On February 12 2011 21:53 ace246 wrote:
Dude, getting no.1 in korean charts is merely about having the right timing executions, much like terran in starcraft 2. To be precise, releasing songs to get the maximum ranks is done when the groups from the big leagues stop promoting. Once the top idols leave the scene, the artist of the new song compete with a bunch of no-shows which isn't much of a hurdle so long as they produce mainstream genre. This method was popularised by SME a few years ago, when they realised snsd didn't stand a chance against wg.
Dude, getting no.1 in korean charts is merely about having the right timing executions, much like terran in starcraft 2. To be precise, releasing songs to get the maximum ranks is done when the groups from the big leagues stop promoting. Once the top idols leave the scene, the artist of the new song compete with a bunch of no-shows which isn't much of a hurdle so long as they produce mainstream genre. This method was popularised by SME a few years ago, when they realised snsd didn't stand a chance against wg.
Man, it never fails to amaze me. Every time there's any post that could be tied to SNSD in any way, ace246 comes in to spout some "SNSD sucks" in one form or another.
Your statement that idols have always been superior than singers truly baffles me when you then say that you've been around for the "good ol' days", when the period of time that ballad artists dominated the charts wasn't even that long ago (read: early 2000s). This new k-pop trend of idols is very recent relatively speaking.
Oh, and as a side note to correct more of your misinformation, SNSD had two #1 wins in the middle of "Tell Me" promotions so no, I don't think there was all that much of a dodge.

![[image loading]](http://nimg.nate.com/orgImg/mk/2010/12/30/20101230_1293639213.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lgj7poJSNk1qzs0p3o1_500.png)
