fatalize said it well. He's not really good on "core" mids. He's a more aggressive styled playmaker. Give him a Puck or even his signature mid Clockwerk and he does work.

fascistfromhell

1689 Posts

September 28 2013 09:07 GMT

#1545

I can't stand Lumi lately. I used to like him.

tada.hts

1968 Posts

September 28 2013 09:08 GMT

#1546

ZSMJ living up to his name, great player.

On September 28 2013 18:07 fascistfromhell wrote:
I can't stand Lumi lately. I used to like him.

True, he should praise the one making plays more than flaming the one got own.

RiZu

Singapore5715 Posts

September 28 2013 09:08 GMT

#1547

DK post game interview
+ Show Spoiler +

http://www.reddit.com/r/DotA2/comments/1nawl2/dks_post_game_interview_iceiceice_i_watched_a/

credit:Killmeplsok

Caesarion

Australia8332 Posts

September 28 2013 09:10 GMT

#1548

Random guy: In the second game iceiceice used a troll warlord, we thought it will be a offlane or solo mid troll initially but you went for a safe lane farming play, did you watched any troll warlord’s replay again this time that led you to play like that?
Iceiceice: Oh replay? Actually this time when I was watching replays I saw a genius troll warlord and his name was iceiceice, I watched his play and was like…"WOAH!" so I told them to pick me a troll.

Haha, Asha. This line is too good not to quote.

Asha

United Kingdom38257 Posts

September 28 2013 09:10 GMT

#1549

On September 28 2013 18:08 RiZu wrote:
DK post game interview
+ Show Spoiler +

http://www.reddit.com/r/DotA2/comments/1nawl2/dks_post_game_interview_iceiceice_i_watched_a/

credit:Killmeplsok

Random guy: In the second game iceiceice used a troll warlord, we thought it will be a offlane or solo mid troll initially but you went for a safe lane farming play, did you watched any troll warlord’s replay again this time that led you to play like that?

Iceiceice: Oh replay? Actually this time when I was watching replays I saw a genius troll warlord and his name was iceiceice, I watched his play and was like…"WOAH!" so I told them to pick me a troll.

That iceiceice

e: lol caes!

739

Bearded Elder29903 Posts

September 28 2013 09:11 GMT

#1550

Hahahaha, iceiceice good as always 8D

hansomreiste

Turkey4 Posts

September 28 2013 09:12 GMT

#1551

Hi guys,

I have a suggestion which is not about tournament but its page on Liquipedia. I've been eagerly updating many things on Liquipedia for a few months as much as I can. It is a great community and lots of information but we need a little reform I think: In addition to writing 2-1-1 to imply the number of outcomes, we need to put a "games played" column in front of those. Something like,

GP / W-D-L / P

4 / 2-1-1 / 7

***

Because this is e-sports, the fixture is mostly based upon "teams" instead of "weeks". When one team plays 3 games one after another, the other one may start the tournament a few days later. This causes a lot trouble for me while checking the table. So, which one would be easier to view?

Alliance 11-4
Na'Vi 9-7
Empire 8-5

or,

Alliance [15] 11-4
Na'Vi [16] 9-7
Empire [13] 8-5

***

I am not "capable of coding" those into tournament stages. If community agrees with me, or if there's a better place to write about this, could you please change the format like that?