|
|
On October 10 2014 10:56 PhoenixVoid wrote:Sadly happens on a Thursday night and the tickets were fairly pricey.
The tournament being run on thursday+friday just killed it for a lot of people that would come otherwise imo. Plus, it's also already 10PM already here on the east coast.
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
I know Redeye follows teamliquid when sc2 events are on, he does the same for liquiddota?
|
On October 10 2014 10:57 blobrus wrote: Redeye's such a good host, asking about the tl loda hate.
Actually, if you listened to what he said, he was doing the exact opposite. He was questioning whether all the Loda praise (from the panel) was warranted since he was just doing what he was supposed to be doing.
|
On October 10 2014 10:55 bagels21 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2014 10:53 SpiritoftheTunA wrote:On October 10 2014 10:51 pellejohnson wrote: Not easy to perform when they lost 2 out of their 3 best players. Loda and Bulldog has always been the worst players in the team i dunno how you people quantify this kind of crap when alliance winning ti3 was entirely dependent on bulldog's unique playstyle rofl you have to be kidding me. Alliance won ti3 becase they had mastered wisp first and knew how to play wisp. Secondly they won ti3 because they had Naga when no one else could play naga siren support*. Finally they had s4 at the peak of his powers. S4 was the best mid in the world at the time and allowed alliance to play their greedy 2core with Loda and AB getting farm. lol ... and bulldog np?
its not that they mastered wisp. They were the first team to realize that you win dota by killing base and had by far the best splitpushing game and were very efficient with their farming.
they also abused BB the most and turned around a lot of mid game fights, then went on to rat enemy to death
|
On October 10 2014 10:54 Kipsate wrote: CAn we not turn this into a fucking Loda Bashing thread
you guys have been going at it for the past like hour.
Agreed, the next series needs to start so that it can become an EE bashing thread.
|
On October 10 2014 10:57 Jaaaaasper wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2014 10:56 Count9 wrote:On October 10 2014 10:52 Jaaaaasper wrote:On October 10 2014 10:50 Count9 wrote: C9 should win 2 games ez, though I do want to see how ush does vs a good team. He held it together quite well vs EG. If he held it together quite well vs EG, you already know how he will do against a good team. 1 data point, could mean anything Well EG is way better than c9 I agree, doesn't undermine my point.
|
On October 10 2014 10:53 TMG26 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2014 10:51 calmasfok wrote: hey lets praise loda because in our world playing well means getting your sunder off against a silenced enigma veno and death prophet. also buying items to late in the wrong order or not at all is great play in our book Let's ignore all the farm he got under pressure, and his spot on decision making. What spot on decision making? He played the 1 in two 4p1 strategies. Its like people forgot what those games look like. Even the analyst desk "oh man loda was playing from behind" of fucking course you are behind when you play 4p1 against a 3 core push lineup. FFS
|
On October 10 2014 10:56 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2014 10:54 Zea! wrote:On October 10 2014 10:51 pellejohnson wrote: Not easy to perform when they lost 2 out of their 3 best players. Loda and Bulldog has always been the worst players in the team What? Bulldog has been carrying the team for like 1 year... Sure, but what has he done for us recently?
He's been the best player till last month...
|
Did anyone really expect Alliance to beat EG with a standin? Thing is that none of the players were comfortable in this situation and debating whether or not someone is a good player gets us no where. Loda did play well this series compared to his teammates which we are not used to as spectators because the previous support duo, EGM+AKKE were so stellar at dictating the tempo of the game.
|
EG's shirts are so bad, they have those long sleeves that are a different colour that people wore when I was 12
|
On October 10 2014 10:55 SpiritoftheTunA wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2014 10:55 bagels21 wrote:On October 10 2014 10:53 SpiritoftheTunA wrote:On October 10 2014 10:51 pellejohnson wrote: Not easy to perform when they lost 2 out of their 3 best players. Loda and Bulldog has always been the worst players in the team i dunno how you people quantify this kind of crap when alliance winning ti3 was entirely dependent on bulldog's unique playstyle rofl you have to be kidding me. Alliance won ti3 becase they had mastered wisp first and knew how to play wisp. Secondly they won ti3 because they had Naga when no one else could play naga siren. Finally they had s4 at the peak of his powers. S4 was the best mid in the world at the time and allowed alliance to play their greedy 2core with Loda and AB getting farm. lol a lot of those strategies were contingent on bulldog's unique carry-splitpusher-from-offlane style
you do realize that bulldog could only carry/split push because they had to ban out s4 and EGM's heroes? (also akke's chen) He could only get so much farm because s4 would gank and win midgame with the two supports... If it really were AB they would have banned NP/LD. Bulldog even now can only play those 2 heroes at a T1 level
|
If you cant tell that hes doing well, maybe its because hes not doing well. But really Bulldog has been shit ever since he stopped getting furion and Lone Druid fell off. He might be the best player in the world on those two heroes, but hes really bad off of them.
|
On October 10 2014 10:50 CosmicSpiral wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2014 10:44 Kreb wrote:On October 10 2014 10:36 CosmicSpiral wrote:On October 10 2014 10:35 Kabras wrote:On October 10 2014 10:33 Zea! wrote: that gyro pick was just stupid and no sense (as vengeful) gyro's really good vs pa cuz he's a natural mkb buyer and he can nuke her down with rocket barrage. pa also can't jump him for the same reason. the pick was good, the play wasn't. Gyro as the last pick in this particular draft was terrible. Invoker would have been so much better and allowed Alliance to fight all around the map. Gyro pick was super fine and Kabras explained why. You sjust throw out "facts" with no reasoning behind. Pick WAS good, execution not so much. Nope. The pick would have been good if it was a more standard mid. Being a natural MKB carrier with high burst damage is great, but it doesn't work when it forces your team to go for a strict wombo-combo style. Alliance had mediocre damage to kill targets without Gyro being in the fight, and EG made the fights so chaotic Alliance could never start the fight on their terms. I have no idea even what this means. Wombo-combo styles doesnt work? Big teamfight ulties and combos have been trending for the last half year or something. Mediocre damage without gyro? So? EG had mediocre damage without PA. Who cares? And how does a pick become bad if you complain about how the rest of the team doesnt do enough without the 5th. If that is ever a reason, then the problem was the other 4, not the 5th. But your whole reasoning is like.... random words. Alliance could never start fights on their terms? Ye its not like they had two super strong initiators in void and clock. And once again, how is them lacking initiation (which they didnt lack) in any way remotely relevant to how good the gyro pick was? Im reading your post over and over again, its random words, trying to understand them and the reasoning behind them is impossible. About everything you say is questionable or completely irrelevant.
If you want to explain why a pick is bad, you do it by putting that heros abilities in context of the other 9 heroes on the field and explain why the hero's abilities dont synergy with his own team (say, picking a stun that needs setup without setup), doesnt fit the overall strategy of the team (say, picking a lategame hero with 4 pushers) or is easily countered by the enemy team. Not throwing out random words.
|
On October 10 2014 10:58 Procake wrote: EG's shirts are so bad, they have those long sleeves that are a different colour that people wore when I was 12 wow is alliance vs eg bringing all of this negativity ?
|
On October 10 2014 10:58 Spicy_Curry wrote: Did anyone really expect Alliance to beat EG with a standin? Thing is that none of the players were comfortable in this situation and debating whether or not someone is a good player gets us no where. Loda did play well this series compared to his teammates which we are not used to as spectators because the previous support duo, EGM+AKKE were so stellar at dictating the tempo of the game. akke and misery played well. loda played badly. hanni and bulldog where next level bad
|
On October 10 2014 10:58 wuhan_clan wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2014 10:57 blobrus wrote: Redeye's such a good host, asking about the tl loda hate. Actually, if you listened to what he said, he was doing the exact opposite. He was questioning whether all the Loda praise (from the panel) was warranted since he was just doing what he was supposed to be doing. Yeah he was bringing up the counterpoints people like you and that other dude were making to question the praise, that's what I mean.
|
On October 10 2014 10:58 bagels21 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2014 10:55 SpiritoftheTunA wrote:On October 10 2014 10:55 bagels21 wrote:On October 10 2014 10:53 SpiritoftheTunA wrote:On October 10 2014 10:51 pellejohnson wrote: Not easy to perform when they lost 2 out of their 3 best players. Loda and Bulldog has always been the worst players in the team i dunno how you people quantify this kind of crap when alliance winning ti3 was entirely dependent on bulldog's unique playstyle rofl you have to be kidding me. Alliance won ti3 becase they had mastered wisp first and knew how to play wisp. Secondly they won ti3 because they had Naga when no one else could play naga siren. Finally they had s4 at the peak of his powers. S4 was the best mid in the world at the time and allowed alliance to play their greedy 2core with Loda and AB getting farm. lol a lot of those strategies were contingent on bulldog's unique carry-splitpusher-from-offlane style you do realize that bulldog could only carry/split push because they had to ban out s4 and EGM's heroes? (also akke's chen) He could only get so much farm because s4 would gank and win midgame with the two supports... If it really were AB they would have banned NP/LD. Bulldog even now can only play those 2 heroes at a T1 level
They did Ban NP/LD, did you even watch Ti3?
|
Reality is that no team had ever been hit like Alliance had after 6.79. All the 6.80 patch was aimed to destroy Alliance playstile, we never fully recovered from there.
|
On October 10 2014 10:59 calmasfok wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2014 10:58 Spicy_Curry wrote: Did anyone really expect Alliance to beat EG with a standin? Thing is that none of the players were comfortable in this situation and debating whether or not someone is a good player gets us no where. Loda did play well this series compared to his teammates which we are not used to as spectators because the previous support duo, EGM+AKKE were so stellar at dictating the tempo of the game. akke and misery played well. loda played badly. hanni and bulldog where next level bad Does anyone still think Alliance is better than EG with or with out a stand in?
|
Brunei Darussalam566 Posts
On October 10 2014 10:57 stuchiu wrote: I know Redeye follows teamliquid when sc2 events are on, he does the same for liquiddota?
Probably, as far as I know he's less versed in Dota than in SC2, so it'd be a good idea to get a deeper insight (even if some of it is just mindless bashing lol).
|
|
|
|
|
|