Diablo III General Discussion - Page 452
Forum Index > General Games |
CruelZeratul
Germany4588 Posts
| ||
cz
United States3249 Posts
Blizz team just plain suck at gaming. Might be impossible for them, but actual gamers will do it quick. | ||
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
They could have just made a seperate inferno beta that would, say, give us lvl 60 characters with decent gear and would let us play the start of act 4 or something | ||
Silidons
United States2813 Posts
On May 20 2012 04:29 cz wrote: Haha, called it. Said inferno would be beat within 5 days when others were saying "months dude, months."' Blizz team just plain suck at gaming. Might be impossible for them, but actual gamers will do it quick. said this for ages myself but everyone thought "if blizzard couldn't do it, zomgz!" blizzard internals ALWAYS suck at gaming | ||
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
| ||
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
On May 20 2012 04:34 solidbebe wrote: Hmm, blizzard didn't mean hardcore? they certainly didn't | ||
Blitzkrieg0
United States13132 Posts
On May 20 2012 04:29 cz wrote: Haha, called it. Said inferno would be beat within 5 days when others were saying "months dude, months."' Blizz team just plain suck at gaming. Might be impossible for them, but actual gamers will do it quick. Maybe they had some stupid idea that people would actually try to clear inferno instead of just the bosses. | ||
Caphe
Vietnam10817 Posts
On May 20 2012 04:37 Blitzkrieg0 wrote: Maybe they had some stupid idea that people would actually try to clear inferno instead of just the bosses. This! I would actually take a long time if people actually do it properly but hey bosses are all that count in a world first rush. I am quite surprise that Blizzard didn't know about res hopping, may be they do but just don't give a fuk. Blizzard needs to fire those game testers that tested the game. | ||
Blix
Netherlands873 Posts
On May 20 2012 04:37 Blitzkrieg0 wrote: Maybe they had some stupid idea that people would actually try to clear inferno instead of just the bosses. yeah.. if they would have made the rezzing and teleporting to a corpse mechanics different, it would have taken much much much longer.. Also, Blizzard has to cater for the casual to semi-casual gamer (after all, they want to sell X million copies). If they make it so that pros playing 16h per day can not beat it in 6 months, then the vast majority of players can never do it. | ||
Caphe
Vietnam10817 Posts
| ||
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On May 20 2012 04:44 Blix wrote: yeah.. if they would have made the rezzing and teleporting to a corpse mechanics different, it would have taken much much much longer.. Also, Blizzard has to cater for the casual to semi-casual gamer (after all, they want to sell X million copies). If they make it so that pros playing 16h per day can not beat it in 6 months, then the vast majority of players can never do it. There's 3 other difficulties for the casuals you know | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44828 Posts
On May 20 2012 04:29 cz wrote: Haha, called it. Said inferno would be beat within 5 days when others were saying "months dude, months."' Blizz team just plain suck at gaming. Might be impossible for them, but actual gamers will do it quick. Who the hell would say "months dude, months."' ? Maybe someone who's never played Diablo 2 or doesn't understand the community or what people would do to break a record lol. Everyone here pretty much knew it would be done within a week... two weeks, tops. | ||
cz
United States3249 Posts
On May 20 2012 04:59 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Who the hell would say "months dude, months."' ? Maybe someone who's never played Diablo 2 or doesn't understand the community or what people would do to break a record lol. Everyone here pretty much knew it would be done within a week... two weeks, tops. Consensus here was that it would be months because Blizzard said it was super-duper impossible and they thought it would take months to beat. Higher post count people were guessing shorter though. | ||
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
On May 20 2012 04:59 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Who the hell would say "months dude, months."' ? Maybe someone who's never played Diablo 2 or doesn't understand the community or what people would do to break a record lol. Everyone here pretty much knew it would be done within a week... two weeks, tops. plenty of people | ||
FieryBalrog
United States1381 Posts
If it took 6 months to beat Inferno for even the most hardcore teams, that would mean 6 months of 24/7 gear farming. That's not the best game design anyway. I'm sure they could have just prevented you from corpse running and rezzing each other, and it would have taken 5 times as long to finish inferno. | ||
FieryBalrog
United States1381 Posts
| ||
humblegar
Norway883 Posts
An exploit first only tells us we need a patch :p | ||
Ottoxlol
735 Posts
| ||
sob3k
United States7572 Posts
On May 20 2012 05:55 humblegar wrote: So how far are the best players without res hopping atm? An exploit first only tells us we need a patch :p dunno, even without res hop everyone basically just runs past the champion groups, nobody can fight them currently, they are far far more dangerous than any boss. | ||
| ||