| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:25 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: i'll take obvious statements that don't really add anything for 800 alex Any system past W/L is going to be luck based on your draw, or a stupid number that could be gamed. Considering it was second round of Tiebreakers and it only happened because TongFu didn't win consecutive games, I'd say it's entirely forgivable. | ||
|
goody153
44236 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:21 icystorage wrote: Wooo Rave :3 so rave earns the 12th spot ? | ||
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
| ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
yep! | ||
KristofferAG
Norway25712 Posts
| ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
| ||
|
hfglgg
Germany5372 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:25 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: i'll take obvious statements that don't really add anything for 800 alex unless you want endless tiebreakers there have to be a way to decide who is gonna advance that derives from the games already played. personally i would rather see the difference in kills as the important metric (as i would say a game where you win with a huge difference in kills is in general more onesided than a game where you win in 20minutes), but timerating is fine too. | ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:30 hfglgg wrote: unless you want endless tiebreakers there have to be a way to decide who is gonna advance that derives from the games already played. personally i would rather see the difference in kills as the important metric (as i would say a game where you win with a huge difference in kills is in general more onesided than a game where you win in 20minutes), but timerating is fine too. First team to win 2 consecutive games, wins | ||
|
hfglgg
Germany5372 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:31 icystorage wrote: First team to win 2 consecutive games, wins thats no difference to endless tiebreakers. teams can just go 1:1:1 for ages. | ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
 | ||
|
hfglgg
Germany5372 Posts
 | ||
|
cravin74
Malaysia1088 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:30 hfglgg wrote: unless you want endless tiebreakers there have to be a way to decide who is gonna advance that derives from the games already played. personally i would rather see the difference in kills as the important metric (as i would say a game where you win with a huge difference in kills is in general more onesided than a game where you win in 20minutes), but timerating is fine too. Kills is still an indirect manner of determining which team is better. Straight up downing the throne faster is more direct. To me time rating is kind of like the penalty shootout of Dota (subpar for determing the best team but doesn't need both teams to keep playing). Then again you could go out like this: http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/31047060 | ||
TheEmulator
28094 Posts
| ||
|
jackdr
Philippines85 Posts
like, have them play the next lowest ranked team (ie 11th in this case) whoever loses is eliminated, whichever team wins (if ever 2 teams win) they get to play each other and whichever team wins gets to advance. but that still counts on having one team lose vs the 11th ranked team as well as further hassling the 11th ranked team lol | ||
|
rebdomine
6040 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:43 jackdr wrote: how about having a constant rather than having everything else variable? like, have them play the next lowest ranked team (ie 11th in this case) whoever loses is eliminated, whichever team wins (if ever 2 teams win) they get to play each other and whichever team wins gets to advance. but that still counts on having one team lose vs the 11th ranked team. This makes the 11th ranked team play more games than they should. Why should they play more games when they're already qualified? | ||
Yhamm
France7248 Posts
| ||
|
jackdr
Philippines85 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:44 rebdomine wrote: This makes the 11th ranked team play more games than they should. Why should they play more games when they're already qualified? yeah i edited it in right before i saw your reply. it doesn't really affect the 11th ranked team, but it still depends if they're willing to do that for the sake of avoiding possible endless tiebreakers. so yeah, a possible solution for tiebreakers but still wouldn't justify itself lol | ||
Elyvilon
United States13143 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:46 Yhamm wrote: I wonder why they are rushing this 1v1 tournament, playing more than 1 match at a time I don't know but it makes it a pain to edit in Edit: You should go back to showing up on IRC  | ||
|
cravin74
Malaysia1088 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:48 jackdr wrote: yeah i edited it in right before i saw your reply. it doesn't really affect the 11th ranked team, but it still depends if they're willing to do that for the sake of avoiding possible endless tiebreakers. so yeah, a possible solution for tiebreakers but still wouldn't justify itself lol The 11th place team has no incentive to perform. They might try for the first game and then get bored and screw the next two games. | ||
|
goody153
44236 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
OSC
IPSL
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
Patches Events
|
|
|
EPT
