EPTD3 Bnet is going the same way as SC2 - Page 2
| Forum Index > Diablo 3 |
|
Nitrogen
United States5345 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13911 Posts
On February 07 2012 08:31 Nitrogen wrote: originally planned to play the fuck out of d3. now i'm not gonna buy it. Starting to sale down on this boat myself just getting tired of all the crap thats going on. well lack of crap... | ||
|
setzer
United States3284 Posts
| ||
|
askTeivospy
1525 Posts
The no chat for trade is kinda lame tho, but i guess thats what auction house is for | ||
|
Nilrem
United States3684 Posts
Yes, it does need the assistance of the actual Diablo III development team to implement it. But I think this whole notion of, "looking to add something in the future" is getting a bit old. We were told about channels and chat before Sc2 release. How long did it take for even that to be implemented? Now, I thought that since it was in Sc2, we would have at least gotten to that point and progressed a little bit. It just does not seem like that is the case anymore. | ||
|
Mataza
Germany5364 Posts
On February 07 2012 05:59 andrewlt wrote: You have to understand, you guys are the minority. The research pretty much confirms what Blizzard is doing. Basically, the biggest demographic of multiplayer videogames, 14-25 year old males, is a complete turn off to every other demographic. It's a negative experience for everyone else. Almost every other year, I read a major study showing how the biggest stumbling block to the expansion of hardcore multiplayer games is its current player base. WoW's player base is generally older than most games in the market nowadays, especially FPS and action games. And I still have most general chat channels turned off on most of my characters. SC2's community is even worse, just judging from in game chat. I can definitely see more negatives than positives in allowing public chat channels. It's pretty odd that they don't have guild support, though, as many of my current and former WoW guildmates are likely to pick up this game. If they don´t want the 14-25 year old males to turn away other demographics, they should consider thatin any event those 14-25 year old males will alwys be 60%-80% of the people who buy and play this game for months. If you remove that pesky and annoying demographic, then there is next to nothing left. I see no way that people older than 35 and women of all ages will ever stay long enough on a game like this. If they want to target another demographic, maybe they should make other games. | ||
|
Assault_1
Canada1950 Posts
they think no communication is best? and fuckin b.net 2, look how convoluted its UI is.. 80% of the stuff you never touch. there's some improvements, like matchmaking and auction house I guess.. with millions of people you cant just have a big list of public games like d2 had, u'd have to sort them. Auction house would've been perfect with just gold, but with real money its a big nuisance (everytime you find something good, you think "should I keep it or make money?"). | ||
|
kikimama
Korea (South)297 Posts
| ||
|
Nilrem
United States3684 Posts
On February 07 2012 09:58 Assault_1 wrote: I don't understand blizzard's issue with b.net 1, they basically say "it simply doesnt work" yet it was perfect for sc and d2. they think no communication is best? and fuckin b.net 2, look how convoluted its UI is.. 80% of the stuff you never touch. there's some improvements, like matchmaking and auction house I guess.. with millions of people you cant just have a big list of public games like d2 had, u'd have to sort them. Auction house would've been perfect with just gold, but with real money its a big nuisance (everytime you find something good, you think "should I keep it or make money?"). B.net 1.0 was quite outdated though. I do find it quite humerous that one of the rationalities for B.net 2.0 was to allow for more of a broader, social interaction theme to be added. But due to the rather deplorable and very delay progression to B.net, it is actually hindered any Social interaction beyond that of actually being in the game. I am having slight difficulties remembering but, can anyone remind me how many changes have actually been done to B.net 2.0? I know it was released, and I remember channels being introduced. But I can't recall anything else or anything significant beyond that. | ||
|
Assault_1
Canada1950 Posts
If thats not an indication I don't know what is | ||
|
Eogris
United States148 Posts
| ||
|
Nilrem
United States3684 Posts
| ||
|
OopsOopsBaby
Singapore3425 Posts
| ||
|
Serpico
4285 Posts
| ||
|
scaban84
United States1080 Posts
| ||
|
Urbz
Netherlands456 Posts
On February 07 2012 11:01 scaban84 wrote: I don't believe for a half-second that people posting in a D3 forum are not going to buy the game. So lols... Exactly, as said before; see you all at release. And if not, your loss. =) | ||
|
stormchaser
Canada1009 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On February 07 2012 11:01 Serpico wrote: Some of the stuff Blizzard is doing with Bnet 0.2 is almost saying "we DARE you to say you won't buy this, because we're almost sure you WILL no matter what features we take out." They've dared me to not buy HOTS or Legacy of the void either, and I'm not buying Diablo 3 either. I stopped playing SC2 actually precisely because whenever I had it open I couldn't chat with anyone and I just got bored of only playing the game with no interaction. They're going to need to make a really nice game to get any of my money again, at least I'll be saving like 100 euros | ||
|
LAN-f34r
New Zealand2099 Posts
| ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
On February 07 2012 04:39 Klesky wrote: Sigh, I don't really understand this at all. I mean, 70% of the time I spent 'playing D2' I was sitting in channels talking about irrelevant shit. And I don't agree that it introduces more negatives, the only real negative was the spambots, but they won't exist due to the RMAH. So I'm a little confused as to why they want to do this. Oh and this "release a game, patch in the rest of the contents later." that Blizzard is doing now is pretty annoying. To be honest, I think that Blizzard is just content with making everything harder to get so they make more money. They should stop being greedy and put out a damn competent game and then with the patches / expansions MAKE IT EVEN BETTER. It's really frustrating when they continue to make the same mistakes and you read all the feedback comments ARE UNANIMOUS so do they not even read them? What the hell is going on @ Blizz HQ seriously... | ||
| ||
