EPTSimple Questions, Simple Answers - Page 1071
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Strategy |
|
Logo
United States7542 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Unleashing
Denmark14978 Posts
How much you actually save depends on too many factors to be able to just give one answer, if you have 400 mana with non-int treads then you have 504 with int-treads and you as such only lose approximately 10% mana by using doppel with int treads compared to losing 12.5% without int treads. So you saved 2.5% of your total mana pool by switching which with a 400 mana pool is about 10 mana. This means that after tread switching 5 times you've saved an entire doppel worth of mana. Those numbers and percentages are specific to a mana pool of 400 without using int treads though, with a smaller or larger mana pool the numbers change, the smaller your mana pool is the more effecient using int treads for spells will be. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
aboxcar
United States447 Posts
if you have soul ring + treads. you soul ring on strength and cut to int to cast used to come up on broodmother a lot but i switched to phase boots.. | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On April 07 2015 01:13 aboxcar wrote: while we're talking about tread cutting, if you have soul ring + treads. you soul ring on strength and cut to int to cast used to come up on broodmother a lot but i switched to phase boots.. Definitely. Somewhat uncommon boot to have with Soul Ring though. | ||
|
Geisterkarle
Germany3257 Posts
 Can Rubick steal Darkness from a Nightstalker? And if yes, how does it effect himself and the enemy Nightstalker? | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
That said, the aghs vision on nightstalker is also model implicit and I *think* isn't reduced by rubick-stolen darkness (unsure). soooo then it gets bad. And I don't think that rubick with aghs stealing darkness gains any particular upgrade so... | ||
|
Xxazn4lyfe51xX
United States976 Posts
On April 07 2015 01:27 FHDH wrote: Definitely. Somewhat uncommon boot to have with Soul Ring though. But, quite useful in the context of slark! Treads on int when you cast dark pact and burn the mana, switch to str before the health loss kicks in. Really helps your jungle. | ||
|
l3loodraven
2753 Posts
| ||
|
Belisarius
Australia6233 Posts
Treads+SR is relevant on a lot of heroes, particularly storm. | ||
|
Xxazn4lyfe51xX
United States976 Posts
On April 07 2015 10:57 Belisarius wrote: You would switch to agi straight after the pact burn ends, so it's only 1-2 rightclicks on str. Treads+SR is relevant on a lot of heroes, particularly storm. Yeah, the proper sequence is int, dark pact, switch to str, self damage, switch to agi. Lots of fun. Good for anyone who wants to practice tread switching. | ||
Excalibur_Z
United States12249 Posts
On April 07 2015 03:31 Geisterkarle wrote: Because I see a Nightstalker right now in a game Can Rubick steal Darkness from a Nightstalker? And if yes, how does it effect himself and the enemy Nightstalker? When you use Darkness as Rubick, this happens. (He facepalms because it offers no benefit to you, only the enemy Night Stalker) Although new Darkness with the reduced vision component is much better to steal. Previously it was completely worthless to steal. | ||
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
does the behavior where if the frontswing of an auto attack starts, the attack will complete no matter what, giving some melee units the illusion of having range when having slowed attack speed, come from wc3 dota? barnyyy called it a bug but i always assumed it was just behavior that enforced wc3parity. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
Autoattacks in Warcraft 3 don't "complete no matter what". They have a range buffer where if the unit remains within the range buffer, the attack will complete, but if the unit leaves the range buffer before the frontswing completes, the attack fails. This behavior works normally in DotA 2 in most cases, it's just that slows can do weird things to a melee unit's range buffer for some reason, which causes the crazy autoattack range bug you're referring to. It's not War3 parity. | ||
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
| ||
|
Ack1027
United States7873 Posts
| ||
|
Xxazn4lyfe51xX
United States976 Posts
| ||
ahswtini
Northern Ireland22213 Posts
| ||
BluemoonSC
SoCal8933 Posts
| ||
| ||
