• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:47
CEST 15:47
KST 22:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting6[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO65.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)77Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition325.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)119
StarCraft 2
General
Revisiting the game after10 years and wow it's bad 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting The New Patch Killed Mech! Ladder Impersonation (only maybe)
Tourneys
Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More
Brood War
General
Map with fog of war removed for one player? BW caster Sayle BW General Discussion Pros React To: BarrackS + FlaSh Coaching vs SnOw After 20 seasons we have a lot of great maps
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal A [ASL20] Semifinal B SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Relatively freeroll strategies Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training Siegecraft - a new perspective
Other Games
General Games
Dawn of War IV Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640} TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Inbreeding: Why Do We Do It…
Peanutsc
From Tilt to Ragequit:The Ps…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1823 users

The Sad Zealot Fan Club - Page 45

Forum Index > Fan Clubs
Post a Reply
Prev 1 43 44 45 46 47 70 Next
cari-kira
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany655 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-12 10:31:37
October 12 2011 10:28 GMT
#881
At least they should lower the EMP range of ghosts, its ridiculous to make it higher than feedback range. ..damn, i forgot tanks have a laughable range, too
Ghosts are vastly overpowered and terrans have just scratched on the surface of its potential, thats the biggest problem.
Live and let live
Bogeyman
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden307 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-12 15:07:27
October 12 2011 14:57 GMT
#882
I feel for you my dear Protoss, but if you want to nerf EMP somehow then you can't reduce the range of it relative to feedback. They have the same range, only EMP is an AoE so it can stretch just a little bit farther and also it doesn't hit instantly so it has to be timed right, whereas feedback is single-target and instant. The dynamic of that works rather well, and both sides have a decent chance of hitting first (with excellent micro I think EMP gets a slight edge over feedback though). So if something really needs to be changed, it has to be something else.

edit: oh, and to clarify: even if the EMP vs feedback battle isn't 100% even, reducing the range of EMP would have such an incredible impact that the result would be far less balanced, perhaps to the point where it's technically impossible to hit an EMP on a templar with feedback targetting the ghost. And quite frankly I don't think anyone wants that.

edit again: wait a minute, EMP range is actually 1 higher? Well perhaps it could be lowered to 9.5. That doesn't seem unreasonable, but I don't quite know.
gizzzy
Profile Joined August 2011
United States27 Posts
October 12 2011 15:32 GMT
#883
Please sign me up for the club, thanks. I'm in favor of some tweaks to ghost.
Tortious_Tortoise
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States944 Posts
October 12 2011 16:09 GMT
#884
On October 12 2011 02:04 laharl23 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2011 01:56 mbr2321 wrote:
On October 12 2011 01:32 pezit wrote:
You know that when even Whitera shows frustration something is wrong. I do hope blizzard works more on the design to fix the balance rather than to just buff some number, because there's a lot of terrible design choices in the protoss race.


Like what?

I get that Protoss aren't doing very well right now, but in all the misery of this sad, sad thread, I haven't seen any compelling argument that Protoss' design is broken. I see more compelling evidence in the than in all of the posts in this thread. Sure, Protoss are doing badly at a professional level, but I have a different reason why: when Zergs were having a difficult time holding off 2 raxes and other such rushes while fast-expanding, the natural instinct was to whine and complain that Terran was imbalanced. But, as time progressed, Zergies explored their race, their options, and the tightest of timings, and found that it was logistically possible to hold the rush and have a hatch up incredibly early. By exploring the problem instead of just whining about it, the top-level Zergs found solutions, and by doing so, became innovative inspirations for their race.

I believe, and I have, since StarCraft II was in beta, always believed that a race struggles to put up tournament results because the other races have been innovating faster and more efficiently. Perhaps that's all it takes for Protoss to get back on their feet. I think this thread should be changed from the "Sad-Zealot" to the "Determined-Zealot" or, dare I say... the "Zealous Zealot"


When zergs were struggling the game was super new and there was obvious things they could do better. Not to mention zergs were helped by a punch of patches and protoss was nerfed more and more.

Its been months and the game is much more developed and protosses are running out of things they can do. Its a different time period in the game so that argument doesn't work.


I completely disagree. Warp-prism play is terribly underused. You want to talk about dodging EMPs? Try that. Hallucination isn't used, Phoenixes are underused, and the last time I saw good Collossus micro was sometime in July. You are arguing that the game has progressed further than the way Protoss is supposed to be played. My argument is that Protoss should be working to progress beyond the current game. Change it.
Treating eSports as a social science since 2011; Credo: "The system is never wrong"-- Day9 Daily #400 Part 3
hummingbird23
Profile Joined September 2011
Norway359 Posts
October 12 2011 16:15 GMT
#885
On October 13 2011 01:09 mbr2321 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2011 02:04 laharl23 wrote:
On October 12 2011 01:56 mbr2321 wrote:
On October 12 2011 01:32 pezit wrote:
You know that when even Whitera shows frustration something is wrong. I do hope blizzard works more on the design to fix the balance rather than to just buff some number, because there's a lot of terrible design choices in the protoss race.


Like what?

I get that Protoss aren't doing very well right now, but in all the misery of this sad, sad thread, I haven't seen any compelling argument that Protoss' design is broken. I see more compelling evidence in the than in all of the posts in this thread. Sure, Protoss are doing badly at a professional level, but I have a different reason why: when Zergs were having a difficult time holding off 2 raxes and other such rushes while fast-expanding, the natural instinct was to whine and complain that Terran was imbalanced. But, as time progressed, Zergies explored their race, their options, and the tightest of timings, and found that it was logistically possible to hold the rush and have a hatch up incredibly early. By exploring the problem instead of just whining about it, the top-level Zergs found solutions, and by doing so, became innovative inspirations for their race.

I believe, and I have, since StarCraft II was in beta, always believed that a race struggles to put up tournament results because the other races have been innovating faster and more efficiently. Perhaps that's all it takes for Protoss to get back on their feet. I think this thread should be changed from the "Sad-Zealot" to the "Determined-Zealot" or, dare I say... the "Zealous Zealot"


When zergs were struggling the game was super new and there was obvious things they could do better. Not to mention zergs were helped by a punch of patches and protoss was nerfed more and more.

Its been months and the game is much more developed and protosses are running out of things they can do. Its a different time period in the game so that argument doesn't work.


I completely disagree. Warp-prism play is terribly underused. You want to talk about dodging EMPs? Try that. Hallucination isn't used, Phoenixes are underused, and the last time I saw good Collossus micro was sometime in July. You are arguing that the game has progressed further than the way Protoss is supposed to be played. My argument is that Protoss should be working to progress beyond the current game. Change it.


That would be viable, except for range 9 vikings. Getting a prism of templars sniped is game ending. Why not do this, let's reduce the range of EMP to 8. If you have trouble getting off EMPs due to feedback, use the medivacs that you always have behind your bio to avoid getting feedbacked, it should be a lot easiest as a feedback is a single target spell, no?
thingULTRA
Profile Joined January 2011
United States48 Posts
October 12 2011 16:18 GMT
#886
al pacino plays protoss ftw^^
"You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you"
Caryc
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany330 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-12 16:22:52
October 12 2011 16:22 GMT
#887
i dont want to argue wheter or not protoss is to weak because i lack expert knowledge,
but i think as long as protoss stop using forcefields especially but also guardian shield when they have higher tech armies - which is basically HT's (and i know,it may be hard),i dont think they have a right to complain.

thats just something i always see that protoss players do...abuse forcefields in early and mid game stages,then completely stop using it once they reach HT tech..
Tortious_Tortoise
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States944 Posts
October 12 2011 16:24 GMT
#888
On October 13 2011 01:15 hummingbird23 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 13 2011 01:09 mbr2321 wrote:
On October 12 2011 02:04 laharl23 wrote:
On October 12 2011 01:56 mbr2321 wrote:
On October 12 2011 01:32 pezit wrote:
You know that when even Whitera shows frustration something is wrong. I do hope blizzard works more on the design to fix the balance rather than to just buff some number, because there's a lot of terrible design choices in the protoss race.


Like what?

I get that Protoss aren't doing very well right now, but in all the misery of this sad, sad thread, I haven't seen any compelling argument that Protoss' design is broken. I see more compelling evidence in the than in all of the posts in this thread. Sure, Protoss are doing badly at a professional level, but I have a different reason why: when Zergs were having a difficult time holding off 2 raxes and other such rushes while fast-expanding, the natural instinct was to whine and complain that Terran was imbalanced. But, as time progressed, Zergies explored their race, their options, and the tightest of timings, and found that it was logistically possible to hold the rush and have a hatch up incredibly early. By exploring the problem instead of just whining about it, the top-level Zergs found solutions, and by doing so, became innovative inspirations for their race.

I believe, and I have, since StarCraft II was in beta, always believed that a race struggles to put up tournament results because the other races have been innovating faster and more efficiently. Perhaps that's all it takes for Protoss to get back on their feet. I think this thread should be changed from the "Sad-Zealot" to the "Determined-Zealot" or, dare I say... the "Zealous Zealot"


When zergs were struggling the game was super new and there was obvious things they could do better. Not to mention zergs were helped by a punch of patches and protoss was nerfed more and more.

Its been months and the game is much more developed and protosses are running out of things they can do. Its a different time period in the game so that argument doesn't work.


I completely disagree. Warp-prism play is terribly underused. You want to talk about dodging EMPs? Try that. Hallucination isn't used, Phoenixes are underused, and the last time I saw good Collossus micro was sometime in July. You are arguing that the game has progressed further than the way Protoss is supposed to be played. My argument is that Protoss should be working to progress beyond the current game. Change it.


That would be viable, except for range 9 vikings. Getting a prism of templars sniped is game ending. Why not do this, let's reduce the range of EMP to 8. If you have trouble getting off EMPs due to feedback, use the medivacs that you always have behind your bio to avoid getting feedbacked, it should be a lot easiest as a feedback is a single target spell, no?


Firstly, if Terran is making Vikings instead of Medivacs when your tech choice is High Templar, good luck losing that game. Secondly, even if Terran only make 2-3 vikings for the sole purpose of sniping your WP, you should have stalkers/archons that can easily pick those vikings off before they can get the WP. Finally, I am not a fan of making more than four ghosts because after EMP, they don't have enough sustainable DPS to be worth their cost in a fight. If Terran makes enough ghosts to individually EMP every one of your units, you should still win the fight because Terran will not have enough MMM.
Treating eSports as a social science since 2011; Credo: "The system is never wrong"-- Day9 Daily #400 Part 3
SC2ShoWTimE
Profile Joined April 2011
Germany722 Posts
October 12 2011 16:45 GMT
#889
4 ghosts?
the reason why protoss having trouble with ghosts is because most terran build ~8-10. it´s easy to spread your hts and feedback 4 ghosts or rather be able to storm, but it´s nearly impossible to feedback 10 ghosts and no, the mmm ball isnt to small when you have 10 ghosts. whats better, getting no emps off and just die to storms or to emp simply everything and destroy the rest of the protoss army?
Progamer
laharl23
Profile Joined February 2011
United States582 Posts
October 12 2011 16:54 GMT
#890
On October 13 2011 01:09 mbr2321 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2011 02:04 laharl23 wrote:
On October 12 2011 01:56 mbr2321 wrote:
On October 12 2011 01:32 pezit wrote:
You know that when even Whitera shows frustration something is wrong. I do hope blizzard works more on the design to fix the balance rather than to just buff some number, because there's a lot of terrible design choices in the protoss race.


Like what?

I get that Protoss aren't doing very well right now, but in all the misery of this sad, sad thread, I haven't seen any compelling argument that Protoss' design is broken. I see more compelling evidence in the than in all of the posts in this thread. Sure, Protoss are doing badly at a professional level, but I have a different reason why: when Zergs were having a difficult time holding off 2 raxes and other such rushes while fast-expanding, the natural instinct was to whine and complain that Terran was imbalanced. But, as time progressed, Zergies explored their race, their options, and the tightest of timings, and found that it was logistically possible to hold the rush and have a hatch up incredibly early. By exploring the problem instead of just whining about it, the top-level Zergs found solutions, and by doing so, became innovative inspirations for their race.

I believe, and I have, since StarCraft II was in beta, always believed that a race struggles to put up tournament results because the other races have been innovating faster and more efficiently. Perhaps that's all it takes for Protoss to get back on their feet. I think this thread should be changed from the "Sad-Zealot" to the "Determined-Zealot" or, dare I say... the "Zealous Zealot"


When zergs were struggling the game was super new and there was obvious things they could do better. Not to mention zergs were helped by a punch of patches and protoss was nerfed more and more.

Its been months and the game is much more developed and protosses are running out of things they can do. Its a different time period in the game so that argument doesn't work.


I completely disagree. Warp-prism play is terribly underused. You want to talk about dodging EMPs? Try that. Hallucination isn't used, Phoenixes are underused, and the last time I saw good Collossus micro was sometime in July. You are arguing that the game has progressed further than the way Protoss is supposed to be played. My argument is that Protoss should be working to progress beyond the current game. Change it.


Where in my post did I say that protosses shouldn't try new things? tell me.

I said the game is much more developed than when zergs were struggling, and when zergs struggled they were helped by a bunch of patches, none of that is wrong.

If you are going to argue with me at least argue with what I was even talking about.
aderum
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Sweden1459 Posts
October 12 2011 16:54 GMT
#891
Ghost are faster, have longer range and more hp. I cant really see a world where this is balanced...
Crazy people dont sit around and wonder if they are insane
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
October 12 2011 17:16 GMT
#892
On October 13 2011 01:22 Caryc wrote:
i dont want to argue wheter or not protoss is to weak because i lack expert knowledge,
but i think as long as protoss stop using forcefields especially but also guardian shield when they have higher tech armies - which is basically HT's (and i know,it may be hard),i dont think they have a right to complain.

thats just something i always see that protoss players do...abuse forcefields in early and mid game stages,then completely stop using it once they reach HT tech..


Ghosts make sentries late game the dumbest thing ever, and they cost so much gas that you have fewer other very important late game tech units in your army if you make sentries. Plus, they do almost no damage and are made of paper, so they don't survive engagements. What matters the most for protoss is retention of gas units, because all of your dps is in your gas. Sentries don't live in engagements past the early game, so you're just throwing away gas.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
Bogeyman
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden307 Posts
October 12 2011 17:18 GMT
#893
Come on let's be reasonable here... range 8 EMP vs range 9 feedback? How do you envision that working out?

Concerning late-game sentry usage... well, there is a point where you start getting those HT out, and you simply don't have enough gas to get a good amount of HTs out if you also want sentries. But perhaps in an even later stage when you're nearing the supply cap, you could mix in some sentries. Obviously you'd want to keep sentries alive from the start, but they're too slow to consistently be able to do that.

And comparing simple stats of various units without looking at them in the context they're used says absolutely nothing about balance.

Ghosts might need a tweak, not a reaper-treatment. Luckily I trust David Kim knows this as well.
Binabik
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany686 Posts
October 12 2011 17:50 GMT
#894
On October 13 2011 02:18 Bogeyman wrote:
Come on let's be reasonable here... range 8 EMP vs range 9 feedback? How do you envision that working out?

EMP has a radius
pPingu
Profile Joined September 2011
Switzerland2892 Posts
October 12 2011 17:57 GMT
#895
On October 13 2011 02:18 Bogeyman wrote:
Come on let's be reasonable here... range 8 EMP vs range 9 feedback? How do you envision that working out?


Not saying that I support this, but ghosts can snipe. And it takes less energy to snipe one ht (50 (2x25)energy if I'm not mistaken) than one emp (75), so it should be the counter of ht maybe? And not just fire in the protoss army without even looking what you will emp.

Plus, you can still cloak to come near the protoss army.
sambo400
Profile Joined March 2011
United States378 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-12 18:12:05
October 12 2011 18:06 GMT
#896
1 I dont understand why the other races get their spell-caster mana upgrade but not Protoss.

2 I don't understand why all the spell-casters don't have the same range. If Fungal, NP, Feedback, Storm, EMP and Snipe all had the same range, then you could only blame your micro if you lost a spell-casting engagement. I can see arguing for NP being a little longer because it traps the infestor in place to be easily killed, and also reducing emp radius because its still harder to feedback than emp, and with the mana upgrade, you should have enough energy for extra emps.

My crying aside I think there are some things protoss needs to explore, like haluc and chrono boost. If Protosses were as good with nexus energy as Zergs were with Queen energy, I think we might start getting somewhere. Warp prisms as well.
Zocat
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany2229 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-12 18:22:44
October 12 2011 18:21 GMT
#897
On October 12 2011 23:57 Bogeyman wrote:
I feel for you my dear Protoss, but if you want to nerf EMP somehow then you can't reduce the range of it relative to feedback. They have the same range, only EMP is an AoE so it can stretch just a little bit farther and also it doesn't hit instantly so it has to be timed right, whereas feedback is single-target and instant. The dynamic of that works rather well, and both sides have a decent chance of hitting first (with excellent micro I think EMP gets a slight edge over feedback though). So if something really needs to be changed, it has to be something else.

edit: oh, and to clarify: even if the EMP vs feedback battle isn't 100% even, reducing the range of EMP would have such an incredible impact that the result would be far less balanced, perhaps to the point where it's technically impossible to hit an EMP on a templar with feedback targetting the ghost. And quite frankly I don't think anyone wants that.


Well why not use snipe then? It has longer range than feedback and the Terrran can successfully snipe all front HT (see Bomber vs Puzzle I think?)
So the Terran would have to make the decision: "Do I want to counter feedback and snipe them" or "Do I take the risk of beeing feedbacked and use EMP to hit all units".
Atm snipe is only used when the terran doesnt want to engage right in that moment and therefore the lost energy would regenerate. EMP currently is the normal engagement spell "Well, I hit other units as well, who cares, but I dont have any downside using it".

On October 13 2011 03:06 sambo400 wrote:
1 I dont understand why the other races get their spell-caster mana upgrade but not Protoss.

Because at max the other races have to wait for the unit being produced before they can use their spell again. P can warpin in 5sec and cast immeditately. Without amulet they also have to wait a certain time until they can cast.
Amui
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Canada10567 Posts
October 12 2011 18:31 GMT
#898
On October 12 2011 23:57 Bogeyman wrote:
I feel for you my dear Protoss, but if you want to nerf EMP somehow then you can't reduce the range of it relative to feedback. They have the same range, only EMP is an AoE so it can stretch just a little bit farther and also it doesn't hit instantly so it has to be timed right, whereas feedback is single-target and instant. The dynamic of that works rather well, and both sides have a decent chance of hitting first (with excellent micro I think EMP gets a slight edge over feedback though). So if something really needs to be changed, it has to be something else.

edit: oh, and to clarify: even if the EMP vs feedback battle isn't 100% even, reducing the range of EMP would have such an incredible impact that the result would be far less balanced, perhaps to the point where it's technically impossible to hit an EMP on a templar with feedback targetting the ghost. And quite frankly I don't think anyone wants that.

edit again: wait a minute, EMP range is actually 1 higher? Well perhaps it could be lowered to 9.5. That doesn't seem unreasonable, but I don't quite know.


You have to remember that in situations where it matters, terran ALWAYS has the vision advantage. That combined with outranging Protoss's anti-EMP means it's a losing battle for protoss every time at the highest levels.
Porouscloud - NA LoL
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
October 12 2011 18:36 GMT
#899
This is a sad zealot fanclub, not a balance whine thread.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Apollo_Shards
Profile Joined February 2011
1210 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-12 20:55:12
October 12 2011 20:54 GMT
#900
On October 13 2011 03:06 sambo400 wrote:
1 I dont understand why the other races get their spell-caster mana upgrade but not Protoss.

2 I don't understand why all the spell-casters don't have the same range. If Fungal, NP, Feedback, Storm, EMP and Snipe all had the same range, then you could only blame your micro if you lost a spell-casting engagement. I can see arguing for NP being a little longer because it traps the infestor in place to be easily killed, and also reducing emp radius because its still harder to feedback than emp, and with the mana upgrade, you should have enough energy for extra emps.

My crying aside I think there are some things protoss needs to explore, like haluc and chrono boost. If Protosses were as good with nexus energy as Zergs were with Queen energy, I think we might start getting somewhere. Warp prisms as well.



Wow
Jaedong, sOs, avilo, MaSa, Oprah
Prev 1 43 44 45 46 47 70 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
12:00
King of the Hill #227
WardiTV647
IndyStarCraft 139
iHatsuTV 16
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Reynor 220
IndyStarCraft 139
LamboSC2 112
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 26827
Hyuk 7265
Calm 6114
Rain 3089
Flash 1923
firebathero 882
EffOrt 805
Mini 659
Soma 637
Light 590
[ Show more ]
ZerO 577
Stork 455
BeSt 371
PianO 304
Snow 299
Hyun 261
Larva 240
hero 119
Rush 101
Soulkey 97
Mind 95
JYJ84
Mong 82
Pusan 81
Nal_rA 63
Barracks 58
Backho 58
Shinee 49
sorry 43
Sea.KH 43
Free 36
zelot 34
Killer 34
sas.Sziky 27
yabsab 20
Aegong 18
Movie 17
Terrorterran 12
scan(afreeca) 11
SilentControl 9
Dota 2
qojqva3313
XcaliburYe457
syndereN311
Counter-Strike
allub187
oskar122
Heroes of the Storm
XaKoH 61
Other Games
summit1g6958
singsing2159
olofmeister1259
B2W.Neo791
hiko572
DeMusliM335
Lowko288
crisheroes265
Mlord149
Sick140
Fuzer 109
ArmadaUGS34
Rex20
Hui .9
ZerO(Twitch)9
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 853
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1300
League of Legends
• TFBlade588
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
21h 14m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 20h
Safe House 2
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Safe House 2
3 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.