| Forum Index > General Games |
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
• Adjustments have been made to increase the base accuracy of all weapons. • Jump and land penalties have been decreased, and the rate of stamina gain has been increased. | ||
Kiante
Australia7069 Posts
| ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
The game feels a lot better with stamina off. | ||
|
Kiante
Australia7069 Posts
| ||
|
Haggis
Scotland104 Posts
On March 31 2012 21:51 Kiante wrote: wow that's kinda dumb. why add extra movement restrictions :S The latest patch toned down restrictions and made it a lot better. | ||
|
Haggis
Scotland104 Posts
On March 30 2012 03:56 skyR wrote: 5v5 is the competitive format, no one wants to pug a 5v5. If you wanted to play competitive, you would get 4 others and find a scrim yourself or just pug in ESEA where the player base is actually good. The Arsenal gametype also really blows compared to original gungame and isn't even fun as a 5v5 game type. People pubbing CS are more interested in big servers that run deathmatch, gungame, unlimited money, 24/7 dust2, 24/7 office, etc. These are much more fun for pubbing than 5v5 for various reasons that I probably don't need to point out. Not to mention server communities make it more enjoyable. If Teamliquid put up a good popular east coast server, I'd want to play on it because there will be admins present and there will be people I recognize on a daily basis. The CSGO beta seems small right now so there is sort of a community feel to it, I do see some of the same people again and again in my games. Please remeber this is just beta and everything is not implemented. Casual mode will be your normal public servers you see atm in source and 1.6 (the d2 24/7 etc), run by communites (such as your TL example) etc. the 5v5 competitive mode effectively brings in mixing with the press of a button as opposed to using a third party site or finding 10 people. I believe there is an ELO ranking aswell where you can join with 4 other friends and play as a team. Like all ELO systems you will eventually play teams your own level - i.e random scrims won't be at the same level of a co-ordinated team so your likely to eventually play against others who are also a team and joined up together. | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
I've been playing Gotham City Impostors lately and honestly those guns feel a lot better. The greyscale/pastel colors are also bugging me more. Models just turn this hazy blue at distance. Let me put the gun issue another way: it doesn't feel like there's distinct rules to shooting. For instance, in 1.6 you know: Crouching increases your accuracy and reduces recoil Standing is your middle ground for accuracy and recoil Moving drastically reduces your accuracy (entirely random, essentially) In terms of spray/recoil, I don't feel a significant difference between moving, standing or crouching. The last game I was in, I kept apologizing for getting lolzy moving headshots with an M4. I don't know why I should stand or crouch at a short-med distance corner rather than just strafe back firing as soon as they come out. | ||
|
Haggis
Scotland104 Posts
GeT_RiGhT reply to gonzo's article: The problem with most of the 1.6 Players, is like the most honest answer is that they arn't used to new changes. I'm can clearly understand that and get their point of view on things. Some points I can say you'r right on and so. But as for me, as what lurppis even said and mention: "It will be interesting to see what will happen if CS:GO does take over CS 1.6 in IEM (as I assume it will) because from talking to other top players, hardly anyone (well, GeT_RiGhT does) seems interested in trying the game. " I'm always open for new things and I think as how much they are updating the game as they are doing right now, seems alright for me to start playing it. Of course it will take time for players like me to change over into game that's still in a Source engine or whatever u say, but still. Does every NEW change everytime be BAD? I'm not sure on that really. I will love to see CS still as one of the top FPS genre in scene, dosen't matter what it is. But for me CS:GO is the right direction. As a hardcore cs player thats played since the 1.3 days this is the sort of positive attitude thats needed to make CSGO work. CSGO is not going to be a direct 1.6 clone and its wrong to reject CSGO based on that fact. | ||
|
Haggis
Scotland104 Posts
On March 31 2012 23:22 Jibba wrote: I've been playing Gotham City Impostors lately and honestly those guns feel a lot better. I don't know if you have already, but a huge bit of advice I can give is to make sure you've disabled Vsync in video options and turned off Mouse accelaration in game settings. For me this made a huge difference; it removes the floaty feel thats found in Day of Defeat Sourcet/L4D. | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
| ||
|
Haggis
Scotland104 Posts
On March 31 2012 23:42 Jibba wrote: Yeah, I never have maccel and I'm pretty sure Vsync is off, since I was getting 300fps. I know myself the first time I played the beta a few weeks back, the first thing I did is turned mouse accel off but I didn't realise that Vsync was on as default - I'd check to be on the safe side. I'd add that it definately takes a bit of adjusting to get the feel for the guns and they are still by no means perfect but I at least feel like am hitting what am aiming at now - since the last patch. | ||
|
Mithriel
Netherlands2969 Posts
| ||
|
dronebabo
10866 Posts
| ||
|
Dust14
Belgium490 Posts
| ||
|
Ornithorynquez
430 Posts
On April 01 2012 03:27 Dust14 wrote: So it seems I have a acquired an extra CS:GO key and none of my CS-playing friends want it Well PM me if you want to make someone happy :D *winkwink* | ||
|
Fallacy
United States227 Posts
| ||
|
TheWarbler
United States1659 Posts
On April 01 2012 03:27 Dust14 wrote: So it seems I have a acquired an extra CS:GO key and none of my CS-playing friends want it I think I have a extra dota 2 beta key. | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On March 31 2012 23:33 Haggis wrote: I'd like to point people to Richard "Gonzo" Lewis's (Editor-in-Chief) article on Cadred over the recent pro 1.6 scene negativity towards CSGO, in particular the whole Lurppis debacle. Its a good read and brings up a lot of valid points. http://www.cadred.org/News/Article/172433/ GeT_RiGhT reply to gonzo's article: The problem with most of the 1.6 Players, is like the most honest answer is that they arn't used to new changes. I'm can clearly understand that and get their point of view on things. Some points I can say you'r right on and so. But as for me, as what lurppis even said and mention: "It will be interesting to see what will happen if CS:GO does take over CS 1.6 in IEM (as I assume it will) because from talking to other top players, hardly anyone (well, GeT_RiGhT does) seems interested in trying the game. " I'm always open for new things and I think as how much they are updating the game as they are doing right now, seems alright for me to start playing it. Of course it will take time for players like me to change over into game that's still in a Source engine or whatever u say, but still. Does every NEW change everytime be BAD? I'm not sure on that really. I will love to see CS still as one of the top FPS genre in scene, dosen't matter what it is. But for me CS:GO is the right direction. As a hardcore cs player thats played since the 1.3 days this is the sort of positive attitude thats needed to make CSGO work. The article fails to point out that Valve had their chance to design a new CS their way without interruptions, and it bombed. I think he correctly points out that most hardcore people do prefer 1.5 to 1.6, but it further illustrates that most of the changes Valve has made since taking over from Cliffe and Gooseman have sucked. No, there isn't a reason to give Source players more input than 1.6, because no one plays their game. 1.6 drew 70,000 viewers at IEM Championships and Source is absolutely nowhere to be seen. Why should that take precedent, then? To this day 1.6 is the most played Steam game. Why on earth would you look to Source players for the model on creating a competitive game? Their competitive scene was marginal at best after CGS died, and even random pubgoers prefer 1.6 to CSS. The first thing they should've done is realized CSS was a failure and not the model to follow. | ||
|
smallerk
897 Posts
You and pretty much everyone. | ||
|
nymfaw
Norway430 Posts
The thing I didnt like with CSGO: The bad mobility. What's the problem with bunnyjumps anyway? All the guns sounds pretty much the same Same maps, but with alot of silly details? All it gave me was nostalgia Gore effects when headshotting in oldCS, nothing like it. I want it back whatever happened to the green color effect when gaining money after getting a kill, it was a dopamine machine! Remove m249.. really? What are the noobs going to buy now. Shooting through walls? havent tested it. It must be possible in a CS game. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
Escore
INu's Battles
Classic vs ByuN
SHIN vs ByuN
OSC
Big Brain Bouts
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Classic vs GgMaChine
Rogue vs Maru
WardiTV Invitational
IPSL
Ret vs Art_Of_Turtle
Radley vs TBD
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
