|
All book discussion in this thread is now allowed. |
On June 06 2012 09:39 Antisocialmunky wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 09:37 Kamate wrote:On June 06 2012 09:27 KwarK wrote:On June 06 2012 08:57 GhostOwl wrote: I'm inclined to believe that Tywin does not know about his daughter and son's incest. No one pretty much knew until near the end of Season 1. It's been told that Joffrey is not the rightful heir, but it's never told to the public directly that he's the offspring of Cersei and Jaime. Additionally, Tywin has been busy doing his own thing / war campaign. If by some chance that this news did somehow reach his ears, he would probably dismiss it as rumors trying to de-legitimize his grandson's claim to the throne. He's probably too used to thinking of Joffrey as Robert's son for years that he's not willing to give a grain of concern about "rumors" he might hear during his war campaign. I very much doubt it. Tywin is the man he is today due to an astute mind. My assumption is that he's assessed the situation, concluded that Joffrey on the throne serves Lannister interests and simply doesn't care beyond that. I agree. Tywin doesnt care that Joffrey is a cruel sadistic incest resulted bastard, - for him , he is the king. Tywin is the family first guy, he told Tyrion to control Cersie and Joffer Cake. Sure ,but, as his horse drop showed us , he doesnt highly regards the king , but I guess for him is still the king. In my opinion
|
On June 06 2012 08:27 antelope591 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:17 Quexana wrote:On June 06 2012 01:51 Steveling wrote:On June 06 2012 00:45 Serejai wrote:On June 05 2012 22:46 Steveling wrote: It just so happened that the season 1 directors were that much better than the current ones You have no idea what you're talking about. The exact same director did both season finales. Any disappointment you have with this season's finale has nothing at all to do with the director. I obviously meant that last season last episode was bad as well, xP. But actually you are right, they aren't to blame. The guys writing the script and Martin are. Martin is not to blame, most of the problems people are having with the end of the 2nd season have to do with the way the show runners have deviated from Martin's book, not the way they are alike. The burning of Winterfell is a key part of the story and one that I am 100% certain will be explained next season, but it's not Martin's fault. In Martin's version of the story there was absolutely no ambiguity about who burned Winterfell and why. Also people are having problems with the Dany storyline, also not Martin's fault. The entire sequence in the House of the Undying and afterwards is different from the book to the show. Granted, I believe, it needed to be changed. The original sequence in the House of the Undying is probably unfilmable. Yet, the choices they made in how they changed it can be called into question. Overall, I think they did okay with the Dany storyline though. However you slice it though, neither of the major problems people have with the season finale is the fault of Martin. Seriously...it fucking pisses me off when people blame Martin for shit that happens in the show. The books aren't perfect but if you haven't read them don't blame Martin for shit that goes on in the show....especially when this season has been nowhere as close to the book as the first season was. GRRM doesn't need fans to defend him. He already has truckloads of money from the promo that GoT has brought ASoIaF. He doesn't care.
|
On June 06 2012 10:08 mmp wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 08:27 antelope591 wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 Quexana wrote:On June 06 2012 01:51 Steveling wrote:On June 06 2012 00:45 Serejai wrote:On June 05 2012 22:46 Steveling wrote: It just so happened that the season 1 directors were that much better than the current ones You have no idea what you're talking about. The exact same director did both season finales. Any disappointment you have with this season's finale has nothing at all to do with the director. I obviously meant that last season last episode was bad as well, xP. But actually you are right, they aren't to blame. The guys writing the script and Martin are. Martin is not to blame, most of the problems people are having with the end of the 2nd season have to do with the way the show runners have deviated from Martin's book, not the way they are alike. The burning of Winterfell is a key part of the story and one that I am 100% certain will be explained next season, but it's not Martin's fault. In Martin's version of the story there was absolutely no ambiguity about who burned Winterfell and why. Also people are having problems with the Dany storyline, also not Martin's fault. The entire sequence in the House of the Undying and afterwards is different from the book to the show. Granted, I believe, it needed to be changed. The original sequence in the House of the Undying is probably unfilmable. Yet, the choices they made in how they changed it can be called into question. Overall, I think they did okay with the Dany storyline though. However you slice it though, neither of the major problems people have with the season finale is the fault of Martin. Seriously...it fucking pisses me off when people blame Martin for shit that happens in the show. The books aren't perfect but if you haven't read them don't blame Martin for shit that goes on in the show....especially when this season has been nowhere as close to the book as the first season was. GRRM doesn't need fans to defend him. He already has truckloads of money from the promo that GoT has brought ASoIaF. He doesn't care. Because money = everything, right??
|
Am i the only one completely baffled about the burning of winterfell? It was my understanding that the greyjoy guys would just give the 500 stark followers Theon and that would be it, no fighting.. Then, skip to Bran and co coming out of hiding and the whole castle is burning and theres no trace of the 500 men that came to save them? What the hell? Are we gonna get some sort of flashback or something to explain this in the next season? I = CONFUSED
otherwise - awesome, awesome, awesome show
|
United States42883 Posts
On June 06 2012 10:15 mskaa wrote: Am i the only one completely baffled about the burning of winterfell? It was my understanding that the greyjoy guys would just give the 500 stark followers Theon and that would be it, no fighting.. Then, skip to Bran and co coming out of hiding and the whole castle is burning and theres no trace of the 500 men that came to save them? What the hell? Are we gonna get some sort of flashback or something to explain this in the next season? I = CONFUSED
otherwise - awesome, awesome, awesome show Your confusion is intentional. We shall have to trust that it'll be explained in a year.
|
On June 06 2012 08:36 Velr wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 08:27 antelope591 wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 Quexana wrote:On June 06 2012 01:51 Steveling wrote:On June 06 2012 00:45 Serejai wrote:On June 05 2012 22:46 Steveling wrote: It just so happened that the season 1 directors were that much better than the current ones You have no idea what you're talking about. The exact same director did both season finales. Any disappointment you have with this season's finale has nothing at all to do with the director. I obviously meant that last season last episode was bad as well, xP. But actually you are right, they aren't to blame. The guys writing the script and Martin are. Martin is not to blame, most of the problems people are having with the end of the 2nd season have to do with the way the show runners have deviated from Martin's book, not the way they are alike. The burning of Winterfell is a key part of the story and one that I am 100% certain will be explained next season, but it's not Martin's fault. In Martin's version of the story there was absolutely no ambiguity about who burned Winterfell and why. Also people are having problems with the Dany storyline, also not Martin's fault. The entire sequence in the House of the Undying and afterwards is different from the book to the show. Granted, I believe, it needed to be changed. The original sequence in the House of the Undying is probably unfilmable. Yet, the choices they made in how they changed it can be called into question. Overall, I think they did okay with the Dany storyline though. However you slice it though, neither of the major problems people have with the season finale is the fault of Martin. Seriously...it fucking pisses me off when people blame Martin for shit that happens in the show. The books aren't perfect but if you haven't read them don't blame Martin for shit that goes on in the show....especially when this season has been nowhere as close to the book as the first season was. The problem i have with Dany (only know the show) is that the show would work just as good whiteout her and the longer it goes the further away from the other storyparts it seems to go (well it changed in that very last episode because they can buy a ship now)... Imho they should just have scrapped most of S2 Dany...
Dany is one of my least favorite characters. And to a certain extent I agree with you. In some ways the show would be better off without her storyline. Her storyline does serve a major purpose though. Remember her brother, Viserys. He wouldn't have known what to do with the Iron Throne even if he had managed to win it. At best, he would have been another Joffrey, More likely though, he would have been just as cruel, but somehow, even less competant. Robert Baratheon won the Iron Throne by force, and though he wasn't as cruel, he was also a bad ruler. One of the major themes of the story is that great conquerers often make bad Kings. They're two different skill sets. Just because you are good at one does not make you good at the other. Take Tyrion for example, he wouldn't have made a very good conquerer, but he was a very effective ruler during his time as hand of the king. Dany's storyline is all about her learning the skills to be a ruler should she win the Iron Throne. As her dragons grow, so must she grow as a leader of her people, else she just be another bad monarch. It's not as sexy a storyline as many in the show, Also, it's a storyline that isn't so much about how she shapes events as it is about how events shape her. That also makes it less sexy, but it's very important in serving as a contrast to the people who are fighting in Westeros, who seem to want power for power's sake (Joffrey and Cercei), or because they feel wronged (Robb), or because they think it's their divine right (Stannis), but don't have any ideas or plans for the day after the war is over.
|
On June 06 2012 09:27 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 08:57 GhostOwl wrote: I'm inclined to believe that Tywin does not know about his daughter and son's incest. No one pretty much knew until near the end of Season 1. It's been told that Joffrey is not the rightful heir, but it's never told to the public directly that he's the offspring of Cersei and Jaime. Additionally, Tywin has been busy doing his own thing / war campaign. If by some chance that this news did somehow reach his ears, he would probably dismiss it as rumors trying to de-legitimize his grandson's claim to the throne. He's probably too used to thinking of Joffrey as Robert's son for years that he's not willing to give a grain of concern about "rumors" he might hear during his war campaign. I very much doubt it. Tywin is the man he is today due to an astute mind. My assumption is that he's assessed the situation, concluded that Joffrey on the throne serves Lannister interests and simply doesn't care beyond that.
You bring up a point that I never disputed. Yeah he sees Joffrey as a puppet-king that serves Lannister interests, when did I ever say otherwise?
I just said that de-legitimizing his grandson's claim to the throne is bad news for Twyin because he wants Joffrey there to rule as a puppet-king
|
On June 06 2012 10:15 mskaa wrote: Am i the only one completely baffled about the burning of winterfell? It was my understanding that the greyjoy guys would just give the 500 stark followers Theon and that would be it, no fighting.. Then, skip to Bran and co coming out of hiding and the whole castle is burning and theres no trace of the 500 men that came to save them? What the hell? Are we gonna get some sort of flashback or something to explain this in the next season? I = CONFUSED
otherwise - awesome, awesome, awesome show
For me it is simple: the northern army Robb sent simply sacked Winterfell even with the Ironborn surrender. They were not sent to save Brann, they were sent to take Winterfell, and taking a city also means a lot of loot, lol. In ancient and medieval times it wasn't unusual for armies to sack cities that did not belong to their enemies, and sacking was many times the only payment soldiers had. Even until our days we hear about soldiers killing civilians just because they can. I believe it was not explained now so it can be resolved next season, and will probably create a conflict between Robb and the bannerman who sent his bastard.
|
On June 06 2012 10:29 LuisArcadia wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 10:15 mskaa wrote: Am i the only one completely baffled about the burning of winterfell? It was my understanding that the greyjoy guys would just give the 500 stark followers Theon and that would be it, no fighting.. Then, skip to Bran and co coming out of hiding and the whole castle is burning and theres no trace of the 500 men that came to save them? What the hell? Are we gonna get some sort of flashback or something to explain this in the next season? I = CONFUSED
otherwise - awesome, awesome, awesome show For me it is simple: the northern army Robb sent simply sacked Winterfell even with the Ironborn surrender. They were not sent to save Brann, they were sent to take Winterfell, and taking a city also means a lot of loot, lol. In ancient and medieval times it wasn't unusual for armies to sack cities that did not belong to their enemies, and sacking was many times the only payment soldiers had. Even until our days we hear about soldiers killing civilians just because they can. I believe it was not explained now so it can be resolved next season, and will probably create a conflict between Robb and the bannerman who sent his bastard. Tell me when it was usual to sack the capital city of your country that you are trying to take back for your king
|
On June 06 2012 10:55 OutlaW- wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 10:29 LuisArcadia wrote:On June 06 2012 10:15 mskaa wrote: Am i the only one completely baffled about the burning of winterfell? It was my understanding that the greyjoy guys would just give the 500 stark followers Theon and that would be it, no fighting.. Then, skip to Bran and co coming out of hiding and the whole castle is burning and theres no trace of the 500 men that came to save them? What the hell? Are we gonna get some sort of flashback or something to explain this in the next season? I = CONFUSED
otherwise - awesome, awesome, awesome show For me it is simple: the northern army Robb sent simply sacked Winterfell even with the Ironborn surrender. They were not sent to save Brann, they were sent to take Winterfell, and taking a city also means a lot of loot, lol. In ancient and medieval times it wasn't unusual for armies to sack cities that did not belong to their enemies, and sacking was many times the only payment soldiers had. Even until our days we hear about soldiers killing civilians just because they can. I believe it was not explained now so it can be resolved next season, and will probably create a conflict between Robb and the bannerman who sent his bastard. Tell me when it was usual to sack the capital city of your country that you are trying to take back for your king
I happened a lot during the Crusades, for example. Like the Siege of Zara: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Zara.
|
On June 06 2012 10:19 Quexana wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 08:36 Velr wrote:On June 06 2012 08:27 antelope591 wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 Quexana wrote:On June 06 2012 01:51 Steveling wrote:On June 06 2012 00:45 Serejai wrote:On June 05 2012 22:46 Steveling wrote: It just so happened that the season 1 directors were that much better than the current ones You have no idea what you're talking about. The exact same director did both season finales. Any disappointment you have with this season's finale has nothing at all to do with the director. I obviously meant that last season last episode was bad as well, xP. But actually you are right, they aren't to blame. The guys writing the script and Martin are. Martin is not to blame, most of the problems people are having with the end of the 2nd season have to do with the way the show runners have deviated from Martin's book, not the way they are alike. The burning of Winterfell is a key part of the story and one that I am 100% certain will be explained next season, but it's not Martin's fault. In Martin's version of the story there was absolutely no ambiguity about who burned Winterfell and why. Also people are having problems with the Dany storyline, also not Martin's fault. The entire sequence in the House of the Undying and afterwards is different from the book to the show. Granted, I believe, it needed to be changed. The original sequence in the House of the Undying is probably unfilmable. Yet, the choices they made in how they changed it can be called into question. Overall, I think they did okay with the Dany storyline though. However you slice it though, neither of the major problems people have with the season finale is the fault of Martin. Seriously...it fucking pisses me off when people blame Martin for shit that happens in the show. The books aren't perfect but if you haven't read them don't blame Martin for shit that goes on in the show....especially when this season has been nowhere as close to the book as the first season was. The problem i have with Dany (only know the show) is that the show would work just as good whiteout her and the longer it goes the further away from the other storyparts it seems to go (well it changed in that very last episode because they can buy a ship now)... Imho they should just have scrapped most of S2 Dany... , but it's very important in serving as a contrast to the people who are fighting in Westeros, who seem to want power for power's sake (Joffrey and Cercei), or because they feel wronged (Robb), or because they think it's their divine right (Stannis), but don't have any ideas or plans for the day after the war is over. As opposed to Dany whose only claim to the throne was something her great great great grandfather did once a long time ago. The fact that she caught a lucky break because she happened to have found the one mage in the world who can sort-of-re animate the dead just enough to drive Dany insane with sadness and to suicide in a very impractical way but ultimately led the lucky break of birthing dragons for the first time in forever. Drago doesnt die, Danny carries around 3 rocks and moves around with a horde of horsemen who invade westeros because, again, Dannys great great great great great ancestor did it. But even with her great dragons, so what? dragons will inbreed, die out. And danny claims these are her only children, therefore once she dies the dragons go around doing whatever it is that wild dragons do while some distant relation of Danny claims the throne and back to square 1 we go.
The only people who get it right in that world are the wildlings, as they practice democracy. And Arya, because she is badass.
|
On June 06 2012 10:08 mmp wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 08:27 antelope591 wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 Quexana wrote:On June 06 2012 01:51 Steveling wrote:On June 06 2012 00:45 Serejai wrote:On June 05 2012 22:46 Steveling wrote: It just so happened that the season 1 directors were that much better than the current ones You have no idea what you're talking about. The exact same director did both season finales. Any disappointment you have with this season's finale has nothing at all to do with the director. I obviously meant that last season last episode was bad as well, xP. But actually you are right, they aren't to blame. The guys writing the script and Martin are. Martin is not to blame, most of the problems people are having with the end of the 2nd season have to do with the way the show runners have deviated from Martin's book, not the way they are alike. The burning of Winterfell is a key part of the story and one that I am 100% certain will be explained next season, but it's not Martin's fault. In Martin's version of the story there was absolutely no ambiguity about who burned Winterfell and why. Also people are having problems with the Dany storyline, also not Martin's fault. The entire sequence in the House of the Undying and afterwards is different from the book to the show. Granted, I believe, it needed to be changed. The original sequence in the House of the Undying is probably unfilmable. Yet, the choices they made in how they changed it can be called into question. Overall, I think they did okay with the Dany storyline though. However you slice it though, neither of the major problems people have with the season finale is the fault of Martin. Seriously...it fucking pisses me off when people blame Martin for shit that happens in the show. The books aren't perfect but if you haven't read them don't blame Martin for shit that goes on in the show....especially when this season has been nowhere as close to the book as the first season was. GRRM doesn't need fans to defend him. He already has truckloads of money from the promo that GoT has brought ASoIaF. He doesn't care.
Meh I don't really care about defending GRM...ignorance just annoys me
|
On June 06 2012 10:29 LuisArcadia wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 10:15 mskaa wrote: Am i the only one completely baffled about the burning of winterfell? It was my understanding that the greyjoy guys would just give the 500 stark followers Theon and that would be it, no fighting.. Then, skip to Bran and co coming out of hiding and the whole castle is burning and theres no trace of the 500 men that came to save them? What the hell? Are we gonna get some sort of flashback or something to explain this in the next season? I = CONFUSED
otherwise - awesome, awesome, awesome show For me it is simple: the northern army Robb sent simply sacked Winterfell even with the Ironborn surrender. They were not sent to save Brann, they were sent to take Winterfell, and taking a city also means a lot of loot, lol. In ancient and medieval times it wasn't unusual for armies to sack cities that did not belong to their enemies, and sacking was many times the only payment soldiers had. Even until our days we hear about soldiers killing civilians just because they can. I believe it was not explained now so it can be resolved next season, and will probably create a conflict between Robb and the bannerman who sent his bastard. Looting yea maybe, but burning the city to the ground... I don't think they would do that. Not when they were ordered there essentially by Robb Stark(He ordered the father of the bastard etc.)
Would it have been possible for the iron islanders to loot and burn it before escaping before the army moved in? Who says they gave up? I think they sacked the place and fled through the secret tunnels the old man was telling Theon about.
|
|
Limiting to ten episodes has nothing at all to do with trying to cram the books in. It's all about budget.
You have to keep in mind that GoT is ten hours long and working on a budget that's less than half what a 90 minute Hollywood movie gets. Filming on location in multiple countries is going to eat that up REALLY quickly. They simply wouldn't be able to afford more episodes without an increased budget. They actually got a 15% larger budget for S2 to use on Episode 9.
The problem is there's no way to really know how much HBO is making off the show. Numbers are good but unlike a movie they aren't making money based on numbers. A lot of people that watch it already have HBO for other reasons so they're getting zero extra income there. For all we know HBO is breaking even at best on the series and only making profit from the DVD/Bluray sales (which can't really be predicted beforehand and thus you can't budget based on those figures).
|
if you want more (and better) GoT the best and only thing you can do is buy the DVDs and buy the books and buy the blurays. and continue watching of course.
|
On June 06 2012 11:07 Necro)Phagist( wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 10:29 LuisArcadia wrote:On June 06 2012 10:15 mskaa wrote: Am i the only one completely baffled about the burning of winterfell? It was my understanding that the greyjoy guys would just give the 500 stark followers Theon and that would be it, no fighting.. Then, skip to Bran and co coming out of hiding and the whole castle is burning and theres no trace of the 500 men that came to save them? What the hell? Are we gonna get some sort of flashback or something to explain this in the next season? I = CONFUSED
otherwise - awesome, awesome, awesome show For me it is simple: the northern army Robb sent simply sacked Winterfell even with the Ironborn surrender. They were not sent to save Brann, they were sent to take Winterfell, and taking a city also means a lot of loot, lol. In ancient and medieval times it wasn't unusual for armies to sack cities that did not belong to their enemies, and sacking was many times the only payment soldiers had. Even until our days we hear about soldiers killing civilians just because they can. I believe it was not explained now so it can be resolved next season, and will probably create a conflict between Robb and the bannerman who sent his bastard. Looting yea maybe, but burning the city to the ground... I don't think they would do that. Not when they were ordered there essentially by Robb Stark(He ordered the father of the bastard etc.) Would it have been possible for the iron islanders to loot and burn it before escaping before the army moved in? Who says they gave up? I think they sacked the place and fled through the secret tunnels the old man was telling Theon about.
That is possible, I agree. But if I remerber correctly it was not Robb's idea to send the bastard. Robb wanted to march all the way back to take Winterfell himself. It was the bannerman's initiative to send his son, and Robb accepted it reluctantly. There must be some kind of foreshadowing going on, lol. At least for me these details are not gratuitous, specially in good storytelling like in this TV show. Or it can be that I just speculate too much, lol.
|
Isn't GoT the most pirated HBO series right now? Or maybe series overall?
|
On June 06 2012 11:51 Archers_bane wrote: Isn't GoT the most pirated HBO series right now? Or maybe series overall?
HBO series easily, last year it was the 2nd most pirated series just behind Dexter. This year I bet it'll be first.
|
Yup, I have to admit I pirate it. In Sweden it's run on a pay channel that's complete crap (there's no HBO channel) and it's currently on season 2 episode 6... You can also watch it on national television (free, no commercials) which only got a deal with HBO just recently, so they're still on season 1. Sadly not gonna happen as I'm the kind of person who wakes up early at 5AM and wait for it to be available. Wouldn't mind paying for it, but fuck they need to deliver in that case, and I don't want to buy a new TV channel for a year to watch 10 episodes. Piracy is sadly the only option that delivers to it's customers. Sorry for derailing, but I had an impulse to defend pirates =/
|
|
|
|