i mean killing main characters doesn't always have to be a twist. would you really consider it a twist if tyrion rode into KL and choked out cersei? i don't think too twist worthy, or particularly lazy. i mean it's what should happen.
i don't see how we have a series finale without cersei dying. she's earned it, and frankly i don't see her way out. the only person not coming for her is Jon. the entire world otherwise is literally marching towards KL in one fashion or another
On July 20 2017 03:19 brian wrote: i mean killing main characters doesn't always have to be a twist. would you really consider it a twist if tyrion rode into KL and choked out cersei? i don't think too twist worthy, or particularly lazy. i mean it's what should happen.
i don't see how we have a series finale without cersei dying. she's earned it, and frankly i don't see her way out. the only person not coming for her is Jon. the entire world otherwise is literally marching towards KL in one fashion or another
god i can't wait.
You think it more fitting for tyrion not jaime to do the deed?
When it comes to Cersei, there are a number of people that could murder her and I would be perfectly happy. Arya’s wolf is at the top of my list to deliver the death blow. In truth, everyone could get their moment to take her down a peg. It could happen in stages.
On July 20 2017 03:19 brian wrote: i mean killing main characters doesn't always have to be a twist. would you really consider it a twist if tyrion rode into KL and choked out cersei? i don't think too twist worthy, or particularly lazy. i mean it's what should happen.
i don't see how we have a series finale without cersei dying. she's earned it, and frankly i don't see her way out. the only person not coming for her is Jon. the entire world otherwise is literally marching towards KL in one fashion or another
god i can't wait.
You think it more fitting for tyrion not jaime to do the deed?
yea 100%, what has Cersei done to Jamie that would warrant it? closest thing i can think is that all their children died- but that isn't directly cersei's doing. while understandable, i don't think that gives Jamie any reason to kill her himself.
whereas she imprisoned Tyrion for killing her son. which, of course, he didn't do. on top of her treating him like a lesser being his entire life. it's her fault tyrion is where he is in life. and where he is, is on the other side of an incoming war. it would make too much sense.
On July 20 2017 03:28 Plansix wrote: When it comes to Cersei, there are a number of people that could murder her and I would be perfectly happy. Arya’s wolf is at the top of my list to deliver the death blow. In truth, everyone could get their moment to take her down a peg. It could happen in stages.
so then i'm just confused why, 'especially with regards to GoT,' (paraphrase) you think killing main characters is lazy. unless you mean when done just for the sake of a twist. which i just don't think is even possible in the landscape of the series anymore. the whole world is a war zone.
On July 20 2017 03:19 brian wrote: i mean killing main characters doesn't always have to be a twist. would you really consider it a twist if tyrion rode into KL and choked out cersei? i don't think too twist worthy, or particularly lazy. i mean it's what should happen.
i don't see how we have a series finale without cersei dying. she's earned it, and frankly i don't see her way out. the only person not coming for her is Jon. the entire world otherwise is literally marching towards KL in one fashion or another
god i can't wait.
You think it more fitting for tyrion not jaime to do the deed?
yea 100%, what has Cersei done to Jamie that would warrant it? closest thing i can think is that all their children died- but that isn't directly cersei's doing. while understandable, i don't think that gives Jamie any reason to kill her himself.
whereas she imprisoned Tyrion for killing her son. which, of course, he didn't do. on top of her treating him like a lesser being his entire life. it's her fault tyrion is where he is in life. and where he is, is on the other side of an incoming war. it would make too much sense.
On July 20 2017 03:28 Plansix wrote: When it comes to Cersei, there are a number of people that could murder her and I would be perfectly happy. Arya’s wolf is at the top of my list to deliver the death blow. In truth, everyone could get their moment to take her down a peg. It could happen in stages.
so then i'm just confused why, 'especially with regards to GoT,' (paraphrase) you think killing main characters is lazy. unless you mean when done just for the sake of a twist. which i just don't think is even possible in the landscape of the series anymore. the whole world is a war zone.
Doing it for the sake of a twist. There are characters in this show that clearly need to die and some that should live. Even the shock of Ed being killed in season one has purpose. Same with the Red Wedding. At this point, killing off Danny or Jon would need a lot of build up to be justified. Or Arya. Or the Hound. They can die, but that death needs to be earned by the writers.
On July 18 2017 01:08 The_Red_Viper wrote: Something else, did anyone actually feel satisfied with the opening of arya murdering the freys? It was extremely obvious what would happen immediately and it being that easy to get revenge didn't create any impact on me tbh. I already felt that way last season with walder frey though. The execution of these scenes feels off, it's not earned and that's the reason i don't care all that much about it when in reality it should be a huge deal if done right.
Yes. I thought it was badass. Not surprised you didn't .
How was it badass? 2 seconds into the scene you knew exactly what would happen. If a scene can be predicted that easily it's generally not interesting.
It definitely has become less of a drama-show and more of a "let's find an easy and unrealistic way so the story can move forward and/or the good guys can win" show. That's not just related to Arya but every single character-arch has started to suffer from that ever since the writers began to write on their own (rather than copying GRRM).
There hasn't been a single story-arch where I was intrigued or surprised by the tactics, details, motives or outcome of the show since S4. Or whenever I am "surprised" it's usually because I expected a higher quality writing (such as the Arya storyline in S6 or Dorne in S6E1) and instead just couldn't believe that all of the time spent on the characters were essentially a waste of time.
Just because I knew what was happening and going to happen doesn't make it awesome. I knew what was going to happen and I thought it was well done. Not everything has to be unpredictable.
You said you weren't surprised by a single arch or surprised by the outcome of anything since season 4, are you telling me you weren't shocked with Cersei killed a ton of characters and became the queen? I don't know a single person that predicted that in season 6.
I'll give you that season 6 was easily the most predictable season of the show. I think the only thing that surprised me was the last episode. However, I don't think that makes it bad or boring or anything.
Really? You didn't see the wildfire coming?
I did know something would happen with Wildfire. I did not expect mace, margaery, Loris etc dying. Did you see that coming?
On July 20 2017 03:19 brian wrote: i mean killing main characters doesn't always have to be a twist. would you really consider it a twist if tyrion rode into KL and choked out cersei? i don't think too twist worthy, or particularly lazy. i mean it's what should happen.
i don't see how we have a series finale without cersei dying. she's earned it, and frankly i don't see her way out. the only person not coming for her is Jon. the entire world otherwise is literally marching towards KL in one fashion or another
god i can't wait.
You think it more fitting for tyrion not jaime to do the deed?
yea 100%, what has Cersei done to Jamie that would warrant it? closest thing i can think is that all their children died- but that isn't directly cersei's doing. while understandable, i don't think that gives Jamie any reason to kill her himself.
whereas she imprisoned Tyrion for killing her son. which, of course, he didn't do. on top of her treating him like a lesser being his entire life. it's her fault tyrion is where he is in life. and where he is, is on the other side of an incoming war. it would make too much sense.
On July 20 2017 03:28 Plansix wrote: When it comes to Cersei, there are a number of people that could murder her and I would be perfectly happy. Arya’s wolf is at the top of my list to deliver the death blow. In truth, everyone could get their moment to take her down a peg. It could happen in stages.
so then i'm just confused why, 'especially with regards to GoT,' (paraphrase) you think killing main characters is lazy. unless you mean when done just for the sake of a twist. which i just don't think is even possible in the landscape of the series anymore. the whole world is a war zone.
The only way I could see Jaime killing Cersei is in a copy of the previous time he killed the King(Queen). Cersei ordering Kings Landing to be blown up by wildfire as Dany breaches the Keep.
But we are getting rather deep into wild speculation territory here ^^
Honestly I'd assume that given how pretty much everyone and everything other than Jaime completely hates and despises Cersei at this point that King's Landing would literally welcome Dany with open arms. Especially when those dragons fly overhead. The armies may not have a choice but they'll be very likely to just fall apart. I can't honestly see there being much of a battle for King's Landing given the state of everything. Naturally Cersei is going to flip and it could happen that she does something so drastic that Jaime has to end it himself.
Personally I'm hoping Tyrion gets to ride one of the dragons, land it gently next to Cersei, flip her off and then order the dragon to fry or eat her. But that's unlikely to actually happen.
On July 20 2017 04:25 Thezzy wrote: Honestly I'd assume that given how pretty much everyone and everything other than Jaime completely hates and despises Cersei at this point that King's Landing would literally welcome Dany with open arms. Especially when those dragons fly overhead. The armies may not have a choice but they'll be very likely to just fall apart. I can't honestly see there being much of a battle for King's Landing given the state of everything. Naturally Cersei is going to flip and it could happen that she does something so drastic that Jaime has to end it himself.
Personally I'm hoping Tyrion gets to ride one of the dragons, land it gently next to Cersei, flip her off and then order the dragon to fry or eat her. But that's unlikely to actually happen.
I don't know if this would actually happen in this situation, though. As much as Cersei is probably hated for her PR stunts like blowing up the sept or slaughtering Robert's bastards, Dany is too much of an unknown for anyone to rally with. Most people would probably goan and think "here we go again"
As much as Dany thinks she's this moral champion of good, she is by definition an invader. She is invading Westeros with a foreign army and seeking to slaughter anyone that opposes her. Also, keep in mind that she has an army of mercenaries and barbarians. Even if the unsullied and dothraki are loyal to her, no one will see them as a noble force. The dothraki in particular are known for pillaging indiscriminately. Not a very good rallying cry.
The only way I could see Jaime killing Cersei is in a copy of the previous time he killed the King(Queen). Cersei ordering Kings Landing to be blown up by wildfire as Dany breaches the Keep.
Honestly I'm almost expecting the show to end with this very scene but Dany & John walking into the throne room instead of Ned & Robert.
The way the show has gone I agree with Thezzy, I think the most surprising thing that can/will happen over the next few episodes is seeing how Cersei cobbles together something that seems reasonable as a resistance to Dany. Though they may just magic is away with Lannister army + Euron. I mean you gotta remember on top of everything else King's Landing is broke and not exactly in good favor with the Iron Bank.
The only way I could see Jaime killing Cersei is in a copy of the previous time he killed the King(Queen). Cersei ordering Kings Landing to be blown up by wildfire as Dany breaches the Keep.
Honestly I'm almost expecting the show to end with this very scene but Dany & John walking into the throne room instead of Ned & Robert.
The way the show has gone I agree with Thezzy, I think the most surprising thing that can/will happen over the next few episodes is seeing how Cersei cobbles together something that seems reasonable as a resistance to Dany. Though they may just magic is away with Lannister army + Euron. I mean you gotta remember on top of everything else King's Landing is broke and not exactly in good favor with the Iron Bank.
You have way too much faith in D&D if you think th IB plot will be resolved
I wonder what exactly the Dothraki expect to get out of this. Their culture is basically "show up, smash shit, take slaves, move on". Once Dany is done is she just going to put them on the next boat home?
The only way I could see Jaime killing Cersei is in a copy of the previous time he killed the King(Queen). Cersei ordering Kings Landing to be blown up by wildfire as Dany breaches the Keep.
Honestly I'm almost expecting the show to end with this very scene but Dany & John walking into the throne room instead of Ned & Robert.
The way the show has gone I agree with Thezzy, I think the most surprising thing that can/will happen over the next few episodes is seeing how Cersei cobbles together something that seems reasonable as a resistance to Dany. Though they may just magic is away with Lannister army + Euron. I mean you gotta remember on top of everything else King's Landing is broke and not exactly in good favor with the Iron Bank.
You have way too much faith in D&D if you think th IB plot will be resolved
Well I don't expect a resolution, but I also don't expect Cersei to be able to hire up a bunch of mercs.
I wonder what exactly the Dothraki expect to get out of this. Their culture is basically "show up, smash shit, take slaves, move on". Once Dany is done is she just going to put them on the next boat home?
I think they follow her out of devotion. I would think they see the dragons pretty much as a religious-ish figure considering their love of all things mount related and they also have high respect for shows of strength (which dany is obviously capable of). Arguably one of the dragons could also be the Stallion who mounts the world, but I wouldn't put much stock into a Dothraki prophecy I suppose.
Game of Thrones is not only know for its twists but also for its foreshadowing. At this point in the story, the constant twists should give way. Not to say that we can't have any, but having twists for its sake would just destroy a lot of the foreshadowing that the series has done. People who have picked apart and studied all the foreshadowing shouldn't be surprised by most of the story anymore. It's nearing its end and D&D shouldn't just throw all those hints in to the trash can to force some twists in.
On July 20 2017 04:41 KwarK wrote: I wonder what exactly the Dothraki expect to get out of this. Their culture is basically "show up, smash shit, take slaves, move on". Once Dany is done is she just going to put them on the next boat home?
Free land to settle on? There are lots of nomadic cultures that calmed down once they reached land they could farm and sustain themselves on. Obviously not all of them, but some.
Considering we are going to be dealing with the White Walkers soon, that event can lead to massive cultural shifts. I don’t think anyone culture is coming out of that war the same.
Dothraki probably will die on the frontline or against white walkers. The sea is dangerous for them, also. The survivors will be too few to matter, probably will be offered the Tyrell or Tully's region to start a new era.
It's not about there being twists for the sake of twists, it's about having enough plotlines/subplots open to reasonably be able to do different things. An example would be Arya and the faceless men. In theory you could expect them to not be ok with her just disappearing, but right now there won't be any of that in the show. Yes the story has to end at some point, but you can end it with a complex status quo in mind. The show just simplifies every single state though which makes it highly predictable and also illogical tbh.
Some people are fine with that because they simply want an ending, others are not because the show lacks narrative depth that way.
Some "unique" review: (fanboys of the show will hate it )
On July 20 2017 05:36 The_Red_Viper wrote: It's not about there being twists for the sake of twists, it's about having enough plotlines/subplots open to reasonably be able to do different things. An example would be Arya and the faceless men. In theory you could expect them to not be ok with her just disappearing, but right now there won't be any of that in the show. Yes the story has to end at some point, but you can end it with a complex status quo in mind. The show just simplifies every single state though which makes it highly predictable and also illogical tbh.
Some people are fine with that because they simply want an ending, others are not because the show lacks narrative depth that way.
Some "unique" review: (fanboys of the show will hate it )
Why would the faceless men be upset that she left? We never really knew the intent when it came to her training. It isn’t like they put out a mission statement. Maybe the faceless god and men really want the queen/king dead and decided to arm her with the tools to do it? Maybe that is how they train people? The problem with a lot of the complaining about the Faceless plotline is that some folks assume they understood the faceless god. But we don’t know anymore about that god than the lord of light.
I mean the specific example isn't even that important (though i would argue that it works), the point is that the show simplifies a lot of scenarios to simply cut the (possible) subplots. Another good example would have been dorne, they simply killed off house martell and pretended that all the other houses would now for whatever reason follow ellaria and the sandsnakes. It basically happened in every single arc tbh, it's a vast difference from earlier seasons where every arc was a lot more complex. And yes they decided to do this so they can end the story in 13 episodes, i get that. But at the same time you also have to understand that this might disappoint people who watched GoT because of the complexity and not because of deaths, tits and dragons.