• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 19:38
CET 01:38
KST 09:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win1BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced14[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13
StarCraft 2
General
SC2 Proleague Discontinued; SKT, KT, SGK, CJ disband Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced Information Request Regarding Chinese Ladder SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest RSL Revival: Season 3 Tenacious Turtle Tussle [Alpha Pro Series] Nice vs Cure
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions Which season is the best in ASL? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh's Valkyrie Copium BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Big Programming Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Esports Earnings: Bigger Pri…
TrAiDoS
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1185 users

GomTV to give up exclusive rights to SC:BW - Page 6

Forum Index > Community News and Headlines
146 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
leakingpear
Profile Joined March 2006
United Kingdom302 Posts
March 31 2011 17:24 GMT
#101
On April 01 2011 00:21 lastreason wrote:
this is probably a strategical move we don't understand


I think you could apply the 'we don't understand' thing to the entirety of this case, despite everyone armchair intellectual property lawyering.
urashimakt
Profile Joined October 2009
United States1591 Posts
March 31 2011 17:53 GMT
#102
On April 01 2011 02:24 leakingpear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2011 00:21 lastreason wrote:
this is probably a strategical move we don't understand


I think you could apply the 'we don't understand' thing to the entirety of this case, despite everyone armchair intellectual property lawyering.

Reminds me of the Always Sunny episode about Bird Law. Every time I spot a thread revealing new info on the case, it just makes me itch to see what the end result is cause that's the only thing I feel I'm going to be able fully comprehend.
Who dat ninja?
Sworn
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada920 Posts
March 31 2011 18:00 GMT
#103
Its a joke :O
"Duty is heavy as a mountain, death is light as a feather." CJ Entus Fighting! <3 Effort
JustPassingBy
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
10776 Posts
March 31 2011 18:36 GMT
#104
Gom realized that arguing with the sc1 companies will only give them negative promotion, so they pass the ball to blizzard. Good move in my opinion. With fewer parties, this case might get resolved quicker.
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10366 Posts
March 31 2011 18:54 GMT
#105
whew, thought it meant that they lost to kespa or at least lost a big part of it (losing BW)
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
PrinceXizor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States17713 Posts
March 31 2011 19:25 GMT
#106
Ideally Blizzard now sells the IP rights to OGN and then everything is pretty much solved. (except kespa charging IP rights to something they don't own. but at least tournaments can go on and everything.
Armathai
Profile Joined October 2007
1023 Posts
March 31 2011 19:31 GMT
#107
I think a bunch of people are misconstruing what is actually happening. This was a strategic move by Blizzard and GOM(Gretech).
As Milkis already pointed out, in the previous court case OGN/MBC demanded that either only Gretech or Blizzard be present, so they are dealing with this potential court issue in this manner.
Not only that, but Blizzard wants GOM to be successful with SC2, so they are going to take the heat from this court case in order to make sure SC2 is more successful in Korea than it has been for GOM. The reason Blizzard will definitely continue this case on its own though is because this isn't about SC2, it's about the future of all their game's IP Rights and how much control they have(SC3? WC4 or whatever you can imagine).
We can only hope that the courts decide in favour of OGN/MBC vs Blizzard because developers having exclusive rights to all-game content (current SC2 battle.net ofr example) is really bad.

We'll see how the court proceedings go to and eagerly await the verdict!
Looking for ArcticCerebrate formerly from @USEast
PrinceXizor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States17713 Posts
March 31 2011 19:38 GMT
#108
On April 01 2011 04:31 Armathai wrote:
I think a bunch of people are misconstruing what is actually happening. This was a strategic move by Blizzard and GOM(Gretech).
As Milkis already pointed out, in the previous court case OGN/MBC demanded that either only Gretech or Blizzard be present, so they are dealing with this potential court issue in this manner.
Not only that, but Blizzard wants GOM to be successful with SC2, so they are going to take the heat from this court case in order to make sure SC2 is more successful in Korea than it has been for GOM. The reason Blizzard will definitely continue this case on its own though is because this isn't about SC2, it's about the future of all their game's IP Rights and how much control they have(SC3? WC4 or whatever you can imagine).
We can only hope that the courts decide in favour of OGN/MBC vs Blizzard because developers having exclusive rights to all-game content (current SC2 battle.net ofr example) is really bad.

We'll see how the court proceedings go to and eagerly await the verdict!



hell having it be open domain is ALSO really bad in fact almost much worse. t

he best result from this would be a sort of compromise.
something like
Companies/organizations can only charge for rights to their production and player's likeness and appearance under their banner, while the in game content if directly created by the game devs can only sell rights to. and in game content created by third parties is public domain and cannot be charegd for. (this would mean that KESPA could make OGN and MBC pay for the appearance of the progamers, but not for use of their games. and blizzard could do nothing to stop that interaction unless kespa used solely blizzard created content (IE the load screen and lobby could no longer be shown.) that kind of thing would be ideal i think.
Fyodor
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Canada971 Posts
March 31 2011 19:48 GMT
#109
I might be wrong but wouldn't this clear the way for a big Samsung sponsorship of GSL? With LG sponsoring the world championship, maybe Samsung approached them afterward and this was a way to ease the conflicting interests for Samsung.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5694 Posts
March 31 2011 20:03 GMT
#110
On April 01 2011 04:38 PrinceXizor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2011 04:31 Armathai wrote:
I think a bunch of people are misconstruing what is actually happening. This was a strategic move by Blizzard and GOM(Gretech).
As Milkis already pointed out, in the previous court case OGN/MBC demanded that either only Gretech or Blizzard be present, so they are dealing with this potential court issue in this manner.
Not only that, but Blizzard wants GOM to be successful with SC2, so they are going to take the heat from this court case in order to make sure SC2 is more successful in Korea than it has been for GOM. The reason Blizzard will definitely continue this case on its own though is because this isn't about SC2, it's about the future of all their game's IP Rights and how much control they have(SC3? WC4 or whatever you can imagine).
We can only hope that the courts decide in favour of OGN/MBC vs Blizzard because developers having exclusive rights to all-game content (current SC2 battle.net ofr example) is really bad.

We'll see how the court proceedings go to and eagerly await the verdict!



hell having it be open domain is ALSO really bad in fact almost much worse. t

he best result from this would be a sort of compromise.
something like
Companies/organizations can only charge for rights to their production and player's likeness and appearance under their banner, while the in game content if directly created by the game devs can only sell rights to. and in game content created by third parties is public domain and cannot be charegd for. (this would mean that KESPA could make OGN and MBC pay for the appearance of the progamers, but not for use of their games. and blizzard could do nothing to stop that interaction unless kespa used solely blizzard created content (IE the load screen and lobby could no longer be shown.) that kind of thing would be ideal i think.


You post doesn't make any sense. How is showing the load screen or lobby different from showing units and buildings? ;;
Razzah
Profile Joined March 2011
United States35 Posts
March 31 2011 20:03 GMT
#111
On March 31 2011 11:08 BLinD-RawR wrote:
Basically this means that gom is no longer the bad guys against BW and just Blizzard.


Blizzard are the good guys. They made the game and they deserve to reap the benefits.
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5694 Posts
March 31 2011 20:06 GMT
#112
On April 01 2011 05:03 Razzah wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2011 11:08 BLinD-RawR wrote:
Basically this means that gom is no longer the bad guys against BW and just Blizzard.


Blizzard are the good guys. They made the game and they deserve to reap the benefits.


As in have 100% rights to the content produced by OGN/MBC/players/teams? 100% rights to the players themselves? Shows like Nal_rA Old Boy, etc.? Total control over the broadcasting schedules, and so on?

KeSPA wants to pay royalties, and that's all blizzard deserves.
arcticStorm
Profile Joined January 2009
United States295 Posts
March 31 2011 20:12 GMT
#113
Now that there aren't any Korean companies involved on Blizzard's side, I somehow don't believe the courts will rule in their favor. Even the most impartial judge is going to subconsciously favor the Korean company.
This statement is a lie.
Fyodor
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Canada971 Posts
March 31 2011 20:45 GMT
#114
On April 01 2011 05:12 arcticStorm wrote:
Now that there aren't any Korean companies involved on Blizzard's side, I somehow don't believe the courts will rule in their favor. Even the most impartial judge is going to subconsciously favor the Korean company.

No, courts don't work that way. This will likely be a landmark case for intellectual property rights in Korea so no way in hell will the court proceedings be biased by something so stupid and base.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
PrinceXizor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States17713 Posts
March 31 2011 20:52 GMT
#115
On April 01 2011 05:03 maybenexttime wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2011 04:38 PrinceXizor wrote:
On April 01 2011 04:31 Armathai wrote:
I think a bunch of people are misconstruing what is actually happening. This was a strategic move by Blizzard and GOM(Gretech).
As Milkis already pointed out, in the previous court case OGN/MBC demanded that either only Gretech or Blizzard be present, so they are dealing with this potential court issue in this manner.
Not only that, but Blizzard wants GOM to be successful with SC2, so they are going to take the heat from this court case in order to make sure SC2 is more successful in Korea than it has been for GOM. The reason Blizzard will definitely continue this case on its own though is because this isn't about SC2, it's about the future of all their game's IP Rights and how much control they have(SC3? WC4 or whatever you can imagine).
We can only hope that the courts decide in favour of OGN/MBC vs Blizzard because developers having exclusive rights to all-game content (current SC2 battle.net ofr example) is really bad.

We'll see how the court proceedings go to and eagerly await the verdict!



hell having it be open domain is ALSO really bad in fact almost much worse. t

he best result from this would be a sort of compromise.
something like
Companies/organizations can only charge for rights to their production and player's likeness and appearance under their banner, while the in game content if directly created by the game devs can only sell rights to. and in game content created by third parties is public domain and cannot be charegd for. (this would mean that KESPA could make OGN and MBC pay for the appearance of the progamers, but not for use of their games. and blizzard could do nothing to stop that interaction unless kespa used solely blizzard created content (IE the load screen and lobby could no longer be shown.) that kind of thing would be ideal i think.


You post doesn't make any sense. How is showing the load screen or lobby different from showing units and buildings? ;;



units and buildings are being used in ways created by third parties (players) while the lobby and load screen are 100% created by blizzard, with only slight text changed (the players named)
infinity2k9
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United Kingdom2397 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-31 21:41:36
March 31 2011 21:36 GMT
#116
On April 01 2011 05:03 Razzah wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2011 11:08 BLinD-RawR wrote:
Basically this means that gom is no longer the bad guys against BW and just Blizzard.


Blizzard are the good guys. They made the game and they deserve to reap the benefits.


Yes they reap the benefits. The sales of the game and possible broadcasting rights, that is fair. What they ask for is infact not fair at all and seems to be solely a tactic to squeeze the BW scene into non-existance in favour of SC2. So no they aren't the 'Good guys' at all.

The made the game, fair enough. Paying to broadcast the game, again fair enough. But they did NOT make or own eSports or any element of it. They shouldn't be anywhere near player contracts, or anything like that. They themselves were perfectly happy with the situation; some of them even attended a Starleague final and i don't remember them saying hey shouldn't we own all this? Isn't this whole scene someone else created actually ours? Then suddenly in 2007, what a coincidence, they really badly care about their IP rights being used and want a lot more than broadcasting fee's.

If they were the good guys they would have left BW, its hundreds of thousands of fans, its salaried players, sponsored teams, and many eSports related employees to continue doing what they do best. It should be a source of pride for them that they made the game that created this industry. Not attempt to now bring it down from the inside to benefit them financially in a new game. Fuck that.

This scene deserves better from Blizzard. It kept their game alive and hyped to unbelievable levels for many years past any other RTS. It should be considered the current pinnacle of what is possible in eSports and something we can hopefully aspire to and then even grow on. But now you have this ugliness, the original developer actually attempting to sabotage it under the guise of IP rights instead of showing it off as what is actually possible with their new game. It's just an ugly unnecessary move.
Novalisk
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Israel1818 Posts
March 31 2011 21:53 GMT
#117
Good news, maybe GOM(and SC2) will get some more love in korea now.
/commercial
Chortles
Profile Joined April 2010
5 Posts
March 31 2011 22:53 GMT
#118
I don't understand why blizzard wants sc1 dead so much. Both sides should back down a bit and reach a freaking deal.
Awakening the Senses
VGhost
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3616 Posts
March 31 2011 23:20 GMT
#119
Seems to me this could (in a rational world) be the prelude to a reasonable conclusion: Blizzard (now in possession of their own broadcasting rights again) drops the lawsuit for a settlement where they sell the broadcasting rights to OGN/MBCGame for a sum a mediator sets as reasonable.

I have no faith we live in a rational world, however.
#4427 || I am not going to scan a ferret.
Rayeth
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States883 Posts
March 31 2011 23:24 GMT
#120
Epic April Fool's troll?

If only...
The Innocent shall suffer... big time.
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
2025 KFC Monthly #3 - Day 5
CranKy Ducklings116
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
CosmosSc2 52
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 670
Dota 2
syndereN512
capcasts117
Super Smash Bros
PPMD75
Other Games
summit1g11932
tarik_tv4652
Grubby3814
FrodaN1672
shahzam787
WinterStarcraft589
C9.Mang0196
Maynarde100
Mew2King51
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick603
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 85
• davetesta64
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22195
Other Games
• imaqtpie1307
• Scarra1298
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
11h 22m
StarCraft2.fi
16h 22m
PiGosaur Monday
1d
Wardi Open
1d 11h
StarCraft2.fi
1d 16h
Replay Cast
1d 23h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
SC Evo League
4 days
BSL 21
4 days
Sziky vs OyAji
Gypsy vs eOnzErG
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
BSL 21
5 days
Bonyth vs StRyKeR
Tarson vs Dandy
Replay Cast
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
StarCraft2.fi
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-28
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
Acropolis #4 - TS3
META Madness #9
Light HT
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
Kuram Kup
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.