|
EU Dota was a bit better pre-TI, mostly because Secret was dominating everything. EU/CIS top 3 at MDL helped with that perception too, but beyond that there weren't really any tournaments with a lot of EU + other teams where EU did well
VP is likely better than every non-Secret EU team, which puts EU roughly in the same spot as they were before. Empire doing their thing and falling apart at TI and immediately after makes things look worse even though they're CIS. In addition
Edit: And while stupid dives may only make up a small % of the game time, they have a much higher impact on the outcome of games
|
On September 30 2015 01:23 TomatoBisque wrote: EU Dota was a bit better pre-TI, mostly because Secret was dominating everything. EU/CIS top 3 at MDL helped with that perception too, but beyond that there weren't really any tournaments with a lot of EU + other teams where EU did well
VP is likely better than every non-Secret EU team, which puts EU roughly in the same spot as they were before. Empire doing their thing and falling apart at TI and immediately after makes things look worse even though they're CIS. In addition
Edit: And while stupid dives may only make up a small % of the game time, they have a much higher impact on the outcome of games A lot of people (Huehue azarkon) thought empire was top3 (of course no longer), c9 no longer exists (as an EU team) and navi looks worse than before I guess. These are all teams with huge fanbases, which may have skewed opinions of them previously, which makes the current state of EU dota look even worse. Otherwise you would be correct
|
Why does TA go deso over MKB this game? wouldn't MKB first be better vs brew + PA?
|
That Brew is doing nothing this game
|
haha...dat wisp heal and gyro hp
|
wisp is back as a hero that punishes teams that can't work together lol
|
On September 30 2015 01:35 bagels21 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 01:23 TomatoBisque wrote: EU Dota was a bit better pre-TI, mostly because Secret was dominating everything. EU/CIS top 3 at MDL helped with that perception too, but beyond that there weren't really any tournaments with a lot of EU + other teams where EU did well
VP is likely better than every non-Secret EU team, which puts EU roughly in the same spot as they were before. Empire doing their thing and falling apart at TI and immediately after makes things look worse even though they're CIS. In addition
Edit: And while stupid dives may only make up a small % of the game time, they have a much higher impact on the outcome of games A lot of people (Huehue azarkon) thought empire was top3 (of course no longer), c9 no longer exists (as an EU team) and navi looks worse than before I guess. These are all teams with huge fanbases, which may have skewed opinions of them previously, which makes the current state of EU dota look even worse. Otherwise you would be correct
Well it is to be expected that EU dota would be bit less successful given that both Arteezy and Zai don't play for an "EU" team anymore. Also at least for now it is true that Empire especially lost their footing after their roster shuffles. The comments that made me cringe were more about the "level of play" and how that somehow tells about everyone being surprisingly terrible.
|
So gyro still a good hero it seems ....
|
|
On September 30 2015 01:47 spudde123 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 01:35 bagels21 wrote:On September 30 2015 01:23 TomatoBisque wrote: EU Dota was a bit better pre-TI, mostly because Secret was dominating everything. EU/CIS top 3 at MDL helped with that perception too, but beyond that there weren't really any tournaments with a lot of EU + other teams where EU did well
VP is likely better than every non-Secret EU team, which puts EU roughly in the same spot as they were before. Empire doing their thing and falling apart at TI and immediately after makes things look worse even though they're CIS. In addition
Edit: And while stupid dives may only make up a small % of the game time, they have a much higher impact on the outcome of games A lot of people (Huehue azarkon) thought empire was top3 (of course no longer), c9 no longer exists (as an EU team) and navi looks worse than before I guess. These are all teams with huge fanbases, which may have skewed opinions of them previously, which makes the current state of EU dota look even worse. Otherwise you would be correct Well it is to be expected that EU dota would be bit less successful given that both Arteezy and Zai don't play for an "EU" team anymore. Also at least for now it is true that Empire especially lost their footing after their roster shuffles. The comments that made me cringe were more about the "level of play" and how that somehow tells about everyone being surprisingly terrible. of course, but even if we discount secret, the remainder of the EU scene just seems as a whole weaker and the teams less cohesive.
I don't agree with lolfail that the players are suddenly worse, I just think that they were overrated a bit to begin with
|
On September 30 2015 01:48 BobMcJohnson wrote: Mag is on fire
Indeed , he has a godly Clock to be honset , i think that hero is what made him "famous"
|
On September 30 2015 01:35 bagels21 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 01:23 TomatoBisque wrote: EU Dota was a bit better pre-TI, mostly because Secret was dominating everything. EU/CIS top 3 at MDL helped with that perception too, but beyond that there weren't really any tournaments with a lot of EU + other teams where EU did well
VP is likely better than every non-Secret EU team, which puts EU roughly in the same spot as they were before. Empire doing their thing and falling apart at TI and immediately after makes things look worse even though they're CIS. In addition
Edit: And while stupid dives may only make up a small % of the game time, they have a much higher impact on the outcome of games A lot of people (Huehue azarkon) thought empire was top3 (of course no longer), c9 no longer exists (as an EU team) and navi looks worse than before I guess. These are all teams with huge fanbases, which may have skewed opinions of them previously, which makes the current state of EU dota look even worse. Otherwise you would be correct Hmm, that's true. All the established teams splitting up to form what basically seems like pubstacks isn't helping perception. Instead of C9 you have Monkey Business and 5jungz, etc.
I'd also say the play would look better if VP and Secret had more games
|
On September 30 2015 01:50 bluzi wrote:Indeed , he has a godly Clock to be honset , i think that hero is what made him "famous"
don't forget centaur
|
Russian Federation40186 Posts
On September 30 2015 01:49 bagels21 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 01:47 spudde123 wrote:On September 30 2015 01:35 bagels21 wrote:On September 30 2015 01:23 TomatoBisque wrote: EU Dota was a bit better pre-TI, mostly because Secret was dominating everything. EU/CIS top 3 at MDL helped with that perception too, but beyond that there weren't really any tournaments with a lot of EU + other teams where EU did well
VP is likely better than every non-Secret EU team, which puts EU roughly in the same spot as they were before. Empire doing their thing and falling apart at TI and immediately after makes things look worse even though they're CIS. In addition
Edit: And while stupid dives may only make up a small % of the game time, they have a much higher impact on the outcome of games A lot of people (Huehue azarkon) thought empire was top3 (of course no longer), c9 no longer exists (as an EU team) and navi looks worse than before I guess. These are all teams with huge fanbases, which may have skewed opinions of them previously, which makes the current state of EU dota look even worse. Otherwise you would be correct Well it is to be expected that EU dota would be bit less successful given that both Arteezy and Zai don't play for an "EU" team anymore. Also at least for now it is true that Empire especially lost their footing after their roster shuffles. The comments that made me cringe were more about the "level of play" and how that somehow tells about everyone being surprisingly terrible. of course, but even if we discount secret, the remainder of the EU scene just seems as a whole weaker and the teams less cohesive. I don't agree with lolfail that the players are suddenly worse, I just think that they were overrated a bit to begin with I mean, if you think about it, they pretty much did not improve, that's true, but 6.84/6.85 exposes this like no other patch in my memory.
|
On September 30 2015 01:52 lolfail9001 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 01:49 bagels21 wrote:On September 30 2015 01:47 spudde123 wrote:On September 30 2015 01:35 bagels21 wrote:On September 30 2015 01:23 TomatoBisque wrote: EU Dota was a bit better pre-TI, mostly because Secret was dominating everything. EU/CIS top 3 at MDL helped with that perception too, but beyond that there weren't really any tournaments with a lot of EU + other teams where EU did well
VP is likely better than every non-Secret EU team, which puts EU roughly in the same spot as they were before. Empire doing their thing and falling apart at TI and immediately after makes things look worse even though they're CIS. In addition
Edit: And while stupid dives may only make up a small % of the game time, they have a much higher impact on the outcome of games A lot of people (Huehue azarkon) thought empire was top3 (of course no longer), c9 no longer exists (as an EU team) and navi looks worse than before I guess. These are all teams with huge fanbases, which may have skewed opinions of them previously, which makes the current state of EU dota look even worse. Otherwise you would be correct Well it is to be expected that EU dota would be bit less successful given that both Arteezy and Zai don't play for an "EU" team anymore. Also at least for now it is true that Empire especially lost their footing after their roster shuffles. The comments that made me cringe were more about the "level of play" and how that somehow tells about everyone being surprisingly terrible. of course, but even if we discount secret, the remainder of the EU scene just seems as a whole weaker and the teams less cohesive. I don't agree with lolfail that the players are suddenly worse, I just think that they were overrated a bit to begin with I mean, if you think about it, they pretty much did not improve, that's true, but 6.84/6.85 exposes this like no other patch in my memory.
a lot of the older players no longer have captains that can hide their flaws and the influx of pub trained mid superstars definitely makes it easier to point out flaws so to an extent I do agree just not to the level you were painting it
|
Why do we need to suffer with a LS again S4 ? whats the point ? so many better carries in the pool.....
|
why would you pick naix. I'm not even sure there's a shittier hero in the whole pool.
|
Russian Federation40186 Posts
On September 30 2015 02:05 bagels21 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 01:52 lolfail9001 wrote:On September 30 2015 01:49 bagels21 wrote:On September 30 2015 01:47 spudde123 wrote:On September 30 2015 01:35 bagels21 wrote:On September 30 2015 01:23 TomatoBisque wrote: EU Dota was a bit better pre-TI, mostly because Secret was dominating everything. EU/CIS top 3 at MDL helped with that perception too, but beyond that there weren't really any tournaments with a lot of EU + other teams where EU did well
VP is likely better than every non-Secret EU team, which puts EU roughly in the same spot as they were before. Empire doing their thing and falling apart at TI and immediately after makes things look worse even though they're CIS. In addition
Edit: And while stupid dives may only make up a small % of the game time, they have a much higher impact on the outcome of games A lot of people (Huehue azarkon) thought empire was top3 (of course no longer), c9 no longer exists (as an EU team) and navi looks worse than before I guess. These are all teams with huge fanbases, which may have skewed opinions of them previously, which makes the current state of EU dota look even worse. Otherwise you would be correct Well it is to be expected that EU dota would be bit less successful given that both Arteezy and Zai don't play for an "EU" team anymore. Also at least for now it is true that Empire especially lost their footing after their roster shuffles. The comments that made me cringe were more about the "level of play" and how that somehow tells about everyone being surprisingly terrible. of course, but even if we discount secret, the remainder of the EU scene just seems as a whole weaker and the teams less cohesive. I don't agree with lolfail that the players are suddenly worse, I just think that they were overrated a bit to begin with I mean, if you think about it, they pretty much did not improve, that's true, but 6.84/6.85 exposes this like no other patch in my memory. a lot of the older players no longer have captains that can hide their flaws and the influx of pub trained mid superstars definitely makes it easier to point out flaws so to an extent I do agree just not to the level you were painting it I mean, once again, i don't talk about mechanical flaws. I talk about grander picture. If anything, influx of pub trained superstars highlights the fact that there is distinct lack of supports in the scene, especially captaining supports.
|
On September 30 2015 02:06 BobMcJohnson wrote: why would you pick naix. I'm not even sure there's a shittier hero in the whole pool. With the amount of carry he needs to do , there is none i believe , you can pick a shit support , but picking one of the worst #1 is unreal , just take the gyro and be done with it , great AOE team fight carry .... that LS gonna get kited to hell this game S4 is smoking something im sure....
|
Russian Federation40186 Posts
s4 should have picked doom instead of naix 100%.
|
|
|
|