|
On August 12 2013 10:10 Turquoise wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2013 10:08 tomatriedes wrote: Completely unbiased opinion there. Please explain how one can have an "unbiased opinion"
It was funny because the guy had an Orange tag in his sig. Just pointing out he obviously he had other reasons for wanting them in the finals than just 'good games'.
|
|
|
"these teams aren't on the same lvl" sure man, let's count a team like na'vi out, because they clearly can't recover at all since you already decided it..
|
|
|
|
|
LD against Alch. 'Tis gonna be good.
|
Oh my god, LD's "AAAAAAAAAAAAND WE'RE BACK!!" made me fear Ayesee was suddenly casting instead.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On August 12 2013 10:13 1Dhalism wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2013 10:04 Vankuga wrote: NAVIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, 0 Blackhole lmao. cant miss if you dont try 100% hit rate!
|
|
|
On August 12 2013 10:10 tadL wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2013 10:09 jeeneeus wrote: So Alliance doesn't get any advantage for being in the winners side? they did not need to play loosers bracket? No MLG bullshit in this Tournament sry
That's actually not MLG bullshit, but the way double elimination works. For example, last time Na'Vi has beaten iG, but it didn't matter, iG got a second chance. Na'Vi didn't. UB winner should have 1-game advantage, as did Na'Vi in 2011.
|
Well, looks like Alliance has stopped messing around with cocky drafts now.
|
Bat, LD! playtime is over
|
haha, batrider/ld and wisp/alch. battle of the farmers here. I really like the wisp/alch combo with essentially double stun.
|
Btw how does Alchemist only have a 45% winrate o_O It should totally stomp pubs, hm
|
|
|
United States1518 Posts
|
On August 12 2013 10:12 dogmode wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2013 10:09 jeeneeus wrote: So Alliance doesn't get any advantage for being in the winners side? yup  dunno why the advantage is less games played. Why is this even an issue.
|
|
|
On August 12 2013 10:06 Steveling wrote: Navi confirmed to joke during the first game and getting serious from now on. NS, i think, during starladder said something along the lines of "Alliance has really obvious holes in their games but when you try to exploit them, you can't" I think Na'Vi had a strategy in mind they just couldnt execute.
|
On August 12 2013 10:12 dogmode wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2013 10:09 jeeneeus wrote: So Alliance doesn't get any advantage for being in the winners side? yup  dunno why They can choose pick or side instead of a coinflip.
|
|
|
|
|
|