| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
StUfF
Australia1437 Posts
Kills/Time stats don't make sense - instead could you use group stage performance? i.e. assign arbitrary point values for rankings 1-16 (rank 1 is worth most points, rank 16 worth least) - in case of tie, tally points based on who beat who and whoever "performed" better during group stages moves on. | ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
| ||
|
Caladbolg
2855 Posts
| ||
|
Emnjay808
United States10663 Posts
| ||
|
cravin74
Malaysia1088 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:52 goody153 wrote: that's for starcraft you scrubs poweroverwhelming was the first word I could touch type. | ||
|
jackdr
Philippines85 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:52 cravin74 wrote: The 11th place team has no incentive to perform. They might try for the first game and then get bored and screw the next two games. or possibly give games away to teams they favor. which why i really don't like RR type (i like GSL group stage better) but in tournaments such as these, classic rr is just the way to go. | ||
|
goody153
44236 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:53 StUfF wrote: re: Tiebreakers. Kills/Time stats don't make sense - instead could you use group stage performance? i.e. assign arbitrary point values for rankings 1-16 (rank 1 is worth most points, rank 16 worth least) - in case of tie, tally points based on who beat who and whoever "performed" better during group stages moves on. if i understood what you mean between CDEC , tongfu and rave can't do the "who beats who" mechanic since they had a rock-paper-scissors situation on the first tiebreaker and the group stages. | ||
|
goody153
44236 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:54 cravin74 wrote: poweroverwhelming was the first word I could touch type. show me the money show me the money black sheep wall operation cwal that's how roll when i have not discovered multiplayer yet | ||
|
cravin74
Malaysia1088 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:56 goody153 wrote: if i understood what you mean between CDEC , tongfu and rave can't do the "who beats who" mechanic since they had a rock-paper-scissors situation on the first tiebreaker and the group stages. I think he's suggesting that you evaluate how the tied teams performed against all the other teams but with a higher weightage for beating higher placed teams. | ||
|
jackdr
Philippines85 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:57 goody153 wrote: show me the money show me the money black sheep wall operation cwal that's how roll when i have not discovered multiplayer yet with you on this. typing this as fast as i could back then helped me very much in learning to type fast and accurate lol OnT: WP Rave. I just hope all this won't go to waste as the lower bracket is just Bo1. hmm | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:53 StUfF wrote: re: Tiebreakers. Kills/Time stats don't make sense - instead could you use group stage performance? i.e. assign arbitrary point values for rankings 1-16 (rank 1 is worth most points, rank 16 worth least) - in case of tie, tally points based on who beat who and whoever "performed" better during group stages moves on. So instead of having tied teams play for their own elimination (even if there are arbitrary stipulations), let's just pick arbitrary numbers and eliminate two right off the bat? | ||
|
DucK-
Singapore11447 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:57 goody153 wrote: show me the money show me the money black sheep wall operation cwal that's how roll when i have not discovered multiplayer yet thegathering These were the first few lines I could type real fast :D | ||
|
goody153
44236 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:59 DucK- wrote: thegathering These were the first few lines I could type real fast :D show me the money was the fastest shit i could type when i was young rofl On February 03 2015 16:59 jackdr wrote: with you on this. typing this as fast as i could back then helped me very much in learning to type fast and accurate lol OnT: WP Rave. I just hope all this won't go to waste as the lower bracket is just Bo1. hmm well i didn't really type much when i was young outside cheatcodes anyways :D You just have to believe that PINOY DOTA BEST DOTA  | ||
|
goody153
44236 Posts
| ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
On February 03 2015 17:11 goody153 wrote: i can vouche that SEA is the most toxic region you will ever play. it's so god awful, especially when they queue AUS server.... | ||
|
lphwo
Malaysia751 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27156 Posts
On February 03 2015 17:13 Doraemon wrote: it's so god awful, especially when they queue AUS server.... Totally agree, but SEA and Australia are the only regions I am under 200 ping on. Whenever I hear an Australian voice on my team I feel so happy. | ||
|
jackdr
Philippines85 Posts
it's less toxic in ranked mm though. or maybe it just depends on timing lol | ||
Elyvilon
United States13143 Posts
| ||
|
bludragen88
United States527 Posts
On February 03 2015 16:59 cravin74 wrote: I think he's suggesting that you evaluate how the tied teams performed against all the other teams but with a higher weightage for beating higher placed teams. But you should also have a higher weightage for losing to worse teams, and they will even out because your records are tied. Which comes back to the same kind of chicken and egg argument that time rating brings out - is it more important to beat the strongest teams or not lose to the weakest teams? | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
OSC
IPSL
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
Patches Events
|
|
|
EPT
