had glaring weaknesses.

even bfbc2 was relatively fun even though it was such a divergence from 1942 and bf2. you still had reasons to work with your team, but occasionally you and a few others could get away with doing really crazy shit to win.

and then we have bf3, which doesn't even feel like a battlefield game anymore. it doesn't matter what class you play. you have very little reason to give a shit about your other team. you do damn near the same thing every game, and your only reason to keep playing is to level up or try to get sick multi-kills. the warfare is gone. it's just a gang shootout now.

On March 20 2013 07:40 Swampflare wrote:
I'm curious what can really be extremely different with this installment.

DICE is normally pretty good at making their games unique, like bad company 2 to battlefield 3. This seems to be the same.

On March 21 2013 21:54 Latham wrote:
I had a lot of fun with BF3 but I also raged a lot because I was completely inept at using helis/jet fighters while other people could fly 1 just all round long and get massive kill streaks.

But is anyone else just a tiny bit tired of this "modern" setting crap? It was fun with CoD 4:MW and although BF3 was great it felt a bit stale with the weapons. I wish they'd venture into the future again like in BF2142 or even go back to WW2 (although I had my fair share of that era a few years back too...)
Maybe some pseudo steampunk setting like bioshock? Hell anything but modern and WW2 =/
And please don't point me to BS:I or Planetside 2...

On March 21 2013 22:12 nanospartan wrote:

Sweet Jesus remember titan sieges, imagine that in frostbite 2 (or 3, but you can hope). That would be the greatest thing ever...

On March 27 2013 15:12 eviltomahawk wrote:
It looks and sounds pretty to say the least. They're obviously putting a lot of work into single-player, which will probably turn out to be at least a very cinematic experience like BF3. I'll wait until we see a laundry-list of multiplayer features before fully juding the game, although I hope the secondary iron-sights make it into multiplayer on multiple guns since that looks cool.

On March 27 2013 15:31 blade55555 wrote:


I am praying for an increase in player count to 64 vs 64 would be sick

On March 27 2013 15:48 zoLo wrote:
Meh... It really does look too similar to BF3. I know that it's common since it's probably a sequel to BF3 in terms of the single player maybe, but they even reused the sound effects, weapons, Russian soldier skins, etc. I see that they even used some of the assets from MoH Warfighter as well.



The rumor a couple of days ago said it will remain 64 for PC and 24 for console. Still hoping though, but I won't get my hopes up since they want the game to be on all platforms.