On February 14 2013 20:04 kudlaty_true wrote: Ok, So I got a question: Can anyone give me a title of a "girls" comedy from the last ten years, that would be about few women hanging out/having fun/are in some kind of trouble/adventure whatever, which is ACTUALLY FUNNY? I mean, guys commedies are hilarious - Hangover, Horrible bosses to name a few. (you get a picture of what I'm looking for). It's women's shenanigans between themselves and/or people around them.
Aside from "Mean girls" (with Lindsey Lohan before drugs) I haven't stumbled on a good chick comedy in ten solid years. Bridesmaids was TERRIBLE. Bachelorette even worse.
easy A and devil wears prada are good (though devil wears prada is a comedy-drama).
but holy shit you made me realise how terrible/few girl comedies there actually are
there are very few good male comedies nowadays too tbh
On February 10 2013 11:29 Sovano wrote: The Intouchables (2011) + Show Spoiler +
A very, very well done movie. An ex-convict helps out a disabled man. Doesn't sound very interesting, but they prove you wrong again and again with its sense of humor and depth of emotions. There's not really much else to say, but watch it if you can! I definitely loved it.
I watched all three movies in a row. Damn, I love my university's theater. Free admission, you can bring your own food/beverages, and awesome movies. I'm going to watch Wreck It Ralph tomorrow and Life of Pi this upcoming Friday. Hopefully they're as good as everyone makes them out to be!
I actually felt that the Intouchables was too exaggerated and that detracted from the feeling I got from the movie. I don't like my emotions being manipulated by lies.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. Although, what part seemed exaggerated to you?
Pretty much all of it.
It's hard to prove my point without video evidence so the dance scene is good evidence. No one just dances like that in real life. And high class people most certainly don't just do what they did in the scene either. A film where a high school teacher gets a group of his students really motivated about their lives through hard work and sacrifice would make a lot of people feel good too, but it'd be unrealistic, and slightly overdone.
Just to give an example of how this movie exaggerates everything, the person Driss is based off of is actually very light skinned. French Hollywood just thought it'd be more interesting if Driss were darker skinned.
Ok I just really have to tell you how much bullshit you're saying. About the fact that he is black... Please get out of your american mindset for a minute. In France, black people, are "immigrants", they came from Africa generally in the 60s 70s, some of them (like Driss, he says he lived his childhood in Mali if I remember) more recently, same as arabic people (Maghreb, most arab immigrants in france, at least 90% of them come from Algeria Tunisia Morocco, North Africans, not middle east), most of the immigration in France is african, on that point, black and arabs really "relate" to eachother, because they're viewed as the same by lets say "racists" people. So no, the fact that the person Driss is based off was arabic doesnt change anything except for his skin. The point stays : he's a "ghetto kid", an african immigrant, in the US an african american and a "recent" immigrant from middle east would have nothing in common talking about their background, family, in France they do, the way they are perceived by a huge part of the population is the same. And even, the fact that he is black is an "exageration"? Are you serious? Do you realize how racist it is to consider that because his skin is DARKER, it is an EXAGERATION? French Hollywood just picked Omar Sy because he fits the role, and he did a damn good job at it, you're the one who's looking at his skin, but yes, for this role he had to be from an african origin. And you really tried to prove that the movie is unrealistic by saying that "No one just dances like that in real life". I mean, seriously? And about that scene, there is nothing unrealistic about it, you're saying "High class people wouldnt act like that", they're not high class people, the only person being high class there is Philippe, the rest are his employees, they're not high class, they just work for him. He is the one not giving a fuck about high class standards and thats the whole point of the movie. I mean you obviously dont know much about the background of the movie, and I dont blame you for not viewing it from an european, or even french point of view, why would I, but why instantly claim it's all "lies"? I have among my friends "ghetto kids", guys from algerian decent, or from west Africa who grew up in Paris' ghettos (suburbs) and I was really surprised at the fact that the movie isnt unrealistic, I really expected it to be a huge exageration, full of cliches, but in fact it's not, Driss, the way he behaves, talks, the few scenes in the ghettos, none of it was unrealistic (and it's a damn good surprise because ghettos in France are subject to a lot of cliches). I'm not saying the movie is amazing, I enjoyed it, not a huge fan but I enjoyed it. But please, "All of it" is unrealistic... You're gonna have to find something better than the dance scene to shit all over it dude
On February 10 2013 11:29 Sovano wrote: The Intouchables (2011) + Show Spoiler +
A very, very well done movie. An ex-convict helps out a disabled man. Doesn't sound very interesting, but they prove you wrong again and again with its sense of humor and depth of emotions. There's not really much else to say, but watch it if you can! I definitely loved it.
I watched all three movies in a row. Damn, I love my university's theater. Free admission, you can bring your own food/beverages, and awesome movies. I'm going to watch Wreck It Ralph tomorrow and Life of Pi this upcoming Friday. Hopefully they're as good as everyone makes them out to be!
I actually felt that the Intouchables was too exaggerated and that detracted from the feeling I got from the movie. I don't like my emotions being manipulated by lies.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. Although, what part seemed exaggerated to you?
Pretty much all of it.
It's hard to prove my point without video evidence so the dance scene is good evidence. No one just dances like that in real life. And high class people most certainly don't just do what they did in the scene either. A film where a high school teacher gets a group of his students really motivated about their lives through hard work and sacrifice would make a lot of people feel good too, but it'd be unrealistic, and slightly overdone. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_NzAvUCZ1M
Just to give an example of how this movie exaggerates everything, the person Driss is based off of is actually very light skinned. French Hollywood just thought it'd be more interesting if Driss were darker skinned.
Ok I just really have to tell you how much bullshit you're saying. About the fact that he is black... Please get out of your american mindset for a minute. In France, black people, are "immigrants", they came from Africa generally in the 60s 70s, some of them (like Driss, he says he lived his childhood in Mali if I remember) more recently, same as arabic people (Maghreb, most arab immigrants in france, at least 90% of them come from Algeria Tunisia Morocco, North Africans, not middle east), most of the immigration in France is african, on that point, black and arabs really "relate" to eachother, because they're viewed as the same by lets say "racists" people. So no, the fact that the person Driss is based off was arabic doesnt change anything except for his skin. The point stays : he's a "ghetto kid", an african immigrant, in the US an african american and a "recent" immigrant from middle east would have nothing in common talking about their background, family, in France they do, the way they are perceived by a huge part of the population is the same. And even, the fact that he is black is an "exageration"? Are you serious? Do you realize how racist it is to consider that because his skin is DARKER, it is an EXAGERATION? French Hollywood just picked Omar Sy because he fits the role, and he did a damn good job at it, you're the one who's looking at his skin, but yes, for this role he had to be from an african origin. And you really tried to prove that the movie is unrealistic by saying that "No one just dances like that in real life". I mean, seriously? And about that scene, there is nothing unrealistic about it, you're saying "High class people wouldnt act like that", they're not high class people, the only person being high class there is Philippe, the rest are his employees, they're not high class, they just work for him. He is the one not giving a fuck about high class standards and thats the whole point of the movie. I mean you obviously dont know much about the background of the movie, and I dont blame you for not viewing it from an european, or even french point of view, why would I, but why instantly claim it's all "lies"? I have among my friends "ghetto kids", guys from algerian decent, or from west Africa who grew up in Paris' ghettos (suburbs) and I was really surprised at the fact that the movie isnt unrealistic, I really expected it to be a huge exageration, full of cliches, but in fact it's not, Driss, the way he behaves, talks, the few scenes in the ghettos, none of it was unrealistic (and it's a damn good surprise because ghettos in France are subject to a lot of cliches). I'm not saying the movie is amazing, I enjoyed it, not a huge fan but I enjoyed it. But please, "All of it" is unrealistic... You're gonna have to find something better than the dance scene to shit all over it dude
Well i have to admit that the black color and the dance arguments are really not fitting to the legit criticism of Intouchables.
But he has a valid point, and that is: it's overall only clichés. The fact it was an arab in the real story and that Sy took the role means actually something. The fact the movie was only entitled to Omar Sy is a big weakness and shows how much they didn't go far about the background of each protagonists. I won't say I didn't enjoy it but it's clearly not a movie that I would suggest. And I can understand the reason why american hollywood would make a Remake of it, it fits so well to overall clichés. The viewer base of that kind of movie is clearly not ghetto suburb kids and that is what makes it wrong.
On February 10 2013 11:29 Sovano wrote: The Intouchables (2011) + Show Spoiler +
A very, very well done movie. An ex-convict helps out a disabled man. Doesn't sound very interesting, but they prove you wrong again and again with its sense of humor and depth of emotions. There's not really much else to say, but watch it if you can! I definitely loved it.
I watched all three movies in a row. Damn, I love my university's theater. Free admission, you can bring your own food/beverages, and awesome movies. I'm going to watch Wreck It Ralph tomorrow and Life of Pi this upcoming Friday. Hopefully they're as good as everyone makes them out to be!
I actually felt that the Intouchables was too exaggerated and that detracted from the feeling I got from the movie. I don't like my emotions being manipulated by lies.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. Although, what part seemed exaggerated to you?
Pretty much all of it.
It's hard to prove my point without video evidence so the dance scene is good evidence. No one just dances like that in real life. And high class people most certainly don't just do what they did in the scene either. A film where a high school teacher gets a group of his students really motivated about their lives through hard work and sacrifice would make a lot of people feel good too, but it'd be unrealistic, and slightly overdone. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_NzAvUCZ1M
Just to give an example of how this movie exaggerates everything, the person Driss is based off of is actually very light skinned. French Hollywood just thought it'd be more interesting if Driss were darker skinned.
Ok I just really have to tell you how much bullshit you're saying. About the fact that he is black... Please get out of your american mindset for a minute. In France, black people, are "immigrants", they came from Africa generally in the 60s 70s, some of them (like Driss, he says he lived his childhood in Mali if I remember) more recently, same as arabic people (Maghreb, most arab immigrants in france, at least 90% of them come from Algeria Tunisia Morocco, North Africans, not middle east), most of the immigration in France is african, on that point, black and arabs really "relate" to eachother, because they're viewed as the same by lets say "racists" people. So no, the fact that the person Driss is based off was arabic doesnt change anything except for his skin. The point stays : he's a "ghetto kid", an african immigrant, in the US an african american and a "recent" immigrant from middle east would have nothing in common talking about their background, family, in France they do, the way they are perceived by a huge part of the population is the same. And even, the fact that he is black is an "exageration"? Are you serious? Do you realize how racist it is to consider that because his skin is DARKER, it is an EXAGERATION? French Hollywood just picked Omar Sy because he fits the role, and he did a damn good job at it, you're the one who's looking at his skin, but yes, for this role he had to be from an african origin. And you really tried to prove that the movie is unrealistic by saying that "No one just dances like that in real life". I mean, seriously? And about that scene, there is nothing unrealistic about it, you're saying "High class people wouldnt act like that", they're not high class people, the only person being high class there is Philippe, the rest are his employees, they're not high class, they just work for him. He is the one not giving a fuck about high class standards and thats the whole point of the movie. I mean you obviously dont know much about the background of the movie, and I dont blame you for not viewing it from an european, or even french point of view, why would I, but why instantly claim it's all "lies"? I have among my friends "ghetto kids", guys from algerian decent, or from west Africa who grew up in Paris' ghettos (suburbs) and I was really surprised at the fact that the movie isnt unrealistic, I really expected it to be a huge exageration, full of cliches, but in fact it's not, Driss, the way he behaves, talks, the few scenes in the ghettos, none of it was unrealistic (and it's a damn good surprise because ghettos in France are subject to a lot of cliches). I'm not saying the movie is amazing, I enjoyed it, not a huge fan but I enjoyed it. But please, "All of it" is unrealistic... You're gonna have to find something better than the dance scene to shit all over it dude
Well i have to admit that the black color and the dance arguments are really not fitting to the legit criticism of Intouchables.
But he has a valid point, and that is: it's overall only clichés. The fact it was an arab in the real story and that Sy took the role means actually something. The fact the movie was only entitled to Omar Sy is a big weakness and shows how much they didn't go far about the background of each protagonists. I won't say I didn't enjoy it but it's clearly not a movie that I would suggest. And I can understand the reason why american hollywood would make a Remake of it, it fits so well to overall clichés. The viewer base of that kind of movie is clearly not ghetto suburb kids and that is what makes it wrong.
I dont get it, why is it only cliches? I really dont see why. I mean you guys are looking for cliches, you can find cliches in everything, everyone. Omar Sy was actually really good at not being a cliche in that movie, the parts that seemed unrealistic were the behaviour of the others employees, some scenes, mostly due to bad acting. But Sy was simply really convincing as an average guy from the ghetto. Im not saying all guys his age from Paris suburbs smoke hash and carry knives (well, the hash part must be higher than 50% ahah), but it was just really convincing, and whats wrong with the viewer base not being ghetto kids? Again I'm not a fan of the movie, probably wont watch it again, its far from being a masterpiece imho, but people jump so easily on movies like this one just because its not dark enough, it pleases to the average ignorant John Doe so you have to criticize it harshly or else you're not special enough, your "intelligence" is insulted or something, I'm so tired of that mindset. My taste in cinema is quite peculiar, I love movies that most people hate, 80% of the movies I watch are really dark, depressing almost (korean movies are good at that), crime movies etc. I mean, stop being hipsters, it's a nice movie, I'm not telling you to like it, but why try and find excuses to bash it? Especially when you just cant point out a single one of those cliches... The dance scene, rofl...
On February 10 2013 11:29 Sovano wrote: The Intouchables (2011) + Show Spoiler +
A very, very well done movie. An ex-convict helps out a disabled man. Doesn't sound very interesting, but they prove you wrong again and again with its sense of humor and depth of emotions. There's not really much else to say, but watch it if you can! I definitely loved it.
I watched all three movies in a row. Damn, I love my university's theater. Free admission, you can bring your own food/beverages, and awesome movies. I'm going to watch Wreck It Ralph tomorrow and Life of Pi this upcoming Friday. Hopefully they're as good as everyone makes them out to be!
I actually felt that the Intouchables was too exaggerated and that detracted from the feeling I got from the movie. I don't like my emotions being manipulated by lies.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. Although, what part seemed exaggerated to you?
Pretty much all of it.
It's hard to prove my point without video evidence so the dance scene is good evidence. No one just dances like that in real life. And high class people most certainly don't just do what they did in the scene either. A film where a high school teacher gets a group of his students really motivated about their lives through hard work and sacrifice would make a lot of people feel good too, but it'd be unrealistic, and slightly overdone. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_NzAvUCZ1M
Just to give an example of how this movie exaggerates everything, the person Driss is based off of is actually very light skinned. French Hollywood just thought it'd be more interesting if Driss were darker skinned.
Ok I just really have to tell you how much bullshit you're saying. About the fact that he is black... Please get out of your american mindset for a minute. In France, black people, are "immigrants", they came from Africa generally in the 60s 70s, some of them (like Driss, he says he lived his childhood in Mali if I remember) more recently, same as arabic people (Maghreb, most arab immigrants in france, at least 90% of them come from Algeria Tunisia Morocco, North Africans, not middle east), most of the immigration in France is african, on that point, black and arabs really "relate" to eachother, because they're viewed as the same by lets say "racists" people. So no, the fact that the person Driss is based off was arabic doesnt change anything except for his skin. The point stays : he's a "ghetto kid", an african immigrant, in the US an african american and a "recent" immigrant from middle east would have nothing in common talking about their background, family, in France they do, the way they are perceived by a huge part of the population is the same. And even, the fact that he is black is an "exageration"? Are you serious? Do you realize how racist it is to consider that because his skin is DARKER, it is an EXAGERATION? French Hollywood just picked Omar Sy because he fits the role, and he did a damn good job at it, you're the one who's looking at his skin, but yes, for this role he had to be from an african origin. And you really tried to prove that the movie is unrealistic by saying that "No one just dances like that in real life". I mean, seriously? And about that scene, there is nothing unrealistic about it, you're saying "High class people wouldnt act like that", they're not high class people, the only person being high class there is Philippe, the rest are his employees, they're not high class, they just work for him. He is the one not giving a fuck about high class standards and thats the whole point of the movie. I mean you obviously dont know much about the background of the movie, and I dont blame you for not viewing it from an european, or even french point of view, why would I, but why instantly claim it's all "lies"? I have among my friends "ghetto kids", guys from algerian decent, or from west Africa who grew up in Paris' ghettos (suburbs) and I was really surprised at the fact that the movie isnt unrealistic, I really expected it to be a huge exageration, full of cliches, but in fact it's not, Driss, the way he behaves, talks, the few scenes in the ghettos, none of it was unrealistic (and it's a damn good surprise because ghettos in France are subject to a lot of cliches). I'm not saying the movie is amazing, I enjoyed it, not a huge fan but I enjoyed it. But please, "All of it" is unrealistic... You're gonna have to find something better than the dance scene to shit all over it dude
Well i have to admit that the black color and the dance arguments are really not fitting to the legit criticism of Intouchables.
But he has a valid point, and that is: it's overall only clichés. The fact it was an arab in the real story and that Sy took the role means actually something. The fact the movie was only entitled to Omar Sy is a big weakness and shows how much they didn't go far about the background of each protagonists. I won't say I didn't enjoy it but it's clearly not a movie that I would suggest. And I can understand the reason why american hollywood would make a Remake of it, it fits so well to overall clichés. The viewer base of that kind of movie is clearly not ghetto suburb kids and that is what makes it wrong.
I dont get it, why is it only cliches? I really dont see why. I mean you guys are looking for cliches, you can find cliches in everything, everyone. Omar Sy was actually really good at not being a cliche in that movie, the parts that seemed unrealistic were the behaviour of the others employees, some scenes, mostly due to bad acting. But Sy was simply really convincing as an average guy from the ghetto. Im not saying all guys his age from Paris suburbs smoke hash and carry knives (well, the hash part must be higher than 50% ahah), but it was just really convincing, and whats wrong with the viewer base not being ghetto kids? Again I'm not a fan of the movie, probably wont watch it again, its far from being a masterpiece imho, but people jump so easily on movies like this one just because its not dark enough, it pleases to the average ignorant John Doe so you have to criticize it harshly or else you're not special enough, your "intelligence" is insulted or something, I'm so tired of that mindset. My taste in cinema is quite peculiar, I love movies that most people hate, 80% of the movies I watch are really dark, depressing almost (korean movies are good at that), crime movies etc. I mean, stop being hipsters, it's a nice movie, I'm not telling you to like it, but why try and find excuses to bash it? Especially when you just cant point out a single one of those cliches... The dance scene, rofl...
I'm not the only one who thinks the movie is cliched. Here are the last three reviews on RT:
The lens through which the “The Intouchables” was filmed may be too rose-colored for some people’s taste, but the window that these talented performers throw open -- a window onto the strange and touching friendship between two very different men -- is crystal clear.
Driss is infectiously upbeat, as well as distastefully cliched: He ridicules high culture -- what else would a black guy from the slums do? -- replacing Phillipe's classical selections with Earth, Wind and Fire, and proceeding to "get down." If he weren't black, he'd be wearing blackface. The only way to buy into "The Intouchables," really, is by considering it ironically, or like a fairy tale -- one that uses race humor to defuse anxieties surrounding race issues. Pardon moi, but that's asking a lot, even of a post-racial society.
Just because I find the movie cliched and unrealistic does not mean I'm a hipster or trying to find excuses. edit: Even if I were being hipster, that's still my opinion and it's legitimate if I feel like I'm being insulted by the way the movie plays out. There's no need to be so tongue in cheek. I'm sure I would find your taste in Korean murder movies hipsterish.
If you aren't bothered by these things you'll still like it for a feel good movie.
I'm really not much for movies, generally more a documentary guy. Checked out "Sound City" yesterday and quite liked it. Directed by Dave Grohl (Foo Fighters & Nirvana) it's about the Sound City recording studio that was around for 50 years in Van Nuys, CA. Tons of amazing records were recorded there over the years. If you're into rock you'll probably enjoy it. It details some of the stories of people that recorded there, the old recording console they had there, why it was so rare and special, the old analog way of doing things compared to digital recording now. They record some new songs using the old beast of a console with people like Paul McCartney, Stevie Nicks, and Trent Reznor.
I'm bad at ranking things so I won't give you a rating number, they're arbitrary anyway. But if you're a fan of rock, musical history, or just the old school way of doing things check it out.
The Positively True Adventures of the Alleged Texas Cheerleader-Murdering Mom
Very unusual dry documentary style movie based on a true(!) story about a mom who tried to hire a hitman to kill her middle school daughter's cheerleading rival. It basically treats all the parties involved (and it's own material!) with a sort of wry eye-rolling contempt for the entire affair that makes it a weird watch. It's very funny, but it's also hard to sit through since by midway through you realize the movie is actually putting in an argument about the ridiculousness of its own existence, which somewhat makes you ask "why am I watching this again?" Holly Hunter is fantastic as usual though.
Also this is not a movie, but the new show on FX, The Americans, I'm so into it. It's about Russian sleeper agents in deep, deep cover as a suburban everyday couple in the US in 1981. So deep they are basically raising American children and living American lives most of the time. Unbelievable drama and quality so far. That's what I've been most interested in watching. Maybe I'll have to start a thread on it.
Just watched Leon: The Professional. Decided to watch it because it was one of the highest rated movies ever on IMDB, and I can clearly see why. This movie is so good. The movie is about a professional hitman who saves a young girl who's family was gunned down. He takes care of her and teaches her how to be a hitman. I have a lot of other good things to say about this movie, but can't do so without spoiling some of it, so I highly recommend a watch.
Watched Couple's Retreat. Pretty decent comedy. Fell victim to the dull resolution climax that a lot of comedies suffer from. Ya know, where the main premise/problem is solved by the characters, which is kind of satisfying, but never really turns out that funny...
All in all, an average comedy.
6 /10 Vince Vaughn always seems to play the same character, haha
Just watched this one last night in the cinema. Such a great movie. The acting and storyline is super believable. So much better than "A Royal Affair" which is nominated for an oscar (best foreign film). If you wish to see a Danish movie watch this one! Mads Mikkelsen (Casino Royal) plays the lead which he won a Cannes award for. Supporting actor Thomas Bo Larsen plays REALLY good in that movie. You can see the inner conflict in his eyes...
Its a pretty dark theme (pedofelia) and without a hollywood ending makes you walk away from the movie with a bitter taste in your mouth from how aweful people are. But it sticks in your mind and make you wonder how you yourself would have acted...
Machinist 8/10 It's about a guy working at a machinery factory who is suffering from insomnia. He starts having delusions and falls into a spiral of fucked up events and the majority of the film is him just scrambling around trying to make sense of it all. This has been on my to-watch queue for a while and I was not disappointed. The overall mood, music and lighting work together so well to pull you into some twisted dreamlike world. Whoever played Ivan did a terrific job, perfect balance of sleaze and charisma, and Christian Bale was also great as a sort of schizophrenic / really wired guy. I didn't see the ending coming at all and it felt really abrupt (the pacing was a bit slow in the middle) but I still thought it was a good conclusion/explanation for it all. If you liked Shutter Island, Memento, and Mulholland Dr. I'd highly recommend.
On February 16 2013 21:36 EpiK wrote: Machinist 8/10 It's about a guy working at a machinery factory who is suffering from insomnia. He starts having delusions and falls into a spiral of fucked up events and the majority of the film is him just scrambling around trying to make sense of it all. This has been on my to-watch queue for a while and I was not disappointed. The overall mood, music and lighting work together so well to pull you into some twisted dreamlike world. Whoever played Ivan did a terrific job, perfect balance of sleaze and charisma, and Christian Bale was also great as a sort of schizophrenic / really wired guy. If you liked Shutter Island, Memento, and Mulholland Dr. I'd highly recommend.
On February 16 2013 17:12 Krychek wrote: I saw "A Clockwork Orange" yesterday.
Really good movie, better than expected, not as legendary as some said. Very uninque, recommended 4/5.
*In proper Clockwork Orange vernacular*
Welly welly welly well, I think you better check yer glazzies because only a gloopy veck wouldnt know A clockwork Orange is a 5/5 sinny and you owe us an appypolly loggy.
Awesome movie, the performance of Julianne Moore blew me away. I felt sorry for Palin, hated Palin, understood Palin, and then got freaked out by Palin. Epic rollercoaster of character sympathy.