EPTOn September 28 2013 18:12 hansomreiste wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
Hi guys,
I have a suggestion which is not about tournament but its page on Liquipedia. I've been eagerly updating many things on Liquipedia for a few months as much as I can. It is a great community and lots of information but we need a little reform I think: In addition to writing 2-1-1 to imply the number of outcomes, we need to put a "games played" column in front of those. Something like,
GP / W-D-L / P
4 / 2-1-1 / 7
***
Because this is e-sports, the fixture is mostly based upon "teams" instead of "weeks". When one team plays 3 games one after another, the other one may start the tournament a few days later. This causes a lot trouble for me while checking the table. So, which one would be easier to view?
Alliance 11-4
Na'Vi 9-7
Empire 8-5
or,
Alliance [15] 11-4
Na'Vi [16] 9-7
Empire [13] 8-5
***
I am not "capable of coding" those into tournament stages. If community agrees with me, or if there's a better place to write about this, could you please change the format like that?
I have a suggestion which is not about tournament but its page on Liquipedia. I've been eagerly updating many things on Liquipedia for a few months as much as I can. It is a great community and lots of information but we need a little reform I think: In addition to writing 2-1-1 to imply the number of outcomes, we need to put a "games played" column in front of those. Something like,
GP / W-D-L / P
4 / 2-1-1 / 7
***
Because this is e-sports, the fixture is mostly based upon "teams" instead of "weeks". When one team plays 3 games one after another, the other one may start the tournament a few days later. This causes a lot trouble for me while checking the table. So, which one would be easier to view?
Alliance 11-4
Na'Vi 9-7
Empire 8-5
or,
Alliance [15] 11-4
Na'Vi [16] 9-7
Empire [13] 8-5
***
I am not "capable of coding" those into tournament stages. If community agrees with me, or if there's a better place to write about this, could you please change the format like that?
I think this thread would be a better place to discuss something like this, or go on the #liquipedia IRC.
My personal opinion though, is that it's a little unnecessary. It adds information that is already there, and doesn't help order the table any better.
