| Forum Index > General Games |
|
MichaelJLowell
United States610 Posts
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/114/1149091p1.html "This game has incredible unbelievable depth. It stands up to its predecessor, generally considered to be one of the best (if not the best) fighting games of all-time. But the game doesn't have additional game modes, so I'm giving it an 8.5-out-of-10." | ||
|
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
 )But yeah they pump up mvc3's dick way bigger than it should be | ||
|
KillerSOS
United States4207 Posts
Just a thought. | ||
|
MichaelJLowell
United States610 Posts
On February 15 2011 11:04 ZlaSHeR wrote: Because IGN and allt hose review sites rate games based on the casual player, not the competitive palyer lol, same shit for starcraft 2 (although sc2 deserves it )But yeah they pump up mvc3's dick way bigger than it should be I'm not really opposed to the idea of reviewing a competitive game shortly after its release, but there's no way you can play a good fighting game and come to a consensus on how well it plays after twenty hours. I refuse to believe it. | ||
|
Foreplay
United States1154 Posts
| ||
|
101toss
3232 Posts
On February 15 2011 11:03 MichaelJLowell wrote: The IGN review of this game is patently ridiculous and I don't even need to play fighting games to know it. http://ps3.ign.com/articles/114/1149091p1.html "This game has incredible unbelievable depth. It stands up to its predecessor, generally considered to be one of the best (if not the best) fighting games of all-time. But the game doesn't have additional game modes, so I'm giving it an 8.5-out-of-10." "Even characters that at first seem powerful, like Devil May Cry's Dante, fit well into the balanced roster." This review just lost its credibility | ||
|
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
| ||
|
Zeroes
United States1102 Posts
On February 15 2011 13:26 ZlaSHeR wrote: Well, its definitely a more balanced roster than MvC2 (so far), I mean like we've been saying, every character has viability, just that Sentinel is fucking insane lol I just wish they removed some of his mobility he is too fast for a huge character | ||
|
Trumpet
United States1935 Posts
On February 15 2011 13:35 Zeroes wrote: I just wish they removed some of his mobility he is too fast for a huge character Damn, they already nuked his air mobility hard, leave my robot alone T_T lol random walmarts doing midnight tournaments, gonna see if I cant get myself a free copy tonight | ||
|
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
| ||
|
sung_moon
United States10110 Posts
On February 15 2011 13:39 Trumpet wrote: Damn, they already nuked his air mobility hard, leave my robot alone T_T lol random walmarts doing midnight tournaments, gonna see if I cant get myself a free copy tonight gogogogogo eviltree just got my copy woot woot oh fuck yea FADC's Seb is back! LMFAO sanford doing sent combos on IM then decides to snap magneto in. "i like practicing on him for some reason" | ||
|
cody1024d
107 Posts
| ||
|
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
| ||
|
NicolBolas
United States1388 Posts
Players are always going to complain about any game being more user-friendly. There are very few games out there being developed that provide an extreme challenge for players. User-friendliness and challenge have nothing to do with each other. You can make very easy games that are hard to play solely because the controls are terrible or unintuitive. Similarly, you can make very challenging games that have simple, intuitive interfaces. There are many, many games made that are hard. Especially nowadays, with so much indie crap out there. It's easy to make something hard; it's much more difficult to make something with legitimate challenge. Challenge imposed by the rules of gameplay rather than arbitrary fiat. Because IGN and allt hose review sites rate games based on the casual player, not the competitive palyer lol, same shit for starcraft 2 (although sc2 deserves it ) As someone who is a casual player of MvC, I'm calling BS on this. The bitching about having "lost 20 characters," for example. I don't give a shit. What we gained was unique characters. No more clones. Number of characters is not a problem, so long as you have a lot of diversity of characters and play styles. That's all the casual player wants: to be able to play different characters. And then there's his "Even Marvel vs. Capcom 2 extended its life by allowing players to "purchase" characters using in-game points," comment. Nobody, casual or competitive alike, enjoyed having to play through the game over and over just to play the characters you really wanted to play. They did it because they had to. But making more characters unlockable does not make the game better in any way, shape, or form. So no; this review is not for casual players. It's not for competitive players either. It's for idiots. | ||
|
ProdT
United States170 Posts
| ||
|
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
On February 15 2011 15:22 NicolBolas wrote: So no; this review is not for casual players. It's not for competitive players either. It's for idiots. Lol touche good sir. | ||
|
Fatmatt2000
United States159 Posts
Hit me up on PSN: thatnerdkid. Ill gladly lose to anyone. Also I keep trying to use MvC2 controls, its messing with my mind. | ||
|
KillerSOS
United States4207 Posts
| ||
|
Pellucidity
Netherlands377 Posts
Will we be making a list in the first post with Xbox/PSN names of TL members that play the game? | ||
|
RawrAnOcean
United States359 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
WardiTV Korean Royale
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Kung Fu Cup
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
RSL Revival
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
