EPTFew days ago in GSL or ESL map thread some zerg wrote: "I would be just fine if they removed cliff from LT", hahhahaa wtf? prophet?
Patch 1.2.1 on PTR - Page 17
| Forum Index > Community News and Headlines |
|
DrGreen
Poland708 Posts
Few days ago in GSL or ESL map thread some zerg wrote: "I would be just fine if they removed cliff from LT", hahhahaa wtf? prophet? | ||
|
link0
United States1071 Posts
| ||
|
Xeph
Korea (South)191 Posts
On February 04 2011 19:02 link0 wrote: I like all the new Blizzard maps. They are so much better than the new GSL maps. I don't think so. They even made the maps smaller. | ||
|
FarbrorAbavna
Sweden4856 Posts
On February 04 2011 18:54 DrGreen wrote: LOLOLOLOL! Few days ago in GSL or ESL map thread some zerg wrote: "I would be just fine if they removed cliff from LT", hahhahaa wtf? prophet? or a zerg player  Gonna be real interesting to try out these new maps when the patch comes out, since I dont have a US account. Anyways this is great news regardless of how bad or good the maps are. | ||
|
nehl
Germany270 Posts
that sucks im glad blizzard finally changes the maps, but we have to see if they are balanced. remember: once they have shown us xel naga caverns the first time, everyone said it is imbalanced as hell because of 3rd base is cliffable. so, sut w8 and see | ||
|
cHicKeLoR
Germany559 Posts
| ||
|
Patriot.dlk
Sweden5462 Posts
 | ||
|
Pondo
Australia283 Posts
| ||
|
Patriot.dlk
Sweden5462 Posts
On February 04 2011 13:40 Plexa wrote: The point is that now the ladder map pool =/= the map pool for the largest tournament which is bound to cause problems  I don't see that being an issue. I assume GSL will cancel that move and use these maps. Any other move would be the wrong one | ||
|
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
On February 04 2011 19:22 Patriot.dlk wrote: I don't see that being an issue. I assume GSL will cancel that move and use these maps. Any other move would be the wrong one Honestly, people need to be more patient. Blizzard maps are moving in the right direction. Yes, they're not perfect yet. It's Blizzard. They're slow. Famous for it, in fact. So we'll use custom maps for now and tough out that the ladder's different. Eventually, with enough pressure, Blizzard maps will be so good that the point will be moot because everyone will want to use their maps anyway. For now, we'll have major tournaments using Blizzard for half the maps in their pools. Xel'naga Caverns, Scrap Station, Test Map 2, and some customs isn't a bad map pool in the slightest. | ||
|
No_Roo
United States905 Posts
| ||
|
Valroth
New Zealand28 Posts
| ||
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
Making the maps huge all of the sudden would change everything. | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50585 Posts
On February 04 2011 19:22 Patriot.dlk wrote: I don't see that being an issue. I assume GSL will cancel that move and use these maps. Any other move would be the wrong one No they would rather still use their maps as they are more balanced at the moment.....plus it's easier for them to give feedback to the maps and map issues take much less time to rectify. | ||
|
Pkol
Australia176 Posts
Give Blizzard some feedback about whats good and bad and they might turn out to be not too bad. | ||
|
Gingerninja
United Kingdom1339 Posts
| ||
|
BimBalla
Germany1 Post
| ||
|
N1mrod
Germany64 Posts
| ||
|
Rareware
Canada340 Posts
On February 04 2011 19:08 Xeph wrote: I don't think so. They even made the maps smaller. Well that really depends on what you compare these maps to. If there replacing Steppes, DQ, and Blistering Sands then at least we will have bigger maps over all. But I also don't want GSL to change its map pool for these maps. When I saw the GSL maps they looked great, noticeably different then the current map pool and I can't wait to see the games that come out of them. | ||
|
MuTT
United States398 Posts
| ||
| ||
